Analyze Diet
International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology2002; 52(Pt 3); 819-822; doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-3-819

Description of Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter thaueri sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter woesei sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter wolinii sp. nov.

Abstract: Formal nomenclature is proposed for five methanogens, isolated from horse, pig, cow, goose and sheep faeces, that represent four novel species of the genus Methanobrevibacter. The four species, Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter thaueri sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter woesei sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter wolinii sp. nov., are distinguished from each other by a lack of genomic DNA reassociation and from previously described members of the genus on the basis of differences in the sequences of the 16S rRNA genes.
Publication Date: 2002-06-11 PubMed ID: 12054244DOI: 10.1099/00207713-52-3-819Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper describes the naming and identification of four new species of Methanobrevibacter, a type of methane-producing microorganisms, found in the feces of various animals. These species have been distinguished from previous ones based on differences in their genetic makeup and characteristics of their 16S rRNA genes.

Identification and Naming of New Methanobrevibacter Species

  • The study documents the formal nomenclature proposal for five methanogens that were identified as new species of the genus Methanobrevibacter. These single-celled microorganisms belong to a category known as methanogens as they generate methane in their metabolic processes.
  • The methanogens were isolated from the feces of various animals including horses, pigs, cows, geese, and sheep, highlighting the wide range of hosts these microorganisms can inhabit.
  • The four novel species were named Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter thaueri sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter woesei sp. nov., and Methanobrevibacter wolinii sp. nov., where “sp. nov.” signifies a new species.

Genomic Differences From Existing Species

  • The four new species were distinguished from each other and from the previously identified Methanobrevibacter species due to differences in their reassociation of genomic DNA, showcasing the genetic uniqueness of these newly discovered species.
  • Further differentiation came from the sequences of their 16S rRNA genes – a specific gene present in all bacteria that helps in their identification and classification. Differences in the sequences of these genes among the new species indicated distinct species lineages.

Cite This Article

APA
Miller TL, Lin C. (2002). Description of Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter thaueri sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter woesei sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter wolinii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 52(Pt 3), 819-822. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-3-819

Publication

ISSN: 1466-5026
NlmUniqueID: 100899600
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 52
Issue: Pt 3
Pages: 819-822

Researcher Affiliations

Miller, Terry L
  • Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany 12201-0509, USA. terry.miller@wadsworth.org
Lin, Chuzhao

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Base Composition
    • Cattle
    • DNA, Ribosomal / analysis
    • Feces / microbiology
    • Geese
    • Horses
    • Methanobacteriaceae / classification
    • Methanobacteriaceae / genetics
    • Methanobacteriaceae / growth & development
    • Molecular Sequence Data
    • Phenotype
    • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
    • Sequence Analysis, DNA
    • Sheep
    • Swine

    Citations

    This article has been cited 38 times.
    1. Feehan B, Ran Q, Dorman V, Rumback K, Pogranichniy S, Ward K, Goodband R, Niederwerder MC, Lee STM. Novel complete methanogenic pathways in longitudinal genomic study of monogastric age-associated archaea.. Anim Microbiome 2023 Jul 17;5(1):35.
      doi: 10.1186/s42523-023-00256-6pubmed: 37461084google scholar: lookup
    2. Miller GA, Auffret MD, Roehe R, Nisbet H, Martínez-Álvaro M. Different microbial genera drive methane emissions in beef cattle fed with two extreme diets.. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1102400.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1102400pubmed: 37125186google scholar: lookup
    3. Volmer JG, Soo RM, Evans PN, Hoedt EC, Astorga Alsina AL, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Morrison M. Isolation and characterisation of novel Methanocorpusculum species indicates the genus is ancestrally host-associated.. BMC Biol 2023 Mar 22;21(1):59.
      doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01524-2pubmed: 36949471google scholar: lookup
    4. Huuki H, Tapio M, Mäntysaari P, Negussie E, Ahvenjärvi S, Vilkki J, Vanhatalo A, Tapio I. Long-term effects of early-life rumen microbiota modulation on dairy cow production performance and methane emissions.. Front Microbiol 2022;13:983823.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.983823pubmed: 36425044google scholar: lookup
    5. Ramírez GA, Keshri J, Vahrson I, Garber AI, Berrang ME, Cox NA, González-Cerón F, Aggrey SE, Oakley BB. Cecal Microbial Hydrogen Cycling Potential Is Linked to Feed Efficiency Phenotypes in Chickens.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:904698.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.904698pubmed: 35799838google scholar: lookup
    6. Dittoe DK, Olson EG, Ricke SC. Impact of the gastrointestinal microbiome and fermentation metabolites on broiler performance.. Poult Sci 2022 May;101(5):101786.
      doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101786pubmed: 35346496google scholar: lookup
    7. Hanišáková N, Vítězová M, Rittmann SKR. The Historical Development of Cultivation Techniques for Methanogens and Other Strict Anaerobes and Their Application in Modern Microbiology.. Microorganisms 2022 Feb 10;10(2).
    8. Brown JL, Swift CL, Mondo SJ, Seppala S, Salamov A, Singan V, Henrissat B, Drula E, Henske JK, Lee S, LaButti K, He G, Yan M, Barry K, Grigoriev IV, O'Malley MA. Co‑cultivation of the anaerobic fungus Caecomyces churrovis with Methanobacterium bryantii enhances transcription of carbohydrate binding modules, dockerins, and pyruvate formate lyases on specific substrates.. Biotechnol Biofuels 2021 Dec 10;14(1):234.
      doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-02083-wpubmed: 34893091google scholar: lookup
    9. Cristobal-Carballo O, McCoard SA, Cookson AL, Laven RA, Ganesh S, Lewis SJ, Muetzel S. Effect of Divergent Feeding Regimes During Early Life on the Rumen Microbiota in Calves.. Front Microbiol 2021;12:711040.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.711040pubmed: 34745024google scholar: lookup
    10. Leggieri PA, Kerdman-Andrade C, Lankiewicz TS, Valentine MT, O'Malley MA. Non-destructive quantification of anaerobic gut fungi and methanogens in co-culture reveals increased fungal growth rate and changes in metabolic flux relative to mono-culture.. Microb Cell Fact 2021 Oct 18;20(1):199.
      doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01684-2pubmed: 34663313google scholar: lookup
    11. Guindo CO, Davoust B, Drancourt M, Grine G. Diversity of Methanogens in Animals' Gut.. Microorganisms 2020 Dec 23;9(1).
      doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010013pubmed: 33374535google scholar: lookup
    12. Zhao L, Caro E, Holman DB, Gzyl KE, Moate PJ, Chaves AV. Ozone Decreased Enteric Methane Production by 20% in an in vitro Rumen Fermentation System.. Front Microbiol 2020;11:571537.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.571537pubmed: 33224114google scholar: lookup
    13. Blank PN, Barnett AA, Ronnebaum TA, Alderfer KE, Gillott BN, Christianson DW, Himmelberger JA. Structural studies of geranylgeranylglyceryl phosphate synthase, a prenyltransferase found in thermophilic Euryarchaeota.. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2020 Jun 1;76(Pt 6):542-557.
      doi: 10.1107/S2059798320004878pubmed: 32496216google scholar: lookup
    14. Rieke EL, Soupir ML, Moorman TB, Yang F, Howe AC. Temporal Dynamics of Bacterial Communities in Soil and Leachate Water After Swine Manure Application.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:3197.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03197pubmed: 30627124google scholar: lookup
    15. Poehlein A, Schneider D, Soh M, Daniel R, Seedorf H. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Members of the Genera Methanosphaera and Methanobrevibacter Reveals Distinct Clades with Specific Potential Metabolic Functions.. Archaea 2018;2018:7609847.
      doi: 10.1155/2018/7609847pubmed: 30210264google scholar: lookup
    16. Ziganshina EE, Mohammed WS, Shagimardanova EI, Vankov PY, Gogoleva NE, Ziganshin AM. Fungal, Bacterial, and Archaeal Diversity in the Digestive Tract of Several Beetle Larvae (Coleoptera).. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:6765438.
      doi: 10.1155/2018/6765438pubmed: 29850548google scholar: lookup
    17. Enzmann F, Mayer F, Rother M, Holtmann D. Methanogens: biochemical background and biotechnological applications.. AMB Express 2018 Jan 4;8(1):1.
      doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0531-xpubmed: 29302756google scholar: lookup
    18. Kamke J, Soni P, Li Y, Ganesh S, Kelly WJ, Leahy SC, Shi W, Froula J, Rubin EM, Attwood GT. Gene and transcript abundances of bacterial type III secretion systems from the rumen microbiome are correlated with methane yield in sheep.. BMC Res Notes 2017 Aug 8;10(1):367.
      doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2671-0pubmed: 28789673google scholar: lookup
    19. van de Pol JA, van Best N, Mbakwa CA, Thijs C, Savelkoul PH, Arts IC, Hornef MW, Mommers M, Penders J. Gut Colonization by Methanogenic Archaea Is Associated with Organic Dairy Consumption in Children.. Front Microbiol 2017;8:355.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00355pubmed: 28344572google scholar: lookup
    20. Danielsson R, Dicksved J, Sun L, Gonda H, Müller B, Schnürer A, Bertilsson J. Methane Production in Dairy Cows Correlates with Rumen Methanogenic and Bacterial Community Structure.. Front Microbiol 2017;8:226.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00226pubmed: 28261182google scholar: lookup
    21. Ziganshin AM, Ziganshina EE, Kleinsteuber S, Nikolausz M. Comparative Analysis of Methanogenic Communities in Different Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digesters.. Archaea 2016;2016:3401272.
      doi: 10.1155/2016/3401272pubmed: 28074084google scholar: lookup
    22. Pakpour S, Scott JA, Turvey SE, Brook JR, Takaro TK, Sears MR, Klironomos J. Presence of Archaea in the Indoor Environment and Their Relationships with Housing Characteristics.. Microb Ecol 2016 Aug;72(2):305-12.
      doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0767-zpubmed: 27098176google scholar: lookup
    23. Nobu MK, Narihiro T, Kuroda K, Mei R, Liu WT. Chasing the elusive Euryarchaeota class WSA2: genomes reveal a uniquely fastidious methyl-reducing methanogen.. ISME J 2016 Oct;10(10):2478-87.
      doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.33pubmed: 26943620google scholar: lookup
    24. Li Z, Wright AD, Liu H, Fan Z, Yang F, Zhang Z, Li G. Response of the Rumen Microbiota of Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) Fed Different Concentrations of Tannin Rich Plants.. PLoS One 2015;10(5):e0123481.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123481pubmed: 25955033google scholar: lookup
    25. Huynh HT, Pignoly M, Nkamga VD, Drancourt M, Aboudharam G. The repertoire of archaea cultivated from severe periodontitis.. PLoS One 2015;10(4):e0121565.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121565pubmed: 25830311google scholar: lookup
    26. Da Silva ML, Cantão ME, Mezzari MP, Ma J, Nossa CW. Assessment of bacterial and archaeal community structure in Swine wastewater treatment processes.. Microb Ecol 2015 Jul;70(1):77-87.
      doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0537-8pubmed: 25432577google scholar: lookup
    27. Cersosimo LM, Lachance H, St-Pierre B, van Hoven W, Wright AD. Examination of the rumen bacteria and methanogenic archaea of wild impalas (Aepyceros melampus melampus) from Pongola, South Africa.. Microb Ecol 2015 Apr;69(3):577-85.
      doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0521-3pubmed: 25351144google scholar: lookup
    28. Seedorf H, Kittelmann S, Henderson G, Janssen PH. RIM-DB: a taxonomic framework for community structure analysis of methanogenic archaea from the rumen and other intestinal environments.. PeerJ 2014;2:e494.
      doi: 10.7717/peerj.494pubmed: 25165621google scholar: lookup
    29. Su Y, Bian G, Zhu Z, Smidt H, Zhu W. Early methanogenic colonisation in the faeces of Meishan and Yorkshire piglets as determined by pyrosequencing analysis.. Archaea 2014;2014:547908.
      doi: 10.1155/2014/547908pubmed: 24678265google scholar: lookup
    30. Leahy SC, Kelly WJ, Li D, Li Y, Altermann E, Lambie SC, Cox F, Attwood GT. The Complete Genome Sequence of Methanobrevibacter sp. AbM4.. Stand Genomic Sci 2013;8(2):215-27.
      doi: 10.4056/sigs.3977691pubmed: 23991254google scholar: lookup
    31. Hook SE, Wright AD, McBride BW. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies.. Archaea 2010 Dec 30;2010:945785.
      doi: 10.1155/2010/945785pubmed: 21253540google scholar: lookup
    32. Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan LL. Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities under different dietary and host feed efficiency conditions, as determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010 Jun;76(12):3776-86.
      doi: 10.1128/AEM.00010-10pubmed: 20418436google scholar: lookup
    33. Evans PN, Hinds LA, Sly LI, McSweeney CS, Morrison M, Wright AD. Community composition and density of methanogens in the foregut of the Tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii).. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009 Apr;75(8):2598-602.
      doi: 10.1128/AEM.02436-08pubmed: 19218421google scholar: lookup
    34. Janssen PH, Kirs M. Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008 Jun;74(12):3619-25.
      doi: 10.1128/AEM.02812-07pubmed: 18424540google scholar: lookup
    35. Ufnar JA, Ufnar DF, Wang SY, Ellender RD. Development of a swine-specific fecal pollution marker based on host differences in methanogen mcrA genes.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 Aug;73(16):5209-17.
      doi: 10.1128/AEM.00319-07pubmed: 17586669google scholar: lookup
    36. Fricke WF, Seedorf H, Henne A, Krüer M, Liesegang H, Hedderich R, Gottschalk G, Thauer RK. The genome sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmanae reveals why this human intestinal archaeon is restricted to methanol and H2 for methane formation and ATP synthesis.. J Bacteriol 2006 Jan;188(2):642-58.
      doi: 10.1128/JB.188.2.642-658.2006pubmed: 16385054google scholar: lookup
    37. Dighe AS, Jangid K, González JM, Pidiyar VJ, Patole MS, Ranade DR, Shouche YS. Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of genus Methanobrevibacter.. BMC Microbiol 2004 May 5;4:20.
      doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-4-20pubmed: 15128464google scholar: lookup
    38. Lepp PW, Brinig MM, Ouverney CC, Palm K, Armitage GC, Relman DA. Methanogenic Archaea and human periodontal disease.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004 Apr 20;101(16):6176-81.
      doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308766101pubmed: 15067114google scholar: lookup