Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material.
Abstract: There are many choices for methods of extracting bacterial DNA for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) from fecal samples. Here, we compare our modifications of a phenol/chloroform extraction method plus an inhibitor removal solution (C3) (ph/Chl+C3) to the PowerFecal® DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio-K). DNA quality and quantity coupled to NGS results were used to assess differences in relative abundance, Shannon diversity index, unique species, and principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) between biological replicates. Six replicate samples, taken from a single ball of horse feces manually collected from the rectum, were subjected to each extraction method. The Ph/Chl+C3 method produced 100× higher DNA yields with less shearing than the MoBio-K method. To assess the methods, the two method samples were sent for sequencing of the bacterial V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene using the Illumina MiSeq platform. The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was greater and there were more unique species assigned to this group in MoBio-K than in Ph/Chl+C3 (P<0.05). In contrast, Firmicutes had greater relative abundance and more unique species in Ph/Chl+C3 extracts than in MoBio-K (P<0.05). The other major bacterial phyla were equally abundant in samples using both extraction methods. Alpha diversity and Shannon Weaver indices showed greater evenness of bacterial distribution in Ph/Chl+C3 compared with MoBio-K (P<0.05), but there was no difference in the OTU richness. Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) indicated a distinct separation between the two methods (P<0.05) and tighter clustering (less variability) in Ph/Chl+C3 than in MoBio-K. These results suggest that the Ph/Chl+C3 may be preferred for research to identify specific Firmicutes taxa such as Clostridium, and Bacillus. However; MoBio-K may be a better choice for projects focusing on Bacteroidetes abundance. The Ph/Chl+C3 method required less time, but has some safety concerns associated with exposure and disposal of phenol and chloroform. While the MoBio-K may be better choice for researchers with less access to safety equipment like a fume hood.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2016-07-25 PubMed ID: 27460337DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.019Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study investigates and compares two different methods for extracting bacterial DNA from horse feces for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). The researchers suggest that the method involving a modification of a phenol/chloroform extraction plus an inhibitor removal solution yields higher DNA with less shearing than a commercial kit, despite potential safety concerns.
Introduction
- The research aims to compare different DNA extraction methods used for analyzing bacterial content in horse feces.
- The chosen methods for comparison were a modified phenol/chloroform extraction with an inhibitor removal solution (referred to as Ph/Chl+C3) and the commercial PowerFecal® DNA Isolation Kit (abbreviated as MoBio-K).
- The comparison’s primary metrics included DNA quality, quantity, and the results garnered through Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
Methodology and Findings
- Six replicate samples, taken from a single horse feces ball, were subjected to each extraction method for comparison.
- The Ph/Chl+C3 method resulted in 100× higher DNA yields and demonstrated less shearing compared to the MoBio-K method.
- Both sample sets were then sent for NGS, specifically targeting the bacterial V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene.
- The MoBio-K samples revealed greater relative abundance and more unique species of Bacteroidetes, while the Ph/Chl+C3 samples showed a higher relative abundance and more unique species of Firmicutes.
- Other major bacterial phyla were equally abundant in samples from both extraction methods.
- The Ph/Chl+C3 samples showed greater evenness of bacterial distribution, but there was no difference in the richness of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs).
- Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) indicated a distinct separation between the two methods and tighter clustering (less variability) in Ph/Chl+C3 than in MoBio-K.
Conclusion
- The study suggests that the Ph/Chl+C3 may be the preferred method for research aiming to identify specific Firmicutes taxa, such as Clostridium and Bacillus, but the MoBio-K might be better for projects focused on Bacteroidetes abundance.
- Despite producing superior results, the Ph/Chl+C3 method carries safety concerns due to potential exposure to phenol and chloroform and issues around safe disposal.
- The researchers conclude that the MoBio-K may be a more suitable choice for researchers with limited access to safety equipment like a fume hood.
Cite This Article
APA
Janabi AHD, Kerkhof LJ, McGuinness LR, Biddle AS, McKeever KH.
(2016).
Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material.
J Microbiol Methods, 129, 14-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.019 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Microbial Biology Graduate Program, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
- Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
- Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
- Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
- Microbial Biology Graduate Program, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; Department of Animal Science, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. Electronic address: mckeever@aesop.rutgers.edu.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Bacteria / genetics
- Bacteria / isolation & purification
- Bacteroidetes / classification
- Bacteroidetes / genetics
- Bacteroidetes / isolation & purification
- Chloroform
- Clostridium / genetics
- Clostridium / isolation & purification
- DNA, Bacterial / genetics
- DNA, Bacterial / isolation & purification
- Feces / microbiology
- High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
- Horses
- Indicators and Reagents
- Microbiota / genetics
- Phenol
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
Citations
This article has been cited 10 times.- Zakaria ND, Hamzah HH, Salih IL, Balakrishnan V, Abdul Razak K. A Review of Detection Methods for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) Genes: From Conventional Approaches to Potentially Electrochemical DNA Biosensors. Biosensors (Basel) 2023 Feb 18;13(2).
- Katiraei S, Anvar Y, Hoving L, Berbée JFP, van Harmelen V, Willems van Dijk K. Evaluation of Full-Length Versus V4-Region 16S rRNA Sequencing for Phylogenetic Analysis of Mouse Intestinal Microbiota After a Dietary Intervention. Curr Microbiol 2022 Jul 30;79(9):276.
- Theelen MJP, Luiken REC, Wagenaar JA, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Rossen JWA, Zomer AL. The Equine Faecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses and Ponies in The Netherlands: Impact of Host and Environmental Factors. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 12;11(6).
- Sui HY, Weil AA, Nuwagira E, Qadri F, Ryan ET, Mezzari MP, Phipatanakul W, Lai PS. Impact of DNA Extraction Method on Variation in Human and Built Environment Microbial Community and Functional Profiles Assessed by Shotgun Metagenomics Sequencing. Front Microbiol 2020;11:953.
- Videnska P, Smerkova K, Zwinsova B, Popovici V, Micenkova L, Sedlar K, Budinska E. Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform. Sci Rep 2019 Sep 25;9(1):13837.
- Beckers KF, Schulz CJ, Childers GW. Rapid regrowth and detection of microbial contaminants in equine fecal microbiome samples. PLoS One 2017;12(11):e0187044.
- Muralidhar M, Naseem MN, Mesa JRB, Omaleki L, Turni C. Optimization of DNA extraction methods from pig farm wastewater for pathogen detection using metagenomic sequencing. Microb Genom 2025 Oct;11(10).
- Wang Q, Zhang J, Liang J, Wang Y, Ren C, Chen X, Cheng D, Zhang H, Liu H. Genomic Insights into Selenate Reduction by Anaerobacillus Species. Microorganisms 2025 Mar 14;13(3).
- Fu L, Liu K, Yang J, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Tang D, Li Y, Chen H. Adsorption Behaviors of ctDNA and Biological Activities Based on Polyvinyl Alcohol/Polyethylene Glycol/Quaternized Chitosan Composite Hydrogel. Molecules 2024 Dec 6;29(23).
- Ward AB, Harris PA, Argo CM, Watson C, Neacsu M, Russell WR, Ribeiro A, Collie-Duguid E, Heidari Z, Morrison PK. Homemade Nucleic Acid Preservation Buffer Proves Effective in Preserving the Equine Faecal Microbiota over Time at Ambient Temperatures. Animals (Basel) 2023 Oct 5;13(19).
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists