FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 14(1); 15; doi: 10.3390/ani14010015

Ex Vivo Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences in Depicting Normal Articular Cartilage in Equine Stifle Cadavers.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare articular cartilage thickness observed in the different 2D and 3D sequences to the cartilage thickness of the equine stifle in cadavers to determine the accuracy of each sequence. The study was conducted as a blinded laboratory study using seven equine stifle specimens. The 2D (T2W TSE) and 3D (3D VIEW T2W HR, T2 3D mFFE, T1W VISTA SPAIR, 3D PDW SPAIR) 3-tesla MRI sequences of each stifle were obtained. Cartilage thickness was measured at 30 locations on MRI and on gross pathology. Thickness measurements were compared using a Bland-Altman plot and post hoc analysis tests. The 3D sequences were found to be generally more accurate than the 2D sequence ( < 0.001). The smallest difference to macroscopic measurements was observed in the 3D VIEW T2W HR and T1W VISTA SPAIR sequences with no statistical difference between each other. Knowing the accuracy of different sequences will improve the evaluation of equine cartilage and the early detection of cartilage pathologies. This would promote MRI as a noninvasive imaging modality for horses suffering from stifle lameness with no findings in conventional imaging methods. Furthermore, since 3D sequences seem to have better accuracy in depicting cartilage, they may replace 2D sequences, thereby shortening scanning times.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-12-19 PubMed ID: 38200746PubMed Central: PMC10778121DOI: 10.3390/ani14010015Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aimed to assess the accuracy of 2D and 3D MRI sequences in measuring the thickness of horse cartilage in stifle joints, by comparing these measurements with the detailed anatomical configuration of cadaver horses. The study found that 3D MRI sequences provide more accurate imaging than 2D methods.

Objective of the Study

  • The research intended to compare the thickness of articular cartilage captured through different 2D and 3D MRI sequences with the actual thickness in horse cadaver’s stifle joints.
  • It aimed to determine which sequence offers the most accurate depiction. A closer resolution allows for better evaluation of the cartilage, crucial for the early detection of potential cartilage problems.

Methodology

  • The study was done as a blinded laboratory analysis using seven specimens of horse stifle joints.
  • Both 2D (T2W TSE) and a variety of 3D MRI sequences (3D VIEW T2W HR, T2 3D mFFE, T1W VISTA SPAIR, 3D PDW SPAIR) were taken from each stifle.
  • The thickness of the cartilage was measured in 30 locations on the MRI images and on gross pathology for comparative examination.
  • Comparison of measurement results was done using a Bland-Altman plot and post hoc analysis tests.

Results and Findings

  • There was a significant difference in the accuracy of the 2D and 3D sequences in depicting cartilage thickness. The 3D sequences were found to be generally more accurate than the 2D sequence.
  • The smallest difference compared to macroscopic measurements was noted with the 3D VIEW T2W HR and T1W VISTA SPAIR sequences. There was no significant difference between these two sequences.

Implications

  • Increased accuracy in the assessment of horse cartilage could lead to the early detection and treatment of potential cartilage disorders.
  • The research asserts the benefits of using MRI as a noninvasive imaging method for horses suffering from stifle joint lameness where conventional imaging methods haven’t yielded results.
  • In addition, since 3D sequences prove to be more accurate in showing cartilage, they could potentially replace 2D sequences, resulting in shorter scanning times and better diagnostic accuracy.

Cite This Article

APA
Seidler A, Aßmann A, Torgerson PR, Sánchez-Andrade JS, Bischofberger A. (2023). Ex Vivo Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences in Depicting Normal Articular Cartilage in Equine Stifle Cadavers. Animals (Basel), 14(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14010015

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
PII: 15

Researcher Affiliations

Seidler, Annika
  • Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Aßmann, Anton
  • Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Torgerson, Paul R
  • Section of Veterinary Epidemiology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Sánchez-Andrade, José Suárez
  • Equine Hospital, Clinic of Diagnostic Imaging Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Bischofberger, Andrea
  • Equine Hospital, Clinic of Diagnostic Imaging Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.

Grant Funding

  • Loriot Research Fund

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 17 references
  1. Recht MP, Goodwin DW, Winalski CS, White LM. MRI of articular cartilage: Revisiting current status and future directions.. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;185:899–914.
    doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0099pubmed: 16177408google scholar: lookup
  2. Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Burstein D, Gold GE, Eckstein F, Baum T, Mosher TJ, Carrino JA, Guermazi A. Articular cartilage in the knee: Current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research.. Radiographics 2011;31:37–61.
    doi: 10.1148/rg.311105084pmc: PMC6939857pubmed: 21257932google scholar: lookup
  3. Nelson BB, Kawcak CE, Barrett MF, McIlwraith CW, Grinstaff MW, Goodrich LR. Recent advances in articular cartilage evaluation using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:564–579.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12808pubmed: 29344988google scholar: lookup
  4. Crema MD, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Niu J, Chagas-Neto FA, Gregio-Junior E, Guermazi A. Three-dimensional turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and semiquantitative assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Comparison with two-dimensional routine MRI.. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013;21:428–433.
    doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.12.011pubmed: 23274102google scholar: lookup
  5. Ristow O, Steinbach L, Sabo G, Krug R, Huber M, Rauscher I, Ma B, Link TM. Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee--image quality and diagnostic performance.. Eur. Radiol. 2009;19:1263–1272.
    doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1260-ypubmed: 19137309google scholar: lookup
  6. Strickland CD, Kijowski R. Morphologic imaging of articular cartilage.. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2011;19:229–248.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2011.02.009pubmed: 21665089google scholar: lookup
  7. Lee YH, Hahn S, Lim D, Suh JS. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: Diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE). Acta Radiol. 2017;58:190–196.
    doi: 10.1177/0284185116646142pubmed: 27207633google scholar: lookup
  8. Graichen H, Jakob J, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Validation of cartilage volume and thickness measurements in the human shoulder with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2003;11:475–482.
    doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00077-3pubmed: 12814610google scholar: lookup
  9. Eckstein F, Sittek H, Milz S, Schulte E, Kiefer B, Reiser M, Putz R. The potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantifying articular cartilage thickness—A methodological study.. Clin. Biomech. 1995;10:434–440.
    doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00013-1pubmed: 11415591google scholar: lookup
  10. Porter EG, Winter MD, Sheppard BJ, Berry CR, Hernandez JA. Correlation of Articular Cartilage Thickness Measurements Made with Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Arthrography, and Computed Tomographic Arthrography with Gross Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Equine Metacarpophalangeal Joint.. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2016;57:515–525.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12390pubmed: 27478155google scholar: lookup
  11. Murray RC, Branch MV, Tranquille C, Woods S. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2005;66:1999–2005.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1999pubmed: 16334962google scholar: lookup
  12. Koo S, Giori NJ, Gold GE, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP. Accuracy of 3D Cartilage Models Generated From MR Images Is Dependent on Cartilage Thickness: Laser Scanner Based Validation of In Vivo Cartilage.. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009;131:121004.
    doi: 10.1115/1.4000087pmc: PMC3072833pubmed: 20524727google scholar: lookup
  13. Nelson BB, Kawcak CE, Goodrich LR, Werpy NM, Valdes-Martinez A, McIlwraith CW. Comparison between Computed Tomographic Arthrography, Radiography, Ultrasonography, and Arthroscopy for the Diagnosis of Femorotibial Joint Disease in Western Performance Horses.. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2016;57:387–402.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12366pubmed: 27170533google scholar: lookup
  14. Carstens A, Kirberger RM, Dahlberg LE, Prozesky L, Fletcher L, Lammentausta E. Validation of delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage and T2 mapping for quantifying distal metacarpus/metatarsus cartilage thickness in Thoroughbred racehorses.. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2013;54:139–148.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12002pubmed: 23279707google scholar: lookup
  15. Milewski MD, Smitaman E, Moukaddam H, Katz LD, Essig DA, Medvecky MJ, Haims AH. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012;81:1637–1643.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.072pubmed: 21683539google scholar: lookup
  16. Frisbie DD, Cross MW, McIlwraith CW. A comparative study of articular cartilage thickness in the stifle of animal species used in human pre-clinical studies compared to articular cartilage thickness in the human knee.. Vet. Comp. Orthop. 2006;19:142–146.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632990pubmed: 16971996google scholar: lookup
  17. Suarez Sanchez-Andrade J, Richter H, Kuhn K, Bischofberger AS, Kircher PR, Hoey S. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and arthrography to identify artificially induced cartilage defects of the equine carpal joints.. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasoun. 2018;59:312–325.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12598pubmed: 29455473google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,658 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.