Analyze Diet
Theriogenology2021; 165; 1-9; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.02.001

Effects of intrauterine devices on proteins in the uterine lavage fluid of mares.

Abstract: Intrauterine devices block luteolysis in cyclic mares, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. To clarify the mechanisms, the protein profile of the endometrial secretome was analyzed using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE). Twenty-seven mares were classified according to whether they were inseminated (AI) or had an intrauterine device (IUD), a water-filled plastic sphere, inserted into the uterus on Day 3 after ovulation. Uterine lavage fluids were collected on Day 15 from pregnant inseminated mares (AI-P; n = 8), non-pregnant inseminated mares (AI-N; n = 4), and mares with IUD (n = 15). The IUD group was further divided into prolonged (IUD-P; n = 7) and normal luteal phase (IUD-N; n = 8) groups on the basis of ultrasound examinations, serum levels of progesterone and PGFM on Days 14 and 15, and COX-2 results on Day 15. Four mares from each group were selected for the 2D-DIGE analyses. Ten proteins had significantly different abundance among the groups, nine of the proteins were identified. Malate dehydrogenase 1, increased sodium tolerance 1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1, prostaglandin reductase 1, albumin and hemoglobin were highest in pregnant mares; T-complex protein 1 was highest in non-pregnant mares; and annexin A1 and 6-phosphogluconolactonase were highest in IUD mares. The results suggest that the mechanism behind the intrauterine devices is likely related to inflammation.
Publication Date: 2021-02-06 PubMed ID: 33601088DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.02.001Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research illustrates an examination of the potential mechanisms whereby intrauterine devices (IUDs) inhibit luteolysis in mares. It investigates changes in the protein profile of endometrial secretome, collected from various groups of mares, to help elucidate the underlying processes.

Research Methodology

  • The study involved 27 mares which were grouped based upon whether they were inseminated (AI) or had an IUD inserted on Day 3 post ovulation.
  • These groups included pregnant inseminated mares (AI-P; n = 8), non-pregnant inseminated mares (AI-N; n = 4), and mares with IUD (n = 15).
  • IUD mares were further sub-categorized into prolonged (IUD-P; n = 7) and normal luteal phase (IUD-N; n = 8) based on ultrasound examinations, serum levels of progesterone and PGFM (prostaglandin F metabolite) on Days 14 and 15, and COX-2 (cyclooxygenase-2) results on Day 15.
  • The analysis was conducted using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) on the uterine lavage fluids collected on Day 15.

Research Findings

  • The 2D-DIGE analyses identified ten proteins with statistically different abundance across the groups.
  • Of these proteins, malate dehydrogenase 1, increased sodium tolerance 1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1, prostaglandin reductase 1, albumin, and hemoglobin were highest in pregnant mares.
  • T-complex protein 1 was found in the greatest abundance in non-pregnant mares.
  • Annexin A1 and 6-phosphogluconolactonase were predominant in mares with IUDs.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The results indicate that the functioning of IUDs may be linked to inflammatory responses, suggested by the elevated presence of annexin A1 and 6-phosphogluconolactonase in the IUD mares.
  • This could be a vital discovery in understanding the effects of IUDs on the equine reproductive system and may potentially hold implications for the humans use of IUDs as well.

Cite This Article

APA
Rivera Del Alamo MM, Katila T, Palviainen M, Reilas T. (2021). Effects of intrauterine devices on proteins in the uterine lavage fluid of mares. Theriogenology, 165, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.02.001

Publication

ISSN: 1879-3231
NlmUniqueID: 0421510
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 165
Pages: 1-9

Researcher Affiliations

Rivera Del Alamo, M M
  • Unit of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Travessera Dels Turons S/n Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain. Electronic address: mariamontserrat.rivera@uab.cat.
Katila, T
  • Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: terttu.katila@helsinki.fi.
Palviainen, M
  • Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: mari.palviainen@helsinki.fi.
Reilas, T
  • Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, Finland. Electronic address: tiina.reilas@luke.fi.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Endometrium
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Intrauterine Devices
  • Luteolysis
  • Pregnancy
  • Therapeutic Irrigation / veterinary
  • Uterus

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Aurich C, Kaps M. Suppression of reproductive behaviour and gonadal function in female horses-An update. Reprod Domest Anim 2022 Sep;57 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):4-12.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.14129pubmed: 35467049google scholar: lookup
  2. Rivera Del Alamo MM, Reilas T, Lukasik K, Galvão AM, Yeste M, Katila T. Inflammatory Markers in Uterine Lavage Fluids of Pregnant, Non-Pregnant, and Intrauterine Device Implanted Mares on Days 10 and 15 Post Ovulation. Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 8;11(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123493pubmed: 34944269google scholar: lookup
  3. Mazzarella R, Sánchez JM, Fernandez-Fuertes B, Egido SG, McDonald M, Álvarez-Barrientos A, González E, Falcón-Pérez JM, Azkargorta M, Elortza F, González ME, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Embryo-Induced Changes in the Protein Profile of Bovine Oviductal Extracellular Vesicles. Mol Cell Proteomics 2025 Apr;24(4):100935.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100935pubmed: 40024377google scholar: lookup
  4. Veraguas-Dávila D, Zapata-Rojas C, Aguilera C, Saéz-Ruiz D, Saravia F, Castro FO, Rodriguez-Alvarez L. Proteomic Analysis of Domestic Cat Blastocysts and Their Secretome Produced in an In Vitro Culture System without the Presence of the Zona Pellucida. Int J Mol Sci 2024 Apr 14;25(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25084343pubmed: 38673927google scholar: lookup
  5. Piotrowska-Tomala KK, Jonczyk AW, Szóstek-Mioduchowska A, Hojo T, Żebrowska E, Katila T, Ferreira-Dias G, Skarzynski DJ. Intrauterine devices influence prostaglandin secretion by equine uterus: in vitro and in vivo studies. BMC Vet Res 2024 Feb 3;20(1):46.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03889-0pubmed: 38310284google scholar: lookup