Analyze Diet

Equine Escherichia coli endotoxemia: comparison of intravenous and intraperitoneal endotoxin administration.

Abstract: Certain physiologic and hematologic data were determined in ponies given Escherichia coli endotoxin by three routes: single IV dose, single intraperitoneal (IP) dose, and multiple IP boluses. In all ponies, the reaction was characterized by weakness, depression, peripheral circulatory abnormalities, and pyrexia. The pyrexia was more severe and was sustained in the ponies given multiple IP bolus endotoxin. Changes in packed cell volume, peripheral blood neutrophil, lymphocyte, and thrombocyte counts, and blood glucose were noticed in the three groups. Blood lactate and beta-glucuronidase values were determined and increases occurred only in the two IP endotoxin administration groups. A fibrinogen increase was observed in only the multiple IP bolus group. Attempts were made to correlate the lactate and beta-glucuronidase values with the severity and prognosis of the endotoxemia response. In general, the single IV bolus and, to a lesser extent, the single IP bolus endotoxin produced abrupt but transient responses. The multiple IP bolus endotoxin administration produced a more gradual and sustained response, which was more closely comparable with a clinical gastrointestinal disease problem than the other routes of administration produced.
Publication Date: 1979-07-01 PubMed ID: 389113
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study analyzes the effects of Escherichia coli endotoxin on ponies, comparing the results of varying routes of administration. The researchers found that different methods of delivery led to varied physical and blood-related responses, with multiple intraperitoneal injections resulting in the most severe and lasting symptoms that closely mirror clinical gastrointestinal disease.

Research Methods

  • The researchers administered Escherichia coli endotoxin to ponies in one of three ways: a single intravenous (IV) dose, a single intraperitoneal (IP – delivered to the body cavity) dose, and multiple IP doses.
  • Physiological responses and changes in blood values were monitored and recorded, including symptoms like weakness, depression, abnormalities in peripheral circulation, and fever.
  • Researchers also noted any changes in packed cell volume, peripheral blood neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, thrombocyte counts, and blood glucose across the three groups.

Findings

  • All ponies showed reactions to the endotoxin, but the severity and nature of the response varied depending on the route of administration.
  • Multiple IP injections resulted in a more sustained and severe fever compared to other methods.
  • Moreover, increases in blood lactate and beta-glucuronidase values were only observed in groups that received the endotoxin via IP dose, hinting at a greater physiological impact of this route of administration.
  • Peculiarly, only the group that received multiple IP injections witnessed a rise in fibrinogen—an indication of inflammation or significant tissue damage.

Interpretations and Implications

  • The results imply that the method of endotoxin administration dramatically impacts the physiological and hematological response of ponies.
  • A single IV bolus or a single IP bolus led to abrupt but fleeting reactions, while multiple IP boluses resulted in more gradual and persistent responses.
  • This sustained response from multiple IP boluses was found to more closely mimic a clinical gastrointestinal problem, making it a potentially useful model for studying such diseases in equine patients.
  • Therefore, the study’s findings may carry significant implications for how researchers administer endotoxins in experimental settings, presenting new avenues of investigation in equine veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Burrows GE. (1979). Equine Escherichia coli endotoxemia: comparison of intravenous and intraperitoneal endotoxin administration. Am J Vet Res, 40(7), 991-998.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 7
Pages: 991-998

Researcher Affiliations

Burrows, G E

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Blood Glucose / analysis
    • Endotoxins / administration & dosage
    • Endotoxins / blood
    • Endotoxins / toxicity
    • Escherichia coli
    • Fever / veterinary
    • Fibrinogen / analysis
    • Glucuronidase / blood
    • Horse Diseases / blood
    • Horse Diseases / chemically induced
    • Horses
    • Humans
    • Injections, Intraperitoneal
    • Injections, Intravenous
    • Lactates / blood
    • Leukocyte Count
    • Male
    • Neutrophils / cytology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 3 times.
    1. Magnusson CB, Poulsen KP, Budde JA, Hartmann FA, Aulik NA, Raabis SM, Moreira ASD, Darien BJ, Peek SF. Quality Control of Compounded Crystalloid Fluids for Intravenous Delivery to Horses. J Vet Intern Med 2018 Jan;32(1):469-473.
      doi: 10.1111/jvim.14864pubmed: 29114956google scholar: lookup
    2. Hazlett MJ, Goodrow DC, Lynch JA, Kierstead MK. Klebsiella oxytoca Septicemia due to Intravenous Administration of a Contaminated Amino-acid Solution to Three Horses. Can Vet J 1987 Jul;28(7):422-4.
      pubmed: 17422822
    3. Burrows GE. Dose-response of ponies to parenteral Escherichia coli endotoxin. Can J Comp Med 1981 Apr;45(2):207-10.
      pubmed: 7020894