Analyze Diet
Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)2015; 129(4); 366-376; doi: 10.1037/a0039677

Evolutionary constraints on equid domestication: Comparison of flight initiation distances of wild horses (Equus caballus ferus) and plains zebras (Equus quagga).

Abstract: Habituation to humans was an essential component of horse (Equus caballus ferus) domestication, with the nondomestication of zebras (Equus quagga) possibly reflecting an adaptive constraint on habituation. We present the human hunting hypothesis, arguing that ancestral humans hunted African animals, including zebras, long enough to promote a persistent wariness of humans, whereas a briefer period of hunting horses in Central Asia influenced by glacial cycles was unlikely to produce an equally persistent wariness. An alternative habituation to humans hypothesis, prompted by field observations, posits that zebras can habituate well to nonthreatening humans given sufficient exposure. If so, other factors must account for zebra nondomestication. To examine these hypotheses, we compared the flight initiation distances (FIDs) of wild horses in the United States and plains zebras in Africa to a human approaching on foot (N = 87). We compared the flight behavior of both species at sites with low and high exposure to humans (mean humans/acre = .004 and .209, respectively). Analyses revealed a significant interaction (p = .0001) between equid species and level of human exposure. The mean FIDs of horses (146 m) and zebras (105 m) with low human exposure did not differ appreciably (p = .412), but these distances were substantially longer (p < .0001) than those of horses (17 m) and zebras (37 m) with high human exposure that did differ significantly (p < .0001). The finding that plains zebras habituate less completely to humans than horses do might reflect an adaptive response to historical hunting and partly explain their resistance to domestication.
Publication Date: 2015-09-07 PubMed ID: 26348970DOI: 10.1037/a0039677Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates why horses were successfully domesticated, while zebras were not by comparing flight distances of wild horses and zebras in relation to human proximity. The findings suggest that the less pronounced habituation of zebras to humans, possibly influenced by historical hunting, could partly explain their non-domestication.

Introduction and Hypotheses

  • The study presents two hypotheses. The ‘human hunting hypothesis’ argues that animals like zebras were hunted by ancestral humans for a long period, leading to a deep-rooted fear of humans, while horses were hunted for a shorter period and hence a less persistent fear.
  • The alternative ‘habituation to humans hypothesis’ suggests that zebras can become used to non-threatening humans, if exposed enough. If this is true, there must be other factors contributing to their non-domestication.

Research Method

  • The researchers compared the flight initiation distances (FIDs) – the distance at which an animal starts to flee when a human approaches – of wild horses in the United States and plains zebras in Africa (a total of 87 individuals).
  • They observed and compared the flight behaviour of both species in areas with low and high human activity, denoted as mean humans/acre as 0.004 and 0.209 respectively.

Findings

  • The analysis revealed a significant link between the species and their level of human exposure.
  • The average FIDs of horses and zebras in areas of low human exposure were longer compared to areas with high human exposure, but did not differ significantly from each other.
  • In high human exposure areas, the FIDs of horses and zebras varied significantly, with zebras maintaining a longer distance.
  • The significantly lower FID of horses compared to zebras in high human exposure areas indicates that horses are more tolerant to human proximity than zebras.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that plains zebras are less habituated to humans than horses, possibly explaining their resistance to domestication.
  • This lesser degree of habituation toward humans, as suggested by the study, could be an adaptive response of zebras due to their historical hunting by humans.

Cite This Article

APA
Brubaker AS, Coss RG. (2015). Evolutionary constraints on equid domestication: Comparison of flight initiation distances of wild horses (Equus caballus ferus) and plains zebras (Equus quagga). J Comp Psychol, 129(4), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039677

Publication

ISSN: 1939-2087
NlmUniqueID: 8309850
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 129
Issue: 4
Pages: 366-376

Researcher Affiliations

Brubaker, Alexali S
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Coss, Richard G
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.

MeSH Terms

  • Africa
  • Animals
  • Animals, Domestic / psychology
  • Animals, Wild / psychology
  • Behavior, Animal / physiology
  • Equidae / psychology
  • Female
  • Habituation, Psychophysiologic / physiology
  • Horses / psychology
  • Male
  • Species Specificity
  • United States

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.