Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2018; 51(3); 336-342; doi: 10.1111/evj.13010

Differences in the equine faecal microbiota between horses presenting to a tertiary referral hospital for colic compared with an elective surgical procedure.

Abstract: The faecal microbiota is emerging as potentially important in intestinal disease. More research is needed to characterise the faecal microbiota from horses with colic. Objective: To compare the relative abundance of bacterial populations comprising the faecal microbiota in horses presenting for colic compared with an elective surgical procedure. Methods: Prospective observational clinical study. Methods: Admission faecal samples were collected from horses presenting for colic and elective surgical procedures. Faecal samples were extracted for genomic DNA, PCR- amplified, sequenced and analysed using QIIME. Species richness and Shannon diversity were estimated for each faecal sample. The extent of the relationship between bacterial communities (beta diversity) was quantified using pairwise UniFrac distances, visualised using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and statistically analysed using PERMANOVA. The relative abundance of bacterial populations between the two treatment groups were compared using ANCOM. Results: Faecal bacterial communities in horses presenting for colic had fewer species (P<0.001) and lower diversity (P<0.001) compared with horses presenting for elective surgical procedures. Based on the PERMANOVA analysis, there was a significant difference in the bacterial community composition between horses admitted for colic vs. elective procedures (P = 0.001). Based on ANCOM test, at the genus level, 14 bacterial lineages differed between the two groups. The relative abundance of known commensal bacteria including Prevotella, Clostridia, Lachnospiraceae were reduced whereas Christenellaceae, Streptococcus and Sphaerochaeta were increased in horses with colic when compared with elective cases. Conclusions: Relative low numbers and a diverse population of horses. Conclusions: Changes in bacterial populations in the faecal microbiota of horses presenting for colic observed in this study concurs with previous studies in veterinary and human patients with gastrointestinal disease. Future studies focusing on different causes of colic, chronic or recurrent disease, and the association with histological changes within the intestine are needed. The Summary is available in Portuguese - see Supporting Information.
Publication Date: 2018-09-22 PubMed ID: 30153353DOI: 10.1111/evj.13010Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Observational Study
  • Veterinary

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates how the types and abundance of bacteria in horse fecal matter differs between horses admitted for colic and those admitted for elective surgical procedures. The researchers found that horses suffering colic displayed less bacterial diversity and richness in their feces than the latter group, which may echo patterns seen in gastrointestinal disease in other species.

Objectives and Methods

  • The primary objective of this study was to compare the diversity and abundance of bacterial species in the fecal matter of horses brought in for colic versus those brought in for elective surgeries.
  • Admission fecal samples were taken from both sets of horses, wherefrom genomic DNA was extracted and analyzed using a suite of tools.
  • The richness and diversity of species in each sample was estimated, and the overall differences between the colic and non-colic samples were analyzed.

Results

  • The research showed that the horses presenting with colic had less diverse and fewer bacterial species in their fecal matter (P<0.001).
  • The bacterial community also differed significantly between the colic and non-colic samples (P=0.001).
  • At the genus level, 14 bacterial lineages differed between the two groups.
  • The prevalence of known helpful (commensal) bacteria, including Prevotella, Clostridia, and Lachnospiraceae, decreased in the colic samples, whereas Christenellaceae, Streptococcus and Sphaerochaeta increased.

Conclusion

  • The researchers concluded that the distinction in bacterial populations found in this study supports previous studies suggesting similar patterns in gastrointestinal disease in various species.
  • Future research should look into different causes of colic, recurrent or chronic diseases, and potential connections with changes within the intestine at a microscopic level.
  • The findings may represent an important step towards better predicting, diagnosing, preventing or treating colic in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Stewart HL, Southwood LL, Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Engiles JB, Pitta D. (2018). Differences in the equine faecal microbiota between horses presenting to a tertiary referral hospital for colic compared with an elective surgical procedure. Equine Vet J, 51(3), 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13010

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 3
Pages: 336-342

Researcher Affiliations

Stewart, H L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Southwood, L L
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Indugu, N
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vecchiarelli, B
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Engiles, J B
  • Department of Pathobiology, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pitta, D
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bacteria / classification
  • Bacteria / genetics
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Colic / microbiology
  • Colic / surgery
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / veterinary
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Prospective Studies
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics

Grant Funding

  • Raymond Firestone Trust Research Foundation Grant

Citations

This article has been cited 21 times.