Analyze Diet
The Biochemical journal1966; 100(1); 63-68; doi: 10.1042/bj1000063

Comparison of the structure of the immunoglobulins from horse serum.

Abstract: A study of the chemical structure of the horse immunoglobulins IgG and IgA(T) has shown that the amino acid contents of the peptide chains are very similar. These globulins differ most markedly in the products of papain digestion. IgG gives 3.5s products, whereas IgA(T) gives a 5s fraction and smaller components. This difference appears to be associated with the presence of an additional easily reducible disulphide bond in the Fd fragment of the heavy chain. There is two to three times as much carbohydrate in IgA(T) as in IgG. In both, this is in the heavy chain and in IgA(T) more than half is covalently bound to the Fd fragment. The differences in antigenic specificity between horse IgG and IgA(T) appear to be due to structural differences in the Fc fragment.
Publication Date: 1966-07-01 PubMed ID: 5965260PubMed Central: PMC1265093DOI: 10.1042/bj1000063Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research addresses the comparative study of the structure of the immunoglobulins, IgG and IgA(T), present in horse serum. The study involves the inspection of their chemical structures, the dissimilarity of their digestion products and their carbohydrate content.

About Immunoglobulins

  • Immunoglobulins, often known as antibodies, are large Y-shaped proteins. These proteins are involved in immune functioning and are produced by specialized white blood cells called B cells.
  • They identify and bind to specific foreign substances (like bacteria, viruses), tagging them for attack by the immune system.

Chemical Structure of Horse Immunoglobulins

  • The research reveals that the chemical structures of horse immunoglobulins, IgG and IgA(T), are very similar when analyzed for their peptide chains’ amino acid contents.
  • This comparison is significant in understanding the structural similarities and differences in these antibodies, and provides possible insight into their respective functionality.

Digestion Products of Horse Immunoglobulins

  • The products following the digestion of these antibodies with papain, an enzyme known for breaking down proteins, appear to differ significantly.
  • The research shows that digestion of IgG results in 3.5s products, while digestion of IgA(T) yields a larger 5s fraction along with smaller components.
  • This substantial difference is linked to the presence of an easily reducible disulfide bond in the Fd fragment of the heavy chain of IgA(T).

Carbohydrate Presence in Immunoglobulins

  • The study points out that the quantity of carbohydrates in IgA(T) is two to three times more than in IgG.
  • In both immunoglobulins, this carbohydrate component is found in the heavy chain. However, in IgA(T), more than half of it is covalently (chemically) bound to the Fd fragment.

Differences in Antigenic Specificity

  • The key point stressed is the difference in antigenic specificity between horse IgG and IgA(T), which is believed to be attributable to the structural variance in the Fc fragment.
  • This insight could be instrumental in the development of more effective response strategies for infectious diseases in horses, allowing for a better understanding of how these immunoglobulins interact with pathogens.

Cite This Article

APA
Weir RC, Porter RR. (1966). Comparison of the structure of the immunoglobulins from horse serum. Biochem J, 100(1), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1000063

Publication

ISSN: 0264-6021
NlmUniqueID: 2984726R
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 100
Issue: 1
Pages: 63-68

Researcher Affiliations

Weir, R C
    Porter, R R

      MeSH Terms

      • Amino Acids / analysis
      • Animals
      • Antigens
      • Clostridium
      • Diphtheria Toxin
      • Horses
      • Immune Sera
      • Immunochemistry
      • Immunoelectrophoresis
      • Papain / pharmacology
      • Peptides / analysis
      • Tetanus Toxoid

      References

      This article includes 18 references
      1. CHAPLIN H, COHEN S, PRESS EM. PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF THE PEPTIDE CHAINS OF NORMAL HUMAN 19 S GAMMA-GLOBULIN (IGM).. Biochem J 1965 Apr;95(1):256-61.
        pubmed: 14335812doi: 10.1042/bj0950256google scholar: lookup
      2. FLEISCHMAN JB, PAIN RH, PORTER RR. Reduction of gamma-globulins.. Arch Biochem Biophys 1962 Sep;Suppl 1:174-80.
        pubmed: 13945475
      3. ARONSSON T, GRONWALL A. Electrophoretic separation of serum protein into twelve fractions.. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1958;10(3):348.
        pubmed: 13602712
      4. McFARLANE AS. Efficient trace-labelling of proteins with iodine.. Nature 1958 Jul 5;182(4627):53.
        pubmed: 13566175doi: 10.1038/182053a0google scholar: lookup
      5. PORTER RR. The hydrolysis of rabbit y-globulin and antibodies with crystalline papain.. Biochem J 1959 Sep;73(1):119-26.
        pubmed: 14434282doi: 10.1042/bj0730119google scholar: lookup
      6. KIMMEL JR, SMITH EL. Crystalline papain. I. Preparation, specificity, and activation.. J Biol Chem 1954 Apr;207(2):515-31.
        pubmed: 13163037
      7. EDELMAN GM, POULIK MD. Studies on structural units of the gamma-globulins.. J Exp Med 1961 May 1;113(5):861-84.
        pubmed: 13725659doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.861google scholar: lookup
      8. POPE CG, STEVENS MF. The purification of diphtheria toxin and the isolation of crystalline toxin-protein.. Br J Exp Pathol 1958 Apr;39(2):139-49.
        pubmed: 13523068
      9. CRUMPTON MJ, WILKINSON JM. AMINO ACID COMPOSITIONS OF HUMAN AND RABBIT GAMMA-GLOBULINS AND OF THE FRAGMENTS PRODUCED BY REDUCTION.. Biochem J 1963 Aug;88(2):228-34.
        pubmed: 14063860doi: 10.1042/bj0880228google scholar: lookup
      10. Cohen S, Porter RR. Heterogeneity of the peptide chains of gamma-globulin.. Biochem J 1964 Feb;90(2):278-84.
        pubmed: 4158025doi: 10.1042/bj0900278google scholar: lookup
      11. SCHEIDEGGER JJ. [A micro-method of immuno-electrophoresis].. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1955;7(2):103-10.
        pubmed: 13262900
      12. NISONOFF A, WISSLER FC, LIPMAN LN, WOERNLEY DL. Separation of univalent fragments from the bivalent rabbit antibody molecule by reduction of disulfide bonds.. Arch Biochem Biophys 1960 Aug;89:230-44.
        pubmed: 14427334doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(60)90049-7google scholar: lookup
      13. SCHULTZE HE. The synthesis of antibodies and proteins.. Clin Chim Acta 1959 Sep;4:610-26.
        pubmed: 14443812doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(59)90002-6google scholar: lookup
      14. FLEISCHMAN JB, PORTER RR, PRESS EM. THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE PEPTIDE CHAINS IN GAMMA-GLOBULIN.. Biochem J 1963 Aug;88(2):220-8.
        pubmed: 14063859doi: 10.1042/bj0880220google scholar: lookup
      15. COHEN S. Properties of the separated chains of human gamma-globulin.. Nature 1963 Jan 19;197:253-5.
        pubmed: 14022096doi: 10.1038/197253a0google scholar: lookup
      16. YPHANSTIS DA. Rapid determination of molecular weights of peptides and preteins.. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1960 Aug 31;88:586-601.
      17. PAIN RH. THE MOLECULAR WEIGHTS OF THE PEPTIDE CHAINS OF GAMMA-GLOBULIN.. Biochem J 1963 Aug;88(2):234-9.
        pubmed: 14063861doi: 10.1042/bj0880234google scholar: lookup
      18. Schultze HE, Haupt H, Heide K, Heimburger N, Schwick HG. Comparative investigations of purified diphtheria and tetanus T-components and their fragments.. Immunochemistry 1965 Sep;2(3):273-84.
        pubmed: 4956919doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(65)90007-8google scholar: lookup

      Citations

      This article has been cited 11 times.
      1. Wagner B, Greiser-Wilke I, Antczak DF. Characterization of the horse (Equus caballus) IGHA gene.. Immunogenetics 2003 Nov;55(8):552-60.
        doi: 10.1007/s00251-003-0617-2pubmed: 14564492google scholar: lookup
      2. Heyworth MF. Effects of anti-lymphocytic globulin in human subjects.. Immunology 1981 Aug;43(4):793-802.
        pubmed: 6974131
      3. Heyworth MF. An immunoperoxidase technique for demonstrating antilymphocytic globulin on cell surfaces.. Histochemistry 1982;76(3):421-4.
        doi: 10.1007/BF00543962pubmed: 6819261google scholar: lookup
      4. Weir RC, Porter RR. The antigen-binding capacity of the peptide chains of horse antibodies.. Biochem J 1966 Jul;100(1):69-72.
        doi: 10.1042/bj1000069pubmed: 5965261google scholar: lookup
      5. Rockey JH. Equine antihapten antibody. The subunits and fragments of anti-beta-lactoside antibody.. J Exp Med 1967 Feb 1;125(2):249-75.
        doi: 10.1084/jem.125.2.249pubmed: 4959973google scholar: lookup
      6. Wetter O, Schmidt CG. [Genetic mechanisms of antibody formation].. Klin Wochenschr 1968 Apr 15;46(8):401-7.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01736928pubmed: 4879591google scholar: lookup
      7. Urasawa S, Urasawa T, Kanamitsu M. Radioimmunoelectrophoretic identification of poliovirus inhibitors and their characteristic mode of action.. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1971;33(1):113-25.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01254169pubmed: 4325969google scholar: lookup
      8. Ek N. Serum levels of the immunoglobulins IgG and IgG(T) in horses.. Acta Vet Scand 1974;15(4):609-19.
        doi: 10.1186/BF03547230pubmed: 4218064google scholar: lookup
      9. McGuire TC, Crawford TB. Identification and quantitation of equine serum and secretory immunoglobulin A.. Infect Immun 1972 Oct;6(4):610-5.
        doi: 10.1128/iai.6.4.610-615.1972pubmed: 4117801google scholar: lookup
      10. Sullivan JB Jr. Immunotherapy in the poisoned patient. Overview of present applications and future trends.. Med Toxicol 1986 Jan-Feb;1(1):47-60.
        doi: 10.1007/BF03259827pubmed: 3537615google scholar: lookup
      11. Merritt GC, Egerton JR. IgG1 and IgG2 immunoglobulins to Bacteroides (Fusiformis) nodosus protease in infected and immunized sheep.. Infect Immun 1978 Oct;22(1):1-4.
        doi: 10.1128/iai.22.1.1-4.1978pubmed: 569644google scholar: lookup