Companion animals and human health: benefits, challenges, and the road ahead for human-animal interaction.
Abstract: There is ample evidence that human-animal interaction (HAI) is associated with health. Studies encompass three general categories: those that compare companion animal owners with individuals who do not own companion animals, those examining brief, 'one-off' contacts with animals, and those that review animal-assisted interventions. The health benefits demonstrated typically include reductions in depression and loneliness, while enhancing social interaction or social skills, and decreasing anxiety and arousal. Other health benefits associated with companion animals include the promotion of exercise or physical activity. The types of human-animal contact that have been evaluated include visual contact, physical contact, and looking at images of animals. The species used in interventions include dogs, cats, horses, rabbits, goats, hamsters and crickets. Despite these benefits, HAIs are also associated with problems, including allergies, asthma, zoonoses, animal bites and scratches, and human falls. Other problems include grief and negative emotions when a companion animal is injured or dies. Companion animal ownership is also expensive. Inconsistent policies concerning keeping animals in housing and enabling service animals to access public places make it difficult to live with companion animals or keep service animals in some circumstances. Additional research is needed to provide an evidence base to evaluate the efficacy of particular types of HAI using a given type of animal. This will document specific outcomes for an individual with certain characteristics and assist in promoting the future use of HAI to enhance human and animal health and well-being. L’existence d’un lien entre la santé, d’une part, et l’interaction humains–animaux d’autre part, est amplement démontrée. Les études en la matière se répartissent en trois catégories principales : comparaisons entre la situation de propriétaires d’animaux de compagnie et celle d’individus ne possédant pas d’animal de compagnie ; études sur des contacts brefs et ponctuels avec des animaux ; études analysant les interventions thérapeutiques recourant à des animaux. Parmi les bénéfices pour la santé mis en évidence dans ces études figurent l’atténuation des états dépressifs et du sentiment de solitude, une meilleure interaction sociale, un renforcement des compétences sociales et une diminution des états d’anxiété et d’agitation. Les animaux de compagnie encouragent à avoir une activité physique, ce qui est un facteur bénéfique pour la santé. Les contacts humains–animaux étudiés sont le contact visuel, le contact physique et la contemplation d’images d’animaux. Les espèces suivantes sont utilisées à des fins thérapeutiques : chiens, chats, chevaux, lapins, chèvres, hamsters et grillons. En dépit de ces avantages, les interactions humains–animaux peuvent aussi provoquer certains problèmes tels qu’allergies, asthme, maladies zoonotiques, blessures dues à des morsures et griffures et chutes. Il y a aussi le chagrin et les émotions négatives qui peuvent s’emparer d’une personne en cas de blessures ou de mort de son animal de compagnie. La possession d’un animal de compagnie entraîne des coûts. L’incohérence des réglementations sur la présence d’animaux dans les logements et sur l’accès des animaux aidants dans les espaces publics rend parfois difficile la vie avec des animaux de compagnie ou le recours aux animaux aidants. Il convient de poursuivre les recherches afin de pouvoir évaluer l’efficacité de certaines catégories d’interactions humains–animaux suivant le type d’animal utilisé. Cela permettra de connaître les résultats spécifiques que l’on peut attendre chez un individu présentant des caractéristiques particulières et contribuera à promouvoir l’utilisation future d’interactions humains–animaux pour améliorer la santé et le bien-être humain et animal. Existen abundantes pruebas de que la interacción de humanos y animales reporta salud. Los estudios realizados corresponden a tres grandes categorías: aquellos que comparan a las personas que tienen una mascota con las que no tienen; aquellos que estudian contactos breves y excepcionales con animales; y aquellos que se centran en las intervenciones auxiliadas por animales. Los beneficios para la salud más comúnmente observados y probados son un menor grado de depresión y sentimiento de soledad, acompañado de una mejora de las relaciones y aptitudes sociales, así como menores niveles de ansiedad y agitación. Entre otros beneficios para la salud asociados a la presencia de animales de compañía destaca el incremento del ejercicio físico. Los tipos de contacto entre humanos y animales que se han evaluado son el contacto visual, el contacto físico y la visión de imágenes de animales. Las especies utilizadas en las intervenciones son principalmente el perro, el gato, el caballo, el conejo, la cabra, el hámster y el grillo. Pese a todos los beneficios que deparan, las relaciones entre humanos y animales también pueden provocar problemas como alergias, asma, zoonosis, mordeduras y arañazos de animal o caídas de las personas. Asimismo, a veces surgen dificultades como el duelo o las emociones negativas que acompañan las lesiones o la muerte de una mascota. Además, la propiedad de un animal de compañía resulta cara. En algunas circunstancias, la aplicación de políticas incoherentes sobre el hecho de tener animales en las viviendas o de permitir el acceso de animales de servicio a lugares públicos dificulta la vida con mascotas o la posesión de animales de servicio. Para evaluar la eficacia de ciertas clases particulares de relación entre humanos y animales con el uso de un determinado tipo de animal se requieren más investigaciones que aporten una sólida base probatoria. Con ello será posible demostrar la obtención de resultados específicos con una persona de determinadas características y promover en el futuro la utilización de la relación entre humanos y animales para procurar a ambas partes mayores cotas de salud y bienestar.
Publication Date: 2018-09-14 PubMed ID: 30209428DOI: 10.20506/rst.37.1.2741Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Review
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research study explores the health benefits and challenges associated with human-animal interaction (HAI), using companion animals as the main subjects. The benefits highlighted are mainly psychological, physical, and social, while the challenges include allergies, injuries, cost implications, and policy inconsistencies. The study calls for more research to effectively evaluate and implement HAI as a standard health-boosting practice.
Overview of Human-Animal Interaction (HAI)
- The study broadly categorizes HAI research into those comparing the health status of pet owners and non-pet owners, those examining brief instances of animal contact, and those scrutinizing animal-assisted interventions.
- The general health benefits derived from HAI include reduced depression and loneliness, improved social interaction and skills, and lower anxiety and arousal levels. Some additional benefits cited are increased exercise and physical activity opportunities.
- Types of human-animal interactions researched include visual contact, physical contact, and viewing images of animals. This interaction could be with a variety of animals such as dogs, cats, horses, rabbits, goats, hamsters, and crickets.
Challenges and Problems in HAI
- Despite the numerous benefits gained from interacting with companion animals, the health risks cannot be ignored. These include allergies, asthma, animal-borne diseases, animal-inflicted injuries, and physical accidents such as falls.
- Emotional distress is another problem when a companion animal gets injured or passes away, invoking grief and other negative feelings.
- Another drawback is the financial responsibility of owning a companion animal that can be rather expensive.
- Policy limitations also pose challenges, with inconsistent rules about animals in living spaces and the accessibility of public areas for service animals hindering the practicality of pet ownership.
The Future: Enhanced Research and Acceptance
- The study concludes with an emphasis on the need for more extensive research in the field. This is essential to create an evidence-based understanding of the effectiveness of different types of HAI using specific animals.
- Such research should document specific outcomes for individuals with particular characteristics. This would contribute to the promotion of HAI as an accepted approach to enhancing both human and animal health and well-being in the future.
Cite This Article
APA
Friedman E, Krause-Parello CA.
(2018).
Companion animals and human health: benefits, challenges, and the road ahead for human-animal interaction.
Rev Sci Tech, 37(1), 71-82.
https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.37.1.2741 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Animal Assisted Therapy
- Animals
- Human-Animal Bond
- Humans
- Pets
- Quality of Life
Citations
This article has been cited 19 times.- Liguori G, Costagliola A, Lombardi R, Paciello O, Giordano A. Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s: Zoonosis Risks, Benefits, and Future Directions-A One Health Approach.. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 9;13(10).
- Lopes-Conceição L, Peleteiro B, Araújo N, Dias T, Fontes F, Pereira S, Lunet N. Pet ownership during the first 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis in the NEON-BC cohort.. Eur J Public Health 2023 Jun 1;33(3):455-462.
- Mattila-Rautiainen S, Venojärvi M, Rautiainen H, Keski-Valkama A. The impact on physical performance, pain and psychological wellbeing of chronic low back pain patients during 12-weeks of equine- facilitated therapy intervention.. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1085768.
- Tóth ÁL, Kívés Z, Szovák E, Kresák R, Jeges S, Kertai B, Pelyva IZ. Sense of Coherence and Self-Rated Aggression of Adolescents during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic, with a Focus on the Effects of Animal Assisted Activities.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Dec 31;20(1).
- Junça-Silva A. Unleashing the Furr-Recovery Method: Interacting with Pets in Teleworking Replenishes the Self's Regulatory Resources: Evidence from a Daily-Diary Study.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Dec 28;20(1).
- Giraudet CSE, Liu K, McElligott AG, Cobb M. Are children and dogs best friends? A scoping review to explore the positive and negative effects of child-dog interactions.. PeerJ 2022;10:e14532.
- Rathish D, Rajapakse J, Weerakoon K. Household preferences for pet keeping: Findings from a rural district of Sri Lanka.. PLoS One 2022;17(11):e0277108.
- Junça-Silva A. The Furr-Recovery Method: Interacting with Furry Co-Workers during Work Time Is a Micro-Break That Recovers Workers' Regulatory Resources and Contributes to Their Performance.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Oct 21;19(20).
- Cabrita ARJ, Guilherme-Fernandes J, Valente IM, Almeida A, Lima SAC, Fonseca AJM, Maia MRG. Nutritional Composition and Untargeted Metabolomics Reveal the Potential of Tetradesmus obliquus, Chlorella vulgaris and Nannochloropsis oceanica as Valuable Nutrient Sources for Dogs.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 1;12(19).
- Martos Martinez-Caja A, De Herdt V, Enders-Slegers MJ, Moons CPH. Pet ownership, feelings of loneliness, and mood in people affected by the first COVID-19 lockdown.. J Vet Behav 2022 Nov;57:52-63.
- D'Amico F, Casalino G, Bozzo G, Camarda A, Lombardi R, Dimuccio MM, Circella E. Spreading of Pasteurella multocida Infection in a Pet Rabbit Breeding and Possible Implications on Healed Bunnies.. Vet Sci 2022 Jun 18;9(6).
- Meixner J, Kotrschal K. Animal-Assisted Interventions With Dogs in Special Education-A Systematic Review.. Front Psychol 2022;13:876290.
- Berardi A, Di Napoli G, Ernesto M, Fabbrini G, Conte A, Ferrazzano G, Viselli F, Galeoto G. The Effectiveness of Equine Therapy Intervention on Activities of Daily Living, Quality of Life, Mood, Balance and Gait in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.. Healthcare (Basel) 2022 Mar 17;10(3).
- Phungviwatnikul T, Lee AH, Belchik SE, Suchodolski JS, Swanson KS. Weight loss and high-protein, high-fiber diet consumption impact blood metabolite profiles, body composition, voluntary physical activity, fecal microbiota, and fecal metabolites of adult dogs.. J Anim Sci 2022 Feb 1;100(2).
- Corrêa GF, Barcelos AM, Mills DS. Dog-related activities and human well-being in Brazilian dog owners: A framework and cross-cultural comparison with a British study.. Sci Prog 2021 Oct;104(4):368504211050277.
- Sparkes AH. Human allergy to cats: A review of the impact on cat ownership and relinquishment.. J Feline Med Surg 2022 Jan;24(1):43-52.
- Friesinger JG, Birkeland B, Thorød AB. Human-Animal Relationships in Supported Housing: Animal Atmospheres for Mental Health Recovery.. Front Psychol 2021;12:712133.
- Rault JL, Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Hemsworth P. The Power of a Positive Human-Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:590867.
- Schwarzmüller-Erber G, Stummer H, Maier M, Kundi M. Nature Relatedness of Recreational Horseback Riders and Its Association with Mood and Wellbeing.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 Jun 10;17(11).
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists