Analyze Diet

Detection of DNA in ancient bones using histochemical methods.

Abstract: We describe histochemical techniques for detecting DNA within the osteocytic lacunae of ancient bones. The bones examined were fragments of femurs from two human individuals found in the Pompeian C. I. Polybius house and fragments of metacarpals from two horses (Equus sp.) found in the Pompeian "Casti Amanti" house. Both buildings were buried by the 79 A. D. Vesuvius eruption. Fragments of femurs from a modern horse, a modern swine and a modern amphibian also were studied as controls. Some bone sections were stained with two different DNA-specific fluorochromes, 4'-'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and chromomycin A3 (CMA), while others were stained by the Feulgen reaction. All of the techniques gave a positive reaction within the osteocytic lacunae. Histological analysis of the undecalcified, ground and unstained sections agreed well with results of bone sections stained with either the fluorochromes or the Feulgen reaction. Bones showing good histology also were positive by our DNA-specific stain. Histochemical and histological analyses correlated well with the success of DNA extraction and amplification. Using conventional DNA-specific histochemical techniques in conjunction with histological analysis can be useful in the study of DNA extracted from ancient bone remains while reducing both the amount of time and cost.
Publication Date: 2000-08-19 PubMed ID: 10950172DOI: 10.3109/10520290009066488Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Historical Article
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores techniques for detecting DNA within the structural holes (osteocytic lacunae) found in ancient bones. In particular, the study focus on fragments of human and horse bones from historical Pompeii, testing various stains and analysis methods to efficiently and cost effectively identify DNA in these samples.

Study Subject and Methodology

  • The selected bones for examination were fragments from two human individuals discovered in the Pompeian house of C. I. Polybius and metacarpals from two horses, found in the “Casti Amanti” house in Pompeii. Both these ancient structures were buried during the 79 A. D. eruption of Mount Vesuvius.
  • For control comparison, the researchers also studied fragments of femurs from a modern horse, a modern swine and a modern amphibian.

Histochemical Applications

  • The researchers used various histochemical techniques in order to stain the DNA for improved visibility. Some of the sections from bone samples were stained with DNA-specific fluorochromes, namely 4′-‘6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and chromomycin A3 (CMA).
  • Other bone sections were stained with a classic genetic staining method called the Feulgen reaction which is highly specific to DNA. All of these staining methods provided a positive reaction for the presence of DNA within the osteocytic lacunae.

Histological Analysis

  • The researchers compared these results with a histological analysis, performing this analysis on undecalcified, finely ground and unstained sections of the bones. The results of the histological analysis were in agreement with the results from the stained samples using both fluorochromes or the Feulgen reaction.
  • Bones that showed good structural morphology (histology) were also positive for DNA presence when stained with the aforementioned techniques. This suggests a good correlation between the bone’s histological condition and the feasibility to retrieve DNA.

Research Significance

  • The findings of this study imply that employing traditional DNA-specific histochemical techniques combined with histological analysis can be an effective strategy when studying DNA extracted from ancient bone remains.
  • This approach additionally promises to reduce both time and cost, hence improving the efficiency of archaeological and paleontological research involving DNA extraction and analysis from ancient remains.

Cite This Article

APA
Guarino FM, Angelini F, Odierna G, Bianco MR, Di Bernardo G, Forte A, Cascino A, Cipollaro M. (2000). Detection of DNA in ancient bones using histochemical methods. Biotech Histochem, 75(3), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520290009066488

Publication

ISSN: 1052-0295
NlmUniqueID: 9107378
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 75
Issue: 3
Pages: 110-117

Researcher Affiliations

Guarino, F M
  • Department of Evolutionary and Comparative Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
Angelini, F
    Odierna, G
      Bianco, M R
        Di Bernardo, G
          Forte, A
            Cascino, A
              Cipollaro, M

                MeSH Terms

                • Animals
                • Carpus, Animal / anatomy & histology
                • Carpus, Animal / chemistry
                • Chromomycin A3 / chemistry
                • Coloring Agents / chemistry
                • DNA / analysis
                • Femur / anatomy & histology
                • Femur / chemistry
                • Fluorescent Dyes / chemistry
                • Histocytochemistry
                • History, Ancient
                • Horses / anatomy & histology
                • Horses / genetics
                • Humans
                • Indoles / chemistry
                • Intercalating Agents / chemistry
                • Italy
                • Paleontology
                • Rosaniline Dyes

                Citations

                This article has been cited 3 times.
                1. Kontopoulos I, Penkman K, Mullin VE, Winkelbach L, Unterländer M, Scheu A, Kreutzer S, Hansen HB, Margaryan A, Teasdale MD, Gehlen B, Street M, Lynnerup N, Liritzis I, Sampson A, Papageorgopoulou C, Allentoft ME, Burger J, Bradley DG, Collins MJ. Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0235146.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235146pubmed: 32584871google scholar: lookup
                2. Gaul JS, Winter E, Grossschmidt K. Ancient pathogens in museal dry bone specimens: analysis of paleocytology and aDNA. Wien Med Wochenschr 2015 Apr;165(7-8):133-9.
                  doi: 10.1007/s10354-015-0357-6pubmed: 25994097google scholar: lookup
                3. Di Bernardo G, Del Gaudio S, Cammarota M, Galderisi U, Cascino A, Cipollaro M. Enzymatic repair of selected cross-linked homoduplex molecules enhances nuclear gene rescue from Pompeii and Herculaneum remains. Nucleic Acids Res 2002 Feb 15;30(4):e16.
                  doi: 10.1093/nar/30.4.e16pubmed: 11842122google scholar: lookup