Analyze Diet

Correspondence of human chromosomes 9, 12, 15, 16, 19 and 20 with donkey chromosomes refines homology between horse and donkey karyotypes.

Abstract: Whole chromosome paints for human (HSA) chromosomes 9, 12, 15 and 20 and arm-specific paints for HSA16p, 19p and 19q were applied on donkey metaphase spreads. All probes, except HSA19p, gave distinct hybridization signals on donkey chromosomes/chromosomal segments. The results show direct segmental homology between human and donkey genomes, and enable refinement of correspondence between donkey and horse karyotypes. Of specific interest is the identification of hitherto unknown correspondence between four equine acrocentric chromosomes (ECA22, 23, 25 and 28) and the donkey chromosomes. Overall, the findings mark the beginning of an ordered study of comparative organization of genomes/karyotypes of the equids, that can shed light on karyotype evolution and ancestral chromosomal condition in the Perissodactyls.
Publication Date: 2002-01-10 PubMed ID: 11778685DOI: 10.1023/a:1012948122600Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines genetic similarities between humans, donkeys, and horses, particularly if particular human chromosomes align with those in donkeys, subsequently refining the correlation between donkey and horse genomes.

Methodology and Results

  • In the study, chromosome paints, essentially gene probes, were used to identify and track chromosomes. The chromosomes were painted for human chromosomes number 9, 12, 15, and 20. Along with these, arm-specific paints were employed for the shorter arm (p) of HSA16 and both the shorter (p) and longer arm (q) for HSA19.
  • These chromosome paints were then used on donkey metaphase spreads. A metaphase spread is a technique used by researchers to visualize chromosomes under a microscope.
  • With the exception of HSA19p (the shorter arm of the 19th human chromosome), all the probes produced unique hybridization (genetic overlap) signals on the donkey chromosomes or chromosomal segments.

Significance of the Findings

  • The results of the study uncover direct segmental homology, which is genetic similarity between species, between the human and donkey genomes.
  • This discovery enables a refinement of the correspondence between the genetic structures of donkeys and horses.
  • The research provides new knowledge of similarities between four equine (horse) acrocentric chromosomes (ECA22, 23, 25 and 28) and specific donkey chromosomes. Acrocentric chromosomes are chromosomes where the centromere, the part of the chromosome linking sister chromatids, is significantly closer to one end of the chromosome.
  • Overall, these findings potentially initiate a more organized study of the comparative arrangement of genome structures or karyotypes among the members of the equid family (which includes horses, donkeys, zebras etc.)
  • Such comparative genetic studies can give invaluable insights into karyotype evolution and offer clues about the ancestral chromosomal conditions in the Perissodactyls, an order of mammals that includes the equid family among others.

Cite This Article

APA
Raudsepp T, Chowdhary BP. (2002). Correspondence of human chromosomes 9, 12, 15, 16, 19 and 20 with donkey chromosomes refines homology between horse and donkey karyotypes. Chromosome Res, 9(8), 623-629. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012948122600

Publication

ISSN: 0967-3849
NlmUniqueID: 9313452
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 8
Pages: 623-629

Researcher Affiliations

Raudsepp, T
  • Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A and M University, College Station 77843, USA.
Chowdhary, B P

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Chromosome Painting
    • Chromosomes
    • Chromosomes, Human
    • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12
    • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15
    • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16
    • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19
    • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 20
    • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9
    • Equidae / genetics
    • Genome, Human
    • Horses / genetics
    • Humans
    • Karyotyping
    • Nucleic Acid Hybridization
    • Physical Chromosome Mapping
    • Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
    • Species Specificity

    References

    This article includes 23 references
    1. Iannuzzi L, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Incarnato D. Comparison of the human with the sheep genomes by use of human chromosome-specific painting probes.. Mamm Genome 1999 Jul;10(7):719-23.
      pubmed: 10384047doi: 10.1007/s003359901078google scholar: lookup
    2. Nash WG, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith MA, Menninger JC, O'Brien SJ. Comparative genomics: tracking chromosome evolution in the family ursidae using reciprocal chromosome painting.. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1998;83(3-4):182-92.
      pubmed: 10072575doi: 10.1159/000015176google scholar: lookup
    3. Raudsepp T, Chowdhary BP. Construction of chromosome-specific paints for meta- and submetacentric autosomes and the sex chromosomes in the horse and their use to detect homologous chromosomal segments in the donkey.. Chromosome Res 1999;7(2):103-14.
      pubmed: 10328622doi: 10.1023/a:1009234814635google scholar: lookup
    4. Raudsepp T, Frönicke L, Scherthan H, Gustavsson I, Chowdhary BP. Zoo-FISH delineates conserved chromosomal segments in horse and man.. Chromosome Res 1996 Apr;4(3):218-25.
      pubmed: 8793207doi: 10.1007/BF02254963google scholar: lookup
    5. Bush GL, Case SM, Wilson AC, Patton JL. Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977 Sep;74(9):3942-6.
      pubmed: 269445doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.9.3942google scholar: lookup
    6. Lear TL, Brandon R, Piumi F, Terry RR, Guérin G, Thomas S, Bailey E. Mapping of 31 horse genes in BACs by FISH.. Chromosome Res 2001;9(3):261-2.
      pubmed: 11330401doi: 10.1023/a:1016608806205google scholar: lookup
    7. Wichman HA, Payne CT, Ryder OA, Hamilton MJ, Maltbie M, Baker RJ. Genomic distribution of heterochromatic sequences in equids: implications to rapid chromosomal evolution.. J Hered 1991 Sep-Oct;82(5):369-77.
    8. Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T, Frönicke L, Scherthan H. Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH.. Genome Res 1998 Jun;8(6):577-89.
      pubmed: 9647633doi: 10.1101/gr.8.6.577google scholar: lookup
    9. Chaudhary R, Raudsepp T, Guan XY, Zhang H, Chowdhary BP. Zoo-FISH with microdissected arm specific paints for HSA2, 5, 6, 16, and 19 refines known homology with pig and horse chromosomes.. Mamm Genome 1998 Jan;9(1):44-9.
      pubmed: 9434944doi: 10.1007/s003359900677google scholar: lookup
    10. Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T. Chromosome painting in farm, pet and wild animal species.. Methods Cell Sci 2001;23(1-3):37-55.
      pubmed: 11741143doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0330-8_6google scholar: lookup
    11. Ryder OA, Epel NC, Benirschke K. Chromosome banding studies of the Equidae.. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1978;20(1-6):332-50.
      pubmed: 648186
    12. Chowdhary BP, Frönicke L, Gustavsson I, Scherthan H. Comparative analysis of the cattle and human genomes: detection of ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies.. Mamm Genome 1996 Apr;7(4):297-302.
      pubmed: 8661702doi: 10.1007/s003359900086google scholar: lookup
    13. Iannuzzi L, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Bardaro T. ZOO-FISH and R-banding reveal extensive conservation of human chromosome regions in euchromatic regions of river buffalo chromosomes.. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1998;82(3-4):210-4.
      pubmed: 9858819doi: 10.1159/000015102google scholar: lookup
    14. Bowling AT, Breen M, Chowdhary BP, Hirota K, Lear T, Millon LV, Ponce de Leon FA, Raudsepp T, Stranzinger G. International system for cytogenetic nomenclature of the domestic horse. Report of the Third International Committee for the Standardization of the domestic horse karyotype, Davis, CA, USA, 1996.. Chromosome Res 1997 Nov;5(7):433-43.
      pubmed: 9421259doi: 10.1023/a:1018408811881google scholar: lookup
    15. Koehler U, Bigoni F, Wienberg J, Stanyon R. Genomic reorganization in the concolor gibbon (Hylobates concolor) revealed by chromosome painting.. Genomics 1995 Nov 20;30(2):287-92.
      pubmed: 8586429doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.9875google scholar: lookup
    16. Wienberg J, Stanyon R. Comparative painting of mammalian chromosomes.. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1997 Dec;7(6):784-91.
      pubmed: 9468788doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(97)80041-xgoogle scholar: lookup
    17. Godard S, Vaiman A, Schibler L, Mariat D, Vaiman D, Cribiu EP, Guérin G. Cytogenetic localization of 44 new coding sequences in the horse.. Mamm Genome 2000 Dec;11(12):1093-7.
      pubmed: 11130977doi: 10.1007/s003350010206google scholar: lookup
    18. Breen M, Thomas R, Binns MM, Carter NP, Langford CF. Reciprocal chromosome painting reveals detailed regions of conserved synteny between the karyotypes of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) and human.. Genomics 1999 Oct 15;61(2):145-55.
      pubmed: 10534400doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5947google scholar: lookup
    19. Haig D. A brief history of human autosomes.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999 Aug 29;354(1388):1447-70.
      pubmed: 10515002doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0490google scholar: lookup
    20. Raudsepp T, Kijas J, Godard S, Guérin G, Andersson L, Chowdhary BP. Comparison of horse chromosome 3 with donkey and human chromosomes by cross-species painting and heterologous FISH mapping.. Mamm Genome 1999 Mar;10(3):277-82.
      pubmed: 10051324doi: 10.1007/s003359900986google scholar: lookup
    21. Yang F, O'Brien PC, Milne BS, Graphodatsky AS, Solanky N, Trifonov V, Rens W, Sargan D, Ferguson-Smith MA. A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps.. Genomics 1999 Dec 1;62(2):189-202.
      pubmed: 10610712doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5989google scholar: lookup
    22. Xu X, Gullberg A, Arnason U. The complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of the donkey and mtDNA comparisons among four closely related mammalian species-pairs.. J Mol Evol 1996 Nov;43(5):438-46.
      pubmed: 8875857doi: 10.1007/BF02337515google scholar: lookup
    23. Raudsepp T, Christensen K, Chowdhar BP. Cytogenetics of donkey chromosomes: nomenclature proposal based on GTG-banded chromosomes and depiction of NORs and telomeric sites.. Chromosome Res 2000;8(8):659-70.
      pubmed: 11196129doi: 10.1023/a:1026707002538google scholar: lookup

    Citations

    This article has been cited 1 times.
    1. Brinkmeyer-Langford C, Raudsepp T, Lee EJ, Goh G, Schäffer AA, Agarwala R, Wagner ML, Tozaki T, Skow LC, Womack JE, Mickelson JR, Chowdhary BP. A high-resolution physical map of equine homologs of HSA19 shows divergent evolution compared with other mammals. Mamm Genome 2005 Aug;16(8):631-49.
      doi: 10.1007/s00335-005-0023-1pubmed: 16180145google scholar: lookup