Exploring the relationship between inhibitory control and coping behaviour in horses.

1. Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M. Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity within populations: causes and consequences.. Anim. Behav. 85, 1031–1039 (2013).
   doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.032google scholar: lookup
2. Mason G. Plastic animals in cages: Behavioural flexibility and responses to captivity.. Anim. Behav. 85, 1113–1126 (2013).
   doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.002google scholar: lookup
3. Koolhaas JM, de Boer SF, Buwalda B, van Reenen K. Individual variation in coping with stress: A multidimensional approach of ultimate and proximate mechanisms.. Brain Behav. Evol. 6–11 (2007).
   doi: 10.1159/000105485google scholar: lookup
4. Koolhaas JM, de Boer SF, Coppens CM, Buwalda B. Neuroendocrinology of coping styles: Towards understanding the biology of individual variation.. Front. Neuroendocr. 31, 307–321 (2010).
   doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.04.001google scholar: lookup
5. Øverli Ø. Evolutionary background for stress-coping styles: Relationships between physiological, behavioral, and cognitive traits in non-mammalian vertebrates.. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 31, 396–412 (2007).
   pubmed: 17182101doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.10.006google scholar: lookup
6. Koolhaas JM. Coping style and immunity in animals: Making sense of individual variation.. Brain. Behav. Immun. 22, 662–667 (2008).
   pubmed: 18395410doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.11.006google scholar: lookup
7. Wechsler B. Coping and coping strategies: a behavioural view.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 43, 123–134 (1995).
   doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00557-9google scholar: lookup
8. Lea SEG, Chow PKY, Leaver LA, McLaren IPL. Behavioral flexibility: A review, a model, and some exploratory tests.. Learn. Behav. 48, 173–187 (2020).
   pubmed: 32043268pmc: 7082303doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00421-wgoogle scholar: lookup
9. Coppens CM, Boer SF D, Koolhaas JM, De Boer SF, Koolhaas JM. Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: Towards underlying mechanisms.. Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365, 4021–4028 (2010).
   doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0217google scholar: lookup
10. Dalley JW, Cardinal RN, Robbins TW. Prefrontal executive and cognitive functions in rodents: Neural and neurochemical substrates.. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 28, 771–784 (2004).
    pubmed: 15555683doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.006google scholar: lookup
11. Benus RF, Koolhaas JM, Van Oortmerssen A. Aggression and adaptation to the light-dark cycle: role of intrinsic and extrinsic control.. Physiol. Behavior. 43, 131–137 (1988).
    doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90228-4google scholar: lookup
12. Benus RF, Daas D, Koolhaas S, Van Oortmerssen GA, J M. Routine formation and flexibility in social and non-social behaviour of aggressive and non-aggressive male mice.. Behaviour 112, 176–193 (1990).
    doi: 10.1163/156853990X00185google scholar: lookup
13. Bolhuis JE, Schouten WGP, de Leeuw JA, Schrama JW, Wiegant VM. Individual coping characteristics, rearing conditions and behavioural flexibility in pigs.. Behav. Brain. Res. 152, 351–360 (2004).
    pubmed: 15196803doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.024google scholar: lookup
14. Sih A, Del Giudice M. Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective.. Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. B-Biological Sci. 367, 2762–2772 (2012).
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0216google scholar: lookup
15. Loyant L, Collins L, Joly M. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.. Biol. Rev. 70055 (2025).
    doi: 10.1111/brv.70055google scholar: lookup
16. Beran MJ. The comparative science of ‘self-control’: what are we talking about?. Front. Psychol. 6, 51 (2015).
    pubmed: 25688226pmc: 4311604doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00051google scholar: lookup
17. Johnson-Ulrich L, Holekamp KE. Group size and social rank predict inhibitory control in spotted hyaenas. Anim. Behav. 160, 157–168 (2020).
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.11.020google scholar: lookup
18. Sheng K, Foris B, Krahn J, Weary DM, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Redefining dominance calculation: Increased competition flattens the dominance hierarchy in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 107, 7286–7298 (2024).
    pubmed: 38825128doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24587google scholar: lookup
19. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 135–168 (2013).
    pubmed: 23020641doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750google scholar: lookup
20. Moffitt TE et al. A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 2693–2698 (2011).
    pubmed: 21262822pmc: 3041102doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108google scholar: lookup
21. Robson DA, Allen MS, Howard SJ. Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 146, 324–354 (2020).
    pubmed: 31904248doi: 10.1037/bul0000227google scholar: lookup
22. Watts TW, Duncan GJ, Quan H. Revisiting the marshmallow test: A conceptual replication investigating links between early delay of gratification and later outcomes. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1159–1177 (2018).
    pubmed: 29799765pmc: 6050075doi: 10.1177/0956797618761661google scholar: lookup
23. Beran MJ, Hopkins WD. Self-control in chimpanzees relates to general intelligence. Curr. Biol. 28, 1–6 (2018).
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.043google scholar: lookup
24. Cervantes MC, Delville Y. Individual differences in offensive aggression in golden hamsters: A model of reactive and impulsive aggression?. Neuroscience 150, 511–521 (2007).
    pubmed: 17964736doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.034google scholar: lookup
25. Benus RF, Koolhaas JM, Van Oortmerssen GA. Individual differences in behavioural reaction to a changing environment in mice and rats. Behav 100, 105–121 (1987).
    doi: 10.1163/156853987X00099google scholar: lookup
26. Coppens CM, de Boer SF, Buwalda B, Koolhaas JM. Aggression and aspects of impulsivity in wild-type rats. Aggressive Behav. 40, 300–308 (2014).
    doi: 10.1002/ab.21527google scholar: lookup
27. Gobbo E, Zupan Šemrov M. Dogs exhibiting high levels of aggressive reactivity show impaired self-control abilities. Front. Veterinary Sci. 9, 1–10 (2022).
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.869068google scholar: lookup
28. Overduin-de Vries AM, Vermande MM, Hessen DJ, Sterck EHM. The ability to inhibit impulses is related to social behavior in long-tailed macaques. Am. J. Primatol. .
    doi: 10.1002/ajp.23587pubmed: 38145328google scholar: lookup
29. Garnham LC, Clarke C, Løvlie H. How inhibitory control relates to positive and negative affective states in red junglefowl. Front. Veterinary Sci. 9, 1–11 (2022).
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.872487google scholar: lookup
30. Garner JP, Mason GJ. Evidence for a relationship between cage stereotypies and behavioural disinhibition in laboratory rodents. Behav. Brain. Res. 136, 83–92 (2002).
    pubmed: 12385793doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00111-0google scholar: lookup
31. Garner JP, Mason GJ, Smith RS. Stereotypic route-tracing in experimentally caged songbirds correlates with general behavioural disinhibition.. Anim. Behav. 66, 711–727 (2003).
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.2002.2254google scholar: lookup
32. Brucks D, Marshall-Pescini S, Wallis LJ, Huber L, Range F. Measures of dogs’ inhibitory control abilities do not correlate across tasks.. Front. Psychol. 8, 849 (2017).
    pubmed: 28596749pmc: 5443147doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00849google scholar: lookup
33. Loyant L, Waller BM, Micheletta J, Joly M. Validation of a battery of inhibitory control tasks reveals a multifaceted structure in non-human primates.. PeerJ 10, e12863 (2022).
    pubmed: 35186469pmc: 8840138doi: 10.7717/peerj.12863google scholar: lookup
34. Völter CJ, Tinklenberg B, Call J, Seed AM. Comparative psychometrics: Establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.. Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sciences 373, (2018).
35. Ruet A. Housing horses in individual boxes is a challenge with regard to welfare.. Animals 9, 1–19 (2019).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090621google scholar: lookup
36. Sarrafchi A, Blokhuis HJ. Equine stereotypic behaviors: Causation, occurrence, and prevention.. J. Veterinary Behavior: Clin. Appl. Res. 8, 386–394 (2013).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.04.068google scholar: lookup
37. Lesimple C. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art.. Animals 10, 294 (2020).
    pubmed: 32069888pmc: 7070675doi: 10.3390/ani10020294google scholar: lookup
38. McBride SD, Mills DS. Psychological factors affecting equine performance.. BMC Veterinary Research 8, (2012).
39. Rankins EM, Wickens CL. A systematic review of equine personality.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 231, 105076 (2020).
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105076google scholar: lookup
40. Budzyńska M. Stress Reactivity and Coping in Horse Adaptation to Environment.. J. Equine Veterinary Sci. 34, 935–941 (2014).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.05.010google scholar: lookup
41. Nagy K, Bodó G, Bárdos G, Bánszky N, Kabai P. Differences in temperament traits between crib-biting and control horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 122, 41–47 (2010).
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.11.005google scholar: lookup
42. Fureix C. Plasma cortisol and faecal cortisol metabolites concentrations in stereotypic and non-stereotypic horses: do stereotypic horses cope better with poor environmental conditions ?. (2013).
43. Bachmann I, Bernasconi P, Herrmann R, Weishaupt MA, Stauffacher M. Behavioural and physiological responses to an acute stressor in crib-biting and control horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 82, 297–311 (2003).
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00086-8google scholar: lookup
44. Briefer Freymond S. Stereotypic horses (Equus caballus) are not cognitively impaired.. Anim. Cogn. 22, 17–33 (2019).
    pubmed: 30328528doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1217-8google scholar: lookup
45. Budzyńska M, Kamieniak J, Marciniak B, Sołtys L. Relationships between thoroughbreds’ contribution in the pedigree and the level of fearfulness and performance in warmblood stallions.. Acta Vet. 68, 288–300 (2018).
    doi: 10.2478/acve-2018-0025google scholar: lookup
46. Hausberger M, Richard-Yris M A, Ricard A. Interplay between environmental and genetic factors in the behaviour of horses. in Horse behaviour and welfare (Wagening Academic, The Netherlands, (2007).
    doi: 10.3920/978-90-8686-614-4google scholar: lookup
47. Osthaus B, Proops L, Hocking I, Burden F. Spatial cognition and perseveration by horses, donkeys and mules in a simple A-not-B detour task. Anim. Cogn. 16, 301–305 (2013).
    pubmed: 23271641doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0589-4google scholar: lookup
48. Brucks D, Härterich A, König von Borstel U. Horses wait for more and better rewards in a delay of gratification paradigm. Front. Psychol. 954472 (2022).
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954472google scholar: lookup
49. Rørvang M V, Nielsen B L, McLean A N. Sensory abilities of horses and their importance for equitation science. Front. Veterinary Sci. 7, 1–17 (2020).
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633google scholar: lookup
50. Brucks D. Intra – and interspecific variation in self – control capacities of parrots in a delay of gratification task. Anim. Cogn. .
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01565-6pubmed: 34671864pmc: 8940755google scholar: lookup
51. Alessandroni N, Miller R, Altschul D. Flexible behavior or flexible methods? A cross-taxon review of experimental designs in reversal learning. Preprint .
    doi: 10.31234/osf.io/mvche_v2google scholar: lookup
52. Safryghin A, Hebesberger D V, Wascher C A F. Testing for behavioral and physiological responses of domestic horses (Equus caballus) across different contexts - consistency over time and effects of context. Front. Psychol. 10, 1–12 (2019).
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00849google scholar: lookup
53. Young T, Creighton E, Smith T, Hosie C A. A novel scale of behavioural indicators of stress for use with domestic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 140, 33–43 (2012).
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.008google scholar: lookup
54. Peeters M, Sulon J, Beckers J F, Ledoux D, Vandenheede M. Comparison between blood serum and salivary cortisol concentrations in horses using an adrenocorticotropic hormone challenge. Equine Vet. J. 43, 487–493 (2011).
    pubmed: 21496072doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00294.xgoogle scholar: lookup
55. Contreras-Aguilar M D. Effect of food contamination and collection material in the measurement of biomarkers in saliva of horses. Res. Vet. Sci. 129, 90–95 (2020).
    pubmed: 31954319doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.01.006google scholar: lookup
56. Vincent A. Evaluation of a modified bit device to obtain saliva samples from horses. Veterinary Sciences 8, (2021).
57. Palme R, Möstl E. Measurement of cortisol metabolites in faeces of sheep as a parameter of cortisol concentration in blood. Z Saugetierkd – Int J. Mammal Biol. 62, 192–197 (1997). Suppl. 2.
58. Schmidt A. Cortisol release and heart rate variability in horses during road transport. Horm. Behav. 57, 209–215 (2010).
    pubmed: 19944105doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.11.003google scholar: lookup
59. ASAB Ethical Committee/ABS Animal Care Committee. Guidelines for the ethical treatment of nonhuman animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim. Behav. 195, I–XI (2023).
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.09.006google scholar: lookup
60. Percie D. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000410 (2020).
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410google scholar: lookup
61. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2021).
62. Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P. Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. (2019).
63. Koo T K, Li M Y. A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15, 155–163 (2016).
    pubmed: 27330520pmc: 4913118doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012google scholar: lookup
64. Nagy K, Bodó G, Bárdos G, Harnos A, Kabai P. The effect of a feeding stress-test on the behaviour and heart rate variability of control and crib-biting horses (with or without inhibition). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 121, 140–147 (2009).
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.008google scholar: lookup
65. Visser E K, Ellis A D, Van Reenen C G. The effect of two different housing conditions on the welfare of young horses stabled for the first time. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114, 521–533 (2008).
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.003google scholar: lookup
66. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01google scholar: lookup
67. Hartig F. DHARMa Residual Diagnostics for hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. R package version 0.3.3.0 (2020).
68. Baayen R. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
69. Roche D G, Careau V, Binning S A. Demystifying animal ‘personality’ (or not): why individual variation matters to experimental biologists. J. Experiment. Biol. 146712 (2016).
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.146712google scholar: lookup
70. Raoult C M C, Osthaus B, Hildebrand A C G, McElligott A G, Nawroth C. Goats show higher behavioural flexibility than sheep in a spatial detour task. Royal Soc. Open. Sci. 8, (2021).
71. Brucks D, Marshall-Pescini S, Range F. Dogs and wolves do not differ in their inhibitory control abilities in a non-social test battery. Anim. Cogn. 22, 1–15 (2018).
    pubmed: 30284077pmc: 6326967doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1216-9google scholar: lookup
72. van Horik J O et al. Do detour tasks provide accurate assays of inhibitory control?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285, (2018).
73. Vernouillet A A A, Stiles L R, McCausland J A, Kelly D M. Individual performance across motoric self-regulation tasks are not correlated for pet dogs. Learning Behavior 46, 522–536 (2018).
    pubmed: 30251102doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0354-xgoogle scholar: lookup
74. Boogert N J, Anderson R C, Peters S, Searcy W, Nowicki S. Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour reaching, but not with other cognitive measures. Anim. Behav. 81, 1209–1216 (2011).
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.004google scholar: lookup
75. Ducatez S, Audet J N, Lefebvre L. Speed–accuracy trade-off, detour reaching and response to PHA in Carib grackles. Anim. Cogn. 22, 625–633 (2019).
    pubmed: 30929104doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01258-1google scholar: lookup
76. Baragli P, Vitale V, Banti L, Sighieri C. Effect of aging on behavioural and physiological responses to a stressful stimulus in horses (Equus caballus). Behav 151, 1513–1533 (2014).
    doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003197google scholar: lookup
77. Finy MS, Bresin K, Korol DL, Verona E. Impulsivity, risk taking, and cortisol reactivity as a function of psychosocial stress and personality in adolescents. Dev. Psychopathol. 26, 1093–1111 (2014).
    pubmed: 24713465doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000212google scholar: lookup
78. Lyons DM, Lopez JM, Yang C, Schatzberg AF. Stress-level cortisol treatment impairs inhibitory control of behavior in monkeys. J. neuroscience: official J. Soc. Neurosci. 20, 7816–7821 (2000).
    doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-20-07816.2000google scholar: lookup
79. van Horik JO, Madden JR. A problem with problem solving: Motivational traits, but not cognition, predict success on novel operant foraging tasks. Anim. Behav. 114, 189–198 (2016).
    pubmed: 27122637pmc: 4833691doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.006google scholar: lookup
80. Velázquez-Sánchez C et al. High Trait impulsivity predicts food addiction-like behavior in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacol 39, 2463–2472 (2014).
    doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.98google scholar: lookup
81. Shaw RC. Testing cognition in the wild: factors affecting performance and individual consistency in two measures of avian cognition. Behav. Process. 134, 31–36 (2017).
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.004google scholar: lookup
82. van Horik JO et al. Unpredictable environments enhance inhibitory control in pheasants. Anim. Cogn. 22, 1105–1114 (2019).
    pubmed: 31471781pmc: 6834925doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01302-0google scholar: lookup
83. Phelipon R et al. Characterisation of facial expressions and behaviours of horses in response to positive and negative emotional anticipation using network analysis. Preprint .
    doi: 10.1101/2025.02.02.636153google scholar: lookup
84. Ricci-Bonot C, Mills DS. Recognising the facial expression of frustration in the horse during feeding period. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 265, 105966 (2023).
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105966google scholar: lookup
85. Cooper JJ, Mcall N, Johnson S, Davidson HPB. The short-term effects of increasing meal frequency on stereotypic behaviour of stabled horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 90, 351–364 (2005).
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.005google scholar: lookup
86. Bebus SE, Small TW, Jones BC, Elderbrock EK, Schoech SJ. Associative learning is inversely related to reversal learning and varies with nestling corticosterone exposure. Anim. Behav. 111, 251–260 (2016).
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.10.027google scholar: lookup
87. Ruiz-Gomez MDL, Huntingford FA, Øverli Ø, Thörnqvist PO, Höglund E. Response to environmental change in rainbow trout selected for divergent stress coping styles. Physiol. Behav. 102, 317–322 (2011).
    pubmed: 21130105doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.023google scholar: lookup
88. McBride SD, Hemmings A. Altered mesoaccumbens and nigro-striatal dopamine physiology is associated with stereotypy development in a non-rodent species. Behav. Brain. Res. 159, 113–118 (2005).
    pubmed: 15795004doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.10.014google scholar: lookup
89. McBride SD, Roberts K, Hemmings AJ, Ninomiya S, Parker MO. The impulsive horse: Comparing genetic, physiological and behavioral indicators to those of human addiction. Physiol. Behav. 254, 113896 (2022).
    pubmed: 35777460doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113896google scholar: lookup
90. Parker M, Redhead ES, Goodwin D, McBride SD. Impaired instrumental choice in crib-biting horses (Equus caballus). Behav. Brain. Res. 191, 137–140 (2008).
    pubmed: 18430476doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.009google scholar: lookup
91. Smith T, Panfil K, Bailey C, Kirkpatrick K. Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control. J. Experimental Psychology: Anim. Learn. Cognition 45, 259–279 (2019).
92. Friedman NP. Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137, 201–225 (2008).
    pubmed: 18473654pmc: 2762790doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201google scholar: lookup

Citations