Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 105863; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105863

Effects of various perineural analgesia techniques on decreasing experimentally-induced lameness of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint.

Abstract: Recent evidence has shown that perineural analgesia may be less specific than previously thought. Objective: To compare the effects of four distal limb perineural analgesia techniques on resolving synovitis-induced lameness of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ). Methods: Nine horses had one MCPJ injected with 75ng of recombinant equine interleukin-1β (reIL-1β). Ten hours later, horses underwent one of two blocking patterns: (1) a palmar digital (PDNB) followed by an abaxial sesamoidean (ASNB) nerve block or (2) a palmar metacarpal (PMNB) followed by a palmar (PaNB) nerve block. Skin sensitivity was evaluated four minutes post block. Lameness was assessed subjectively (Modified AAEP Grade 0-5) and objectively at five and ten minutes following each block. After a one-week washout period, lameness was induced in the opposite MCPJ, and the opposite blocking pattern was performed. Results: Mean subjective lameness post-reIL-1β injection was grade 3.2 and was not significantly improved following PDNBs or ASNBs. However, in two horses (2/9) lameness improved by ≥50% five minutes post-PDNB. Mean subjective lameness significantly improved following PMNBs (grade 2.7 ± 0.8 at five and 2.2 ± 1.0 at ten minutes post-block; p < 0.03) and PaNBs (grade 1.5 ± 1.2 at five and 1.3 ± 1.3 at ten minutes post-block; p < 0.0001). Objective lameness scores followed a similar pattern, except the mean Q score did not significantly improve five minutes following the PMNB. Conclusions: MCPJ lameness was most reliably improved following both PMNBs and PaNBs. In some instances, MCPJ pain was substantially improved following a PDNB.
Publication Date: 2026-03-24 PubMed ID: 41887473DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105863Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated the effectiveness of four different nerve block techniques in reducing experimentally induced lameness caused by inflammation in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ).
  • It found that certain blocks (palmar metacarpal and palmar blocks) were more consistently effective at reducing lameness than others (palmar digital and abaxial sesamoidean blocks).

Background and Objective

  • Perineural analgesia involves injecting local anesthetics around specific nerves to relieve pain.
  • There has been recent evidence suggesting this analgesia may not be as precisely targeted as expected, impacting its effectiveness.
  • The study aimed to compare four nerve block techniques on reducing lameness caused by synovitis (joint inflammation) in the horse’s MCPJ.
  • The MCPJ, also known as the fetlock joint, is a common site for lameness in horses due to its critical role in movement.

Methods

  • Study subjects were nine horses with experimentally induced inflammation in one MCPJ, achieved by injecting 75 ng of recombinant equine interleukin-1β (reIL-1β) to simulate synovitis.
  • After 10 hours post-injection, each horse received one of two blocking patterns:
    • Pattern 1: Palmar digital nerve block (PDNB) followed by abaxial sesamoidean nerve block (ASNB)
    • Pattern 2: Palmar metacarpal nerve block (PMNB) followed by palmar nerve block (PaNB)
  • Skin sensitivity was tested 4 minutes after each nerve block to evaluate block onset/effectiveness.
  • Lameness was scored both subjectively using the Modified American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) scale (grade 0 to 5) and objectively via quantitative assessments at 5 and 10 minutes after each block.
  • After a one-week washout period to allow inflammation to subside, the procedure was repeated on the opposite MCPJ applying the alternate blocking pattern.

Results

  • Baseline induced lameness averaged a moderate grade 3.2 on the subjective scale after the reIL-1β injection.
  • PDNBs and ASNBs did not significantly improve mean lameness scores overall:
    • However, in 2 of the 9 horses, lameness improved by 50% or more five minutes after PDNB.
  • PMNBs led to a statistically significant reduction in subjective lameness scores:
    • Mean grades decreased to about 2.7 at 5 minutes and 2.2 at 10 minutes post-block.
  • PaNBs showed the greatest improvement with lameness scores dropping to 1.5 at 5 minutes and 1.3 at 10 minutes after block administration, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
  • Objective lameness measurements supported these results, mirroring the subjective scores, except that the mean quantitative lameness score (Q score) did not significantly improve 5 minutes after PMNB.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Perineural analgesia targeting the palmar metacarpal and palmar nerves consistently and effectively reduced lameness caused by MCPJ inflammation.
  • Some cases showed notable improvement after the palmar digital nerve block, suggesting it may help in certain situations but is less reliably effective overall.
  • The study highlights that while perineural analgesia is useful, its specificity varies based on the block location and the pain source.
  • For clinical and diagnostic purposes in equine lameness, PMNB and PaNB techniques should be considered more reliable for MCPJ-associated pain.
  • This information aids veterinarians in selecting appropriate nerve blocks for better management and diagnosis of joint pain in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Patterson HE, Yocom AF, Seabaugh KA, Kawcak CE, Contino EK. (2026). Effects of various perineural analgesia techniques on decreasing experimentally-induced lameness of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint. J Equine Vet Sci, 105863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105863

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 105863
PII: S0737-0806(26)00099-7

Researcher Affiliations

Patterson, H E
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 601 Vernon L Tharp Street, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Yocom, A F
  • Bayhill Equine, 123 Belmont Ave, Redwood City, California, 94061.
Seabaugh, K A
  • Department of Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 W Drake Ave, Fort Collins, CO, 80523.
Kawcak, C E
  • Department of Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 W Drake Ave, Fort Collins, CO, 80523.
Contino, E K
  • Department of Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 W Drake Ave, Fort Collins, CO, 80523. Electronic address: erin.contino@colostate.edu.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.