FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Development and Preliminary Validation of an Equine Brief Pa...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(2); doi: 10.3390/ani14020181

Development and Preliminary Validation of an Equine Brief Pain Inventory for Owner Assessment of Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis in Horses.

Abstract: An owner-completed questionnaire was designed to monitor the level of chronic pain and impact on quality of life in horses with osteoarthritis (OA). A standardized approach to develop and validate subjective-state scales for clinical use was followed. Scale items were generated through literature review, focus group meetings, and expert panel evaluation. The draft tool was tested for reading level and language ambiguity and piloted in 25 owners/caregivers of horses with osteoarthritis, with factor analysis performed on responses. The resulting revised questionnaire is currently undergoing validation in a larger sample population of 60 OA and 20 sound control horses. In the pilot group, 21 people (84%) found the questionnaire easy to complete and 22 people (88%) found it useful. It could be completed within 5 min by all participants. Readability scores (Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, SMOG index) indicated an English language reading level comparable to that of 6th to 7th grade in the U.S. system (age 11-12 years). Cronbach's alpha of all items in the tool was 0.957, indicating excellent inter-item correlation. Interim analysis for 23 OA horses from the sample population showed good test-retest reliability and higher scores compared to 5 control horses. Full validation must be completed for the instrument to be used in clinical practice.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-01-05 PubMed ID: 38254349PubMed Central: PMC10812429DOI: 10.3390/ani14020181Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers have developed a horse owner completed questionnaire for assessing chronic pain levels and its impact on the life quality of horses suffering from osteoarthritis. The preliminary results are promising and the tool is currently being validated with a larger sample size.

Design and Development of the Questionnaire

  • The researchers developed a questionnaire for horse owners or caregivers to record and monitor levels of chronic pain in horses suffering from osteoarthritis (OA), a chronic affliction leading to stiffness, lameness, and a diminished quality of life.
  • To ensure accuracy and clinical relevancy, the researchers followed a strict protocol: they reviewed literature on similar questionnaires, collected opinions and experiences during focus group meetings, and consulted experts in veterinary care.
  • The questionnaire underwent initial testing for readability and ambiguity of language.

Preliminary Testing and Results

  • The researchers piloted the draft tool with a sample group of 25 owners or caregivers of horses with osteoarthritis.
  • The responses relative to each item (or question) on the draft questionnaire were subjected to statistical analysis (factor analysis) to test the consistency and reliability of the tool.
  • Over 80% of the participants found the questionnaire easy to fill out and useful.
  • All participants could complete the form in less than 5 minutes.
  • The readability tests indicated that understanding the questionnaire required an English reading level comparable to a 6th to 7th grader in the United States education system.

Inter-Item Correlation and Test-Retest Reliability

  • A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.957 indicated excellent inter-item correlation for all items on the tool – that is, each item on the questionnaire consistently measured the same concept (chronic pain).
  • In the interim analysis of 23 horses with OA, the questionnaire showed a good test-retest reliability, meaning that the tool produced consistent results over time when repeated on the same subjects.
  • The questionnaire assigned higher scores to horses with osteoarthritis compared to control horses, confirming its potential to differentiate between OA and healthy horses.

Further Validation and Future Steps

  • The revised questionnaire is currently being tested on a larger sample population, 60 horses with OA and 20 healthy control horses to determine its validity.
  • The researchers affirm that a thorough validation is necessary before the tool can be recommended for use in clinical practice.

Cite This Article

APA
Howard DL, Lancaster B, de Grauw J. (2024). Development and Preliminary Validation of an Equine Brief Pain Inventory for Owner Assessment of Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis in Horses. Animals (Basel), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020181

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 2

Researcher Affiliations

Howard, Diane L
  • Independent Researcher, 01710 Thoiry, France.
Lancaster, Bryony
  • The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
de Grauw, Janny
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.

Grant Funding

  • D21EQ-508 / Morris Animal Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 48 references
  1. Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use?. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2018;36:707–714.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008pubmed: 29321111google scholar: lookup
  2. Hesselgard K, Larsson S, Romner B, Strömblad L.G., Reinstrup P. Validity and reliability of the Behavioural Observational Pain Scale for postoperative pain measurement in children 1–7 years of age. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2007;8:102–108.
    doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000257098.32268.AApubmed: 17273124google scholar: lookup
  3. Fuchs-Lacelle S, Hadjistavropoulos T. Development and preliminary validation of the pain assessment checklist for seniors with limited ability to communicate (PACSLAC). Pain Manag. Nurs. 2004;5:37–49.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2003.10.001pubmed: 14999652google scholar: lookup
  4. National Research Council (US) Committee on Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals. Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals. National Academies Press Washington, DC, USA: 2009.
    pubmed: 20662126
  5. McLennan K, Mahmoud M. Development of an Automated Pain Facial Expression Detection System for Sheep (Ovis aries). Animals 2019;9:196.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9040196pmc: PMC6523241pubmed: 31027279google scholar: lookup
  6. Gleerup K, Andersen P, Munksgaard L, Forkman B. Pain evaluation in dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;171:25–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023google scholar: lookup
  7. Mathews K, Kronen P.W., Lascelles D, Nolan A, Robertson S, Steagall P.V., Wright B, Yamashita K. Guidelines for recognition, assessment and treatment of pain: WSAVA Global Pain Council members and co-authors of this document. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2014;55:E10–E68.
    doi: 10.1111/jsap.12200pubmed: 24841489google scholar: lookup
  8. Wiseman-Orr M.L., Nolan A.M., Reid J, Scott E.M. Development of a questionnaire to measure the effects of chronic pain on health-related quality of life in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2004;65:1077–1084.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1077pubmed: 15334841google scholar: lookup
  9. Hielm-Björkman A.K., Rita H, Tulamo R.M. Psychometric testing of the Helsinki chronic pain index by completion of a questionnaire in Finnish by owners of dogs with chronic signs of pain caused by osteoarthritis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2009;70:727–734.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.6.727pubmed: 19496661google scholar: lookup
  10. Brown D.C., Boston R.C., Coyne J.C., Farrar J.T. Development and psychometric testing of an instrument designed to measure chronic pain in dogs with osteoarthritis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2007;68:631–637.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.6.631pmc: PMC2907349pubmed: 17542696google scholar: lookup
  11. Epstein M. Assessing Chronic Pain in Dogs. Today’s Veterinary Practice 2013; pp. 23–35.
  12. Allweiller S. Recognition and Assessment of Pain in Animals. Merck Manual Veterinary Manual 2023.
  13. Bussières G, Jacques C, Lainay O, Beauchamp G, Leblond A, Cadoré J.L., Desmaizières L.M., Cuvelliez S.G., Troncy E. Development of a composite orthopaedic pain scale in horses. Res. Vet. Sci. 2008;85:294–306.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.10.011pubmed: 18061637google scholar: lookup
  14. van Loon J, Back W, Hellebrekers L, van Weeren P. Application of a composite pain scale to objectively monitor horses with somatic and visceral pain under hospital conditions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2010;30:641–649.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2010.09.011google scholar: lookup
  15. Graubner C, Gerber V, Doherr M, Spadavecchia C. Clinical Application and Reliability of a Post Abdominal Surgery Pain Assessment Scale (PASPAS) in Horses. Vet. J. 2011;188:178–183.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.029pubmed: 20627635google scholar: lookup
  16. Sutton G.A., Dahan R, Turner D, Paltiel O. A Behaviour-Based Pain Scale for Horses with Acute Colic: Scale Construction. Vet. J. 2013;196:394–401.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.008pubmed: 23141961google scholar: lookup
  17. van Loon J, Jonckheer-Sheeny V, Back W, van Weeren P, Hellebrekers L. Monitoring Equine Visceral Pain with a Composite Pain Scale Score and Correlation with Survival after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery. Vet. J. 2014;200:109–115.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.01.003pubmed: 24491373google scholar: lookup
  18. van Loon J.P.A.M., Van Dierendonck M.C. Monitoring Acute Equine Visceral Pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A Scale-Construction Study. Vet. J. 2015;206:356–364.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.023pubmed: 26526526google scholar: lookup
  19. Taffarel M.O., Luna S.P.L., de Oliveira F.A., Cardoso G.S., de Moura Alonso J., Pantoja J.C., Brondani J.T., Love E, Taylor P, White K. Refinement and Partial Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale for Assessing Postoperative Pain in Horses. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:83.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0395-8pmc: PMC4393617pubmed: 25888751google scholar: lookup
  20. Maskato Y, Dugdale A, Singer E, Kelmer G, Sutton G. Prospective Feasibility and Revalidation of the Equine Acute Abdominal Pain Scale (EAAPS) in Clinical Cases of Colic in Horses. Animals 2020;10:2242.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122242pmc: PMC7760242pubmed: 33260428google scholar: lookup
  21. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach M.C. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a Pain Assessment Tool in Horses Undergoing Routine Castration. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e92281.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092281pmc: PMC3960217pubmed: 24647606google scholar: lookup
  22. van Loon J.P.A.M., Van Dierendonck M.C. Monitoring Equine Head-Related Pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP). Vet. Res. 2017;220:88–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.006pubmed: 28190503google scholar: lookup
  23. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine Discomfort Ethogram. Animals 2021;11:580.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pmc: PMC7931104pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
  24. van Loon J.P.A.M., Macri L. Objective Assessment of Chronic Pain in Horses Using the Horse Chronic Pain Scale (HCPS): A Scale-Construction Study. Animals 2021;11:1826.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061826pmc: PMC8234780pubmed: 34207290google scholar: lookup
  25. van Weeren P.R., de Grauw J.C. Pain in Osteoarthritis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2010;26:619–642.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.07.007pubmed: 21056303google scholar: lookup
  26. Ireland J.L., Clegg P.D., McGowan C.M., McKane S.A., Chandler K.J., Pinchbeck G.L. Comparison of Owner-Reported Health Problems with Veterinary Assessment of Geriatric Horses in the United Kingdom. Equine Vet. J. 2011;44:94–100.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00394.xpubmed: 21696434google scholar: lookup
  27. van Weeren P.R., Back W. Musculoskeletal Disease in Aged Horses and Its Management. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2016;32:229–247.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2016.04.003pubmed: 27449390google scholar: lookup
  28. Steiner N, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2009.
  29. Hutchinson N, Baird G.L., Garg M. Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses. Am. J. Med. 2016;129:637–639.
    doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.008pubmed: 26829438google scholar: lookup
  30. Stossel L.M., Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of Patient Education Materials Available online the Point of Care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2012;27:1165–1170.
    doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2046-0pmc: PMC3514986pubmed: 22528620google scholar: lookup
  31. Readable. Flesch Reading Ease and the Flesch Kincaid Grade Level. 2023.
  32. Readable. The SMOG Index. 2023.
  33. Pollard D, Wylie C.E., Verheyen K.L.P., Newton J.R. Assessment of Horse Owners’ Ability to Recognise Equine Laminitis: A Cross-Sectional Study of 93 Veterinary Diagnosed Cases in Great Britain. Equine Vet. J. 2017;49:759–766.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12704pubmed: 28543943google scholar: lookup
  34. Mullard J, Berger J.M., Ellis A.D., Dyson S. Development of an Ethogram to Describe Facial Expressions in Ridden Horses (FEReq). J. Vet. Behav. 2017;18:7–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.11.005google scholar: lookup
  35. Dyson S, Berger J.M., Ellis A.D., Mullard J. Can the Presence of Musculoskeletal Pain Be Determined from the Facial Expressions of Ridden Horses (FEReq)?. J. Vet. Beh. 2017;19:78–89.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.03.005google scholar: lookup
  36. Caron J. Osteoarthritis. In: Ross M., Dyson S., editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2011. pp. 655–667.
  37. Cleeland C.S., Ryan K.M. Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pan Inventory. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 1994;23:129–138.
    pubmed: 8080219
  38. Dixon W.G., Beukenhorst A.L., Yimer B.B., Cook L, Gasparrini A, El-Hay T, Hellman B, James B, Vicedo-Cabrera A.M., Maclure M. How the Weather Affects the Pain of Citizen Scientists Using a Smartphone App. npj Digit. Med. 2019;2:105.
    doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0180-3pmc: PMC6811599pubmed: 31667359google scholar: lookup
  39. Gingerich D.A., Strobel J.D. Use of client-specific outcome measures to assess treatment effects in geriatric, arthritic dogs: Controlled clinical evaluation of a nutraceutical. Vet Ther. 2003;4:376–386.
    pubmed: 15136979
  40. Lascelles B.D.X., Hansen B.D., Roe S., DePuy V., Thomson A., Pierce C.C., Smith E.S., Rowinski E. Evaluation of Client-Specific Outcome Measures and Activity Monitoring to Measure Pain Relief in Cats with Osteoarthritis. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007;21:410–416.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb02983.xpubmed: 17552444google scholar: lookup
  41. British Council. What Can a B1-Level Learner of English Do?. .
  42. Olcoz M., Cabezas M.Á., Rocca G.D., Gómez de Segura I.A. Translation to Spanish and linguistic validation of the Canine Brief Pain Inventory. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023;10:1203453.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1203453pmc: PMC10348357pubmed: 37456964google scholar: lookup
  43. Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297–334.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02310555google scholar: lookup
  44. Taber K.S. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Res. Sci. Ed. 2018;48:1273–1296.
    doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2google scholar: lookup
  45. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. In-Person Caretaker Visits Disrupt Ongoing Discomfort Behavior in Hospitalized Equine Orthopedic Surgical Patients. Animals 2020;10:210.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020210pmc: PMC7070845pubmed: 32012670google scholar: lookup
  46. Stewart D, Shamdasani P, Rook D. Focus Groups. 2nd ed. Sage Publishing; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2011.
  47. Cohn N. Who in the World Is Still Answering Pollsters’ Phone Calls. The New York Times Oct 12, 2022.
  48. Lusin N. Email Communication. 2023.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.