Analyze Diet
Archives of virology2025; 170(8); 181; doi: 10.1007/s00705-025-06368-5

Growth properties of recombinant equine influenza viruses with different backbones generated by reverse genetics in embryonated chicken eggs.

Abstract: Reverse genetics (RG) technology is useful for quickly updating influenza vaccine strains. A high-yield backbone (i.e., six segments other than hemagglutinin and neuraminidase) derived from A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (PR8) has been developed to improve the growth of avian and human influenza viruses. However, for equine influenza virus (EIV), an EIV-derived backbone may have better growth properties due to more-natural segment combinations. We compared the growth properties in eggs between the PR8 backbone and an EIV backbone from A/equine/Ibaraki/1/2007, a vaccine strain in Japan. The results showed that the PR8 backbone was propagated more efficiently and is therefore more suitable for EIV vaccine production.
Publication Date: 2025-07-12 PubMed ID: 40646296PubMed Central: 6135912DOI: 10.1007/s00705-025-06368-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study aims to investigate and compare the growth attributes of different recombinant equine influenza viruses in chicken eggs using reverse genetics technology. The researchers found that the PR8 backbone, derived from A/Puerto Rico/8/1934, exhibited better propagation efficiency, making it preferable for equine influenza virus vaccine production.

Reverse Genetics Technology and Influenza Vaccines

  • The research is predicated on the concept of reverse genetics (RG), a method that allows for the alteration of the genetic sequence of viruses to study their properties and behavior. This technology is considered advantageous in swiftly updating influenza vaccine strains.
  • Prior to this study, a high-yield backbone extracted from A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (often referred to as PR8) was formulated for improving the growth properties of avian and human strains of influenza viruses. A virus “backbone” refers to the structural proteins that hold the virus together.

Comparing Growth Properties of EIV with PR8 and EIV Backbones

  • The researchers speculated that for equine influenza virus (EIV), a backbone derived from the same virus might exhibit improved growth characteristics, likely due to more natural combinations of viral segments.
  • To test this hypothesis, the growth properties in eggs of PR8 backbone and an EIV backbone derived from A/equine/Ibaraki/1/2007 (a vaccine strain used in Japan) were compared.
  • Eggs are often used as a medium for virus growth in laboratories due to their suitability for virus propagation and ease of use.

Results and Implications

  • The study results revealed that the PR8 backbone was more efficiently propagated, demonstrating superior growth properties compared to the EIV backbone.
  • These findings imply that the PR8 backbone, rather than an EIV-derived backbone, is more appropriate for developing and producing vaccines for equine influenza virus.
  • This research contributes valuable information to the field of veterinary virology and could lead to the formulation of more effective vaccines for equine influenza, ultimately leading to better disease prevention and control strategies in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Nemoto M, Kawanishi N, Kambayashi Y, Bannai H, Yamanaka T, Garvey M, Cullinane A, Yamayoshi S, Kawaoka Y, Tsujimura K. (2025). Growth properties of recombinant equine influenza viruses with different backbones generated by reverse genetics in embryonated chicken eggs. Arch Virol, 170(8), 181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-025-06368-5

Publication

ISSN: 1432-8798
NlmUniqueID: 7506870
Country: Austria
Language: English
Volume: 170
Issue: 8
Pages: 181

Researcher Affiliations

Nemoto, Manabu
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tochigi, Japan. nemoto_manabu@equinst.go.jp.
Kawanishi, Nanako
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tochigi, Japan.
Kambayashi, Yoshinori
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tochigi, Japan.
Bannai, Hiroshi
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tochigi, Japan.
Yamanaka, Takashi
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tochigi, Japan.
Garvey, Marie
  • Virology Unit, Irish Equine Centre, Kildare, Ireland.
Cullinane, Ann
  • Virology Unit, Irish Equine Centre, Kildare, Ireland.
Yamayoshi, Seiya
  • Division of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • The Research Center for Global Viral Diseases, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
  • The University of Tokyo Pandemic Preparedness, Infection and Advanced Research Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Kawaoka, Yoshihiro
  • Division of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • The Research Center for Global Viral Diseases, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
  • The University of Tokyo Pandemic Preparedness, Infection and Advanced Research Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Tsujimura, Koji
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tochigi, Japan.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Reverse Genetics / methods
  • Horses
  • Chick Embryo
  • Influenza A Virus, H3N8 Subtype / growth & development
  • Influenza A Virus, H3N8 Subtype / genetics
  • Influenza Vaccines / genetics

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Japan Racing Association Research Planning Committee (approval no. 2021-2827-02). Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 15 references
  1. Singh RK, Dhama K, Karthik K, Khandia R, Munjal A, Khurana SK, Chakraborty S, Malik YS, Virmani N, Singh R, Tripathi BN, Munir M, van der Kolk JH. A comprehensive review on equine influenza virus: etiology, epidemiology, pathobiology, advances in developing diagnostics, vaccines, and control strategies.. Front Microbiol 2018 9:1941.
    pubmed: 30237788pmc: 6135912
  2. Chambers TM. Equine Influenza. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2022 12:a038331.
    pubmed: 32152243pmc: 8725621
  3. Whitlock F, Grewar J, Newton R. An epidemiological overview of the equine influenza epidemic in great britain during 2019.. Equine Vet J 2023 55:153–164.
    pubmed: 36054725
  4. Yamanaka T, Niwa H, Tsujimura K, Kondo T, Matsumura T. Epidemic of equine influenza among vaccinated racehorses in Japan in 2007.. J Vet Med Sci 2008 70:623–625.
    pubmed: 18628606
  5. Oladunni FS, Oseni SO, Martinez-Sobrido L, Chambers TM. Equine influenza virus and vaccines.. Viruses 2021 13:1657.
    pubmed: 34452521pmc: 8402878
  6. Neumann G, Watanabe T, Ito H, Watanabe S, Goto H, Gao P, Hughes M, Perez DR, Donis R, Hoffmann E, Hobom G, Kawaoka Y. Generation of influenza a viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999 96:9345–9350.
    pubmed: 10430945pmc: 17785
  7. Ohta M, Bannai H, Kambayashi Y, Tamura N, Tsujimura K, Yamayoshi S, Kawaoka Y, Nemoto M. Growth properties and immunogenicity of a virus generated by reverse genetics for an inactivated equine influenza vaccine.. Equine Vet J 2022 54:139–144.
    pubmed: 33527477
  8. Ohta M, Kambayashi Y, Mita H, Kuroda T, Bannai H, Tsujimura K, Yamanaka T, Garvey M, Cullinane A, Yamayoshi S, Kawaoka Y, Nemoto M. Protective efficacy of a reverse genetics-derived inactivated vaccine against equine influenza virus in horses.. Vaccine 2022 40:6362–6366.
    pubmed: 36175213
  9. Ohta M, Bannai H, Kambayashi Y, Tsujimura K, Tamura N, Iwamoto Y, Wakuno A, Yamayoshi S, Kawaoka Y, Nemoto M. Antibody responses to a reverse genetics-derived bivalent inactivated equine influenza vaccine in thoroughbred horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2022 109:103860.
    pubmed: 34973368
  10. Ping J, Lopes TJS, Nidom CA, Ghedin E, Macken CA, Fitch A, Imai M, Maher EA, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. Development of high-yield influenza a virus vaccine viruses.. Nat Commun 2015 6:8148.
    pubmed: 26334134
  11. Nemoto M, Yamayoshi S, Bannai H, Tsujimura K, Kokado H, Kawaoka Y, Yamanaka T. A single amino acid change in hemagglutinin reduces the cross-reactivity of antiserum against an equine influenza vaccine strain.. Arch Virol 2019 164:2355–2358.
    pubmed: 31227892
  12. Nemoto M, Yamanaka T, Bannai H, Tsujimura K, Kokado H. Complete genomic sequences of H3N8 equine influenza virus strains used as vaccine strains in Japan.. Genome Announc 2018 6:e00172-e218.
    pubmed: 29567739pmc: 5864938
  13. Shu Y, McCauley J. GISAID: global initiative on sharing all influenza data - from vision to reality.. Euro Surveill 2017 22:30494.
    pubmed: 28382917pmc: 5388101
  14. Motoshima M, Okamatsu M, Asakura S, Kuribayashi S, Sengee S, Batchuluun D, Ito M, Maeda Y, Eto M, Sakoda Y, Sodnomdarjaa R, Kida H. Antigenic and genetic analysis of H3N8 influenza viruses isolated from horses in Japan and Mongolia, and imported from Canada and Belgium during 2007–2010.. Arch Virol 2011 156:1379–1385.
    pubmed: 21505822
  15. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints.. Am J Hyg 1938 27:493–497.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.