Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2023; 133; 104992; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104992

Comparison of antibody and antigen response to intranasal and intramuscular EHV-1 modified-live vaccination in healthy adult horses.

Abstract: During neurological EHV-1 outbreaks, modified-live vaccines (MLV) are often administrated intranasally in an off-label fashion to healthy cohort horses in order to achieve rapid mucosal immunity. Thus, the goal of the present study was to determine if a commercially available EHV-1 MLV given intranasally to healthy horses would trigger a measurable systemic and/or mucosal antibody response. Eight healthy adult horses were given the EHV-1 MLV vaccine intranasally, while 8 healthy adult horses received the vaccine intramuscularly. An additional 8 healthy horses served as unvaccinated controls. EHV-1 specific antibodies (total IgG, IgG4/7, IgG1 and IgA) were measured in blood and nasal secretions prior to vaccine administration and 14- and 30-days post-vaccine administration. Further, nasal secretions and whole blood were tested for the presence of EHV-1 DNA by qPCR prior to and 5 days after vaccine administration. EHV-1 was detected by qPCR for the first 48 hours post-intranasal vaccine administration in nasal secretions in a total of three horses. Total EHV-1 IgG and IgG4/7 antibody values in serum increased only in horses receiving the intramuscular MLV. Antibody values at 14- and 30-days post vaccine administration were not different from values prior to vaccine administration in horses receiving the intranasal vaccine. The results support the intramuscular use of the EHV-1 MLV as recommended by the manufacturer. Intranasal vaccination with the study-specific EHV-1 MLV did not induce an increase in systemic or nasal antibodies, therefore, this vaccine route seems suboptimal and should not be used to vaccinate adult horses that have received multiple EHV-1 vaccinations and have pre-existing antibodies against EHV-1.
Publication Date: 2023-12-29 PubMed ID: 38160702DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104992Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about a study that compares the antibody and antigen responses in horses after receiving intranasal and intramuscular vaccinations for EHV-1 with a standard EHV-1 modified-live vaccine. The study found that intramuscular vaccination was more effective in triggering immunity.

Introduction and Purpose of the Study

  • The researchers wanted to investigate the efficiency of intranasal and intramuscular vaccinations for Equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1), a common and often fatal infectious disease in horses.
  • The primary objective was to evaluate whether an intranasal EHV-1 modified-live vaccine (MLV) could induce a measurable systemic and/or mucosal immune response.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted with 24 healthy adult horses, divided into three groups. Eight horses received the EHV-1 MLV intranasally, another eight received the vaccine intramuscularly, and the remaining group of eight acted as unvaccinated controls for comparison.
  • The presence of EHV-1-specific antibodies (total IgG, IgG4/7, IgG1, and IgA) in blood and nasal secretions were measured at three time points: before vaccination, and 14 and 30 days after vaccination. This assessment was intended to measure the immune response triggered by the vaccination.
  • In addition, nasal secretions and whole blood samples were tested for the presence of EHV-1 DNA before and 5 days after vaccination to determine any viral infections rising from the vaccination.

Findings and Conclusion

  • EHV-1 was detected in nasal secretions of only three horses in the first 48 hours after intranasal administration of the vaccine.
  • An increase in the total EHV-1 IgG and IgG4/7 antibodies in blood serum was noted only in those horses that received the intramuscular vaccination.
  • There were no significant differences in the antibody values at 14- and 30-days post-vaccination compared to the initial values in horses administered the vaccine intranasally.
  • The findings suggest that the intramuscular usage of EHV-1 MLV, as recommended by the manufacturer, is more effective for inciting an immune response.
  • The results indicate that the intranasal route of vaccination doesn’t seem to encourage an increase in systemic or nasal antibodies, thereby rendering it suboptimal for vaccinating adult horses with pre-existing antibodies against EHV-1.

Cite This Article

APA
Stasi D, Wagner B, Barnum S, Pusterla N. (2023). Comparison of antibody and antigen response to intranasal and intramuscular EHV-1 modified-live vaccination in healthy adult horses. J Equine Vet Sci, 133, 104992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104992

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 133
Pages: 104992

Researcher Affiliations

Stasi, Denise
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Wagner, Bettina
  • Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Barnum, Samantha
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Pusterla, Nicola
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: npusterla@ucdavis.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Humans
  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Herpesvirus 1, Equid / genetics
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Herpesvirus Vaccines
  • Vaccination / veterinary
  • Vaccination / methods
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Vaccines, Attenuated

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.