Analyze Diet
Current issues in molecular biology2025; 47(8); 671; doi: 10.3390/cimb47080671

Comparative Study of Reprogramming Efficiency and Regulatory Mechanisms of Placental- and Fibroblast-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) in Mules.

Abstract: As an interspecies hybrid inheriting genetic material from horse and donkey lineages, mules provide a unique model for studying allele-specific regulatory dynamics. Here, we isolated adult fibroblasts (AFs) and placental fibroblasts (PFs) from mule tissues and reprogrammed them into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Intriguingly, placental fibroblast-derived iPSCs (mpiPSCs) exhibited reduced reprogramming efficiency compared to adult fibroblast-derived iPSCs (maiPSCs). Through allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis, we systematically dissected transcriptional biases in parental cell types and their reprogrammed counterparts, revealing conserved preferential expression of asinine alleles in core pluripotency regulators (e.g., /, , ) across both cell lineages. Strikingly, mpiPSCs displayed stronger asinine allele dominance than maiPSCs, suggesting tissue-specific parental genomic imprinting. Mechanistic exploration implicated PI3K-AKT signaling as a potential pathway mediating the reprogramming inefficiency in placental fibroblasts. By integrating transcriptomic profiling with ASE technology, this study uncovers allele selection hierarchies during somatic cell reprogramming in hybrids and establishes a framework for understanding how parental genomic conflicts shape pluripotency establishment. These findings advance interspecies iPSC research by delineating allele-specific regulatory networks and providing insights into the molecular constraints of hybrid cellular reprogramming.
Publication Date: 2025-08-19 PubMed ID: 40864824PubMed Central: PMC12384536DOI: 10.3390/cimb47080671Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study compares the efficiency and regulatory mechanisms of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from placental fibroblasts and adult fibroblasts in mules, an interspecies hybrid of horses and donkeys.
  • It investigates how genetic material from two species is selectively expressed and how this affects the reprogramming process to pluripotency, highlighting differences based on cell origin and allele-specific expression patterns.

Background and Model

  • Mules are hybrids resulting from crossing a horse (Equus caballus) with a donkey (Equus asinus), inheriting genomes from both species.
  • This interspecies hybrid status makes them an excellent model to study allele-specific regulatory dynamics, especially in contexts such as cellular reprogramming.
  • Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are somatic cells that have been genetically reprogrammed to a pluripotent state, capable of differentiating into various cell types.
  • Reprogramming somatic cells into iPSCs helps investigate developmental biology, disease modeling, and therapeutic potentials.

Experimental Design

  • Researchers isolated two types of fibroblasts from mules:
    • Adult fibroblasts (AFs)
    • Placental fibroblasts (PFs)
  • Both cell types were reprogrammed into iPSCs, termed:
    • maiPSCs – adult fibroblast-derived iPSCs
    • mpiPSCs – placental fibroblast-derived iPSCs
  • Their reprogramming efficiencies were compared to see how well placental and adult fibroblasts convert into iPSCs.
  • Allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis was performed to identify preferential expression of horse or donkey alleles in parental and reprogrammed cells.

Key Findings

  • Reprogramming Efficiency:
    • Placental fibroblasts reprogrammed less efficiently than adult fibroblasts, indicating tissue-specific differences in cellular plasticity.
  • Allele-Specific Expression and Parental Biases:
    • Both adult and placental fibroblasts and their derived iPSCs showed a conserved preferential expression of asinine (donkey) alleles in key pluripotency regulator genes.
    • Key regulatory genes involved include core pluripotency factors (though specific gene names were omitted in the abstract).
    • Placental fibroblast-derived iPSCs exhibited stronger asinine allele dominance compared to adult-derived iPSCs, suggesting tissue-specific parental genomic imprinting influences gene expression during reprogramming.
  • Mechanistic Insights:
    • Pathway analysis indicated that the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway may be involved in the reduced reprogramming efficiency seen in placental fibroblasts.
    • This implicates specific molecular signaling pathways as constraints during the reprogramming of certain cell types.

Scientific Significance

  • The study delineates how parental genomes from two species interact and are differentially expressed in hybrid cells, revealing complexities in allele selection during reprogramming.
  • By integrating ASE with transcriptomic profiling, it provides a framework for understanding allele-specific regulatory networks in hybrid cellular states.
  • The identification of signaling pathways linked to reprogramming efficiency uncovers potential molecular mechanisms limiting placental cell plasticity.
  • These insights have broader implications for interspecies stem cell research, including therapeutic applications and understanding genomic conflicts during development.

Conclusion

  • Mule-derived iPSCs from different tissue sources vary in reprogramming efficiency, with placental fibroblasts being less efficient.
  • Allele-specific expression reveals preferential usage of donkey alleles in key pluripotency genes, especially pronounced in placental fibroblast-derived iPSCs, highlighting the role of genomic imprinting.
  • The PI3K-AKT pathway is a candidate mechanism that may influence these differences.
  • This comparative study advances understanding of how hybrid genomes regulate cell identity and pluripotency, which is crucial for refining interspecies reprogramming technologies and studying developmental biology in hybrid animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Liu F, Zhang J, Kong L, Wu R, Jiang Q, Lu Y, Li X. (2025). Comparative Study of Reprogramming Efficiency and Regulatory Mechanisms of Placental- and Fibroblast-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) in Mules. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 47(8), 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47080671

Publication

ISSN: 1467-3045
NlmUniqueID: 100931761
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 47
Issue: 8
PII: 671

Researcher Affiliations

Liu, Fangyuan
  • State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation & Breeding of Grassland Livestock, School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia·Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Inner Mongolia SaiKexing, Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
Zhang, Jia
  • State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation & Breeding of Grassland Livestock, School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia·Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou 311113, China.
Kong, Lingyu
  • College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Wu, Rihan
  • State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation & Breeding of Grassland Livestock, School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia·Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • National Center of Technology Innovation for Dairy Industry, Hohhot 010020, China.
Jiang, Qiqi
  • State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation & Breeding of Grassland Livestock, School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia·Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • National Center of Technology Innovation for Dairy Industry, Hohhot 010020, China.
Lu, Ying
  • College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Li, Xihe
  • State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation & Breeding of Grassland Livestock, School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia·Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
  • Inner Mongolia SaiKexing, Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
  • National Center of Technology Innovation for Dairy Industry, Hohhot 010020, China.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 24 references
  1. Proops L, Burden F, Osthaus B. Mule cognition: A case of hybrid vigour?. Anim. Cogn. 2009;12:75–84.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0172-1pubmed: 18636282google scholar: lookup
  2. Brosnahan M.M. Genetics, Evolution, and Physiology of Donkeys and Mules. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2019;35:457–467.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2019.08.003pubmed: 31672199google scholar: lookup
  3. Jevit M.J, Castaneda C, Paria N, Das P.J, Miller D, Antczak D.F, Kalbfleisch T.S, Davis B.W, Raudsepp T. Trio-binning of a hinny refines the comparative organization of the horse and donkey X chromosomes and reveals novel species-specific features. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:20180.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47583-xpmc: PMC10656420pubmed: 37978222google scholar: lookup
  4. Zhang J, Zhao L, Fu Y, Liu F, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhao G, Sun W, Wu B, Song Y. Reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency of mule iPSCs over its parents†. Biol. Reprod. 2023;108:887–901.
    doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioad041pmc: PMC10266948pubmed: 37040346google scholar: lookup
  5. Falk J, Donadeu F.X. Equine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture. Methods Mol. Biol. 2024;2749:175–184.
    pubmed: 38133784
  6. Koch T.G, Kuzma-Hunt A.G, Russell K.A. Overview of Equine Stem Cells: Sources, Practices, and Potential Safety Concerns. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Equine Pract. 2023;39:461–474.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2023.06.008pubmed: 37574382google scholar: lookup
  7. Wang Y, Gao S, Zhao Y, Chen W.H, Shao J.J, Wang N.N, Li M, Zhou G.X, Wang L, Shen W.J. Allele-specific expression and alternative splicing in horsexdonkey and cattlexyak hybrids. Zool. Res. 2019;40:293–304.
  8. Shao L, Xing F, Xu C, Zhang Q, Che J, Wang X, Song J, Li X, Xiao J, Chen L.L. Patterns of genome-wide allele-specific expression in hybrid rice and the implications on the genetic basis of heterosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:5653–5658.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820513116pmc: PMC6431163pubmed: 30833384google scholar: lookup
  9. Saito A, Tahara R, Hirose M, Kadota M, Hasegawa A, Kondo S, Kato H, Amano T, Yoshiki A, Ogura A. Inter-subspecies mouse F1 hybrid embryonic stem cell lines newly established for studies of allelic imbalance in gene expression. Exp. Anim. 2024;73:310–318.
    doi: 10.1538/expanim.24-0002pmc: PMC11254486pubmed: 38447983google scholar: lookup
  10. Mack K.L, Talbott H.E, Griffin M.F, Parker J.B.L, Guardino N.J, Spielman A.F, Davitt M.F, Mascharak S, Downer M, Morgan A. Allele-specific expression reveals genetic drivers of tissue regeneration in mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30:1368–1381.e6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.08.010pmc: PMC10592051pubmed: 37714154google scholar: lookup
  11. Wang X, Asgenbaatar N, Shen Y, Yi M, Zhao B, Ren H, Davshilt T, Ulaangerel T, Wang M, Burenbaatar A. Lower expression of the equine maternally imprinted gene IGF2R is related to the slow proliferation of hinny embryonic fibroblast in vitro. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023;50:185–192.
    doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07937-6pubmed: 36319787google scholar: lookup
  12. Wang B, Starr A.L, Fraser H.B. Cell-type-specific cis-regulatory divergence in gene expression and chromatin accessibility revealed by human-chimpanzee hybrid cells. eLife 2024;12:RP89594.
    doi: 10.7554/eLife.89594.3pmc: PMC10942608pubmed: 38358392google scholar: lookup
  13. Wang Q, Mank J.E, Li J, Yang N, Qu L. Allele-Specific Expression Analysis Does Not Support Sex Chromosome Inactivation on the Chicken Z Chromosome. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017;9:619–626.
    doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx031pmc: PMC5381566pubmed: 28391319google scholar: lookup
  14. Wang Y, Liu Q, Kang J, Zhang Y, Quan F. Overexpression of PGC7 in donor cells maintains the DNA methylation status of imprinted genes in goat embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer technology. Theriogenology 2020;151:86–94.
  15. Dobin A, Davis C.A, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013;29:15–21.
  16. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078–2079.
  17. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015;33:290–295.
    doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122pmc: PMC4643835pubmed: 25690850google scholar: lookup
  18. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 2012;16:284–287.
    doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118pmc: PMC3339379pubmed: 22455463google scholar: lookup
  19. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005;102:15545–15550.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102pmc: PMC1239896pubmed: 16199517google scholar: lookup
  20. Singh AM, Dalton S. The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2009;5:141–149.
    doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.07.003pmc: PMC2909475pubmed: 19664987google scholar: lookup
  21. Panopoulos AD, Yanes O, Ruiz S, Kida YS, Diep D, Tautenhahn R, Herrerias A, Batchelder EM, Plongthongkum N, Lutz M. The metabolome of induced pluripotent stem cells reveals metabolic changes occurring in somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Res. 2012;22:168–177.
    doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.177pmc: PMC3252494pubmed: 22064701google scholar: lookup
  22. Zhu X, Huang L, Li G, Deng B, Wang X, Yang H, Zhang Y, Wen Q, Wang C, Zhang J. Genome-Wide Silencer Screening Reveals Key Silencer Modulating Reprogramming Efficiency in Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Adv. Sci. 2025;12:e2408839.
    doi: 10.1002/advs.202408839pmc: PMC12079485pubmed: 40112175google scholar: lookup
  23. Kumar D, Talluri TR, Selokar NL, Hyder I, Kues WA. Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in livestock. World J. Stem Cells 2021;13:1–29.
    doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i1.1pmc: PMC7859985pubmed: 33584977google scholar: lookup
  24. Dunaway K, Goorha S, Matelski L, Urraca N, Lein PJ, Korf I, Reiter LT, LaSalle JM. Dental Pulp Stem Cells Model Early Life and Imprinted DNA Methylation Patterns. Stem Cells 2017;35:981–988.
    doi: 10.1002/stem.2563pmc: PMC5367950pubmed: 28032673google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.