FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Anim Cogn / Horses discriminate between human facial and vocal expressio...
Animal cognition2023; 26(5); 1733-1742; doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01817-7

Horses discriminate between human facial and vocal expressions of sadness and joy.

Abstract: Communication of emotions plays a key role in intraspecific social interactions and likely in interspecific interactions. Several studies have shown that animals perceive human joy and anger, but few studies have examined other human emotions, such as sadness. In this study, we conducted a cross-modal experiment, in which we showed 28 horses two soundless videos simultaneously, one showing a sad, and one a joyful human face. These were accompanied by either a sad or joyful voice. The number of horses whose first look to the video that was incongruent with the voice was longer than their first look to the congruent video was higher than chance, suggesting that horses could form cross-modal representations of human joy and sadness. Moreover, horses were more attentive to the videos of joy and looked at them for longer, more frequently, and more rapidly than the videos of sadness. Their heart rates tended to increase when they heard joy and to decrease when they heard sadness. These results show that horses are able to discriminate facial and vocal expressions of joy and sadness and may form cross-modal representations of these emotions; they also are more attracted to joyful faces than to sad faces and seem to be more aroused by a joyful voice than a sad voice. Further studies are needed to better understand how horses perceive the range of human emotions, and we propose that future experiments include neutral stimuli as well as emotions with different arousal levels but a same valence.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-08-06 PubMed ID: 37543956PubMed Central: 4785927DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01817-7Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study revolves around understanding how horses perceive and react to human emotions, especially joy and sadness.

Background:

  • Emotion communication is vital for social interactions within a species and possibly between different species.
  • Previous research indicates animals can recognize certain human emotions like joy and anger. However, understanding of emotions like sadness is limited.

Experiment:

  • Participants: 28 horses.
  • Setup: Horses were shown two simultaneous silent videos. One displayed a happy human face, and the other showed a sad face. Alongside the visuals, a voice expressing either joy or sadness was played.
  • The researchers observed which video the horses looked at first and for how long, comparing the reactions between congruent (e.g., sad face with sad voice) and incongruent (e.g., sad face with happy voice) scenarios.

Findings:

  • Horses seemed to recognize the mismatch when the emotion expressed in the voice did not match the facial expression in the video.
  • Horses displayed more attention towards the joyful faces. They looked at happy videos more often, for longer durations, and initiated their gaze more quickly than when looking at sad videos.
  • In terms of physiological response, horses’ heart rates tended to rise with joyful voices and decrease with sad voices.

Conclusions:

  • Horses can differentiate between human expressions of joy and sadness in both facial and vocal cues. They might even form a combined understanding of these emotions across different senses (like hearing and seeing).
  • Horses seem more drawn to happy human expressions and might be more emotionally stirred by joyful sounds than sad ones.
  • The researchers recommend that future studies should consider adding neutral emotional stimuli and exploring emotions of similar positivity or negativity but with varying intensity levels.

In simpler terms, this study suggests that horses can understand and react differently to human expressions of joy and sadness. They seem more attracted to and possibly uplifted by happiness, while sadness has a calming or downplaying effect on them.

Cite This Article

APA
Jardat P, Liehrmann O, Reigner F, Parias C, Calandreau L, Lansade L. (2023). Horses discriminate between human facial and vocal expressions of sadness and joy. Anim Cogn, 26(5), 1733-1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01817-7

Publication

Animal cognition
ISSN: 1435-9456
NlmUniqueID: 9814573
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 26
Issue: 5
Pages: 1733-1742

Researcher Affiliations

Jardat, Plotine
  • CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France. plotine.jardat@gmail.com.
Liehrmann, Océane
  • Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Reigner, Fabrice
  • UEPAO, INRAE, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Parias, Céline
  • CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Calandreau, Ludovic
  • CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Lansade, Léa
  • CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France. lea.lansade@inrae.fr.

MeSH Terms

  • Humans
  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Sadness
  • Facial Expression
  • Emotions / physiology
  • Happiness
  • Voice

Grant Funding

  • 32 001176-Cognition Equine / French Horse and Riding Institute

References

This article includes 55 references
  1. Adriaense JEC, Koski SE, Huber L, Lamm C. Challenges in the comparative study of empathy and related phenomena in animals.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020 May;112:62-82.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.021pubmed: 32001272google scholar: lookup
  2. Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Joo H. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organ Res Methods 16:270–301.
    doi: 10.1177/1094428112470848google scholar: lookup
  3. Albuquerque N, Guo K, Wilkinson A, Savalli C, Otta E, Mills D. Dogs recognize dog and human emotions.. Biol Lett 2016 Jan;12(1):20150883.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883pubmed: 26763220pmc: 4785927google scholar: lookup
  4. Albuquerque N, Guo K, Wilkinson A, Resende B, Mills DS. Mouth-licking by dogs as a response to emotional stimuli.. Behav Processes 2018 Jan;146:42-45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.006pubmed: 29129727google scholar: lookup
  5. Baba C, Kawai M, Takimoto-Inose A. Are Horses (Equus caballus) Sensitive to Human Emotional Cues?. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 29;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090630pubmed: 31470656pmc: 6770165google scholar: lookup
  6. Bänziger T, Mortillaro M, Scherer KR. Introducing the Geneva Multimodal expression corpus for experimental research on emotion perception.. Emotion 2012 Oct;12(5):1161-79.
    doi: 10.1037/a0025827pubmed: 22081890google scholar: lookup
  7. Briefer EF. Vocal contagion of emotions in non-human animals. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci .
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2783google scholar: lookup
  8. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9:378–400.
    doi: 10.32614/RJ-2017-066google scholar: lookup
  9. Corujo LA, Kieson E, Schloesser T, Gloor PA. Emotion recognition in horses with convolutional neural networks. Futur Internet 13:1–13.
    doi: 10.3390/fi13100250google scholar: lookup
  10. Custance D, Mayer J. Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study.. Anim Cogn 2012 Sep;15(5):851-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0510-1pubmed: 22644113google scholar: lookup
  11. Désiré L, Boissy A, Veissier I. Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology.. Behav Processes 2002 Nov;60(2):165-180.
    doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00081-5pubmed: 12426068google scholar: lookup
  12. Friard O, Gamba M. BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330.
    doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12584google scholar: lookup
  13. Fureix C, Meagher RK. What can inactivity (in its various forms) reveal about affective states in non-human animals? A review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 171:8–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.036google scholar: lookup
  14. Fureix C, Beaulieu C, Argaud S. Investigating anhedonia in a non-conventional species: Do some riding horses Equus caballus display symptoms of depression?. Appl Anim Behav Sci 162:26–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.007google scholar: lookup
  15. Galvan M, Vonk J. Man's other best friend: domestic cats (F. silvestris catus) and their discrimination of human emotion cues.. Anim Cogn 2016 Jan;19(1):193-205.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0927-4pubmed: 26400749google scholar: lookup
  16. Gouyet C, Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S, Jardat P, Parias C, Reigner F, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Horses cross-modally recognize women and men.. Sci Rep 2023 Mar 8;13(1):3864.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30830-6pubmed: 36890162pmc: 9995451google scholar: lookup
  17. Hall C, Randle H, Pearson G. Assessing equine emotional state. Appl Anim Behav Sci 205:183–193.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.03.006google scholar: lookup
  18. Hartig F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.3. .
  19. Hötzel MJ, Vieira MC, Leme DP. Exploring horse owners’ and caretakers’ perceptions of emotions and associated behaviors in horses. J Vet Behav 29:18–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.10.002google scholar: lookup
  20. Huber A, Barber ALA, Faragó T, Müller CA, Huber L. Investigating emotional contagion in dogs (Canis familiaris) to emotional sounds of humans and conspecifics.. Anim Cogn 2017 Jul;20(4):703-715.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1092-8pubmed: 28432495pmc: 5486498google scholar: lookup
  21. Jardat P, Lansade L. Cognition and the human-animal relationship: a review of the sociocognitive skills of domestic mammals toward humans.. Anim Cogn 2022 Apr;25(2):369-384.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01557-6pubmed: 34476652google scholar: lookup
  22. Jardat P, Calandreau L, Ferreira V, Gouyet C, Parias C, Reigner F, Lansade L. Pet-directed speech improves horses' attention toward humans.. Sci Rep 2022 Mar 11;12(1):4297.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08109-zpubmed: 35277552pmc: 8917202google scholar: lookup
  23. Jardat P, Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S, Gouyet C, Degrande R, Parias C, Reigner F, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Horses form cross-modal representations of adults and children.. Anim Cogn 2023 Mar;26(2):369-377.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01667-9pubmed: 35962844google scholar: lookup
  24. Jitsumori M, Yoshihara M. Categorical discrimination of human facial expressions by pigeons: a test of the linear feature model. Q J Exp Psychol Sect B Comp Physiol Psychol 50:253–268.
  25. Kassambara A. ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based Publication Ready Plots. .
  26. Kassambara A, Kosinski M, Biecek P. Survminer: drawing survival curves using “ggplot2”. .
  27. Keaveney SM. Equines and their human companions. J Bus Res 61:444–454.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.017google scholar: lookup
  28. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.. J Chiropr Med 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012pubmed: 27330520pmc: 4913118google scholar: lookup
  29. Kremer L, Klein Holkenborg SEJ, Reimert I, Bolhuis JE, Webb LE. The nuts and bolts of animal emotion.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020 Jun;113:273-286.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.028pubmed: 31982603google scholar: lookup
  30. Lampe JF, Andre J. Cross-modal recognition of human individuals in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2012 Jul;15(4):623-30.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0490-1pubmed: 22526687google scholar: lookup
  31. Mendl M, Burman OH, Paul ES. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood.. Proc Biol Sci 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):2895-904.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303pubmed: 20685706pmc: 2982018google scholar: lookup
  32. Nagasawa M, Murai K, Mogi K, Kikusui T. Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions.. Anim Cogn 2011 Jul;14(4):525-33.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0386-5pubmed: 21359654google scholar: lookup
  33. Nakamura K, Takimoto-Inose A, Hasegawa T. Cross-modal perception of human emotion in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Sci Rep 2018 Jun 21;8(1):8660.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26892-6pubmed: 29930289pmc: 6013457google scholar: lookup
  34. Nawroth C, Albuquerque N, Savalli C, Single MS, McElligott AG. Goats prefer positive human emotional facial expressions.. R Soc Open Sci 2018 Aug;5(8):180491.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.180491pubmed: 30225038pmc: 6124102google scholar: lookup
  35. Panksepp J. Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. .
  36. Patteson MW. Equine cardiology. .
  37. Pérez-Manrique A, Gomila A. Emotional contagion in nonhuman animals: A review.. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 2022 Jan;13(1):e1560.
    doi: 10.1002/WCS.1560pubmed: 33951303google scholar: lookup
  38. Pritsch C, Telkemeyer S, Mühlenbeck C, Liebal K. Perception of facial expressions reveals selective affect-biased attention in humans and orangutans.. Sci Rep 2017 Aug 10;7(1):7782.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07563-4pubmed: 28798378pmc: 5552869google scholar: lookup
  39. Proops L, Mccomb K. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:3131–3138.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0626google scholar: lookup
  40. Proops L, Grounds K, Smith AV, McComb K. Animals Remember Previous Facial Expressions that Specific Humans Have Exhibited.. Curr Biol 2018 May 7;28(9):1428-1432.e4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.035pubmed: 29706519google scholar: lookup
  41. Quaranta A, d'Ingeo S, Amoruso R, Siniscalchi M. Emotion Recognition in Cats.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 28;10(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10071107pubmed: 32605256pmc: 7401521google scholar: lookup
  42. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. .
  43. Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Parias C. Housing horses in individual boxes is a challenge with regard to welfare. Animal 9:621.
    doi: 10.3390/ANI9090621google scholar: lookup
  44. Siniscalchi M, d'Ingeo S, Fornelli S, Quaranta A. Lateralized behavior and cardiac activity of dogs in response to human emotional vocalizations.. Sci Rep 2018 Jan 8;8(1):77.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18417-4pubmed: 29311574pmc: 5758824google scholar: lookup
  45. Siniscalchi M, d'Ingeo S, Quaranta A. Orienting asymmetries and physiological reactivity in dogs' response to human emotional faces.. Learn Behav 2018 Dec;46(4):574-585.
    doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0325-2pubmed: 29923158google scholar: lookup
  46. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, McComb K. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus).. Biol Lett 2016 Feb;12(2):20150907.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907pubmed: 26864784pmc: 4780548google scholar: lookup
  47. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, Scott SK, McComb K. Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations.. Sci Rep 2018 Aug 29;8(1):13052.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30777-zpubmed: 30158532pmc: 6115467google scholar: lookup
  48. Špinka M. Social dimension of emotions and its implication for animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 138:170–181.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.005google scholar: lookup
  49. Therneau TM. Coxme: mixed effects cox models. .
  50. Trösch M, Cuzol F, Parias C, Calandreau L, Nowak R, Lansade L. Horses Categorize Human Emotions Cross-Modally Based on Facial Expression and Non-Verbal Vocalizations.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 24;9(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9110862pubmed: 31653088pmc: 6912773google scholar: lookup
  51. Van Dierendonck MC, Goodwin D. Social contact in horses: implications for human-horse interactions. In: de Jonge FH, van den Bos R (eds) The human-animal relationship. Forever and a day. Royal van Gorcum, Assen, pp 65–81.
  52. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, van der Werf JT, Schilder MB, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses.. Physiol Behav 2002 Jun 1;76(2):289-96.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00698-4pubmed: 12044602google scholar: lookup
  53. von Borell E, Langbein J, Després G. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals—a review. Physiol Behav 92:293–316.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007google scholar: lookup
  54. von Lewinski M, Biau S, Erber R. Cortisol release, heart rate and heart rate variability in the horse and its rider: different responses to training and performance. Vet J 197:229–232.
    doi: 10.1016/J.TVJL.2012.12.025google scholar: lookup
  55. Wickham H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. .
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Jardat P, Destrez A, Damon F, Tanguy-Guillo N, Lainé AL, Parias C, Reigner F, Ferreira VHB, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Human emotional odours influence horses' behaviour and physiology. PLoS One 2026;21(1):e0337948.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337948pubmed: 41533708google scholar: lookup
  2. Ricci-Bonot C, Brosche K, Baragli P, Nicol C. A systematic review on the effect of individual characteristics and management practices on equine cognition. Anim Cogn 2025 Nov 26;28(1):96.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-02016-2pubmed: 41296132google scholar: lookup
  3. Larrigaldie I, Damon F, Brimaud D, Lansade L, Schaal B, Destrez A. Behaviour of ewes and lambs in response to human emotional odours. Sci Rep 2025 Nov 24;15(1):45234.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-29186-wpubmed: 41286085google scholar: lookup
  4. Jardat P, Yamamoto S, Ringhofer M, Tanguy-Guillo N, Parias C, Reigner F, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Emotional contagion of fear and joy from humans to horses using a combination of facial and vocal cues. Sci Rep 2025 May 21;15(1):17689.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98794-3pubmed: 40399542google scholar: lookup
  5. Brosche K, Veit A, Fraga PP, Wondrak M, Andics A, Virányi Z. Human ostension enhances attentiveness but not performance in domestic pigs. Sci Rep 2025 May 9;15(1):16161.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00511-7pubmed: 40346262google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.