Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal1988; 65(5); 133-135; doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1988.tb14439.x

Comparison of direct electron microscopy and enzyme immunoassay for the detection of rotaviruses in calves, lambs, piglets and foals.

Abstract: Direct electron microscopy (EM) and enzyme-immunoassay (rotazyme) results for the detection of rotaviruses in 346 enteric specimens from calves, lambs, piglets and foals were compared. The rotazyme test was at least 3 times more sensitive than direct EM in diagnosing infection. Rotavirus antigen was demonstrated by rotazyme in 22% of 280 scour samples and in 27% of 66 samples from non-scouring animals. There was an association between diarrhoea and higher amounts of rotavirus antigen. This prevalence of rotaviruses detected in animals with diarrhoea highlights the significant involvement of other pathogens identified in the study including Eimeria, Cryptosporidia, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, and other viruses.
Publication Date: 1988-05-01 PubMed ID: 3041953DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1988.tb14439.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study compares two methods – direct electron microscopy and enzyme immunoassay – for detecting rotaviruses in different animals. The results showed that the enzyme immunoassay was more effective in diagnosing the infection, and that there was a correlation between diarrhea and higher levels of rotavirus antigen.

Comparison of Diagnostic Methods

  • The research compared two diagnostic methods: electron microscopy (EM) and enzyme-immunoassay (Rotazyme test) used to detect rotavirus infections in animals. It was found that the rotazyme test was three times more sensitive, or effective, than the electron microscopy in diagnosing the infection.
  • The test subjects in this study included a variety range of animals – calves, lambs, piglets and foals. This would provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of the two diagnostic methods across different species.

Prevalence and Impact of Rotaviruses

  • Rotaviruses were found in both animals suffering from diarrhoea (scour) and animals that were not. However, the prevalence was higher in specimens with diarrhoea, indicating a relationship between diarrhoea and the existence of rotavirus.
  • The research found rotavirus antigens in 22% of 280 scour samples and 27% of 66 samples from non-scouring animals. An antigen is a substance that causes your immune system to produce antibodies against it.
  • This suggests that rotaviruses are common and can be a significant factor in causing diarrhoea in animals, but they are not the only pathogens involved. Other pathogens such as Eimeria, Cryptosporidia, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, and other viruses were also identified during the study.

Implications of the Study

  • The findings of this study have important implications for diagnosing and treating diarrhoeal illnesses in animals. By pinpointing a more effective testing method, the study guides veterinary professionals in making a faster, more accurate diagnosis and subsequently deciding on the most appropriate treatment method.

Cite This Article

APA
Ellis GR, Daniels E. (1988). Comparison of direct electron microscopy and enzyme immunoassay for the detection of rotaviruses in calves, lambs, piglets and foals. Aust Vet J, 65(5), 133-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1988.tb14439.x

Publication

ISSN: 0005-0423
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 65
Issue: 5
Pages: 133-135

Researcher Affiliations

Ellis, G R
  • Central Veterinary Laboratories, Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia.
Daniels, E

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Cattle
    • Cattle Diseases / diagnosis
    • Cattle Diseases / microbiology
    • Diarrhea / etiology
    • Diarrhea / microbiology
    • Diarrhea / veterinary
    • Feces / microbiology
    • Feces / parasitology
    • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
    • Horse Diseases / microbiology
    • Horses
    • Immunoenzyme Techniques
    • Microscopy, Electron
    • Rotavirus Infections / diagnosis
    • Rotavirus Infections / veterinary
    • Sheep
    • Sheep Diseases / diagnosis
    • Sheep Diseases / microbiology
    • Swine
    • Swine Diseases / diagnosis
    • Swine Diseases / microbiology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 5 times.
    1. Wani SA, Bhat MA, Samanta I, Ishaq SM, Ashrafi MA, Buchh AS. Epidemiology of diarrhoea caused by rotavirus and Escherichia coli in lambs in Kashmir valley, India. Small Rumin Res 2004 Apr;52(1):145-153.
      doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00255-4pubmed: 32288212google scholar: lookup
    2. Dhama K, Chauhan RS, Mahendran M, Malik SV. Rotavirus diarrhea in bovines and other domestic animals. Vet Res Commun 2009 Jan;33(1):1-23.
      doi: 10.1007/s11259-008-9070-xpubmed: 18622713google scholar: lookup
    3. Wani SA, Bhat MA, Nawchoo R, Munshi ZH, Bach AS. Evidence of rotavirus associated with neonatal lamb diarrhoea in India. Trop Anim Health Prod 2004 Jan;36(1):27-32.
    4. Maes RK, Grooms DL, Wise AG, Han C, Ciesicki V, Hanson L, Vickers ML, Kanitz C, Holland R. Evaluation of a human group a rotavirus assay for on-site detection of bovine rotavirus. J Clin Microbiol 2003 Jan;41(1):290-4.
      doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.290-294.2003pubmed: 12517863google scholar: lookup
    5. Caple IW. Neonatal viral diarrhoeas. Aust Vet J 1989 Dec;66(12):407-8.