Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2024; 143; 105215; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105215

Environmental impacts and daily voluntary movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing.

Abstract: Pasture tracks are a modern equine housing trend often implemented as a weight control strategy due to the belief that they promote movement, though this is not proven experimentally. To test movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing, two experiments were performed using a track (0.2ha, 3.5m in width, 561 m total distance) created around the perimeter of a 2.0 ha pasture. In experiment 1, eight horses were paired and rotated between three treatment locations: track (T), small 2 ha pasture housed within the track (SP), and a larger 20 ha pasture on the same farm (LP). A GPS-equipped watch attached to the crown piece of a halter tracked movement of horses over a ten-week study as they rotated in pairs to each location, with testing in all locations occurring simultaneously. Environmental impacts of housing were evaluated by comparing vegetative biomass and soil relocation throughout the study. In experiment 2, the same horses (n = 8) were rotated in isolated pairs to T or SP, with only one pair of horses tested at a time to ensure that social influences did not confound movement data. Collective results indicate that horses traveled approximately the same distance in T as compared to SP or LP. However, detrimental environmental impacts resulted from the track, including a decrease in vegetative biomass and greater sediment deposition from runoff. Potential environmental impacts should be further investigated to develop best management practices to mitigate erosion caused by pasture tracks.
Publication Date: 2024-11-05 PubMed ID: 39510325DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105215Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how horses’ movement patterns and the environmental impact differ between pasture tracks and conventional pastures. The research indicates that horses travelled the same distances in both environments, but pasture tracks had a more negative environmental impact.

Research Methodology

The researchers conducted two experiments:

  • Experiment 1: In this test, eight horses were divided into pairs and moved between three different locations – a track, a small pasture enclosed within the track, and a larger, off-site pasture. The horses were monitored via GPS to track their movement in all the environments for a ten-week period. Also, the researchers observed the impact of these environments on vegetative biomass and soil relocation.
  • Experiment 2: The same eight horses were used again, but this time, movement data were recorded with only one pair of horses at a time in either the track or small pasture. This was done to eliminate potential effects of social influences on the horses’ movement patterns.

Research Findings

The study reveales:

  • The distances travelled by the horses in both the track and the small and large pastures were similar. This indicates that there wasn’t any significant difference in the voluntary movement of horses in the track or pastures.
  • However, pasture tracks were found to have a greater negative environmental impact, including reduced vegetative biomass and higher sediment deposition from runoff. This suggests that the use of pasture tracks may lead to environmental degradation due to accelerated erosion.

Research Implications

  • This study suggests that while horses’ movement levels remain constant across different types of environments, the choice of housing has a profound impact on the environment. Although pasture tracks are a popular housing trend, they may be detrimental to the environment and cause erosion.
  • Therefore, it is necessary to further explore potential environmental impacts of equine housing and develop best management practices, such as perhaps altering housing design or maintenance practices, to lessen the environmental impact.

Cite This Article

APA
Farmer Long J, Duberstein J, Costin K, Callaway T, Abrams A, Wassel B, Toal K, Duberstein K. (2024). Environmental impacts and daily voluntary movement of horses housed in pasture tracks as compared to conventional pasture housing. J Equine Vet Sci, 143, 105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105215

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 143
Pages: 105215
PII: S0737-0806(24)00221-1

Researcher Affiliations

Farmer Long, Jenna
  • University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States. Electronic address: jenna.farmer@uga.edu.
Duberstein, Jamie
  • Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Costin, Kayla
  • University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Callaway, Todd
  • University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Abrams, Alexander
  • University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Wassel, Brooklyne
  • University of Georgia Cooperative Extension, Athens, GA, United States.
Toal, Kimberly
  • University of Georgia Cooperative Extension, Athens, GA, United States.
Duberstein, Kylee
  • University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Housing, Animal
  • Animal Husbandry / methods
  • Environment
  • Male
  • Female

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.