Analyze Diet
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023; 55(1); 63; doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00837-8

Genetic analysis of geometric morphometric 3D visuals of French jumping horses.

Abstract: For centuries, morphology has been the most commonly selected trait in horses. A 3D video recording enabled us to obtain the coordinates of 43 anatomical landmarks of 2089 jumping horses. Generalized Procrustes analysis provided centered and scaled coordinates that were independent of volume, i.e., centroid size. Genetic analysis of these coordinates (mixed model; 17,994 horses in the pedigree) allowed us to estimate a variance-covariance matrix. New phenotypes were then defined: the "summarized shapes". They were obtained by linear combinations of Procrustes coordinates with, as coefficients, the eigenvectors of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. These new phenotypes were used in genome-wide association analyses (GWAS) and multitrait genetic analysis that included judges' scores and competition results of the horses. Results: We defined ten shapes that represented 86% of the variance, with heritabilities ranging from 0.14 to 0.42. Only one of the shapes was found to be genetically correlated with competition success (r = - 0.12, standard error = 0.07). Positive and negative genetic correlations between judges' scores and shapes were found. This means that the breeding objective defined by judges involves improvement of anatomical parts of the body that are negatively correlated with each other. Known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosomes 1 and 3 for height at withers were significant for centroid size but not for any of the shapes. As these SNPs were not associated with the shape that distinguished rectangular horses from square horses (with height at withers greater than body length), we hypothesize that these SNPs play a role in the overall development of horses, i.e. in height, width, and length but not in height at withers when standardized to unit centroid size. Several other SNPs were found significant for other shapes. Conclusions: The main application of 3D morphometric analysis is the ability to define the estimated breeding value (EBV) of a sire based on the shape of its potential progeny, which is easier for breeders to visualize in a single synthetic image than a full description based on linear profiling. However, the acceptance of these new phenotypes by breeders and the complex nature of summarized shapes may be challenging. Due to the low genetic correlations of the summarized shapes with jumping performance, the methodology did not allow indirect performance selection criteria to be defined.
Publication Date: 2023-09-18 PubMed ID: 37723416PubMed Central: PMC10506242DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00837-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on the analysis of genetic factors influencing the physical shapes of French jumping horses using 3D imaging, and its impact on performance and breeding choices.

Methodology

  • The researchers used 3D video recording to capture the coordinates of 43 anatomical landmarks on 2089 jumping horses.
  • A technique known as Generalized Procrustes analysis was then used to provide scaled coordinates that were independent of volume, thus neutralizing the effect of size differences.
  • Using a mixed model and a pedigree of 17,994 horses, genetic analysis was performed on these coordinates to estimate a variance-covariance matrix.
  • New phenotypes, known as “summarized shapes”, were defined as linear combinations of Procrustes coordinates with the eigenvectors of the genetic variance-covariance matrix as coefficients.
  • These new phenotypes were used in genome-wide association analyses (GWAS) and a multitrait genetic analysis that included judges’ scores and competition results of the horses.

Results

  • Ten shapes were defined that represented 86% of the variance, with heritabilities ranging from 0.14 to 0.42.
  • Only one of the shapes was found to be genetically correlated with competition success.
  • Positive and negative genetic correlations were found between judges’ scores and shapes, indicating that the breeding goals set by judges involve improvement of body parts that are negatively correlated with each other.
  • Known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosomes 1 and 3 associated with height at withers were significant for overall horse development, but not for any of the shapes.
  • Several other significant SNPs were discovered for other shapes.

Conclusions

  • The primary application of 3D morphometric analysis allows breeders to determine the estimated breeding value (EBV) of a sire based on the potential shape of its offspring. This is easier to visualize in a single image rather than a full description based on linear profiling.
  • However, the acceptance of these new phenotypes by breeders might be challenging due to the complexity of summarized shapes.
  • Since the genetic correlations of the summarized shapes with jumping performance are low, the methodology did not allow for defining indirect performance selection criteria.

Cite This Article

APA
Ricard A, Crevier-Denoix N, Pourcelot P, Crichan H, Sabbagh M, Dumont-Saint-Priest B, Danvy S. (2023). Genetic analysis of geometric morphometric 3D visuals of French jumping horses. Genet Sel Evol, 55(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00837-8

Publication

ISSN: 1297-9686
NlmUniqueID: 9114088
Country: France
Language: English
Volume: 55
Issue: 1
Pages: 63
PII: 63

Researcher Affiliations

Ricard, Anne
  • Pôle développement, innovation et recherche, Institut français du cheval et de l'équitation, 61310, Exmes-Gouffern en Auge, France. anne.ricard@inrae.fr.
  • Université Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France. anne.ricard@inrae.fr.
Crevier-Denoix, Nathalie
  • INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Unité 957 BPLC, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Pourcelot, Philippe
  • INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Unité 957 BPLC, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Crichan, Harmony
  • Pôle développement, innovation et recherche, Institut français du cheval et de l'équitation, 61310, Exmes-Gouffern en Auge, France.
Sabbagh, Margot
  • Pôle développement, innovation et recherche, Institut français du cheval et de l'équitation, 61310, Exmes-Gouffern en Auge, France.
Dumont-Saint-Priest, Bernard
  • Pôle développement, innovation et recherche, Institut français du cheval et de l'équitation, 61310, Exmes-Gouffern en Auge, France.
Danvy, Sophie
  • Pôle développement, innovation et recherche, Institut français du cheval et de l'équitation, 61310, Exmes-Gouffern en Auge, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / genetics
  • Genome-Wide Association Study
  • Pedigree
  • Phenotype
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 80 references
  1. Koenen EPC, Aldridge LI, Philipsson J. An overview of breeding objectives for warmblood sport horses. Livest Prod Sci 2004;88:77–84.
  2. Duensing J, Stock KF, Krieter J. Implementation and prospects of linear profiling in the warmblood horse. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:360–368.
  3. Druml T, Baumung R, Sölkner J. Morphological analysis and effect of selection for conformation in the Noriker draught horse population. Livest Sci 2008;115:118–128.
  4. Folla F, Sartori C, Guzzo N, Pigozzi G, Mantovani R. Genetics of linear type traits scored on young foals belonging to the Italian Heavy Draught Horse breed. Livest Sci 2019;219:91–96.
  5. Folla F, Sartori C, Mancin E, Pigozzi G, Mantovani R. Genetic parameters of linear type traits scored at 30 months in Italian heavy draught horse. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:1099.
    pmc: PMC7341255pubmed: 32630510
  6. Vostry L, Capkova Z, Pribyl J, Mach K. Analysis of Czech cold-blooded horses: genetic parameters, breeding value and the influence of inbreeding depression on linear description of conformation and type characters. Czech J Anim Sci 2011;56:217–230.
  7. Vostry L, Vostra-Vydrova H, Hofmanova B, Vesela Z, Schmidova J, Majzik I. Genetic parameters for linear type traits in three Czech draught horse breeds. Agric Conspec Sci 2017;82:111–115.
  8. Molina A, Valera M, Dos Santos R, Rodero A. Genetic parameters of morphofunctional traits in Andalusian horse. Livest Prod Sci 1999;60:295–303.
  9. Samoré AB, Pagnacco G, Miglior F. Genetic parameters and breeding values for linear type traits in the Haflinger horse. Livest Prod Sci 1997;52:105–111.
  10. Ablondi M, Summer A, Vasini M, Simoni M, Sabbioni A. Genetic parameters estimation in an Italian horse native breed to support the conversion from agricultural uses to riding purposes. J Anim Breed Genet 2020;137:200–210.
    pubmed: 31310049
  11. Sabbioni A, Beretti V, Zanon A, Pagani GP, Filippini S, Superchi P. Morphological evolution of Bardigiano horse. Ital J Anim Sci 2005;4:412–414.
  12. Gmel AI, Druml T, Portele K, von Niederhausern R, Neuditschko M. Repeatability, reproducibility and consistency of horse shape data and its association with linearly described conformation traits in Franches-Montagnes stallions. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202931.
    pmc: PMC6110498pubmed: 30148872
  13. Zechner P, Zohman F, Sölkner J, Bodo I, Habe F, Marti E. Morphological description of the Lipizzan horse population. Livest Prod Sci 2001;69:163–177.
  14. Druml T, Dobretsberger M, Brem G. The use of novel phenotyping methods for validation of equine conformation scoring results. Animal 2015;9:928–937.
    pubmed: 25582051
  15. Sánchez MJ, Gómez MD, Molina A, Valera M. Genetic analyses for linear conformation traits in Pura Raza Español horses. Livest Sci 2013;157:57–64.
  16. Sanchez-Guerrero MJ, Cervantes I, Molina A, Gutierrez JP, Valera M. Designing an early selection morphological linear traits index for dressage in the Pura Raza Espanol horse. Animal 2017;11:948–957.
    pubmed: 27839527
  17. van Bergen HMJM, van Arendonk JAM. Genetic parameters for linear type traits in Shetland Ponies. Livest Prod Sci 1993;36:273–284.
  18. Vostry L, Mach K, Pribyl J. Selection of a suitable data set and model for the genetic evaluation of the linear description of conformation and type description in Old Kladruber horses. Archiv Tierzucht 2012;55:105–112.
  19. Kuhnke S, Bär K, Bosch P, Rensing M, Borstel UKV. Evaluation of a novel system for linear conformation, gait, and personality trait scoring and automatic ranking of horses at breed shows: a pilot study in American Quarter horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2019;78:53–59.
    pubmed: 31203984
  20. Koenen EPC, van Veldhuizen AE, Brascamp EW. Genetic parameters of linear scored conformation traits and their relation to dressage and show-jumping performance in the Dutch Warmblood Riding Horse population. Livest Prod Sci 1995;43:85–94.
  21. Ducro BJ, Koenen EPC, van Tartwijk JMFM, Bovenhuis H. Genetic relations of movement and free-jumping traits with dressage and show-jumping performance in competition of Dutch Warmblood horses. Livest Sci 2007;107:227–234.
  22. Rustin M, Janssens S, Buys N, Gengler N. Multi-trait animal model estimation of genetic parameters for linear type and gait traits in the Belgian warmblood horse. J Anim Breed Genet 2009;126:378–386.
    pubmed: 19765164
  23. Novotná A, Svitáková A, Veselá Z, Vostrý L. Estimation of genetic parameters for linear type traits in the population of sport horses in the Czech Republic. Livest Sci 2017;202:1–6.
  24. Viklund A, Hellsten ET, Nasholm A, Strandberg E, Philipsson J. Genetic parameters for traits evaluated at field tests of 3-and 4-year-old Swedish Warmblood horses. Animal 2008;2:1832–1841.
    pubmed: 22444090
  25. Jönsson L, Näsholm A, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A, Dalin G, Philipsson J. Conformation traits and their genetic and phenotypic associations with health status in young Swedish warmblood riding horses. Livest Sci 2014;163:12–25.
  26. Viklund Å, Eriksson S. Genetic analyses of linear profiling data on 3-year-old Swedish Warmblood horses. J Anim Breed Genet 2018;135:62–72.
    pubmed: 29345075
  27. Ducro BJ, Bovenhuis H, Back W. Heritability of foot conformation and its relationship to sports performance in a Dutch Warmblood horse population. Equine Vet J 2009;41:139–143.
    pubmed: 19418741
  28. Nazari-Ghadikolaei A, Fikse F, Viklund AG, Eriksson S. Factor analysis of evaluated and linearly scored traits in Swedish Warmblood horses. J Anim Breed Genet 2023;140:366–375.
    pubmed: 36852464
  29. Thorén Hellsten E, Stock KF. International workshop on linear profiling delivers new knowledge about traits important for sport horse performance. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on linear profiling in the warmblood horse: 29–30 March 2023; Plön and Grebin; 2023.
  30. Barrey E, Desliens F, Poirel D, Biau S, Lemaire S, Rivero JLL. Early evaluation of dressage ability in different breeds. Equine Vet J Suppl 2002;34:319–324.
    pubmed: 12405708
  31. Holmström M, Magnusson LE, Philipsson J. Variation in conformation of Swedish Warmblood horses and conformational characteristics of élite sport horses. Equine Vet J 1990;22:186–193.
    pubmed: 2361507
  32. Langlois B, Froidevaux J, Lamarche L, Legault C, Legault P, Tassencourt L. Analyse des liaisons entre la morphologie et l'aptitude au galop au trot et au saut d'obstacles chez le cheval. Ann Genet Sel Anim 1978;10:443–474.
    pmc: PMC2718918pubmed: 22896112
  33. Pourcelot P, Audigié F, Lacroix V, Denoix JM, Crevier-Denoix N. A 3-D method to measure morphometrical data and standing conformation in horses. Proc J Rech Equine 2002;28:137–148.
  34. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol 2009;36:235–247.
  35. Klingenberg CP, Leamy LJ. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 2001;55:2342–2352.
    pubmed: 11794792
  36. Gmel AI, Burren A, Neuditschko M. Estimates of genetic parameters for shape space data in Franches-Montagnes horses. Animals (Basel) 2022;12:2186.
    pmc: PMC9454882pubmed: 36077906
  37. Crevier-Denoix N, Pourcelot P, Concordet D, Erlinger D, Ricard A, Tavernier L. Application of a 3D morphometric method to the follow-up of conformational changes with growth and to the study of the correlations between morphology and performance. In: Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the European association for animal production: 5–8 June 2005; Uppsala; 2005.
  38. Ricard A, Pourcelot P, Erlinger D, Lagache C, Falala S, Denoix J-M. Heritability of morphological traits and genetic correlations between them measured by a 3D morphometric method. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Equine Locomotion: 16–19 June 2008; Cabourg; 2008.
  39. Kristjansson T, Bjornsdottir S, Sigurdsson A, Crevier-Denoix N, Pourcelot P, Arnason T. Objective quantification of conformation of the Icelandic horse based on 3-D video morphometric measurements. Livest Sci 2013;158:12–23.
  40. Chassier M, Barrey E, Robert C, Duluard A, Danvy S, Ricard A. Genotype imputation accuracy in multiple equine breeds from medium- to high-density genotypes. J Anim Breed Genet 2018;135:420–431.
    pubmed: 30298946
  41. Ricard A, Danvy S, Legarra A. Computation of deregressed proofs for genomic selection when own phenotypes exist with an application in French show-jumping horses. J Anim Sci 2013;91:1076–1085.
    pubmed: 23230121
  42. Ricard A, Dumont Saint Priest B, Chassier M, Sabbagh M, Danvy S. Genetic consistency between gait analysis by accelerometry and evaluation scores at breeding shows for the selection of jumping competition horses. PLoS One 2020;15:e0244064.
    pmc: PMC7743953pubmed: 33326505
  43. Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel FS. A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives. BMC Genomics 2014;15:478.
    pmc: PMC4076979pubmed: 24935670
  44. Adams D, Collyer M, Kaliontzopoulou A. Geometric morphometric analysis of 2D/3D landmark data. Version 3.3.1. 2020. https://github.com/geomorphR/geomorph/. Accessed 18 July 2023.
  45. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.
  46. Meyer K. WOMBAT—a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2007;8:815–821.
    pmc: PMC2064953pubmed: 17973343
  47. Meyer K. A penalized likelihood approach to pooling estimates of covariance components from analyses by parts. J Anim Breed Genet 2013;130:270–285.
    pubmed: 23855629
  48. Aguilar I, Tsuruta S, Masuda Y, Lourenco D, Legarra A, Misztal I. BLUPF90 suite of programs for animal breeding with focus on genomics. In: Proceedings of the world congress on genetics applied to livestock production: 11–16 February 2018; Auckland; 2018.
  49. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:743–752.
    pubmed: 20105546
  50. Christensen OF, Lund MS. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genet Sel Evol 2010;42:2.
    pmc: PMC2834608pubmed: 20105297
  51. Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM, Garrick DJ. A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses. Genet Sel Evol 2014;46:50.
    pmc: PMC4262255pubmed: 25253441
  52. Legarra A, Christensen OF, Aguilar I, Misztal I. Single Step, a general approach for genomic selection. Livest Sci 2014;166:54–65.
  53. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 2008;91:4414–4423.
    pubmed: 18946147
  54. Aguilar I, Legarra A, Cardoso F, Masuda Y, Lourenco D, Misztal I. Frequentist p-values for large-scale-single step genome-wide association, with an application to birth weight in American Angus cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2019;51:28.
    pmc: PMC6584984pubmed: 31221101
  55. Devlin B, Roeder K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 1999;55:997–1004.
    pubmed: 11315092
  56. Li M-X, Yeung JMY, Cherny SS, Sham PC. Evaluating the effective numbers of independent tests and significant p-value thresholds in commercial genotyping arrays and public imputation reference datasets. Hum Genet 2012;131:747–756.
    pmc: PMC3325408pubmed: 22143225
  57. Meyer K. Performance of penalized maximum likelihood in estimation of genetic covariances matrices. Genet Sel Evol 2011;43:39.
    pmc: PMC3331854pubmed: 22117894
  58. Meyer K, Kirkpatrick M. Better estimates of genetic covariance matrices by “bending” using penalized maximum likelihood. Genetics 2010;185:1097–1110.
    pmc: PMC2907195pubmed: 20442220
  59. Monteiro LR, Diniz-Filho JAF, dos Reis SF, Araújo ED. Geometric estimates of heritability in biological shape. Evolution 2002;56:563–572.
    pubmed: 11989686
  60. Klingenberg CP, Debat V, Roff DA. Quantitative genetics of shape in cricket wings: developmental integration in a functional strcuture. Evolution 2010;64:2935–2951.
    pubmed: 20482613
  61. Cervantes I, Baumung R, Molina A, Druml T, Gutiérrez JP, Sölkner J. Size and shape analysis of morphofunctional traits in the Spanish Arab horse. Livest Sci 2009;125:43–49.
  62. Druml T, Dobretsberger M, Brem G. Ratings of equine conformation—new insights provided by shape analysis using the example of Lipizzan stallions. Arch Anim Breed 2016;59:309–317.
  63. David I, Ricard A, Huynh-Tran V-H, Dekkers JCM, Gilbert H. Quality of breeding value predictions from longitudinal analyses, with application to residual feed intake in pigs. Genet Sel Evol 2022;54:32.
    pmc: PMC9103455pubmed: 35562648
  64. Ghavi H-Z. A meta-analysis of genetic parameter estimates for conformation traits in horses. Livest Sci 2021;250:104601.
  65. Karlsson K. Linear assessment in Swedish Warmblood foals. Master’s thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 2020.
  66. de Oliveira Bussiman F, Carvalho RSB, e Silva FF, Ventura RV, Ferraz JBS, Mattos EC. Reduced rank analysis of morphometric and functional traits in Campolina horses. J Anim Breed Genet 2022;139:231–246.
    pubmed: 34841593
  67. Schöpke K, Wensch-Dorendorf M, Swalve HH. Genetic evaluations of the German Sport Horse: population structure and use of data from foal and mare inspections and performance tests of mares. Arch Anim Breed 2013;56:658–674.
  68. Schroder W, Stock KF, Distl O. Genetic evaluation of Hanoverian warmblood horses for conformation traits considering the proportion of genes of foreign breeds. Archiv Tierzucht 2010;53:377–387.
  69. Rovere G, Ducro BJ, van Arendonk JAM, Norberg E, Madsen P. Genetic correlations between dressage, show jumping and studbook-entry inspection traits in a process of specialization in Dutch Warmblood horses. J Anim Breed Genet 2017;134:162–171.
    pubmed: 27678258
  70. Jönsson L, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Näsholm A, Dalin G, Philipsson J. Associations of health status and conformation with longevity and lifetime competition performance in young Swedish Warmblood riding horses: 8,238 cases (1983–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;244:1449–1461.
    pubmed: 24871069
  71. Viklund A, Braam A, Nasholm A, Strandberg E, Philipsson J. Genetic variation in competition traits at different ages and time periods and correlations with traits at field tests of 4-year-old Swedish Warmblood horses. Animal 2010;4:682–691.
    pubmed: 22444120
  72. Stock KF, Workel I, Hahn A, Schulze-Schleppinghoff W. Assessing the value of genetic linear profiles for selecting for sport performance of riding horse. In: Proceedings of the 72nd annual meeting of the EAAP: 30 August–3 September 2021; Davos; 2021.
  73. Seierø T, Mark T, Jönsson L. Genetic parameters for longevity and informative value of early indicator traits in Danish show jumping horses. Livest Sci 2016;184:126–133.
  74. Gmel AI, Druml T, von Niederhäusern R, Leeb T, Neuditschko M. Genome-wide association studies based on equine joint angle measurements reveal new QTL affecting the conformation of horses. Genes (Basel) 2019;10:370.
    pmc: PMC6562990pubmed: 31091839
  75. Metzger J, Kreft O, Sieme H, Martinsson G, Reineking W, Hewicker-Trautwein M. Hanoverian F/W-line contributes to segregation of Warmblood fragile foal syndrome type 1 variant PLOD1:c.2032G>A in Warmblood horses. Equine Vet J 2021;53:51–59.
    pubmed: 32323341
  76. Frischknecht M, Signer-Hasler H, Leeb T, Rieder S, Neuditschko M. Genome-wide association studies based on sequence-derived genotypes reveal new QTL associated with conformation and performance traits in the Franches-Montagnes horse breed. Anim Genet 2016;47:227–229.
    pubmed: 26767322
  77. Makvandi-Nejad S, Hoffman GE, Allen JJ, Chu E, Gu E, Chandler AM. Four loci explain 83% of size variation in the horse. PLoS One 2012;7:e39929.
    pmc: PMC3394777pubmed: 22808074
  78. Metzger J, Schrimpf R, Philipp U, Distl O. Expression levels of LCORL are associated with body size in horses. PLoS One 2013;8:e56497.
    pmc: PMC3572084pubmed: 23418579
  79. Signer-Hasler H, Flury C, Haase B, Burger D, Simianer H, Leeb T. A genome-wide association study reveals loci influencing height and other conformation traits in horses. PLoS One 2012;7:e37282.
    pmc: PMC3353922pubmed: 22615965
  80. Tetens J, Widmann P, Kuhn C, Thaller G. A genome-wide association study indicates LCORL/NCAPG as a candidate locus for withers height in German Warmblood horses. Anim Genet 2013;44:467–471.
    pubmed: 23418885

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.