FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Aust Vet J / How decision-making about euthanasia for animals is taught t...
Australian veterinary journal2021; 99(8); 334-343; doi: 10.1111/avj.13077

How decision-making about euthanasia for animals is taught to Australasian veterinary students.

Abstract: This study set out to explore how euthanasia decision-making for animals was taught to students in eight Australasian veterinary schools. A questionnaire-style interview guide was used by a representative at each university to interview educators. Educators were interviewed about their teaching of euthanasia decision-making for four categories of animals: livestock, equine, companion and avian/wildlife. Using thematic analysis, the terms provided by participants to describe how (mode of teaching) and what (specific content) they taught to students were categorised. Information about content was categorised into human-centred factors that influence decision-making, and animal-based indicators used to directly inform decision-making. All eight representatives reported some teaching relevant to euthanasia decision-making at their university for livestock, companion animal and avian/wildlife. One representative reported no such teaching for equid animals at their university. Observation of a euthanasia case was rarely reported as a teaching method. Five universities reported multiple modes of teaching relevant information, while two universities made use of modalities that could be described as opportunistic teaching (e.g., 'Discussion of clinical cases'). Factors taught at most universities included financial considerations, and that it is the owner's decision to make, while animal-based indicators taught included QoL/animal welfare, prognosis and behaviour change. Overall, most universities used a variety of methods to cover relevant material, usually including lectures and several other approaches for all animal types. However, because two universities relied on presentation of clinical cases, not all students at these veterinary schools will be exposed to make, or assist in making, euthanasia decisions.
© 2021 Australian Veterinary Association.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-05-17 PubMed ID: 34002368DOI: 10.1111/avj.13077Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article explores how veterinary students in eight Australasian schools are taught decision-making processes related to animal euthanasia. The teaching methods and content are examined and categorized based on educator interviews, revealing various approaches and indicating aspects that need improvement.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a study to ascertain how euthanasia decision-making is taught in veterinary schools by interviewing a representative educator from each school.
  • These representatives provided information on how, and what, they taught students regarding euthanasia related decisions for different types of animals – livestock, equine, companion animals, and avian/wildlife.
  • An interview guide fashioned like a questionnaire was used in this process, ensuring the data collected could be comparatively analysed.

Research Findings

  • The profiles of teaching methods were categorised through thematic analysis. Teaching methodologies included direct instruction, observation-based, and experiential learning.
  • All participating universities reported teaching about euthanasia decision-making related to livestock, companion animals, and avian/wildlife, excluding an institution which didn’t report teachings related to equid animals.
  • Interestingly, observation of an actual euthanasia case was sparsely reported as a teaching method.
  • Five universities were found to employ diverse methods for teaching euthanasia decision-making, whereas the remaining three mainly relied on clinical case presentations, described as ‘opportunistic teaching’.

Content of Teaching

  • The teaching content was separated into two categories: human-centred factors that affect decision-making and animal-based indicators that directly influence decisions.
  • Topics commonly covered at most universities included financial considerations and the emphasis that it’s the owner’s ultimate decision on euthanasia. Animal-based indicators included ones like quality of life, prognosis, and behaviour changes.
  • However, the reliance on opportunistic teaching methods by some universities means that not all students are appropriately exposed to euthanasia decision-making situations.

Conclusions

  • Overall, the study reveals that most veterinary schools use a mix of methods to teach euthanasia decision-making and cover a wide range of influencing factors, both human-centred and animal-based.
  • However, some inconsistencies were detected, mainly with the universities that depended on clinical case presentations, calling for some improvements in teaching approaches for all veterinary schools.

Cite This Article

APA
Littlewood KE, Beausoleil NJ, Stafford KJ, Stephens C, Collins T, Quain A, Hazel S, Lloyd JF, Mallia C, Richards L, Wedler NK, Zito S. (2021). How decision-making about euthanasia for animals is taught to Australasian veterinary students. Aust Vet J, 99(8), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13077

Publication

Australian veterinary journal
ISSN: 1751-0813
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 99
Issue: 8
Pages: 334-343

Researcher Affiliations

Littlewood, K E
  • School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Beausoleil, N J
  • School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Stafford, K J
  • School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Stephens, C
  • School of Psychology, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Collins, T
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
Quain, A
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
Hazel, S
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Lloyd, Jk F
  • Discipline of Veterinary Sciences, College of Public Health, Medical & Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 1 Solander Drive, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia.
Mallia, C
  • School of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, New South Wales, 2640, Australia.
Richards, L
  • School of Veterinary Science, University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.
Wedler, N K
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
Zito, S
  • Animal Welfare Science and Education Department, Royal New Zealand SPCA National Office, 3047 Great North Road, Auckland, 0640, New Zealand.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Wild
  • Education, Veterinary
  • Euthanasia, Animal
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Quality of Life
  • Students

References

This article includes 58 references
  1. Hewson CJ. How might veterinarians do more for animal welfare?. Can Vet J-Revue Vet Can 2003;44:1000-1004.
  2. Morton DB. A commentary on the animal welfare symposium, with possible actions.. J Vet Med Educ 2010;37:107-113.
  3. Yeates JW. Maximising canine welfare in veterinary practice and research: a review.. Vet J 2012;192:272-278.
  4. Persson K, Selter F, Neitzke G. Philosophy of a “good death” in small animals and consequences for euthanasia in animal law and veterinary practice.. Animals 2020;10:1-14.
  5. Yeates J. Animal welfare in veterinary practice.. Ames, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
  6. Morris P. Blue juice: euthanasia in veterinary medicine.. Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 2012.
  7. Leary SUW, Anthony R, Cartner S. AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2020 edition.. Schaumburg, American Veterinary Medical Association, 2020.
  8. Tinga CE, Adams CL, Bonnett BN. Survey of veterinary technical and professional skills in students and recent graduates of a veterinary college.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:924-931.
  9. Tannenbaum J. Veterinary medical ethics: A focus of conflicting interests.. J Soc Issues 1993;49:143-156.
  10. Goldberg K. Veterinary hospice and palliative care: a comprehensive review of the literature.. Vet Rec 2016;178:369-374.
  11. Kemp HR, Jacobs N, Stewart S. The lived experience of companion-animal loss: A systematic review of qualitative studies.. Anthrozoos 2016;29:533-557.
  12. Sandøe P, Corr S, Palmer C. Companion animal ethics.. Oxford, UFAW, 2016.
  13. Knesl O, Hart B, Fine A. Veterinarians and humane endings: when is it the right time to euthanize a companion animal?. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:1-7.
  14. Grimm H, Bergadano A, Musk G. Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party.. Vet Rec 2018;182:664.
  15. Shaw JR, Lagoni L. End-of-life communication in veterinary medicine: Delivering bad news and euthanasia decision making.. Vet Clinics North Am-Small Anim Pract 2007;37:95-108.
  16. Matte AR, Khosa DK, Coe JB. Impacts of the process and decision-making around companion animal euthanasia on veterinary wellbeing.. Vet Rec 2019;185:1-6.
  17. Magalhaes-Sant'Ana M. Ethics teaching in European veterinary schools: a qualitative case study.. Vet Rec 2014;175:592-597.
  18. Magalhaes-Sant'Ana M, Lassen J, Millar KM. Examining why ethics is taught to veterinary students: a qualitative study of veterinary educators’ perspectives.. J Vet Med Educ 2014;41:350-357.
  19. Morton DB, Sant'ana MM, Ohl F. FVE & EAEVE report on European veterinary education in animal welfare science, ethics and law.. Joint publication of the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe and the European Association of Establishments of Veterinary Education, 2013.
  20. Wright TA, Bonett DG. Job satisfaction and psychological well-being as nonadditive predictors of workplace turnover.. J Manage 2007;33:141-160.
  21. Black AF, Winefield HR, Chur-Hansen A. Occupational stress in veterinary nurses: Roles of the work environment and own companion animal.. Anthrozoös 2011;24:191-202.
  22. Cake MA, Bell MA, Williams JC. Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME guide no. 38.. Med Teach 2016;38:550-563.
  23. Anonymous, Australasian Veterinary Boards Council Inc. Program accreditation.. 2020. Available at: https://avbc.asn.au/veterinary-education/program-accreditation/. Accessed 3 March 2021.
  24. Anonymous. COE accreditation policies and procedures: requirements.. Available at: https://www.avma.org/education/accreditation/colleges/coe-accreditation-policies-and-procedures-requirements. 2020. Accessed 22 February 2020.
  25. Anonymous. Accreditation standards.. 2021. Available at: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/setting-standards/accrediting-primary-qualifications/accrediting-veterinary-degrees/accreditation-standards/. Accessed 3 March 2021.
  26. Anonymous. Clinical procedures checklists.. 2016. Available at: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/pdp-competences-checklist/. Accessed 22 March 2017.
  27. Main DCJ, Thornton P, Kerr K. Teaching animal welfare science, ethics, and law to veterinary students in the United Kingdom.. J Vet Med Educ 2005;32:505-508.
  28. Littlewood KE, Beausoleil NJ, Stafford KJ. Exploring how end-of-life management is taught to Australasian veterinary students. Part 1: technical euthanasia.. Vet Rec 2018;183:1-10.
  29. Littlewood KE, Beausoleil NJ, Stafford KJ. How management of grief associated with ending the life of an animal is taught to Australasian veterinary students.. Aust Vet J 2020;98:356-363.
  30. Dickinson GE, Roof KW, Roof PD. UK veterinarians’ experiences with euthanasia.. Vet Rec 2014;175:174-175.
  31. Dickinson GE, Roof PD, Roof KW. End-of-life issues in United States veterinary medicine schools.. Soc Anim 2010;18:152-162.
  32. Cohen-Salter C, Folmer-Brown S, Hogrefe KM. A model euthanasia workshop: one class's experience at Tufts University.. J Vet Med Educ 2004;31:72-75.
  33. Shivley CB, Garry FB, Kogan LR. Survey of animal welfare, animal behavior, and animal ethics courses in the curricula of AVMA Council on education-accredited veterinary colleges and schools.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016;248:1165-1170.
  34. Bath D, Smith C, Stein S. Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum.. Higher Educ Res Dev 2004;23:313-328.
  35. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it take at least two to tango).. Soc Sci Med 1997;44:681-692.
  36. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. A typology of errors and myths perpetuated in educational research textbooks.. Curr Issues Educ 2005;8:1-13.
  37. Polkinghorne DE. Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research.. J Couns Psychol 2005;52:137-145.
  38. Lyons AC. Approaches to collecting data.. In: Rohleder P, Lyons AC, editors. Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2015;74-95.
  39. Moon K, Blackman D. A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists.. Conserv Biol 2014;28:1167-1177.
  40. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology.. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.
  41. Hart LA, Hart BL, Mader B. Humane euthanasia and companion animal death: Caring for the animal, the client, and the veterinarian.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;197:1292-1299.
  42. Dickinson GE, Roof PD, Roof KW. A curvey of veterinarians in the US: Euthanasia and other end-of-life issues.. Anthrozoos 2011;24:167-174.
  43. Tatlock S, Gober M, Williamson N. Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of an owner-completed measure of feline quality of life.. Vet J 2017;228:22-32.
  44. Vols KK, Heden MA, Kristensen AT. Quality of life assessment in dogs and cats receiving chemotherapy - a review of current methods.. Vet Comp Oncol 2017;15:684-691.
  45. Giuffrida MA, Brown DC, Ellenberg SS. Development and psychometric testing of the canine owner-reported quality of life questionnaire, an instrument designed to measure quality of life in dogs with cancer.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018;252:1073-1083.
  46. Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE. The 2020 five domains model: including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare.. Animals 2020;10:1-24.
  47. Anonymous. Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: Past, present and future.. London, Farm Animal Welfare Council, 2009.
  48. Reid J, Nolan AM, Hughes JML. Development of the short-form Glasgow composite measure pain scale (CMPS-SF) and derivation of an analgesic intervention score.. Anim Welfare 2007;16:97-104.
  49. Mullan S. Assessment of quality of life in veterinary practice: developing tools for companion animal carers and veterinarians.. Vet Med: Res Rep 2015;6:203-210.
  50. Lord LK, Millman ST, Carbone L. A model curriculum for the study of animal welfare in colleges and schools of veterinary medicine.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2017;250:632-640.
  51. Main DCJ. Evolution of animal-welfare education for veterinary students.. J Vet Med Educ 2010;37:30-35.
  52. Dickinson GE, Paul ES. UKveterinary schools: Emphasis on end-of-life issues.. Vet Rec 2014;174:1-2.
  53. Magnier K, Wang R, Dale VHM. Enhancing clinical learning in the workplace: A qualitative study.. Vet Rec 2011;169:682-686.
  54. Christiansen SB, Kristensen AT, Lassen J. Veterinarians’ role in clients’ decision-making regarding seriously ill companion animal patients.. Acta Vet Scand 2016;58:1-14.
  55. Norman EJ. Supervisor descriptions of veterinary student performance in the clinical workplace: A qualitative interview study.. Vet Rec 2017;180:1-7.
  56. Moir FM, Van den Brink ARK. Current insights in veterinarians’ psychological wellbeing.. N Z Vet J 2020;68:3-12.
  57. Rollin BE. Euthanasia, moral stress, and chronic illness in veterinary medicine.. Vet Clinics North Am-Small Anim Pract 2011;41:651-659.
  58. Fawcett A. Euthanasia and morally justifiable killing in a veterinary clinical context.. In: Johnston J, Probyn-Rapsey F, editors. Animal death. Sydney University Press, Sydney, 2013.

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,107 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.