Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2009; 181(1); 5-11; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.023

How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques.

Abstract: The long-held belief that human dominance and equine submission are key to successful training and that the horse must be taught to 'respect' the trainer infers that force is often used during training. Many horses respond by trialling unwelcome evasions, resistances and flight responses, which readily become established. When unable to cope with problem behaviours, some handlers in the past might have been encouraged to use harsh methods or devices while others may have called in a so-called 'good horseman' or 'horse whisperer' to remediate the horse. Frequently, the approaches such practitioners offer could not be applied by the horse's owner or trainer because of their lack of understanding or inability to apply the techniques. Often it seemed that these 'horse-people' had magical ways with horses (e.g., they only had to whisper to them) that achieved impressive results although they had little motivation to divulge their techniques. As we begin to appreciate how to communicate with horses sensitively and consistently, misunderstandings and misinterpretations by horse and trainer should become less common. Recent studies have begun to reveal what comprises the simplest, most humane and most effective mechanisms in horse training and these advances are being matched by greater sharing of knowledge among practitioners. Indeed, various practitioners of what is referred to here as 'natural horsemanship' now use techniques similar to the 'whisperers' of old, but they are more open about their methods. Reputable horse trainers using natural horsemanship approaches are talented observers of horse behaviour and respond consistently and swiftly to the horse's subtle cues during training. For example, in the roundpen these trainers apply an aversive stimulus to prompt a flight response and then, when the horse slows down, moves toward them, or offers space-reducing affiliative signals, the trainer immediately modifies his/her agonistic signals, thus negatively reinforcing the desired response. Learning theory and equine ethology, the fundamentals of the emerging discipline of equitation science, can be used to explain almost all the behaviour modification that goes on in these contexts and in conventional horsemanship. By measuring and evaluating what works and what does not, equitation science has the potential to have a unifying effect on traditional practices and developing branches of equitation.
Publication Date: 2009-04-25 PubMed ID: 19394880DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.023Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Historical Article
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article revolves around the idea of altering long-standing horse training methods which often involve force and dominance, suggesting that employing equitation science can provide a more effective and humane approach to horsemanship.

Traditional Practices versus Natural Horsemanship

  • The article kicks off by highlighting the age-old practices of training horses which typically involve teaching the horse to submit to the trainer, often resorting to force. It points out that such methods usually result in resistance, evasion, and fear in horses, leading to problem behaviors which are then difficult to manage.
  • Traditional mitigation strategies have included using harsher methods or calling upon reputed horse trainers or whisperers. The latter seemingly possess a natural skill to train horses effectively, often leaving onlookers and horse owners intrigued but clueless about the techniques employed. This is primarily due to a lack of knowledge sharing or an inability of the owners to apply the techniques properly.
  • The article poses ‘natural horsemanship’ as a viable alternative to these conventional methods. It notes that these modern trainers tend to emulate the ways of horse whisperers. However, unlike the secretive practices of old, these trainers readily share their techniques.

Role of Equitation Science

  • Equitation science comes as an extension of natural horsemanship. The article introduces it as a developing field that could potentially revamp traditional practices. This discipline builds upon principles of learning theory and ethology (the science of animal behavior).
  • Proponents of natural horsemanship and equitation science believe in observing the horse’s behavior closely, responding consistently and swiftly to subtle cues during training. An example mentioned talks about how, within the confines of a roundpen, a trainer uses an aversive stimulus to trigger a flight response in the horse. Following this, when the horse slows down or displays affiliative signals, the trainer modifies his/her signals in response, reinforcing the desired behavior negatively yet effectively.
  • Equitation science aims to understand the behavior modification processes in horse training contexts. It uses measured evaluations to determine what works and what does not. This scientific approach to horse training might have a unifying effect on existing practices and evolving equitation patterns.

Cite This Article

APA
Goodwin D, McGreevy P, Waran N, McLean A. (2009). How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques. Vet J, 181(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.023

Publication

ISSN: 1090-0233
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 181
Issue: 1
Pages: 5-11

Researcher Affiliations

Goodwin, Deborah
  • School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. d.goodwin@soton.ac.uk
McGreevy, Paul
    Waran, Natalie
      McLean, Andrew

        MeSH Terms

        • Animal Welfare
        • Animals
        • Behavior, Animal
        • Conditioning, Psychological
        • History, Ancient
        • History, Medieval
        • Horses / psychology
        • Human-Animal Bond
        • Humans
        • Reinforcement, Psychology
        • Teaching / history
        • Teaching / methods

        Citations

        This article has been cited 10 times.
        1. Knox AL, Fenner K, Zsoldos RR, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Owner-Observed Behavioral Characteristics in Off-the-Track Thoroughbreds (OTTTBs) in Equestrian Second Careers. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 11;15(14).
          doi: 10.3390/ani15142046pubmed: 40723508google scholar: lookup
        2. Kieson E. Interspecies Relational Theory: A Framework for Compassionate Interspecies Interactions. Vet Sci 2025 Jun 14;12(6).
          doi: 10.3390/vetsci12060586pubmed: 40559823google scholar: lookup
        3. Seck M, Jobling R, Brown AF. Trialling Locally Made, Low-Cost Bits to Improve Bit-Related Welfare Problems in Cart Horses: Findings from a Study in Senegal. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 20;13(1).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13010002pubmed: 36611612google scholar: lookup
        4. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
        5. Jones McVey R. An Ethnographic Account of the British Equestrian Virtue of Bravery, and Its Implications for Equine Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 14;11(1).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11010188pubmed: 33466901google scholar: lookup
        6. Fenner K, Webb H, Starling MJ, Freire R, Buckley P, McGreevy PD. Effects of pre-conditioning on behavior and physiology of horses during a standardised learning task. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0174313.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174313pubmed: 28358892google scholar: lookup
        7. Loftus L, Marks K, Jones-McVey R, Gonzales JL, Fowler VL. Monty Roberts' Public Demonstrations: Preliminary Report on the Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability of Horses Undergoing Training during Live Audience Events. Animals (Basel) 2016 Sep 9;6(9).
          doi: 10.3390/ani6090055pubmed: 27618108google scholar: lookup
        8. Chapman M, Thompson K. Preventing and Investigating Horse-Related Human Injury and Fatality in Work and Non-Work Equestrian Environments: A Consideration of the Workplace Health and Safety Framework. Animals (Basel) 2016 May 6;6(5).
          doi: 10.3390/ani6050033pubmed: 27164148google scholar: lookup
        9. Starling M, McLean A, McGreevy P. The Contribution of Equitation Science to Minimising Horse-Related Risks to Humans. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 23;6(3).
          doi: 10.3390/ani6030015pubmed: 26907354google scholar: lookup
        10. Thompson K, McGreevy P, McManus P. A Critical Review of Horse-Related Risk: A Research Agenda for Safer Mounts, Riders and Equestrian Cultures. Animals (Basel) 2015 Jul 17;5(3):561-75.
          doi: 10.3390/ani5030372pubmed: 26479374google scholar: lookup