Comparison of specificities of serum antibody responses of horses to clinical infections caused by Streptococcus equi or zooepidemicus.
Abstract: Streptococcus zooepidemicus (Sz) and its clonal derivative Streptococcus equi (Se) share greater than 96% DNA identity and elicit immune responses to many shared proteins. Identification of proteins uniquely targeted by the immune response to each infection would have diagnostic value. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare serum antibody responses of horses infected by Se or Sz. Methods: Antibody levels were measured to panels of recombinant proteins of Sz and Se in sera of horses and ponies before and after experimental and naturally occurring invasive infections by these organisms. Antibody responses to an Se extract vaccine were also measured. Sera diluted 1:200 were assayed in triplicate using optimum concentrations of 9 and 14 immunoreactive proteins of Se and Sz, respectively. Bound IgG was detected using HRP-Protein G conjugate. Results: Antibodies specific for SeM-N2, IdeE2, Se42.0 and Se75.3 (SEQ2190) were elicited by Se but not by Sz infection. Commercial Se extract vaccine did not elicit responses to IdeE2 or Se75.3. Sz infections resulted in significant (p<0.01) responses to Sz115, SzM, ScpC, SzP, MAP and streptokinase an indication these proteins are expressed during opportunistic invasions of the respiratory tract. FSR and HylC specific responses were unique to infections by Sz. Conclusions: The data indicate antibodies to IdeE2, Se75.3 and SeM-N2 may be used to distinguish infection by Se from that caused by the closely related Sz. Se infection, but not vaccination with Se extract elicits antibody to IdeE2 and Se75.3.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Publication Date: 2015-09-12 PubMed ID: 26386491DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.09.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article explores the differences in immune responses in horses when infected by two closely related bacteria, Streptococcus equi and Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Detection of distinct antibodies elicited by each infection could be used to differentiate between the two infections.
Objective and Methodology
- The study aim was to identify the unique immune response of horses, specifically their serum (the component of blood that houses antibodies) response, to infections by Streptococcus equi (Se) and Streptococcus zooepidemicus (Sz).
- Streptococcus equi and Streptococcus zooepidemicus share more than 96% of their DNA and many common proteins that trigger immune responses; hence differentiating their infections can be challenging.
- To investigate this, the researchers measured the antibody levels in response to sets of recombinant proteins of Se and Sz. This was done before and after experimental infections in horses and ponies. They also measured the responses to Se extract vaccine.
- The testing was thorough, with each serum sample diluted and assayed in triplicate, using optimal concentrations of known immunoreactive proteins of Se and Sz.
Results
- The results showed that certain antibodies were produced in response to Se infection, but not to Sz infection. These include antibodies for proteins dubbed SeM-N2, IdeE2, Se42.0 and Se75.3 (SEQ2190).
- The commercially available Se extract vaccine, on the other hand, did not elicit responses to proteins IdeE2 or Se75.3.
- Sz infections triggered significant (p<0.01) responses to proteins named Sz115, SzM, ScpC, SzP, MAP and streptokinase, indicating these proteins' role during Sz infections.
- The study discovered antibodies response unique to Sz infection, specifically FSR and HylC.
Conclusion
- The study concluded that antibodies to IdeE2, Se75.3 and SeM-N2 can be used to differentiate an infection caused by Se from a Sz-caused infection.
- Interestingly, the study highlighted that an infection by Se, but not vaccination with Se extract, elicits antibody to IdeE2 and Se75.3.
- This research might contribute to the development of more accurate diagnostic methods for these types of infections in horses. It may also be significant for understanding the immunity function in response to Se and Sz infections.
Cite This Article
APA
Velineni S, DeNegri R, Artiushin SC, Timoney JF.
(2015).
Comparison of specificities of serum antibody responses of horses to clinical infections caused by Streptococcus equi or zooepidemicus.
Vet Microbiol, 180(3-4), 253-259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.09.004 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546 USA.
- Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546 USA.
- Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546 USA.
- Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546 USA. Electronic address: jtimoney@uky.edu.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
- Antibody Formation
- Antibody Specificity
- Horse Diseases / immunology
- Horses / immunology
- Horses / microbiology
- Recombinant Proteins
- Streptococcal Infections / immunology
- Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
- Streptococcus equi / classification
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists