Analyze Diet
Preventive veterinary medicine2026; 257; 107043; doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.107043

Economic assessment of burden of animal diseases in donkeys in Ethiopia.

Abstract: Working donkeys play a crucial role in Ethiopia's household and agricultural economies but they carry a massive, neglected burden of disease. There is currently limited understanding of the size and scale of this burden. This study aimed to quantify the burden of disease in working donkeys in Ethiopia using the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) metric. The AHLE measures all cause disease burden by estimating the gap between actual production and potential output in an ideal, animal disease-free scenario. An enterprise budget analysis was conducted under two health scenarios (current and ideal) using a stochastic dynamic population model which captures income generated, expenditure and losses. The difference between the enterprise budget from the current and ideal scenarios represents the AHLE. The models were parameterised using data from household surveys, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, expert elicitation, and secondary data from the literature. The total AHLE was estimated at USD 116 (95% PI: 96-142) per average donkey owning household per year which equates to 28% of an average households potential income from donkeys. When extrapolated across the national herd of 10.2 million donkeys this equates to an estimated absolute loss of USD 646 million (95% PI: 566-739). Morbidity losses constituted the largest component of the AHLE, exceeding 70% across all production systems (commercial, domestic agricultural and domestic pastoral) and in contrast spending on animal health contributed the smallest portion of the AHLE (0.8-2.1% across the three systems). External and non-infectious causes imposed the highest proportion of health-related losses, contributing significantly to production losses. Lameness, modelled separately as an example of attributing part of the AHLE to a specific disease, accounted for 12.8% of the total AHLE in the commercial system (USD 8 million). These estimates provide evidence to inform policies and interventions aimed at improving donkey health and welfare to the benefit of communities reliant on these animals.
Publication Date: 2026-10-05 PubMed ID: 42849111DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.107043Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study quantifies the economic burden of diseases affecting working donkeys in Ethiopia, using a metric that compares current productivity to an ideal disease-free scenario.
  • It calculates the overall financial losses to donkey-owning households and the national economy, highlighting the significant impact of health problems on donkey productivity.

Background and Importance of Donkeys in Ethiopia

  • Working donkeys are vital for Ethiopia’s agricultural households and broader economy, providing crucial labor and transport services.
  • Despite their importance, donkeys suffer from a heavy and often neglected burden of disease, which adversely affects their productivity and welfare.
  • There has been limited quantitative analysis of the scale and economic impact of these diseases until now.

Research Objective

  • The objective was to assess and quantify the disease burden in Ethiopian working donkeys using the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) metric.
  • AHLE measures the loss by comparing actual donkey production with a hypothetical ideal scenario where donkeys are free of all diseases.

Methodology

  • Modeling Approach:

    • Applied a stochastic dynamic population model to estimate income, expenditures, and losses from donkey-related enterprises.
    • Two health scenarios were considered: current health conditions versus an ideal disease-free state.
    • The difference between the enterprise budgets under these two scenarios represents the AHLE, or the economic loss due to disease.
  • Data Sources:

    • Household surveys, focus group discussions, and interviews with key informants provided primary data.
    • Expert elicitation helped parameterize disease and productivity impacts.
    • Secondary data from existing literature was also incorporated to strengthen model assumptions.

Key Findings

  • Economic Losses at Household Level:

    • The average economic loss due to donkey diseases per donkey-owning household was estimated at USD 116 annually (95% Prediction Interval: 96-142 USD).
    • This loss represents approximately 28% of the potential income that households could earn if their donkeys were disease-free.
  • National Level Impact:

    • When extrapolated to the national population of 10.2 million donkeys, the total economic loss is estimated at approximately USD 646 million annually (95% PI: 566-739 million USD).
  • Components of the Disease Burden:

    • Morbidity, or the loss due to illness reducing productivity, accounts for more than 70% of total AHLE across all production types: commercial, domestic agricultural, and pastoral systems.
    • Expenditure on animal health (treatments, preventive measures) represents a very small proportion of total losses—only 0.8 to 2.1% depending on the system.
    • External factors and non-infectious causes (such as injuries or environmental factors) cause the largest share of health-related losses, emphasizing the importance of these less-studied problems.
  • Focus Example – Lameness:

    • Lameness was modeled separately to illustrate disease-specific impact.
    • In the commercial donkey production system, lameness accounted for 12.8% of the total AHLE, equating to about USD 8 million in losses.

Implications and Recommendations

  • The study highlights a substantial economic burden from diseases in donkeys, underscoring the critical need for better animal health interventions.
  • Policy makers and stakeholders can use these estimates to prioritize investments in donkey health and welfare programs.
  • Targeted strategies to reduce morbidity—especially from non-infectious causes like injuries—could significantly boost donkey productivity and household incomes.
  • Improved veterinary services, education, and preventive care are likely necessary to mitigate these losses effectively.
  • Addressing donkey health also directly benefits communities reliant on these animals for their livelihoods, improving socioeconomic outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Asteraye GB, Chaters GL, Jobling R, Pinchbeck G, Meyer A, Larkins A, Knight-Jones TJD, Jemberu WT, Rushton J. (2026). Economic assessment of burden of animal diseases in donkeys in Ethiopia. Prev Vet Med, 257, 107043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.107043

Publication

ISSN: 1873-1716
NlmUniqueID: 8217463
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 257
Pages: 107043
PII: S0167-5877(26)00262-X

Researcher Affiliations

Asteraye, Girma Birhan
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Department of Livestock and One Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. Electronic address: Girma.Asteraye@ed.ac.uk.
Chaters, Gemma L
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; The Centre for Health Informatics, Computing and Statistics (CHICAS), Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Jobling, Ruth
  • Brooke: Action for Working Horses and Donkeys, London, United Kingdom.
Pinchbeck, Gina
  • Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Department of Livestock and One Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Meyer, Anne
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Episystemic, Lyon, France.
Larkins, Andrew
  • School of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J D
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jemberu, Wudu T
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Rushton, Jonathan
  • Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.