Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2000; 32(4); 341-344; doi: 10.2746/042516400777032200

Effect of water restriction on equine behaviour and physiology.

Abstract: Six pregnant mares were used to determine what level of water restriction causes physiological and/or behavioural changes indicative of stress. Nonlegume hay was fed ad libitum. During the first week of restriction, 5 l water/100 kg bwt was available, during the second week 4 l/100 kg bwt and, during the third week, 3 l/100 kg bwt. Ad libitum water intake was 6.9 l/100 kg bwt; at 3 l/100 kg bwt water intake was 42% of this. Daily hay intake fell significantly with increasing water restriction from 12.9 +/- 0.75 kg to 8.3 +/- 0.54 kg; bodyweight fell significantly for a total loss of 48.5 +/- 8.3 kg in 3 weeks. Daily blood samples were analysed; osmolality rose significantly with increasing water restriction from 282 +/- 0.7 mosmols/kg to 293.3 +/- 0.8 mosmols/kg bwt, but plasma protein and PCV did not change significantly. Cortisol concentrations fell from 8.1 ng/ml to 6.4 ng/ml over the 3 week period. Aldosterone fell from 211.3 +/- 74.2 pg/ml to 92.5 +/- 27.5 pg/ml at the end of the first week. The behaviour of 4 of the 6 mares was recorded 24 h/day for the duration of the study. The only significant difference was in time spent eating, which decreased with increasing water restriction from 46 +/- 3% to 30 +/- 3%. It is concluded that water restriction to 4 l/100 kg bwt dehydrates pregnant mares and may diminish their welfare, but is not life- or pregnancy-threatening.
Publication Date: 2000-08-22 PubMed ID: 10952384DOI: 10.2746/042516400777032200Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the effects of water restriction on pregnant horses. It finds that limiting water intake causes physiological and behavioral changes associated with stress.

Research Methodology

  • The study utilized six pregnant mares to investigate the level of water restriction that brings about physiological and/or behavioral changes suggestive of stress.
  • Each mare was fed nonlegume hayad libitum(a diet provided freely and unrestricted) throughout the experiment.
  • The investigators systematically decreased the water intake of the mares over three weeks – 5 liters per 100 kg body weight (bwt) in the first week, 4 liters per 100 kg bwt in the second week, and 3 liters per 100 kg bwt in the final week. The average ad libitum water intake was 6.9 liters per 100 kg bwt, which means the most severe water restriction (3 liters per 100 kg bwt) only provided 42% of the typical ad libitum water intake.

Results

  • The results revealed a significant decrease in daily hay intake with increasing water restriction, falling from 12.9 +/- 0.75 kg to 8.3 +/- 0.54 kg. The bodyweight of the mares also significantly decreased, resulting in a total weight loss of 48.5 +/- 8.3 kg over the three weeks.
  • The study demonstrated physiological changes. The osmolality, a measure of concentration in bodily fluids, significantly increased with water restriction, going from 282 +/- 0.7 mosmols/kg to 293.3 +/- 0.8 mosmols/kg bwt. However, plasma protein and packed cell volume (PCV), two key blood parameters, didn’t show significant changes.
  • Two stress hormone levels – cortisol and aldosterone – were monitored throughout the experiment. Both hormones significantly decreased; cortisol fell from 8.1 ng/ml to 6.4 ng/ml, while aldosterone fell from 211.3 +/- 74.2 pg/ml to 92.5 +/- 27.5 pg/ml. This decline indicates the animals were stressed.
  • From a behavioural perspective, the study found the only significant difference was in the time the animals spent eating. This activity decreased with increasing water restriction – dropping from 46 +/- 3% to 30 +/- 3%.

Conclusion

  • The investigation concludes that restricting water intake to 4 liters per 100 kg bwt dehydrates pregnant mares and may affect their welfare negatively. Though the imposed water restriction is not life-threatening or leading to miscarriages, it does cause stress and discomfort to the animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Houpt KA, Eggleston A, Kunkle K, Houpt TR. (2000). Effect of water restriction on equine behaviour and physiology. Equine Vet J, 32(4), 341-344. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516400777032200

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 341-344

Researcher Affiliations

Houpt, K A
  • Department of Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6401, USA.
Eggleston, A
    Kunkle, K
      Houpt, T R

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Behavior, Animal
        • Blood Proteins / analysis
        • Energy Intake
        • Female
        • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Osmolar Concentration
        • Pregnancy
        • Stress, Physiological / veterinary
        • Video Recording
        • Water Deprivation / physiology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 8 times.
        1. Harvey AM, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 1;12(23).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12233385pubmed: 36496906google scholar: lookup
        2. Ayala MD, Carrillo A, Iniesta P, Ferrer P. Pilot Study of the Influence of Equine Assisted Therapy on Physiological and Behavioral Parameters Related to Welfare of Horses and Patients. Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 10;11(12).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11123527pubmed: 34944303google scholar: lookup
        3. Pederzani S, Britton K, Aldeias V, Bourgon N, Fewlass H, Lauer T, McPherron SP, Rezek Z, Sirakov N, Smith GM, Spasov R, Tran NH, Tsanova T, Hublin JJ. Subarctic climate for the earliest Homo sapiens in Europe. Sci Adv 2021 Sep 24;7(39):eabi4642.
          doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi4642pubmed: 34550733google scholar: lookup
        4. Bailey PA, Hague BA, Davis M, Major MD, Zubrod CJ, Brakenhoff JE. Incidence of post-anesthetic colic in non-fasted adult equine patients. Can Vet J 2016 Dec;57(12):1263-1266.
          pubmed: 27928173
        5. Jonckheer-Sheehy VS, Houpt KA. Management methods to improve the welfare of horses used in research. Lab Anim (NY) 2015 Sep;44(9):350-8.
          doi: 10.1038/laban.741pubmed: 26300095google scholar: lookup
        6. Ali MA, Kazzam E, Amir N, Nyberg F, Adem A. Effects of dehydration and blockade of angiotensin II AT1 receptor on stress hormones and anti-oxidants in the one-humped camel. BMC Vet Res 2013 Nov 19;9:232.
          doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-232pubmed: 24252635google scholar: lookup
        7. Mejdell CM, Simensen E, Bøe KE. Is snow a sufficient source of water for horses kept outdoors in winter? A case report. Acta Vet Scand 2005;46(1-2):19-22.
          doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-46-19pubmed: 16108209google scholar: lookup
        8. Viksten SM, Hartmann E, Schneller K, Steen M. Welfare of extensively managed Swedish Gotland ponies. Anim Welf 2023;32:e21.
          doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.20pubmed: 38487419google scholar: lookup