Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1986; 118(12); 334-338; doi: 10.1136/vr.118.12.334

Guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in animals. Prepared by a working party of the Association of Veterinary Teachers and Research Workers.

Abstract: Despite some views to the contrary the working party of the Association of Veterinary Teachers and Research Workers considers that it has been demonstrated that it is possible to prepare guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in experimental animals. The detailed information readily available on species specific signs is limited and it has been particularly difficult to obtain such signs for the smaller mammals and for the non-mammalian species.
Publication Date: 1986-03-22 PubMed ID: 3705373DOI: 10.1136/vr.118.12.334Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the development of guidelines for recognizing and assessing pain in experimental animals, acknowledging the difficulty in acquiring specific signs, especially for smaller mammals and non-mammalian species.

Objective of the Research

  • The main objective of this research conducted by the working party of the Association of Veterinary Teachers and Research Workers was to establish guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in animals used in experiments. This is particularly crucial given the ethical implications of using animals in experimental research, and the need to minimize any pain or distress caused to these animals.

Insufficiency in Available Information

  • The researchers highlight a limitation in their work, which is the lack of detailed, species-specific information available. Recognizing and assessing pain in animals can be significantly different across species, and it is important for the guidelines to capture this diversity.
  • This limitation is particularly pronounced for smaller mammals and non-mammalian species, for which the research team has faced significant difficulty in obtaining specific signs of pain.

Tackling Views to the Contrary

  • In the course of their research, the team addresses some opposing view that suggests it might not be possible to create comprehensive and effective guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in experimental animals.
  • Despite the existence of this viewpoint, the research team firmly believes in the possibility and importance of preparing such guidelines, and this belief underlies the motivation for their research work.

Conceptual Importance

  • The establishment of these guidelines is expected to play a significant role in promoting the best practices when it comes to using animals in experimental research. It is anticipated to ensure ethical practices in the scientific community, leading to minimal pain and distress inflicted on animals during experiments.

Cite This Article

APA
(1986). Guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in animals. Prepared by a working party of the Association of Veterinary Teachers and Research Workers. Vet Rec, 118(12), 334-338. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.118.12.334

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 118
Issue: 12
Pages: 334-338

Researcher Affiliations

MeSH Terms

  • Analgesics / therapeutic use
  • Animals
  • Birds
  • Cats
  • Cattle
  • Dogs
  • Fishes
  • Goats
  • Horses
  • Pain / diagnosis
  • Pain / physiopathology
  • Pain / prevention & control
  • Pain / veterinary
  • Poultry
  • Primates
  • Rabbits
  • Sheep
  • Stress, Physiological / physiopathology
  • Stress, Physiological / veterinary
  • Swine
  • Vocalization, Animal