Analyze Diet
Comparative biochemistry and physiology. B, Comparative biochemistry1990; 95(2); 229-232; doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(90)90070-a

Conformational comparison in the growth hormone family.

Abstract: 1. The method of Kubota et al. [Biochim. biophys. Acta 701, 242-252 (1982)] was applied to several members of the growth hormone family in order to examine their conformational homology. 2. The method neither detects differences between rat, cow, sheep, horse and alpaca hormones, nor between monkey and human hormones. 3. Lack of homology between primate and non-primate growth hormones was found in segments 42-49 and 184-191. The first fragment could be linked to species-specificity.
Publication Date: 1990-01-01 PubMed ID: 2109667DOI: 10.1016/0305-0491(90)90070-aGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study involves the intricate analysis of various growth hormone family members to inspect their structural similarities and differences. The main finding demonstrated lack of structural similarity between primate and non-primate growth hormones in specific fragments, which may be linked to species-specificity.

Methods

  • The researchers utilized a method presented by Kubota et al. in Biochim. biophys. Acta 701, 242-252 (1982) to assess and explore the so-called ‘conformational homology’ within various growth hormone family members.

Key findings

  • The method applied in this research was unable to detect any distinctions between the hormones of different species such as rat, cow, sheep, horse, and alpaca. This suggests that despite having variations in their genetic makeup, the growth hormones across these species may have similar structural formations, which cannot be differentiated by the method deployed here.
  • Similarly, the method could not distinguish between monkey and human growth hormones, signifying remarkable homology in their structures.
  • Noteworthy differences were, however, discovered between primate and non-primate growth hormones. These differences were spotted in segments 42-49 and 184-191 of the hormones.

Implications

  • The first fragment of differences (42-49) could be associated with species-specificity. This means that despite the gross structural similarities, there are specific sections of the hormone that are uniquely shaped and structured in different species. Such differences can be of great importance, as they could be responsible for nuanced variances in the way the growth hormone operates or interacts with other molecules inside the bodies of different species.
  • Further research would be needed to gain a deep understanding of how these structural differences impart variation in the function of the growth hormone across different species. This could potentially open new avenues for understanding the biology of growth and development across the animal kingdom.

Cite This Article

APA
Rivero JL, Cascone O, Biscoglio de Jimenez Bonino MJ. (1990). Conformational comparison in the growth hormone family. Comp Biochem Physiol B, 95(2), 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(90)90070-a

Publication

ISSN: 0305-0491
NlmUniqueID: 2984730R
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 95
Issue: 2
Pages: 229-232

Researcher Affiliations

Rivero, J L
  • Instituto de Química y Fisicoquímica Biológicas (UBA-CONICET), Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cascone, O
    Biscoglio de Jimenez Bonino, M J

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Camelids, New World
      • Cattle
      • Growth Hormone
      • Haplorhini
      • Horses
      • Humans
      • Protein Conformation
      • Rats
      • Species Specificity

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.