Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2026; 22(1); 181; doi: 10.1186/s12917-026-05366-2

Effects of L-selenomethionine supplementation on nutrient digestibility and metabolism, antioxidant capacity, hormone levels, and fecal microbiota diversity in pregnant Yili mares during mid- to late gestation.

Abstract: L-selenomethionine (L-SeMet), a highly bioavailable organic form of selenium, plays a critical role in maintaining antioxidant homeostasis, regulating reproductive hormone secretion, and improving intestinal microbial ecology. Previous studies have demonstrated that appropriate supplementation with L-SeMet can significantly enhance the production performance and health status of ruminants. However, the nutritional regulatory mechanisms and physiological effects of L-SeMet in monogastric herbivores, particularly horses during mid- to late gestation, remain inadequately understood. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of different levels of L-SeMet supplementation on nutrient digestibility and metabolism, antioxidant capacity, reproductive hormone profiles, and fecal microbiota diversity in pregnant Yili mares. The results showed that selenium (L-SeMet) supplementation at 0.4, 0.6, or 0.8 mg Se mare⁻¹ day⁻¹ significantly increased apparent crude protein digestibility and serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity in pregnant mares compared with controls. Compared with the control group, the 0.6 and 0.8 mg Se mare⁻¹ day⁻¹ groups exhibited significantly higher neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility, nitrogen metabolism rate, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), catalase (CAT) activity, progesterone, and estradiol levels, while malondialdehyde (MDA) and urinary estrone levels were reduced. Fecal microbiota analysis further revealed an increased relative abundance of methanogens and Actinobacteriota, particularly in the 0.6 mg Se mare⁻¹ day⁻¹ group. Functional predictions indicated enrichment of microbial metabolic pathways related to carbohydrates and energy metabolism. Collectively, these findings indicate that selenium supplementation (provided as L-SeMet) enhances nutrient utilization, antioxidant defenses, and the endocrine milieu during pregnancy, with 0.6–0.8 mg Se mare⁻¹ day⁻¹ appearing to confer the broadest benefits; dose optimization and long term outcomes warrant further investigation.
Publication Date: 2026-02-14 PubMed ID: 41689060PubMed Central: PMC13011649DOI: 10.1186/s12917-026-05366-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study examined how supplementing pregnant Yili mares with L-selenomethionine, an organic selenium source, affects their nutrient digestion, metabolism, antioxidant capacity, hormone levels, and gut microbiota during mid- to late gestation.
  • The research found that L-selenomethionine improves protein digestibility, antioxidant enzyme activity, reproductive hormones, and beneficial gut microbial populations, with doses of 0.6–0.8 mg selenium per mare per day providing the most comprehensive benefits.

Background and Purpose

  • L-selenomethionine (L-SeMet) is a highly bioavailable organic form of selenium important for:
    • Maintaining antioxidant balance in the body
    • Regulating secretion of reproductive hormones
    • Enhancing gut microbial health and diversity
  • Previous research has shown beneficial effects of L-SeMet supplementation in ruminant animals but its impact on monogastric herbivores like horses, especially during pregnancy, is not well known.
  • This study aimed to fill that knowledge gap by investigating the effects of various doses of L-SeMet on several physiological and metabolic parameters in pregnant Yili mares between mid- and late gestation stages.

Methods

  • Pregnant Yili mares were supplemented daily with L-SeMet at doses of 0.4, 0.6, or 0.8 mg selenium per mare.
  • Measured parameters included:
    • Apparent nutrient digestibility (crude protein, neutral detergent fiber)
    • Nitrogen metabolism rate
    • Antioxidant enzyme activities: glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC)
    • Markers of oxidative stress: malondialdehyde (MDA)
    • Reproductive hormone levels: progesterone, estradiol, urinary estrone
    • Fecal microbiota diversity and composition via microbial sequencing and functional pathway prediction

Key Findings

  • Nutrient Digestibility and Metabolism:
    • All L-SeMet doses significantly increased crude protein digestibility compared to controls.
    • Higher doses (0.6 and 0.8 mg) also improved neutral detergent fiber digestibility and nitrogen metabolism rate.
  • Antioxidant Capacity:
    • Serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity was elevated with all supplementation levels.
    • At 0.6 and 0.8 mg doses, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) and catalase (CAT) activity were significantly higher, indicating enhanced antioxidant defenses.
    • Levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation, were reduced, particularly in higher dose groups.
  • Hormonal Effects:
    • Progesterone and estradiol levels were significantly increased with 0.6 and 0.8 mg Se supplementation, suggesting improved reproductive hormone regulation during gestation.
    • Urinary estrone, another estrogen form, was decreased in supplemented mares, possibly reflecting hormonal balance adjustments.
  • Gut Microbiota Changes:
    • The relative abundance of methanogens (microbes producing methane) and Actinobacteriota (a phylum containing many beneficial microbes) increased, most prominently at the 0.6 mg Se level.
    • Functional prediction analyses indicated enhanced microbial carbohydrate and energy metabolism pathways, suggesting improved gut microbial functionality.

Interpretation and Implications

  • L-selenomethionine supplementation positively influences multiple interconnected systems in pregnant mares:
    • Improved nutrient digestion ensures better nutrient availability for both mare and developing fetus.
    • Enhanced antioxidant capacity helps reduce oxidative stress, which is particularly important during pregnancy due to increased metabolic demands.
    • Hormonal improvements may support better reproductive health and fetal development.
    • Shifts in gut microbial populations and function suggest a healthier intestinal ecosystem that may contribute to overall wellbeing.
  • The findings support the use of 0.6 to 0.8 mg Se per mare per day as effective supplementation levels during mid- to late gestation.
  • Further research is needed to optimize dosing strategies and evaluate long-term effects on mare and foal health.

Cite This Article

APA
Li M, Lin J, Ma C, Wei G, Hu Q, Li X. (2026). Effects of L-selenomethionine supplementation on nutrient digestibility and metabolism, antioxidant capacity, hormone levels, and fecal microbiota diversity in pregnant Yili mares during mid- to late gestation. BMC Vet Res, 22(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05366-2

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 1
PII: 181

Researcher Affiliations

Li, Minghao
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China.
Lin, Jianwei
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China.
Ma, Chaoyu
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China.
Wei, Guoqiang
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China.
Hu, Qingsong
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China.
Li, Xiaobin
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China. 172387243@qq.com.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All animal procedures conducted in this study strictly followed the guidelines for the ethical treatment of animals in scientific research. The entire experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Xinjiang Agricultural University (Permit Number: 2020024). Before the commencement of the study, all pregnant mare owners were thoroughly informed of the purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits of the study. They voluntarily signed informed consent forms, agreeing to the inclusion of their animals in the research. All efforts were made to ensure the welfare and humane treatment of the animals throughout the experimental period. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 82 references
  1. Ma C, Gao Q, Zhang W, Azad MAK, Kong X. Alterations in the blood parameters and fecal microbiota and metabolites during pregnant and lactating stages in Bama mini pigs as a model. Mediators Inflamm 2020:8829072.
    pmc: PMC7607286pubmed: 33162832doi: 10.1155/2020/8829072google scholar: lookup
  2. Shang Q, Liu S, Liu H, Mahfuz S, Piao X. Impact of sugar beet pulp and wheat Bran on serum biochemical profile, inflammatory responses and gut microbiota in sows during late gestation and lactation. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:54.
    doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00573-3pmc: PMC8059298pubmed: 33879267google scholar: lookup
  3. Joo EH, Kim YR, Kim N, Jung JE, Han SH, Cho HY. Effect of endogenic and exogenic oxidative stress triggers on adverse pregnancy outcomes: preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, gestational diabetes mellitus and preterm birth. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(18):10122.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms221810122pmc: PMC8468091pubmed: 34576285google scholar: lookup
  4. Vincze B, Kutasi O, Baska F, Szenci O. Pregnancy-associated changes of serum biochemical values in Lipizzaner broodmares. Acta Vet Hung 2015;63:303–16.
    doi: 10.1556/004.2015.028pubmed: 26551420google scholar: lookup
  5. Olfati A, Moghaddam G, Kor N, Bakhtiari M. The relationship between progesterone and biochemical constituents of amniotic fluid with placenta traits in Iranian crossbred Ewes (Arkhar-Merino×Ghezel). Asian Pac J Trop Med 2014;7:S162–6.
    doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60224-8pubmed: 25312113google scholar: lookup
  6. Nabi F, Arain M, Hassan F, Umar M, Rajput N, Alagawany M. Nutraceutical role of selenium nanoparticles in poultry nutrition: a review. World Poult Sci J 2020;76:459–71.
  7. Kong XF, Ji YJ, Li HW, Zhu Q, Blachier F, Geng MM, Chen W, Yin YL. Colonic luminal microbiota and bacterial metabolite composition in pregnant Huanjiang mini-pigs: effects of food composition at different times of pregnancy. Sci Rep 2016;6:37224.
    doi: 10.1038/srep37224pmc: PMC5137017pubmed: 27917879google scholar: lookup
  8. Castillo C, Hernandez J, Bravo A, Lopez-Alonso M, Pereira V, Benedito JL. Oxidative status during late pregnancy and early lactation in dairy cows. Vet J 2005;169(2):286–92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.02.001pubmed: 15727923google scholar: lookup
  9. Genchi G, Lauria G, Catalano A, Sinicropi M, Carocci A. Biological activity of selenium and its impact on human health. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24:506.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms24032633pmc: PMC9917223pubmed: 36768955google scholar: lookup
  10. Surai PF. Natural antioxidants in avian nutrition and reproduction. .
  11. Liu Y, Wang C, Liu Q, Guo G, Huo W, Zhang Y. Effects of sodium selenite addition on ruminal fermentation, microflora, and urinary excretion of purine derivatives in Holstein dairy bulls. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2019;103:1719–26.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.13193pubmed: 31441137google scholar: lookup
  12. Zhang ZD, Wang C, Du HS, Liu Q, Guo G, Huo WJ. Effects of sodium selenite and coated sodium selenite on lactation performance, total tract nutrient digestion, and rumen fermentation in Holstein dairy cows. Animal 2020;14:2091–9.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000804pubmed: 32340650google scholar: lookup
  13. Wei JY, Wang J, Liu W, Zhang KZ, Sun P. Short communication: effects of different selenium supplements on rumen fermentation and apparent nutrient and selenium digestibility of mid-lactation dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2019;102:3131–5.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15455pubmed: 30738681google scholar: lookup
  14. Montgomery JB, Wichtel JJ, Wichtel MG, McNiven MA, McClure JT, Markham F. Effects of selenium source on measures of selenium status and immune function in horses. Can J Vet Res 2012;76:281–91.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2011.12.003pmc: PMC3460607pubmed: 23543954google scholar: lookup
  15. Daghigh Kia H, Saedi S, Hosseinkhani A. Effects of organic and inorganic selenium supplementation with vitamin E during the Flushing period on reproductive performance of Ghezel Ewes. Iran J Appl Anim Sci 2019;9:433–41.
  16. Mou D. Effect of hydroxy-analogue of selenomethionine supplementation during pregnancy on sow reproductive performance and its underlying mechanism (Master’s thesis). Sichuan Agricultural University 2021.
  17. Surai PF, Kochish II, Fisinin VI, Velichko OA. Selenium in poultry nutrition: from sodium selenite to organic selenium sources. J Poult Sci 2018;55:79–93.
    doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0170132pmc: PMC6756489pubmed: 32055160google scholar: lookup
  18. Surai PF, Kochish II, Fisinin VI, Juniper DT. Revisiting oxidative stress and the use of organic selenium in dairy cow nutrition. Animals 2019;9:462.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070462pmc: PMC6680431pubmed: 31331084google scholar: lookup
  19. Takahashi KW, Suzuki N, Ogra Y. Bioavailability comparison of nine bioselenocompounds in vitro and in vivo. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:506.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms18030506pmc: PMC5372522pubmed: 28245633google scholar: lookup
  20. Miranda S, Wang YJ, Purdie NG, Osborne VR, Coomber BL, Cant JP. Selenomethionine stimulates expression of glutathione peroxidase 1 and 3 and growth of bovine mammary epithelial cells in primary culture. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:2670–83.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1901pubmed: 19448000google scholar: lookup
  21. Latshaw JD, Osman M. A selenium and vitamin E responsive condition in the laying Hen. Poult Sci 1974;53:1704–8.
    doi: 10.3382/ps.0531704pubmed: 4472882google scholar: lookup
  22. Hashidhara R, Devegowda G. Effect of dietary Mannan oligosaccharide on broiler breeder production traits and immunity. Poult Sci 2003;82:1319–25.
    doi: 10.1093/ps/82.8.1319pubmed: 12943304google scholar: lookup
  23. Harrison GA, Tricarico JM, Elliott SA. Effect of Sel-Plex™ supplementation on milk production, composition, and somatic cell count of lactating dairy cows in commercial dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2005;88(Suppl 1):60.
  24. Ahn JH, Han GW, Nam IS. Effects of selenium injection on the reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows. J Anim Health Prod 2021;9:335–41.
  25. Upton JR, Edens FW, Ferket PR. Selenium yeast effect on broiler performance. Int J Poult Sci 2008;7:798–805.
    doi: 10.3923/ijps.2008.798.805google scholar: lookup
  26. Pavlović Z, Miletić I, Jokić Ž, Šobajić S. The effect of dietary selenium source and level on Hen production and egg selenium concentration. Biol Trace Elem Res 2009;131:263–70.
    doi: 10.1007/s12011-009-8369-ypubmed: 19352598google scholar: lookup
  27. Horwitz W, Latimer GW Jr. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. AOAC International 18th ed., rev. 2. International 8th ed., current through revision 2. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International; 2007.
  28. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583–97.
  29. Keulen JV, Young BA. Evaluation of acid-insoluble Ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J Anim Sci 1977;44:282–7.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1977.442282xgoogle scholar: lookup
  30. You JS, YingLi, JiaqiYang, XmoqinLiu ZZ, ZhigangXiong WW, Jingyuan. Rapid quantification of human urinary Estrogens and Estrogen metabolites by HPLC mass spectrometry. Microchemical Journal: Devoted Application Microtechniques all Branches Sci 2019;147:157–62.
  31. Frape D. Equine nutrition and feeding. 4th ed. Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:183.
  32. Sun XM. Effects of selenium supplementation on the production performance and related serum biochemical indexes of grazing sheep (Master’s thesis). Shihezi: (China) : Shihezi University. 2018:9-19.
  33. Toboła-Wróbel K, Pietryga M, Dydowicz P, Napierała M, Brązert J, Florek E. Association of oxidative stress on pregnancy. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020;2020(6398520).
    pmc: PMC7512072pubmed: 33014274doi: 10.1155/2020/6398520google scholar: lookup
  34. Abdelrahman MM, Kincaid RL. Effect of selenium supplementation of cows on maternal transfer of selenium to fetal and newborn calves. J Dairy Sci 1995;78:625–30.
  35. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and new world camelids. Washington (DC): National Academies; 2007.
    doi: 10.17226/11654google scholar: lookup
  36. Shi L, Xun W, Yue W, Zhang C, Ren Y, Liu Q. Effect of elemental nano-selenium on feed digestibility, rumen fermentation, and purine derivatives in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;163:136–42.
  37. Wang Z, Cui X, Chang S, Xiao X, Yan T, Hong W. Effect of different levels of selenium yeast on the antioxidant status, nutrient digestibility, selenium balances and nitrogen metabolism of Tibetan sheep in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Small Rumin Res 2019;180:63–9.
  38. Li Z, Dong Y, Chen S, Jia X, Jiang X, Che L. Organic selenium increased gilts’ antioxidant capacity, immune function, and changed intestinal microbiota. Front Microbiol 2021;12:723190.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.723190pmc: PMC8415750pubmed: 34484164google scholar: lookup
  39. Hossain A, Skalický M, Brestič M, Maitra S, Sarkar S, Ahmad Z. Selenium biofortification: roles, mechanisms, responses and prospects. Molecules 2021;26:881.
    doi: 10.3390/molecules26040881pmc: PMC7914768pubmed: 33562416google scholar: lookup
  40. Ríos JJ, Blasco B, Rosales MA, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Leyva R, Cervilla LM. Response of nitrogen metabolism in lettuce plants subjected to different doses and forms of selenium. J Sci Food Agric 2010;90:1914–9.
    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4032pubmed: 20602511google scholar: lookup
  41. Lei XG, Combs GF, Sunde RA, Caton JS, Arthington JD, Vatamaniuk MZ. Dietary selenium across species. Annu Rev Nutr 2022;42:337–75.
  42. Saifi H, Mabrouk Y, Saifi R, Benabdelkader M, Saidi M. Influence of selenium supplementation on carbohydrate metabolism and oxidative stress in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Med Biochem 2019;Advance online publication:1–7.
    doi: 10.2478/jomb-2019-0034pmc: PMC7526014pubmed: 33033452google scholar: lookup
  43. Le Bras M, Clément M-V, Pervaiz S, Brenner C. Reactive oxygen species and the mitochondrial signaling pathway of cell death. Histol Histopathol 2005.
    doi: 10.14670/HH-20.205pubmed: 15578439google scholar: lookup
  44. Çelebi Ş. Effect of dietary vitamin E, selenium and their combination on concentration of selenium, MDA, and antioxidant enzyme activities in some tissues of laying hens. Pakistan J Zool 2019;51(3):1155–61.
  45. Nambo Y, Nagata S, Oikawa M-A, Yoshihara T, Tsunoda N, Kohsaka T, Taniyama H, Watanabe G, Taya K. High concentrations of immunoreactive inhibin in the plasma of mares and fetal gonads during the second half of pregnancy. Reprod Fertility Dev 1996;8(8):1137.
    doi: 10.1071/rd9961137pubmed: 8981637google scholar: lookup
  46. Evans MJ, Irvine CH. Serum concentrations of FSH, LH and progesterone during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy in the mare.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1975;23:193–200.
    pubmed: 1060778
  47. Ren YS. Effects of selenium sources and levels on reproductive performance and GPx gene expression in the testes of goats. 2013.
  48. Yin D, Meng K, Xu H, Du L. The role of intestinal flora imbalance in the development of autoimmune thyroid diseases and the application of regulatory methods.. Shandong Med J 2024;64(33):97–101.
  49. Lekatz LA, Caton JS, Taylor JB, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA, Vonnahme KA. Maternal selenium supplementation and timing of nutrient restriction in pregnant sheep: effects on maternal endocrine status and placental characteristics.. J Anim Sci 2010;88(3):955–71.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2152pubmed: 19933425google scholar: lookup
  50. Kato H, Sugino N, Takiguchi S, Kashida S, Nakamura Y. Roles of reactive oxygen species in the regulation of luteal function.. Reviews Reprod 1997;2:81–3.
    doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0020081pubmed: 9414469google scholar: lookup
  51. Emma B, John H, Bruce S. Selenium-enriched foods are more effective at increasing glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity compared with selenomethionine: A meta-analysis.. Nutrients 2014;6(10):4002–31.
    doi: 10.3390/nu6104002pmc: PMC4210904pubmed: 25268836google scholar: lookup
  52. Conley AJ. Review of the reproductive endocrinology of the pregnant and parturient mare.. Theriogenology 2016;355–65.
  53. Wesson JA, Ginther OJ. Fetal and maternal gonads and gonadotropins in the pony.. Biol Reprod 1980;22(4):735.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod22.4.735pubmed: 6772243google scholar: lookup
  54. Makkawi AA, Hamra A, El-Abdala SB. Effects of vitamin E and selenium on leukocytic profile and reproductive performance in Awassi Ewes.. Univ Khartoum J Veterinary Med Anim Prod 2009;5:3–10.
  55. Sun LH, Zhang NY, Zhu MK, Zhao L, Zhou JC, Qi DS. Prevention of aflatoxin B1 hepatotoxicity by dietary selenium is associated with Inhibition of cytochrome P450 isozymes and up-regulation of 6 Selenoprotein genes in chick liver.. J Nutr 2015;146(4):655–61.
    doi: 10.3945/jn.115.224626pubmed: 26962192google scholar: lookup
  56. Terqui M, Palmer E. Oestrogen pattern during early pregnancy in the mare.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1979;27:441–6.
    pubmed: 289820
  57. Levy MJ, Boyne MT, Rogstad S. Marketplace analysis of conjugated estrogens: determining the consistently present steroidal content with LC-MS.. AAPS J 2015;17(6):1438–45.
    doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9805-xpmc: PMC4627451pubmed: 26242210google scholar: lookup
  58. Falany JL, Falany CN. Expression of cytosolic sulfotransferases in normal mammary epithelial cells and breast cancer cell lines.. Cancer Res 1996;56(7):1551–5.
    pubmed: 8603401
  59. Venkatachalam KV. Biochemical sulfuryl group transfer from 3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate (PAPS) versus phosphoryl transfer from ATP: what can be learnt?. Biochem Physiol 2016;01(05):0–0.
    doi: 10.4172/2168-9652.1000192google scholar: lookup
  60. Li X, Chen H, Zhao F, Xie J, Yang J, Yang K. Effects of supplementary sodium sulfate, trace elements, and their combination on the daily excretion of three Estrogen sulfates in pregnant Kazakh mares.. Chin J Anim Nutr 2018;30(10):3941–9.
  61. Sekulić N, Dietrich K, Paarmann I, Ort S, Konrad M, Lavie A. Elucidation of the active conformation of the APS-kinase domain of human PAPS synthetase 1. J Mol Biol 2007;367(2):488–500.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.025pmc: PMC1941671pubmed: 17276460google scholar: lookup
  62. Yang Q, Christensen MJ. Selenium regulates gene expression for Estrogen sulfotransferase and alpha2u-globulin in rat liver. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1998;64(5–6):239–44.
    doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(97)00201-xpubmed: 9618024google scholar: lookup
  63. Brümmer M, Hayes S, Earing J, McCown S, Lawrence LM. Effect of selenium depletion on oxidative stress in mature horses. J Equine Veterinary Sci 2011;31(5–6):257–257.
  64. Kachuee R, Abdi-Benemar H, Mansoori Y, Sánchez-Aparicio P, Seifdavati J, Elghandour MMMY, Jiménez Guillén R, Salem AZM. Effects of sodium selenite, L-selenomethionine, and selenium nanoparticles during late pregnancy on selenium, zinc, copper, and iron concentrations in Khalkhali goats and their kids. Biol Trace Elem Res 2019;191(2):389–402.
    doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1618-1pubmed: 30600505google scholar: lookup
  65. Liao H, Ding S, Hu D, Liu Q. Research progress on the regulation of cell signaling by trace element selenium. Chem Biol Eng Q 2004;04:10–2.
  66. . Diet and intestinal bacteria.. JAMA 2019;322(22):2252.
    doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.15638pubmed: 31821422google scholar: lookup
  67. Brestoff JR, Artis D. Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system. Nat Immunol 2013;14:676–84.
    doi: 10.1038/ni.2640pmc: PMC4013146pubmed: 23778795google scholar: lookup
  68. Qin S, Zhang K, Applegate TJ, Ding X, Bai S, Luo Y, Wang J, Peng H, Su Z, Xuan Y, Zeng Q. Dietary administration of resistant starch improved caecal barrier function by enhancing intestinal morphology and modulating microbiota composition in meat Duck. Br J Nutr 2019;123(2):172–81.
    doi: 10.1017/s0007114519002319pubmed: 31495347google scholar: lookup
  69. Cheng L, Shu Y, He M, Xia X, Li Y, Feng S, Wang X, Wu J. Effects of selenium-enriched yeast and on intestinal mucosal morphology and rectum microflora of Hu lambs. Chin J Anim Nutr 2018;30:4660–9.
  70. Cui X, Wang Z, Tan Y, Chang S, Zheng H, Wang H, Yan T, Guru T, Hou F. Selenium yeast dietary supplement affects rumen bacterial population dynamics and fermentation parameters of Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries) in alpine meadow. Front Microbiol 2021;12:663945.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.663945pmc: PMC8283570pubmed: 34276597google scholar: lookup
  71. Rother M, Quitzke V. Selenoprotein synthesis and regulation in archaea. Biochim Et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Gen Subj 2018;1862(11):2451–62.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.04.008pubmed: 29656122google scholar: lookup
  72. Mu BZ. The nomenclatural types of the orders Acholeplasmatales, Halanaerobiales, Halobacteriales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Planctomycetales, Prochlorales, Sulfolobales, Thermococcales, Thermoproteales, and verrucomicrobiales. Int J Syst Evolutionary Microbiol Pt 2005;1:55.
    doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63548-0pubmed: 15653928google scholar: lookup
  73. Ali AM. Effects of selenium supplementation on rumen microbiota, rumen fermentation, and apparent nutrient digestibility of ruminant animals: A review. Fermentation 2021;8:4.
  74. Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes 2016;7(3):189–200.
  75. Kim J, Van Soest PJ, Combs GF. Studies on the effects of selenium on rumen microbial fermentation in vitro.. Biol Trace Elem Res 1997;56(2):203–13.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02785393pubmed: 9164665google scholar: lookup
  76. Thauer RK, Kaster A-K, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R. Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation.. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008;6(8):579–91.
    doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1931pubmed: 18587410google scholar: lookup
  77. Steinbrenner H, Speckmann B, Pinto A, Sies H. High selenium intake and increased diabetes risk: experimental evidence for interplay between selenium and carbohydrate metabolism.. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2010;48(1):40–5.
    doi: 10.3164/jcbn.11-002fpmc: PMC3022062pubmed: 21297910google scholar: lookup
  78. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy B, Britt EB, Fu X, Wu Y, Li L, Smith J, DiDonato JA, Chen J, Li H, Wu GD, Lewis JD, Warrier M, Brown JR, Krauss RM, Tang WHW, Bushman FD, Lusis AJ, Hazen SL. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis.. Nat Med 2013;19(5):576–85.
    doi: 10.1038/nm.3145pmc: PMC3650111pubmed: 23563705google scholar: lookup
  79. Warrier M, Shih DM, Burrows A, Ferguson D, Gromovsky AD, Brown A, Marshall SM, McDaniel AL, Schugar RC, Wang Z, Sacks J, Rong X, Vallim T, Chou JW, Ivanova PT, Myers DS, Brown HA, Lee RG, Crooke RM, Graham M, Liu X, Parini P, Tontonoz P, Lusis AJ, Hazen SL, Temel RE. The TMAO-generating enzyme flavin monooxygenase 3 is a central regulator of cholesterol balance.. Cell Rep 2015;10(3):326–38.
  80. Martínez Fernández G, Jiao J, Padmanabha J, Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Seasonal and nutrient supplement responses in rumen microbiota structure and metabolites of tropical rangeland cattle.. Microorganisms 2020;8(10):1550.
  81. Ravelo A, Calvo Agustinho B, Arce-Cordero JA, Monterio HF, Bennet SL, Sarmikasoglou E, Vinyard JR, Vieira ERdeQ, Lobo RR, Ferraretto LF, Vyas D, Faciola AP. Effects of partially replacing dietary corn with molasses, condensed Whey permeate, or treated condensed Whey permeate on ruminal microbial fermentation.. J Dairy Sci 2022;105(3):2215–27.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20818pubmed: 34955246google scholar: lookup
  82. McGovern E, Kenny DA, McCabe MS, Fitzsimons C, McGee M, Kelly AK, Waters SM. 16S rRNA sequencing reveals relationship between potent cellulolytic genera and feed efficiency in the rumen of bulls.. Front Microbiol 2018;9(0):0–0.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01842pmc: PMC6097346pubmed: 30147683google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.