Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2015; 206(2); 136-142; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.004

Comparison of subjective lameness evaluation, force platforms and an inertial-sensor system to identify mild lameness in an equine osteoarthritis model.

Abstract: When mild lameness exists, agreement between clinicians is often controversial due to its subjective nature. The goal of the study was to compare subjective and objective methods to identify the presence of mild lameness using an established model of osteoarthritis (OA) in which OA was induced by creating a unilateral carpal osteochondral fragment (OCF) in the middle carpal joint of 16 horses. Subjective lameness evaluations (blinded and unblinded), force platforms (FP), and an inertial-sensor system (ISS) were used to detect forelimb lameness at four time points. Limbs identified as lame by each method were compared as well as compared with the OCF limb at each time point. Spearman correlations were calculated between all outcome parameters. Independent of time, blinded subjective evaluation (54%) and the ISS (60%) identified a higher percentage of horses as lame in the OCF limb compared to FP (40%). Blinded subjective evaluation and the ISS agreed which forelimb was lame more often (50%) compared with blinded subjective evaluation and the FP (38%). Induction of mild lameness within the OCF limb was supported by an increase in the frequency of horses considered lame by both subjective evaluations the ISS and a decrease (3.6%) in mean (among all horses) peak vertical force from baseline to post OCF induction. The percentage of horses identified as lame in the OCF limb, independent of time, was highest with the ISS (60%) followed by blinded subjective evaluation (51%) and the FP (42%). It was concluded that the best agreement was between subjective evaluation and the inertial-sensor system.
Publication Date: 2015-08-10 PubMed ID: 26361749DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates how mild lameness in horses, caused by an induced osteoarthritis model, can be identified using different methods. These methods include subjective lameness evaluation, force platforms, and an inertial-sensor system, which were tested over different periods of time. The study found the most agreement in identifying lame horses between subjective evaluation and the inertial-sensor system.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to compare subjective and objective methods in identifying mild lameness in horses. The research team induced osteoarthritis in 16 horses by creating a unilateral carpal osteochondral fragment in their middle carpal joint, which is a commonly used method to simulate osteoarthritis. The horse’s reactions and behavior were then assessed over four time points using different methods.

Methods of Evaluation

  • Subjective lameness evaluations (both blinded and unblinded) were used. This method relies on an expert’s opinion who assesses the horse’s gait and behavior to determine if they show signs of lameness.
  • Force platforms (FP) were employed. This tool measures the force exerted by a horse’s limb when it strikes and leaves the platform, which can indicate any changes likely due to lameness.
  • An inertial-sensor system (ISS) was used. This device records movement data from accelerometers and gyroscopes which can track any subtle behavioral changes of the horse that may indicate lameness.

Comparisons and Findings

  • Once the evaluations were done, limbs that were identified as lame by each of these methods were compared with each other as well as against the limb with the osteochondral fragment.
  • This comparison showed that the ISS and the blinded subjective evaluation identified a higher percentage of horses as lame on the osteoarthritic limb compared to the force platform. Beyond just the osteoarthritic limb, the ISS and subjective evaluation also had the highest agreement on which limb was lame compared to the force platform and subjective evaluation.
  • The induction of lameness was supported by a rise in the frequency of horses considered lame by both subjective evaluations and ISS, along with a decrease in the mean peak vertical force from baseline to post-osteochondral fragment induction.

Conclusion

  • Overall, the research concluded that the best agreement in identification of lameness was found between subjective evaluation and the inertial-sensor system. This suggests that these two methods might be more accurate in detecting mild lameness in horses, compared to the use of a force platform.

Cite This Article

APA
Donnell JR, Frisbie DD, King MR, Goodrich LR, Haussler KK. (2015). Comparison of subjective lameness evaluation, force platforms and an inertial-sensor system to identify mild lameness in an equine osteoarthritis model. Vet J, 206(2), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.004

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 206
Issue: 2
Pages: 136-142
PII: S1090-0233(15)00328-7

Researcher Affiliations

Donnell, J R
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Frisbie, D D
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Electronic address: david.frisbie@colostate.edu.
King, M R
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Goodrich, L R
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Haussler, K K
  • Gail Holmes Equine Orthopedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Accelerometry / veterinary
  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Forelimb / pathology
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horses
  • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
  • Lameness, Animal / pathology
  • Osteoarthritis / diagnosis
  • Osteoarthritis / veterinary

Grant Funding

  • K08AR054903-01A2 / NIAMS NIH HHS

Citations

This article has been cited 21 times.
  1. Crecan CM, Peștean CP. Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Jul 11;23(14).
    doi: 10.3390/s23146301pubmed: 37514599google scholar: lookup
  2. Mercer MA, Davis JL, McKenzie HC. The Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Evaluation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Adult Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13101597pubmed: 37238029google scholar: lookup
  3. Panos KE, Morgan K, Gately R, Wilkinson J, Uden A, Reed SA. Short Communication: changes in gait after 12 wk of shoeing in previously barefoot horses. J Anim Sci 2023 Jan 3;101.
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skac374pubmed: 36383438google scholar: lookup
  4. Crecan CM, Morar IA, Lupsan AF, Repciuc CC, Rus MA, Pestean CP. Development of a Novel Approach for Detection of Equine Lameness Based on Inertial Sensors: A Preliminary Study. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Sep 19;22(18).
    doi: 10.3390/s22187082pubmed: 36146429google scholar: lookup
  5. Bailey J, Redpath A, Hallowell G, Bowen M. An objective study into the effects of an incline on naturally occurring lameness in horses. Vet Med Sci 2022 Nov;8(6):2390-2395.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.900pubmed: 35982535google scholar: lookup
  6. Seabaugh KA, Barrett MF, Rao S, McIlwraith CW, Frisbie DD. Examining the Effects of the Oral Supplement Biota orientalis in the Osteochondral Fragment-Exercise Model of Osteoarthritis in the Horse. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:858391.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.858391pubmed: 35720848google scholar: lookup
  7. Pritchard A, Nielsen BD, Robison C, Manfredi JM. Low dietary silicon supplementation may not affect bone and cartilage in mature, sedentary horses. J Anim Sci 2020 Dec 1;98(12).
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa377pubmed: 33216909google scholar: lookup
  8. Tijssen M, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Nielen M, Serra Braganςa FM. Automatic hoof-on and -off detection in horses using hoof-mounted inertial measurement unit sensors. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0233266.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233266pubmed: 32492034google scholar: lookup
  9. Egan S, Brama P, McGrath D. Irish Equine Industry Stakeholder Perspectives of Objective Technology for Biomechanical Analyses in the Field. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 8;9(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9080539pubmed: 31398822google scholar: lookup
  10. López S, Vilar JM, Rubio M, Sopena JJ, Santana A, Rodríguez O, Rodríguez-Altonaga JA, Carrillo JM. Pedobarography: a novel approach to test the efficacy of treatments for lameness; an experience with mavacoxib in dogs with elbow osteoarthritis. BMC Vet Res 2019 Jun 11;15(1):193.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1946-1pubmed: 31186043google scholar: lookup
  11. Pitti L, Oosterlinck M, Díaz-Bertrana ML, Carrillo JM, Rubio M, Sopena J, Santana A, Vilar JM. Assessment of static posturography and pedobarography for the detection of unilateral forelimb lameness in ponies. BMC Vet Res 2018 May 2;14(1):151.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1462-8pubmed: 29716596google scholar: lookup
  12. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s18030850pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
  13. Meistro F, Ralletti MV, Rinnovati R, Spadari A. Objective Evaluation of Gait Asymmetries in Traditional Racehorses During Pre-Race Inspection: Application of a Markerless AI System in Straight-Line and Lungeing Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 18;15(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15121797pubmed: 40564348google scholar: lookup
  14. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ, Rhodin M, Hernlund E, Peterson M, Bos R, Bragança FS. Vertical Movement of Head, Withers, and Pelvis of High-Level Dressage Horses Trotting in Hand vs. Being Ridden. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 16;15(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15020241pubmed: 39858241google scholar: lookup
  15. Crecan CM, Ciulu-Angelescu V, Morar IA, Lupșan AF, Tripon MA, Tripon MA, Bungărdean D, Daradics Z, Peștean CP. Quantitative lameness assessment in horses by using an accelerometer-based simple device: A preliminary study. Open Vet J 2024 Nov;14(11):3089-3099.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i11.38pubmed: 39737023google scholar: lookup
  16. Seabaugh K, Rao S, Koenig JB, Pezzanite L, Dow S, Koch TG, Russell KA, Mehrpouyan S, Alizadeh AH, Goodrich LR. A Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Synovitis in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2024 Nov 26;14(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14233406pubmed: 39682372google scholar: lookup
  17. Kallerud AS, Marques-Smith P, Bendiksen HK, Fjordbakk CT. Objective movement asymmetry in horses is comparable between markerless technology and sensor-based systems. Equine Vet J 2025 Jan;57(1):115-125.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14089pubmed: 38566453google scholar: lookup
  18. Aghapour M, Affenzeller N, Lutonsky C, Peham C, Tichy A, Bockstahler B. A validation study to analyze the reliability of center of pressure data in static posturography in dogs. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1353824.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1353824pubmed: 38560629google scholar: lookup
  19. Calle-González N, Lo Feudo CM, Ferrucci F, Requena F, Stucchi L, Muñoz A. Objective Assessment of Equine Locomotor Symmetry Using an Inertial Sensor System and Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study. Animals (Basel) 2024 Mar 16;14(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14060921pubmed: 38540019google scholar: lookup
  20. Auer U, Kelemen Z, Vogl C, von Ritgen S, Haddad R, Torres Borda L, Gabmaier C, Breteler J, Jenner F. Development, refinement, and validation of an equine musculoskeletal pain scale. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023;4:1292299.
    doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1292299pubmed: 38312997google scholar: lookup
  21. O'Brien TJ, Hollinshead F, Goodrich LR. Extracellular vesicles in the treatment and prevention of osteoarthritis: can horses help us translate this therapy to humans?. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids 2023 Jun;4(2):151-169.
    doi: 10.20517/evcna.2023.11pubmed: 37829144google scholar: lookup