Analyze Diet
Applied microbiology and biotechnology2019; 103(12); 5023-5037; doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09849-1

Do different livestock dwellings on single grassland share similar faecal microbial communities?

Abstract: Huge numbers of microorganisms reside in livestock faeces and constitute one of the most complex microbial ecosystems. Here, faecal microbial communities of three typical livestock in Xilingol steppe grassland, i.e. sheep, cattle, and horse, were investigated by Illumina MiSeq sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes comprised the majority of bacterial communities in three livestock faeces. Sordariomycetes, Leotiomycetes, and Dothideomycetes were dominant in fungal communities, as well as Methanobacteria and Methanomicrobia were dominant in archaeal communities in three livestock faeces. Similar fungal community dominated in these samples, with 95.51% of the sequences falling into the overlap of three livestock faeces. In contrast, bacterial communities were quite variable among three different livestock faeces, but a similar community was observed in sheep and cattle faeces. Nearly all the archaea were identified as methanogens, whilst the most diverse and abundant methanogens were detected in cattle faeces. Potential pathogens including Bacteroides spp., Desulfovibrio spp., and Fusarium spp. were also detected in livestock faeces. Overall, this study provides the first detailed microbial comparison of typical livestock faeces dwelling on single grassland, and may be help guide management strategies for livestock grazing and grassland restoration.
Publication Date: 2019-05-04 PubMed ID: 31055653DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09849-1Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses a comparative study of the microbial communities present in the feces of three different livestock animals – sheep, cattle, and horse – raised on the Xilingol steppe grassland.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers used Illumina MiSeq sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), both powerful methods for studying microbial communities.
  • Taking faecal samples from sheep, cattle, and horses, they investigated the bacterial, fungal, and archaeal communities present.

Key Findings

  • The bacterial communities present were mainly comprised of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, yet differed significantly between the three animals. However, sheep and cattle showed a more similar bacterial community compared to horses.
  • Fungal communities were dominated by Sordariomycetes, Leotiomycetes, and Dothideomycetes, showing a high similarity (95.51%) across all three types of livestock.
  • The archaeal populations were mostly Methanobacteria and Methanomicrobia, known as methanogens, with cattle feces demonstrating the most diverse and populous methanogens.
  • Potential pathogens such as Bacteroides spp., Desulfovibrio spp., and Fusarium spp. were detected in livestock faeces. These could pose a health risk to the livestock or be an indicator of their health status.

Significance of the Study

  • Through this comparison, the paper provides a deeper insight into the microbiology of livestock digestive systems, specifically how they differ between species and how they are affected by the shared grassland environment.
  • Understanding these microbial communities could potentially inform management strategies for livestock grazing and grassland restoration, especially with regard to optimizing livestock health and productivity.
  • The study equally helps to make a note of the presence of potential pathogens, which can be useful when formulating preventive measures against diseases.

Cite This Article

APA
Yang J, Wang Y, Cui X, Zhang Y, Yu Z. (2019). Do different livestock dwellings on single grassland share similar faecal microbial communities? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 103(12), 5023-5037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09849-1

Publication

ISSN: 1432-0614
NlmUniqueID: 8406612
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 103
Issue: 12
Pages: 5023-5037

Researcher Affiliations

Yang, Jie
  • College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100049, China.
Wang, Yanfen
  • College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Cui, Xiaoyong
  • College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Zhang, Yiming
  • Environmental Protection Bureau of Shunyi District, Beijing, 101300, China.
Yu, Zhisheng
  • College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100049, China. yuzs@ucas.ac.cn.
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China. yuzs@ucas.ac.cn.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Archaea / classification
  • Archaea / isolation & purification
  • Bacteria / classification
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Cattle / microbiology
  • China
  • Euryarchaeota / classification
  • Euryarchaeota / isolation & purification
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Grassland
  • Herbivory
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
  • Horses / microbiology
  • Livestock / microbiology
  • Microbiota
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Sheep / microbiology
  • Soil Microbiology

Grant Funding

  • XDB05010200 / Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Qin X, Xi L, Zhao L, Han J, Qu H, Xu Y, Weng W. Exploring the distinctive characteristics of gut microbiota across different horse breeds and ages using metataxonomics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2025;15:1590839.
    doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1590839pubmed: 40692682google scholar: lookup