Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2013; 91(4); 1736-1744; doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5720

Effect of transportation on fecal bacterial communities and fermentative activities in horses: impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 supplementation.

Abstract: This study evaluated the effect of transportation on fecal bacterial communities and activities in horses with or without supplementation of live yeast and attempted to link those effects with changes in blood stress markers. Four mature horses were assigned to a crossover design and fed a basal diet (60:40 forage to concentrate; 1.45% BW on a DM basis), with or without supplementation, of 2 × 10(10) cfu/d of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077. After a 14-d adaptation to dietary treatments, the 5-d experiment started 1 d before transportation (d -1). At d 0, horses were simultaneously transported in a truck for 2 h. Feces were sampled 4 h after the morning meal of concentrate at d -1, 0 (immediately after transportation), and 3 for enumeration of the main functional bacterial groups and determination of fermentative variables. Within each dietary treatment, feces were pooled before DNA extraction and molecular analysis of the bacterial communities, using temporal temperature gradient electrophoreses (TTGE). Blood samples were collected at the same time for determination of white blood cells (WBC) counts and glucose and total protein concentrations. Regardless of dietary treatment, the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio increased during transportation (P < 0.01), indicating that horses were stressed. In both treatments, TTGE profiles were clearly different before and 3 d after transportation, and the percentage of similarity between profiles at d -1 and 3 was greater in supplemented horses compared with the controls. From d 0 to 3, the molar percentage of propionate increased and total concentration of VFA and the acetate + butyrate to propionate ratio decreased, regardless of dietary treatment (P < 0.01, P = 0.02, and P < 0.01, respectively), whereas pH decreased only in control horses (P = 0.03). Regardless of day of sampling, fecal concentrations of lactate-utilizing bacteria and cellulolytic bacteria were greater in supplemented horses than in control horses (P = 0.04 and 0.08, respectively). Our results indicate that transportation for 2 h disturbed the fecal bacterial ecosystem in horses that could increase the risk of triggering microbial dysbiosis on a longer term in the equine large intestine. Supplementing Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 could help reduce the negative impact of transportation on the fecal bacterial ecosystem.
Publication Date: 2013-02-13 PubMed ID: 23408806DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5720Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explores the impact of travel on horses’ gut bacteria and how supplementing their diet with a specific yeast strain – Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 – may help mitigate any negative effects. Changes in blood stress markers were also tracked alongside shifts in the fecal bacterial communities.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers used a controlled experiment involving four mature horses subjected to identical diet and transportation conditions. Their meal plans consisted of 60% forage and 40% concentrate, at 1.45% of their body weight based on dry matter basis. Some of the horses were complemented with the live yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077.
  • Post a 14-day adaptation period, a 5-day experiment began a day prior to the transportation event (assigned as day -1). On day 0, all horses were transported simultaneously in a truck for two hours.
  • The team gathered feces samples 4 hours after the morning meal on days -1, 0 (immediately post-transportation), and 3. These samples were analyzed to identify the primary functional bacterial groups and to measure fermentative variables.
  • Using the method of temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis (TTGE), they analyzed the DNA from these samples to further understand the bacterial communities.
  • At the same time frames, the researchers collected blood samples to determine white blood cell counts and concentrations of glucose and total protein. All these factors indicated the stress levels in horses.

Findings

  • Regardless of their diet, all horses showed an increase in the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes during transportation. This is indicative of stress.
  • The TTGE profiles of fecal bacteria varied before and after transportation. Horses who were fed the yeast supplement showed greater similarity in their bacterial makeup before and three days after transport compared to non-supplemented horses.
  • From day 0 to 3, there was a rise in the molar percentage of propionate, along with a decrease in the total concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and the ratio of acetate + butyrate to propionate, irrespective of the dietary regimen. The pH levels decreased in the control horses only.
  • Fecal samples from horses fed the yeast supplement had higher concentrations of lactate-utilizing and cellulolytic bacteria on all sampling days compared to those from control horses.
  • This research implies that even a two-hour transportation can disrupt the gut bacteria ecosystem in horses, potentially leading to long-term imbalance or dysbiosis in the large intestine. However, supplementing their diet with Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 could help minimize the negative effects of such stressors on the gut bacteria ecosystem.

Cite This Article

APA
Faubladier C, Chaucheyras-Durand F, da Veiga L, Julliand V. (2013). Effect of transportation on fecal bacterial communities and fermentative activities in horses: impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 supplementation. J Anim Sci, 91(4), 1736-1744. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5720

Publication

ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 91
Issue: 4
Pages: 1736-1744

Researcher Affiliations

Faubladier, C
  • URANIE, AgroSup Dijon, 21079 Dijon, France. c.faubladier@agrosupdijon.fr
Chaucheyras-Durand, F
    da Veiga, L
      Julliand, V

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Blood Glucose / analysis
        • Blood Proteins / analysis
        • Diet / veterinary
        • Dietary Supplements
        • Feces / microbiology
        • Female
        • Fermentation
        • Horses / metabolism
        • Horses / microbiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Leukocyte Count / veterinary
        • Male
        • Saccharomyces cerevisiae / metabolism
        • Stress, Psychological / immunology
        • Stress, Psychological / physiopathology
        • Transportation

        Citations

        This article has been cited 13 times.
        1. Theelen MJP, Luiken REC, Wagenaar JA, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Rossen JWA, Schaafstra FJWC, van Doorn DA, Zomer AL. Longitudinal study of the short- and long-term effects of hospitalisation and oral trimethoprim-sulfadiazine administration on the equine faecal microbiome and resistome.. Microbiome 2023 Feb 27;11(1):33.
          doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01465-6pubmed: 36850017google scholar: lookup
        2. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Sacy A, Karges K, Apper E. Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens.. Microorganisms 2022 Dec 19;10(12).
        3. Perricone V, Sandrini S, Irshad N, Comi M, Lecchi C, Savoini G, Agazzi A. The Role of Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Supporting Gut Health in Horses: An Updated Review on Its Effects on Digestibility and Intestinal and Fecal Microbiota.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 9;12(24).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12243475pubmed: 36552396google scholar: lookup
        4. Welch CB, Ryman VE, Pringle TD, Lourenco JM. Utilizing the Gastrointestinal Microbiota to Modulate Cattle Health through the Microbiome-Gut-Organ Axes.. Microorganisms 2022 Jul 10;10(7).
        5. Martinez RE, Leatherwood JL, Arnold CE, Glass KG, Walter KW, Valigura HC, Norton SA, White-Springer SH. Responses to an intra-articular lipopolysaccharide challenge following dietary supplementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product in young horses.. J Anim Sci 2021 Oct 1;99(10).
          doi: 10.1093/jas/skab272pubmed: 34619765google scholar: lookup
        6. Fernandes KA, Gee EK, Rogers CW, Kittelmann S, Biggs PJ, Bermingham EN, Bolwell CF, Thomas DG. Seasonal Variation in the Faecal Microbiota of Mature Adult Horses Maintained on Pasture in New Zealand.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 4;11(8).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11082300pubmed: 34438757google scholar: lookup
        7. Jiang G, Zhang X, Gao W, Ji C, Wang Y, Feng P, Feng Y, Zhang Z, Li L, Zhao F. Transport stress affects the fecal microbiota in healthy donkeys.. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Sep;35(5):2449-2457.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.16235pubmed: 34331476google scholar: lookup
        8. Arnold CE, Pilla R, Chaffin MK, Leatherwood JL, Wickersham TA, Callaway TR, Lawhon SD, Lidbury JA, Steiner JM, Suchodolski JS. The effects of signalment, diet, geographic location, season, and colitis associated with antimicrobial use or Salmonella infection on the fecal microbiome of horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Sep;35(5):2437-2448.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.16206pubmed: 34268795google scholar: lookup
        9. Theelen MJP, Luiken REC, Wagenaar JA, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Rossen JWA, Zomer AL. The Equine Faecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses and Ponies in The Netherlands: Impact of Host and Environmental Factors.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 12;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061762pubmed: 34204691google scholar: lookup
        10. Padalino B, Davis GL, Raidal SL. Effects of transportation on gastric pH and gastric ulceration in mares.. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Mar;34(2):922-932.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.15698pubmed: 32009244google scholar: lookup
        11. Salem SE, Maddox TW, Berg A, Antczak P, Ketley JM, Williams NJ, Archer DC. Variation in faecal microbiota in a group of horses managed at pasture over a 12-month period.. Sci Rep 2018 May 31;8(1):8510.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26930-3pubmed: 29855517google scholar: lookup
        12. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Hayes SH, Crum A, Flythe MD. Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota.. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0154037.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154037pubmed: 27128793google scholar: lookup
        13. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese JS. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs.. BMC Vet Res 2015 Feb 3;11:19.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0335-7pubmed: 25644524google scholar: lookup