Analyze Diet
Archives animal breeding2026; 69(2); 323-336; doi: 10.5194/aab-69-323-2026

Genetic variability and associations of Trakehner and other horse populations in Lithuania.

Abstract: To obtain genetic parameters relevant for the management of animal genetic resources, this study provides a comparative characterization of the Trakehner (TRAK) horse population in relation to four other horse populations maintained in Lithuania - Arabian (ARAB), Baltic Warmblood (BW), Lithuanian Warmblood (LW), and Zemaitukai (ZEM). These populations represent diverse histories, selection goals, and breeding practices. Pedigree data ( 22 666) and parentage verification genetic data based on blood group markers ( 1293) were used to evaluate genetic diversity, population structure, and inter-population relationships. Despite a 25 % population decline in recent years, the TRAK population maintained moderate inbreeding ( 0.037) and a balanced genetic structure. The effective population size ( ) was lower than in BW and LW but higher than in the endangered ZEM population. TRAK retained a high number of alleles ( 3.83), with observed heterozygosity ( 0.460) slightly lower than that observed in open sport horse populations. Comparison of all individuals and the Lithuanian reference populations revealed stable or increased heterozygosity in currently breeding individuals, particularly within TRAK. Genetic distances and assignment tests confirmed close relationships among TRAK, BW, and LW, reflecting shared ancestry. In contrast, ARAB and ZEM populations remained genetically distinct. PCA and heatmap analyses further supported the separation between closed and open populations in the current breeding context. These findings highlight that population structure, historical gene flow, and management practices jointly shape genetic variability. The results can be used to optimize mating plans by balancing sire and dam contributions, monitor inbreeding and effective population size trends, manage gene flow between related populations (TRAK, BW, LW), and develop targeted conservation strategies for genetically distinct breeds such as ZEM and ARAB.
Publication Date: 2026-06-02 PubMed ID: 42238714PubMed Central: PMC13228154DOI: 10.5194/aab-69-323-2026Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed genetic diversity and relationships among the Trakehner horse population and four other horse populations in Lithuania to inform breed management and conservation efforts.

Objectives and Populations Studied

  • Objective: To obtain genetic parameters relevant for managing animal genetic resources among five horse populations in Lithuania.
  • Populations studied:
    • Trakehner (TRAK)
    • Arabian (ARAB)
    • Baltic Warmblood (BW)
    • Lithuanian Warmblood (LW)
    • Zemaitukai (ZEM)
  • These populations have diverse histories, selection goals, and breeding practices reflecting different genetic characteristics.

Data Used

  • Pedigree data of 22,666 horses to analyze lineage and inbreeding trends.
  • Parentage verification data based on 1293 genetic blood group markers to assess genetic diversity and confirm relationships.

Findings on Genetic Diversity and Population Structure

  • Trakehner Population:
    • Despite a 25% population decline recently, the TRAK population maintained moderate inbreeding coefficient (approximately 0.037), indicating controlled genetic health.
    • Genetic structure remained balanced.
    • Effective population size was lower than Baltic Warmblood and Lithuanian Warmblood but higher than the endangered Zemaitukai breed.
    • High number of alleles per locus (~3.83) was retained, showing good genetic variability.
    • Observed heterozygosity (0.460) slightly lower than open sport horse populations, indicating moderate genetic diversity.
  • Heterozygosity Trends:
    • Comparison between all individuals and currently breeding populations showed stable or increasing heterozygosity, especially in TRAK, suggesting effective genetic management.

Genetic Relationships and Differentiation Among Populations

  • Genetic distance analyses and assignment tests showed:
    • Close genetic relationships among TRAK, Baltic Warmblood (BW), and Lithuanian Warmblood (LW), likely due to shared ancestry and gene flow.
    • Arabian (ARAB) and Zemaitukai (ZEM) populations remained genetically distinct, indicating limited gene flow and unique breed identities.
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and heatmap:
    • Supported separation between “closed” (genetically isolated) and “open” (mixed or gene-flow influenced) populations under current breeding practices.

Implications for Breed Management and Conservation

  • Population structure, historical gene flow, and breeding management practices collectively shape observed genetic variability.
  • Results provide:
    • Guidance for optimizing mating plans that balance contributions from sires and dams, minimizing inbreeding risks.
    • Monitoring tools for trends in effective population size and inbreeding over time.
    • Strategies to manage gene flow between related populations like TRAK, BW, and LW, maintaining genetic health while preserving distinctiveness.
    • Foundations for targeted conservation of genetically unique breeds such as the endangered Zemaitukai (ZEM) and the distinct Arabian (ARAB) lines.

Cite This Article

APA
Račkauskaitė A, Šveistienė R, Razmaitė V, Jatkauskienė V, Marašinskienė Š. (2026). Genetic variability and associations of Trakehner and other horse populations in Lithuania. Arch Anim Breed, 69(2), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-69-323-2026

Publication

ISSN: 2363-9822
NlmUniqueID: 101701238
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 69
Issue: 2
Pages: 323-336

Researcher Affiliations

Račkauskaitė, Alma
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Animal Science Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, 82317, Lithuania.
Šveistienė, Rūta
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Animal Science Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, 82317, Lithuania.
Razmaitė, Violeta
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Animal Science Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, 82317, Lithuania.
Jatkauskienė, Virginija
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Animal Science Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, 82317, Lithuania.
Marašinskienė, Šarūnė
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Animal Science Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, 82317, Lithuania.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

References

This article includes 54 references
  1. Aurich J, Aurich C. Developments in European horse breeding and consequences for veterinarians in equine reproduction.. Reprod Domest Anim 2006;41:275–279.
  2. Barisevičius J, Isoda V, Paičius D, Valkauskas D. Lietuvoje veisiami arkliai ir jų įvertinimai [report]. Agricultural Information and Rural Business Centre; Vilnius, Lithuania: 2007. pp. 21–22.
  3. Bartolomé E, Cervantes I, Valera M, Gutiérrez J. Influence of foreign breeds on the genetic structure of the Spanish Sport Horse population.. Livest Sci 2011;142:70–79.
  4. Bokor Á, Mihók S, Posta J. Pedigree-based description of three traditional Hungarian horse breeds.. Animals 2022;12:2071.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12162071pmc: PMC9405318pubmed: 36009663google scholar: lookup
  5. Caballero A. Quantitative genetics.. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2020. pp. 109–112.
    doi: 10.1017/9781108630542google scholar: lookup
  6. Cosenza M, La Rosa V, Rosati R, Chiofalo V. Genetic diversity of the Italian thoroughbred horse population.. Ital J Anim Sci 2019;18:538–545.
  7. Cosgrove E, Sadeghi R, Schlamp F, Holl H, Moradi SM, Miraei A, Reza S, Abdalla S, Shykind B, Troedsson M, Stefaniuk M, Prabhu A, Bucca S, Bugno M, Wallner B, Malek J, Miller D, Clark A, Antczak D, Brooks S. Genome diversity and the origin of the Arab horse.. Sci Rep 2020;10:9702.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66232-1pmc: PMC7298027pubmed: 32546689google scholar: lookup
  8. Curik I, Ferenčaković M, Sölkner J. Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: A possible solution to an old problem.. Livest Sci 2017;166:26–34.
  9. Dell A, Ryan A, Buckley M. The Cleveland Bay horse: progress in its conservation over the last two decades.. Rare Breeds International Bulletin 2020;97:19–26.
  10. Doyle JL, Carroll CJ, Corbally AF, Fahey AG. An overview of international genetic evaluations of show jumping in sport horses.. Transl Anim Sci 2022;6:txac038.
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txac038pmc: PMC9071089pubmed: 35529043google scholar: lookup
  11. Duru S. Pedigree analysis of the Turkish Arab horse population: structure. inbreeding and genetic variability. Animal 2017;11:1449–1456.
    doi: 10.1017/S175173111700009Xpubmed: 28190413google scholar: lookup
  12. Falconer DS, Mackay TEC. Introduction to quantitative genetics.. 4th ed. Longman; Harlow, UK: 1996.
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources and the Interlaken Declaration.. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome: 2007.
  14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); [last access: 27 April 2022]. https://www.fao.org/home/en. n
  15. Frankham R. Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation.. Biol Conserv 2010;143:1919–1927.
  16. Głażewska I. Speculations on the origin of the Arab horse breed.. Livest Sci 2010;129:49–55.
  17. Flade JE, Gleß K. Kleinpferde.. VEB Deutscher Landvirtschaftsverlag; Berlin: 1989.
  18. Goudet J. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (Version 2.9.4.). 2001.
  19. Groeneveld E, Westhuizen B, Maiwashe N, Voordewind F, Ferraz J. POPREP: A generic report for population management.. Genet Mol Res 2009;8:1158–1178.
    doi: 10.4238/vol8-3gmr648pubmed: 19866435google scholar: lookup
  20. Juras R, Cothran EG. Genetic diversity of the Zemaitukai horse.. (EAAP Scientific Series).Conservation genetics of endangered horse breeds 2005;116:177–183.
    doi: 10.3920/978-90-8686-546-8google scholar: lookup
  21. Juras R, Cothran EG, Klimas R. Genetic analysis of three Lithuanian native horse breeds.. Acta Agr Scand A-An 2003;53:180–185.
    doi: 10.1080/09064700310012971google scholar: lookup
  22. Kierkegaard LS, Groeneveld LF, Kettunen A, Peer Berg P. The status and need for characterization of Nordic animal genetic resources.. Acta Agr Scand A-An 2020;69:2–24.
  23. Koenen EPC, Aldridge LI, Philipsson J. An overview of breeding objectives for warmblood sport horses.. Livest Prod Sci 2004;88:77–84.
  24. Krikščiūnas B. Immunogenetic polymorphism of horses in the Lithuanian SSR and its use in breeding [dissertation]. Baisogala, Lithuania: Lithuanian Research Institute of Livestock and Veterinary; 1990. 155 p..
  25. Krikščiūnas J, Skaisgiris J. Žemės ūkio ministerijos metraštis XX 1918–1938.. 1939. 30, 39–49.
  26. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics.. Genome Res 2009;19:1639–1645.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109pmc: PMC2752132pubmed: 19541911google scholar: lookup
  27. Leroy G, Mary-Huard T, Verrier E, Danvy S, Charvolin E, Burge DC. Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: Examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse.. Genet Sel Evol 2013;45:1.
    doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-1pmc: PMC3599586pubmed: 23281913google scholar: lookup
  28. MacCluer JW, Boyce AJ, Dyke B, Weitkamp LR, Pfennig DW, Parsons CJ. Inbreeding and pedigree structure in Standardbred horses.. J Hered 1983;74:394–399.
  29. Macijauskienė V. Naujų linijų kūrimo proceso įtaka žemaitukų populiacijos genotipui.. Gyvulininkystė 2009 54:20–31.
  30. Macijauskienė V, Šveistienė R, Jatkauskienė V. Peculiarities and differences of Zemaitukai and large-type Zemaitukai horse genotypes.. Biologija 2009;55:57–63.
    doi: 10.2478/v10054-009-0011-6google scholar: lookup
  31. Martyniuk E, Pilling D, Scherf B. Indicators: Do we have effective tools to measure trends in genetic diversity of domesticated animals.. Anim Genet Resour 2010;47:31–43.
    doi: 10.1017/S2078633610001013google scholar: lookup
  32. Metsalu T, Vilo J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap.. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:W566–W570.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468pmc: PMC4489295pubmed: 25969447google scholar: lookup
  33. Nolte W, Thaller G, Kuehn C. Selection signatures in four German warmblood horse breeds: Tracing breeding history in the modern sport horse.. PLoS One 2019;14:e0215913.
  34. Oldenburger Pferdezuchtverband [last access: 20 March 2022];Breeding Programme for Oldenburg Horses. 2022 nhttps://oldenburger-pferde.com/upload/organisation/Zuchtprogramm_des_Oldenburger_Pferdes-2018_ENG_final.pdf. n
  35. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A. Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power, .. Mol Ecol 2004;13:55–65.
  36. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update.. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2537–2539.
  37. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Cothran EG, Andersson LS, Axelsson J, Bailey E, Bannasch D, Binns MM, Borges AS, Brama P, da Câmara Machado A, Distl O, Felicetti M, Fox-Clipsham L, Graves KT, Guérin G, Haase B, Hasegawa T, Hemmann K, Hill EW, Leeb T, Lindgren G, Lohi H, Lopes MS, McGivney BA, Mikko S, Orr N, Penedo MC, Piercy RJ, Raekallio M, Rieder S, Røed KH, Silvestrelli M, Swinburne J, Tozaki T, Vaudin M, Wade CM, McCue ME. Genetic diversity in the modern horse illustrated from genome-wide SNP data.. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e54997.
  38. Pjontek J, Kadlečík O, Kasarda R, Horný M. Pedigree analysis in four Slovak endangered horse breeds.. Czech J Anim Sci 2012;57:54–64.
    doi: 10.17221/5132-CJASgoogle scholar: lookup
  39. Popadiuk SS. Immunogenetic control of the origin of the Hutsul horse breed.. Sci Messenger LNU Vet Med Biotechnol Ser Agric Sci 2019;21:98–102.
    doi: 10.32718/nvlvet-a9117google scholar: lookup
  40. Poyato-Bonilla J, Laseca N, Demyda-Peyrás S, Molina A, Valera M. 500 years of breeding in the Carthusian strain of Pura Raza Español horse: An evolutional analysis using genealogical and genomic data.. J Anim Breed Genet 2022;139:84–99.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12641pubmed: 34363624google scholar: lookup
  41. Próchniak T, Kasperek K, Knaga S, Rozempolska-Rucińska I, Batkowska J, Drabik K. Population structure and genetic diversity of Polish Arabian horses based on pedigree data.. Animal 2024;18:101148.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101148pubmed: 38642411google scholar: lookup
  42. Račkauskaitė A, Šveistienė R, Razmaitė V, Jatkauskienė V. Evaluation of genetic diversity of subdivided genealogical groups in Lithuanian Trakehner horse population using immunogenetic tools.. Czech J Anim Sci 2021;66:200–210.
    doi: 10.17221/118/2020-CJASgoogle scholar: lookup
  43. Remais JV, Xiao N, Akullian A, Qiu D, Blair D. Genetic Assignment Methods for Gaining Insight into the Management of Infectious Disease by Understanding Pathogen, Vector, and Host Movement.. PLoS Pathog 2011;7:e1002013.
  44. Roos L, Hinrichs D, Nissen T, Krieter J. Investigations into genetic variability in Holstein horse breed using pedigree data. Livest Sci 2015;177:25–32.
  45. Schröder W, Stock KF, Distl O. Genetic evaluation of Hanoverian warmblood horses for conformation traits considering the proportion of genes of foreign breeds. Arch Anim Breed 2010;53:377–387.
    doi: 10.5194/aab-53-377-2010google scholar: lookup
  46. Somogyvári E, Posta J, Mihók S. Genetic analysis of the Hungarian population of endangered Hucul horses. Czech J Anim Sci 2018;63:237–246.
    doi: 10.17221/54/2017-CJASgoogle scholar: lookup
  47. Šveistienė R. Lietuvos jojamųjų žirgų įvairovė ir populiacijos struktūros analizė pagal kilmės informaciją. [last access: 20 March 2022];Gyvulininkystė. 2007 49:3–13. nhttps://publications.lsmuni.lt/object/elaba:6219109/6219109.pdf. n
  48. Teegen R, Edel C, Thaller G. Population structure of the Trakehner horse breed. Animal 2009;3:6–15.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731108003273pubmed: 22444167google scholar: lookup
  49. Thirstrup JP, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V. Genetic analysis, breed assignment and conservation priorities of three native Danish horse breeds. Anim Genet 2008;39:496–505.
  50. Trakehner Verband Breeding goal. [last access: 27 April 2025]. 2022. nhttps://www.trakehner-verband.de/en/pferde/zuchtziel/ n
  51. Trakehner Verband [last access: 19 March 2026];Zuchtprogramm für die Population des Ostpreußischen Warmblutpferdes Trakehner Abstammung (Stand April 2025) 2025 Available from: https://www.trakehner-verband.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Zuchtprogramm-2025-Weimar.pdf .
  52. World Breeding Federation for Sport Horses (WBFSH) [last access: 27 April 2025];Guidelines on Setting up a Sport Horse Studbook. 2021 nhttps://www.wbfsh.com/downloads/members/2021-06-WBFSH-Guidelines-on-setting-up-a-studbook.pdf. n
  53. Yaro M, Munyard KA, Stear MJ, Groth DM. Molecular identification of livestock breeds: a tool for modern conservation biology. Biol Rev 2017;92:993–1010.
    doi: 10.1111/brv.12265pubmed: 27000721google scholar: lookup
  54. Zechner P, Sölkner J, Bodo I, Druml T, Baumung R, Achmann R, Marti E, Habe F, Brem G. Analysis of diversity and population structure in the Lipizzan horse breed based on pedigree information. Livest Prod Sci 2002;77:137–146.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.