Analyze Diet
Veterinary microbiology1991; 27(2); 145-150; doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90005-z

Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: in vitro susceptibility to 39 antimicrobial agents.

Abstract: The minimal inhibitory concentrations of 39 antimicrobial agents for 54 isolates of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in vitro have been determined. The most active agents were penicillins, macrolides, tetracyclines, cephalosporins, lincomycin, chloramphenicol, and rifampicin. Most isolates were resistant to aminoglycosides, nitrofurans, polymyxins, nalidixic acid, and cycloheximide.
Publication Date: 1991-04-01 PubMed ID: 2063546DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90005-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about testing the effectiveness of 39 antimicrobial agents on Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and determining which agents are most effective.

Research Purpose and Methodology

In this study, scientists went about determining the minimal inhibitory concentrations of 39 different antimicrobial agents on 54 isolates, or strains, of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in a controlled lab environment (in vitro).

  • The Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is the smallest amount of an antimicrobial agent that can prevent bacterial growth. By identifying the MIC, researchers can determine which antimicrobial agents are capable of combating Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis.
  • In vitro, as opposed to in vivo, means the research was conducted in a controlled laboratory environment (like a Petri dish or test tube) instead of in a living organism.

Findings

The results of the research showed a spectrum of efficacy among the tested agents.

  • The most effective or ‘active’ agents against the bacterial species were found to be penicillins, macrolides, tetracyclines, cephalosporins, lincomycin, chloramphenicol, and rifampicin.
  • The bacteria were mostly resistant to aminoglycosides, nitrofurans, polymyxins, nalidixic acid, and cycloheximide.

Implications

These results have significant utility in the field of medicine and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of the infections caused by Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis.

  • Knowing which antimicrobial agents are most effective in inhibiting the growth of the bacterium helps in devising targeted treatment plans.
  • The observed resistance of the bacterium to certain antimicrobial agents draws attention to the need for perpetually developing new and effective antimicrobials, as well as using the current ones judiciously to prevent resistance.

Cite This Article

APA
Judson R, Songer JG. (1991). Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: in vitro susceptibility to 39 antimicrobial agents. Vet Microbiol, 27(2), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(91)90005-z

Publication

ISSN: 0378-1135
NlmUniqueID: 7705469
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 27
Issue: 2
Pages: 145-150

Researcher Affiliations

Judson, R
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Arizona, Tucson 85705.
Songer, J G

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
    • Cattle
    • Corynebacterium / drug effects
    • Drug Resistance, Microbial
    • Goats
    • Horses
    • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
    • Sheep

    Citations

    This article has been cited 6 times.
    1. Fouad EA, Abu Elnaga ASM, Kandil MM. Antibacterial efficacy of Moringa oleifera leaf extract against pyogenic bacteria isolated from a dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) abscess.. Vet World 2019 Jun;12(6):802-808.
    2. Silva WM, Carvalho RDO, Dorella FA, Folador EL, Souza GHMF, Pimenta AMC, Figueiredo HCP, Le Loir Y, Silva A, Azevedo V. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Changes in the Benchmark Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Biovar Equi Exoproteome after Passage in a Murine Host.. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017;7:325.
      doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00325pubmed: 28791255google scholar: lookup
    3. Oliveira A, Teixeira P, Azevedo M, Jamal SB, Tiwari S, Almeida S, Silva A, Barh D, Dorneles EM, Haas DJ, Heinemann MB, Ghosh P, Lage AP, Figueiredo H, Ferreira RS, Azevedo V. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis may be under anagenesis and biovar Equi forms biovar Ovis: a phylogenic inference from sequence and structural analysis.. BMC Microbiol 2016 Jun 2;16:100.
      doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0717-4pubmed: 27251711google scholar: lookup
    4. Rhodes DM, Magdesian KG, Byrne BA, Kass PH, Edman J, Spier SJ. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates (1996-2012).. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):327-32.
      doi: 10.1111/jvim.12534pubmed: 25586790google scholar: lookup
    5. Norman TE, Batista M, Lawhon SD, Zhang S, Kuskie KR, Swinford AK, Bernstein LR, Cohen ND. In vitro susceptibility of equine-obtained isolates of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis to gallium maltolate and 20 other antimicrobial agents.. J Clin Microbiol 2014 Jul;52(7):2684-5.
      doi: 10.1128/JCM.01252-14pubmed: 24829243google scholar: lookup
    6. Funke G, von Graevenitz A, Clarridge JE 3rd, Bernard KA. Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria.. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997 Jan;10(1):125-59.
      doi: 10.1128/CMR.10.1.125pubmed: 8993861google scholar: lookup