Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2020; 16(1); 182; doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02400-9

Comparison of physiological demands in Warmblood show jumping horses over a standardized 1.10 m jumping course versus a standardized exercise test on a track.

Abstract: A greater understanding of exercise physiology and biochemistry is required for the sport horse disciplines, including show jumping. Conditioning of horses for show jumping is empirical because they are primarily trained on flat ground, however the equivalent workload between jumping and flat work is currently unknown. The objectives of the study were therefore to compare the physiological demands of Warmblood show jumpers over a standardized 1.10 m course vs a 600 m standardized incremental exercise test on flat ground, and to report reference field test values for competitive show jumping horses. In this prospective field study, 21 healthy, actively competing Warmblood show jumping horses were assessed to determine physiological variables after a standardized jumping course at 6.4 m/s (average speed) and track standardized incremental exercise test at 5 m/s, 8 m/s and 11 m/s. Heart rate, velocity, blood lactate, blood pH, pCO2, bicarbonate, PCV and TP concentrations were recorded. V200, V170 and VLa4 were calculated. Parametric statistics were performed on analysis of all 21 horses' variables. Results: Contrary to exercise at 5 m/s and 11 m/s, cantering at 8 m/s did not induce any significant difference in blood lactate, mean heart rate or mean venous blood pH compared to after completion of the jumping course. Conclusions: Jumping a 1.10 m course demands a statistically similar workload to cantering around a flat track at 8 m/s. This study will help to test fitness and design conditioning programs for Warmblood show jumping horses.
Publication Date: 2020-06-08 PubMed ID: 32513241PubMed Central: PMC7282170DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02400-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focuses on understanding and comparing the physiological demands of Warmblood show jumping horses by analysing them under two conditions: jumping a 1.10m course and an exercise test on flat ground. The findings suggest that jumping a 1.10m course requires similar effort as running around a flat track at 8 meters per second.

Objective of the Study

  • The primary aim of this study is to compare the physiological impacts of two types of exercises on Warmblood show jumping horses: running on a flat ground and jumping a 1.10 m course. Additionally, the research also aims to establish field test reference values for competitive jumping horses.

Methodology

  • This study is a prospective field study involving 21 healthy, actively competing Warmblood show jumping horses. The horses were assessed under two conditions: after jumping a standardized 1.10m course at an average speed of 6.4m/s and after undergoing a track standardized incremental exercise at different speeds (5m/s, 8m/s, and 11m/s).
  • The physiological variables like heart rate, velocity, blood lactate, blood pH, pCO2, bicarbonate, PCV, and TP concentrations were recorded and analysed. Variables V200, V170, and VLa4 were calculated.

Results

  • The results revealed that there was no significant difference in blood lactate, mean heart rate, and mean venous blood pH when the horses were cantering at 8m/s when compared to after they completed the 1.10m jumping course.
  • However, significant differences were noted at the speed of 5m/s and 11m/s.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that the physiological demands of jumping a 1.10m course and cantering around a flat track at 8m/s are similar for Warmblood show jumping horses.
  • These findings could help in the designing of tailored conditioning programs for these horses, and can be instrumental in testing fitness.

Cite This Article

APA
Léguillette R, Bond SL, Lawlor K, Haan T, Weber LM. (2020). Comparison of physiological demands in Warmblood show jumping horses over a standardized 1.10 m jumping course versus a standardized exercise test on a track. BMC Vet Res, 16(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02400-9

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 1
Pages: 182

Researcher Affiliations

Léguillette, Renaud
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada. rleguill@ucalgary.ca.
Bond, Stephanie L
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Lawlor, Kelda
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Haan, Tineke de
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Weber, Lauren M
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Blood Gas Analysis / veterinary
  • Blood Proteins
  • Exercise Test / methods
  • Exercise Test / veterinary
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Hematocrit
  • Horses / blood
  • Horses / physiology
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Lactic Acid / blood
  • Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology
  • Sports

Grant Funding

  • n/a / Investigative Medicine Fund, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Services, University of Calgary

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Perkins SWJ, Reid RS, Morris. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries of the lower limbs in thoroughbred racehorses in New Zealand. N Z Vet J 2005;53(3):171–183.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2005.36502pubmed: 16012587google scholar: lookup
  2. Art T, Amory H, Desmecht D, Lekeux P. Effect of show jumping on heart rate, blood lactate and other plasma biochemical values. Equine Vet J 1990;22(S9):78–82.
  3. Silverman SC, Birks. Evaluation of the i-STAT hand-held chemical analyser during treadmill and endurance exercise. Equine Vet J 2002;34(S34):551–554.
  4. Kingston J, Soppet G, Rogers C, Firth E. Use of a global positioning and heart rate monitoring system to assess training load in a group of thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2006;38(S36):106–109.
  5. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Spierenburg AJ, Broek ETW. The workload of riding-school horses during jumping. Equine Vet J 2006;38(S36):93–97.
  6. Ferlazzo A, Medica C, Cravana E, Fazio. Effects of fence height on total and free iodothyronine changes in horses after experimental show jumping sessions. Equine Vet J 2010;42(s38):110–115.
  7. Cikrytova E, Kostelecka B, Kovar J, Horak F, Hanak J. Standardised exercise test on a track to evaluate exercise capacity in different breeds of horses. Equine Exerc Physiol 1991;3:37–40.
  8. Evans DL, Harris DH, Snow. Correlation of racing performance with blood lactate and heart rate after exercise in thoroughbred horses. Equine Vet J 1993;25(5):441–445.
  9. Fazio E, Alberghina D, Aronica V, Medica P, Ferlazzo A. Effect of performance success on blood β-endorphin, ACTH and cortisol levels in show jumping horses. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Equine Sports Medicine and Science Taormina, Italy, May 14th–16th. 2000.
  10. Lewczuk D. The effect of training on linear jumping parameters in young stallions. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2007;4(3–4):159–165.
    doi: 10.1017/S1478061507890074google scholar: lookup
  11. Butler PJ, Woakes AJ, Smale K, Roberts CA, Hillidge CJ, Snow DH. Respiratory and cardiovascular adjustments during exercise of increasing intensity and during recovery in thoroughbred racehorses. J Exp Biol 1993;179:159–180.
    pubmed: 8340728
  12. Davie A, Priddle T, Evans D. Metabolic responses to submaximal field exercise tests and relationships with racing performance in pacing Standardbreds. Equine Vet J 2002;34(S34):112–115.
  13. Fraipont A, Van Erck E, Ramery E, Richard E, Denoix J, Lekeux P. Subclinical diseases underlying poor performance in endurance horses: diagnostic methods and predictive tests. Vet Rec 2011;169(6):154.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.d4142pubmed: 21795311google scholar: lookup
  14. Marlin PA, Harris RC, Schroter RC, Roberts CM, Scott CE, Orme M. Physiological, metabolic and biochemical responses of horses competing in the speed and endurance phase of a CCI**** 3-day-event. Equine Vet J 1995;27(S20):37–46.
  15. Muñoz A, Riber C, Santisteban R, Vivo R, Agüera EI, Castejón FM. Investigation of standardized exercise tests according to fitness level for three-day event horses. J Equine Sci 1998;9(1):1–7.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.9.1google scholar: lookup
  16. van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MS, Wensing T, Breukink H. Standardized exercise test on a track to evaluate fitness and training of saddle horses. ICEEP 1987. pp. 68–76.
  17. Fraipont A, Van Erck E, Ramery E, Fortier G, Lekeux P, Art T. Assessing fitness in endurance horses. Can Vet J 2012;53(3):311.
    pmc: PMC3280789pubmed: 22942450
  18. Leguillette R, Greco-Otto P, Sides R, Bond S, Alami S, Bayly W. Relative aerobic energy contribution in endurance horses and Throughbreds during strenuous exercise. International conference of equine exercise physiology Lorne: ICEEP; 2018.
  19. Bitschnau C, Wiestner T, Trachsel D, Auer J, Weishaupt M. Performance parameters and post exercise heart rate recovery in Warmblood sports horses of different performance levels. Equine Vet J 2010;42(s38):17–22.
  20. Vo-OM S, Barneveld A. Comparison of the workload of Dutch warmblood horses ridden normally and on a treadmill. Vet Rec 1995;137(6):136–139.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.137.6.136pubmed: 8540205google scholar: lookup
  21. Barrey E, Galloux P, Valette J, Auvinet B, Wolter R. Stride characteristics of overground versus treadmill locomotion in the saddle horse. Cells Tissues Organs 1993;146(2–3):90–94.
    doi: 10.1159/000147427pubmed: 8470471google scholar: lookup
  22. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Clayton HM. Advantages and disadvantages of track vs. treadmill tests. Equine V J 1999;31(S30):645–647.
  23. Evans D. Exercise testing in the field. In: Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps AJ, Geor RJ, editors. Equine Exercise Physiology: The Science of Exercise in the Athletic Horse Elsevier Health Sciences. 2008. pp. 19–31.
  24. Dekker H, Marlin D, Alexander L, Bishop R, Harris P. A pilot study investigating the relationship between perceived and actual workload and estimated energy intake in riding Centre horses. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2007;4(01):7–14.
    doi: 10.1017/S1478061507708253google scholar: lookup
  25. Munsters CC, van den Broek J, van Weeren R, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MMS. A prospective study on fitness, workload and reasons for premature training ends and temporary training breaks in two groups of riding horses. Prev Vet Med 2013;108(2):199–208.
  26. Meershoek L, Schamhardt H, Roepstorff L, Johnston C. Forelimb tendon loading during jump landings and the influence of fence height. Equine Vet J Suppl 2001;33(S33):6–10.
  27. De Moffarts B, Kirschvink N, van Erck E, Art T, Pincemail J, Lekeux P. Assessment of the oxidant–antioxidant blood balance in a field exercise test in Standardbredand eventing horses. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2005;2(04):253–261.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200567google scholar: lookup
  28. Munsters CC, van den Broek J, Welling E, van Weeren R, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan M. A prospective study on a cohort of horses and ponies selected for participation in the European Eventing Championship: reasons for withdrawal and predictive value of fitness tests. BMC Vet Res 2013;9(1):182.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-182pmc: PMC3848563pubmed: 24034152google scholar: lookup
  29. van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MMS, van den Broek ET, Spierenburg AJ. Evaluation of the usefulness of the portable device lactate pro for measurement of lactate concentrations in equine whole blood. J Vet Diagn Investig 2008;20(1):83–85.
    doi: 10.1177/104063870802000117pubmed: 18182516google scholar: lookup
  30. Shields E, Seiden-Long I, Massie S, Passante S, Leguillette R. Analytical validation and establishment of reference intervals for a ‘high-sensitivity’cardiac troponin-T assay in horses. BMC Vet Res 2016;12(1):104.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0737-1pmc: PMC4906598pubmed: 27296016google scholar: lookup
  31. Weber J-M, Parkhouse WS, Dobson GP, Harman JC, Snow DH, Hochachka PW. Lactate kinetics in exercising thoroughbred horses: regulation of turnover rate in plasma. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys 1987;253(6):R896–R903.
    pubmed: 3425768
  32. Von Engelhardt W. Cardiovascular effects of exercise and training in horses. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med 1976;21:173–205.
    pubmed: 602867
  33. Lekeux P, Art T, Linden A, Desmecht D, Amory H. Heart rate, hematological and serum biochemical responses to show jumping. Equine Exerc Physiol 1991;3:385–390.
  34. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016.

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Barshick MR, Ely KM, Mogge KC, Chance LM, Johnson SE. Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) Supplementation in Adult Horses Supports Improved Skeletal Muscle Inflammatory Gene Expression Following Exercise. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 14;15(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15020215pubmed: 39858215google scholar: lookup
  2. Santosuosso E, Léguillette R, Shoemaker S, Baumwart R, Temple S, Hemmerling K, Kell T, Bayly W. A consort-guided randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial on the effects of 6 weeks training on heart rate variability in thoroughbred horses. J Vet Intern Med 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):e17253.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.17253pubmed: 39655519google scholar: lookup
  3. Riley JW, Chance LM, Barshick MR, Johnson SE. Administration of sodium hyaluronate to adult horses prior to and immediately after exercise does not alter the range of motion in either the tarsus or metacarpophalangeal joints. Transl Anim Sci 2024;8:txae153.
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txae153pubmed: 39554613google scholar: lookup
  4. Söderlund EE, Kyröläinen H, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM, Hyytiäinen HK. Proposed Protocol for Field Testing of Endurance Fitness of Young Labrador Retrievers. Methods Protoc 2023 Jun 28;6(4).
    doi: 10.3390/mps6040061pubmed: 37489428google scholar: lookup
  5. Siegers E, van Wijk E, van den Broek J, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan M, Munsters C. Longitudinal Training and Workload Assessment in Young Friesian Stallions in Relation to Fitness: Part 1. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 16;13(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13040689pubmed: 36830476google scholar: lookup
  6. Kirsch K, Fercher C, Horstmann S, von Reitzenstein C, Augustin J, Lagershausen H. Monitoring Performance in Show Jumping Horses: Validity of Non-specific and Discipline-specific Field Exercise Tests for a Practicable Assessment of Aerobic Performance. Front Physiol 2021;12:818381.
    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.818381pubmed: 35095574google scholar: lookup