Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2003; 223(7); 987-992; doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.987

Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system for use in dogs, cats, and horses.

Abstract: To evaluate a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) for use in dogs, cats, and horses. Methods: Prospective clinical study. Animals-7 horses, 3 cats, and 4 dogs that were clinically normal and 1 horse, 2 cats, and 3 dogs with diabetes mellitus. Methods: Interstitial glucose concentrations were monitored and recorded every 5 minutes by use of a CGMS. Interstitial glucose concentrations were compared with whole blood glucose concentrations as determined by a point-of-care glucose meter. Interstitial glucose concentrations were also monitored in 2 clinically normal horses after oral and i.v. administration of glucose. Results: There was a positive correlation between interstitial and whole blood glucose concentrations for clinically normal dogs, cats, and horses and those with diabetes mellitus. Events such as feeding, glucose or insulin administration, restraint, and transport to the clinic were recorded by the owner or clinician and could be identified on the graph and associated with time of occurrence. Conclusions: Our data indicate that use of CGMS is valid for dogs, cats, and horses. This system alleviated the need for multiple blood samples and the stress associated with obtaining those samples. Because hospitalization was not required, information obtained from the CGMS provided a more accurate assessment of the animal's glucose concentrations for an extended period, compared with measurement of blood glucose concentrations. Use of the CGMS will promote the diagnostic and research potential of serial glucose monitoring.
Publication Date: 2003-10-14 PubMed ID: 14552487DOI: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.987Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper evaluated a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to monitor glucose levels in dogs, cats, and horses, both those with normal health conditions and those diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. The study concluded that the CGMS is a valid tool for glucose monitoring in these animals, reducing the stress of multiple blood samples and eliminating the need for hospitalization.

Methods and Animal Subjects

  • The research was carried out in the form of a prospective clinical study, which means it was designed and carried out to test a hypothesis about a specific health problem.
  • The animal subjects used for the study consisted of 7 horses, 3 cats, and 4 dogs that were clinically normal as well as 1 horse, 2 cats, and 3 dogs that had been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus.

Glucose Monitoring and Comparison

  • The continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) was used to monitor and record interstitial glucose concentrations (that is, the concentration of glucose in the fluid between cells) every 5 minutes.
  • The results from the CGMS were then compared with whole blood glucose concentrations, as determined by a point-of-care glucose meter (a device that allows for immediate results and treatment plans).
  • In addition, interstitial glucose concentrations were also monitored in two clinically normal horses following oral and intravenous administration of glucose.

Results and Findings

  • The study found that there was a positive correlation between interstitial and whole blood glucose concentrations in both healthy animals and animals with diabetes mellitus.
  • Significant events such as feeding, insulin administration, restraint, and transport to the clinic were all recorded and could be traced on a graph, helping to contextualize fluctuations in glucose levels.

Conclusions

  • Based on the study findings, the authors conclude that the CGMS is a valid and useful tool for glucose monitoring in dogs, cats, and horses.
  • Using this system eliminated the stress associated with drawing multiple blood samples and the need for hospitalization, both of which can have a significant impact on glucose levels.
  • The CGMS gave a clearer and more accurate picture of the animal’s glucose concentration over an extended period, improving upon the traditional method of measuring blood glucose concentrations at singular points in time.
  • The researchers also suggested that the use of CGMS can enhance diagnostic and research possibilities in the field of serial glucose monitoring.

Cite This Article

APA
Wiedmeyer CE, Johnson PJ, Cohn LA, Meadows RL. (2003). Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system for use in dogs, cats, and horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 223(7), 987-992. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.987

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 223
Issue: 7
Pages: 987-992

Researcher Affiliations

Wiedmeyer, Charles E
  • Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Johnson, Philip J
    Cohn, Leah A
      Meadows, Richard L

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Blood Glucose / analysis
        • Cat Diseases / blood
        • Cat Diseases / diagnosis
        • Cats
        • Diabetes Mellitus / blood
        • Diabetes Mellitus / diagnosis
        • Diabetes Mellitus / veterinary
        • Dog Diseases / blood
        • Dog Diseases / diagnosis
        • Dogs
        • Horse Diseases / blood
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horses
        • Monitoring, Physiologic / instrumentation
        • Monitoring, Physiologic / veterinary
        • Prospective Studies
        • Sensitivity and Specificity

        Citations

        This article has been cited 20 times.
        1. Byrd MKH, Arneson AG, Soffa DR, Stewart JW, Rhoads ML. Human continuous glucose monitors for measurement of glucose in dairy cows. JDS Commun 2022 Jan;3(1):78-83.
          doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2021-0147pubmed: 36340679google scholar: lookup
        2. Knies M, Teske E, Kooistra H. Evaluation of the FreeStyle Libre, a flash glucose monitoring system, in client-owned cats with diabetes mellitus. J Feline Med Surg 2022 Aug;24(8):e223-e231.
          doi: 10.1177/1098612X221104051pubmed: 35762266google scholar: lookup
        3. Wong D, Malik C, Dembek K, Estell K, Marchitello M, Wilson K. Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system in neonatal foals. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Jul;35(4):1995-2001.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.16186pubmed: 34096103google scholar: lookup
        4. Del Baldo F, Fracassi F, Pires J, Tardo AM, Malerba E, Manassero E, Gilor C. Accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system in cats and determination of the time lag between blood glucose and interstitial glucose concentrations. J Vet Intern Med 2021 May;35(3):1279-1287.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.16122pubmed: 33991129google scholar: lookup
        5. Vitale V, Berg LC, Larsen BB, Hannesdottir A, Dybdahl Thomsen P, Laursen SH, Verwilghen D, van Galen G. Blood glucose and subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill horses: A pilot study. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0247561.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247561pubmed: 33626099google scholar: lookup
        6. Del Baldo F, Diana A, Canton C, Linta N, Chiocchetti R, Fracassi F. The Influence of Skin Thickness on Flash Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy in Dogs with Diabetes Mellitus. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 5;11(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11020408pubmed: 33562672google scholar: lookup
        7. Ober RA, Geist GE. Assessment of a Noninvasive Chronic Glucose Monitoring System in Euglycemic and Diabetic Swine (Sus scrofa). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2020 Apr 13;59(4):430-7.
        8. Malerba E, Cattani C, Del Baldo F, Carotenuto G, Corradini S, Golinelli S, Drudi I, Fracassi F. Accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system in dogs with diabetic ketoacidosis. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Jan;34(1):83-91.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.15657pubmed: 31725202google scholar: lookup
        9. Asaro NJ, Berendt KD, Zijlstra RT, Brewer J, Shoveller AK. Carbohydrate level and source have minimal effects on feline energy and macronutrient metabolism. J Anim Sci 2018 Dec 3;96(12):5052-5063.
          doi: 10.1093/jas/sky365pubmed: 30219852google scholar: lookup
        10. Bonnet X, El Hassani MS, Lecq S, Michel CL, El Mouden EH, Michaud B, Slimani T. Blood mixtures: impact of puncture site on blood parameters. J Comp Physiol B 2016 Aug;186(6):787-800.
          doi: 10.1007/s00360-016-0993-1pubmed: 27146147google scholar: lookup
        11. Byers SR, Beemer OM, Lear AS, Callan RJ. Evaluation of glucose response to 3 types of insulin using a continuous glucose monitoring system in healthy alpacas. J Vet Intern Med 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):1613-20.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.12389pubmed: 24965884google scholar: lookup
        12. Johnson PJ, Wiedmeyer CE, LaCarrubba A, Ganjam VK, Messer NT 4th. Diabetes, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome in horses. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012 May 1;6(3):534-40.
          doi: 10.1177/193229681200600307pubmed: 22768883google scholar: lookup
        13. Cook AK. Monitoring methods for dogs and cats with diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012 May 1;6(3):491-5.
          doi: 10.1177/193229681200600302pubmed: 22768878google scholar: lookup
        14. Johnson PJ, Wiedmeyer CE, Messer NT, Ganjam VK. Medical implications of obesity in horses--lessons for human obesity. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009 Jan;3(1):163-74.
          doi: 10.1177/193229680900300119pubmed: 20046661google scholar: lookup
        15. Kvist PH, Jensen HE. Recent advances in continuous glucose monitoring: biocompatibility of glucose sensors for implantation in subcutis. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2007 Sep;1(5):746-52.
          doi: 10.1177/193229680700100520pubmed: 19885143google scholar: lookup
        16. Schuppisser C, Ferri F, Reusch CE, Glaus T, Zini E. Comparison of continuous glucose monitoring profiles during the day and night in healthy and diabetic cats. J Feline Med Surg 2025 Nov;27(11):1098612X251376606.
          doi: 10.1177/1098612X251376606pubmed: 41204810google scholar: lookup
        17. Velineni S, Schiltz P, Chang KH, Peng YM, Cowles B. Accuracy and validation of a point-of-care blood glucose monitoring system for use in horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1436714.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1436714pubmed: 39450406google scholar: lookup
        18. Eiermann JS, Hazuchova K, Vidondo B, Campos M, Schuller S, Cui Y. Comparison between a Flash Glucose Monitoring System and a Portable Blood Glucose Meter for Monitoring of Cats with Diabetic Ketosis or Ketoacidosis. Animals (Basel) 2024 Sep 26;14(19).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14192787pubmed: 39409736google scholar: lookup
        19. Hafner M, Lutz TA, Reusch CE, Zini E. Evaluation of sensor sites for continuous glucose monitoring in cats with diabetes mellitus. J Feline Med Surg 2013 Feb;15(2):117-23.
          doi: 10.1177/1098612X12463925pubmed: 23064996google scholar: lookup
        20. Ristic JM, Herrtage ME, Walti-Lauger SM, Slater LA, Church DB, Davison LJ, Catchpole B. Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system in cats with diabetes mellitus. J Feline Med Surg 2005 Jun;7(3):153-62.
          doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2004.07.006pubmed: 15922222google scholar: lookup