FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Ecol / Impacts of feral horses on a desert environment.
BMC ecology2009; 9; 22; doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-9-22

Impacts of feral horses on a desert environment.

Abstract: Free-ranging horses (Equus caballus) in North America are considered to be feral animals since they are descendents of non-native domestic horses introduced to the continent. We conducted a study in a southern California desert to understand how feral horse movements and horse feces impacted this arid ecosystem. We evaluated five parameters susceptible to horse trampling: soil strength, vegetation cover, percent of nonnative vegetation, plant species diversity, and macroinvertebrate abundance. We also tested whether or not plant cover and species diversity were affected by the presence of horse feces. Results: Horse trailing resulted in reduced vegetation cover, compacted soils, and in cases of intermediate intensity disturbance, increased plant species diversity. The presence of horse feces did not affect plant cover, but it did increase native plant diversity. Conclusions: Adverse impacts, such as soil compaction and increased erosion potential, were limited to established horse trails. In contrast, increased native plant diversity near trails and feces could be viewed as positive outcomes. Extensive trailing can result in a surprisingly large impact area: we estimate that 25 km2 of trails in our study area.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2009-11-10 PubMed ID: 19903355PubMed Central: PMC2781800DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-9-22Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research observes the effects of feral horses on a desert environment in southern California, detailing how their movements and feces impact several aspects including soil strength, vegetation cover, plant species diversity, and macroinvertebrate abundance. The study found that while horse activity resulted in soil compaction and reduced vegetation cover, it also led unpredictably to increased plant species diversity, especially among native plants in the area.

Study Objective and Execution

  • The objective of this study was to investigate the impacts of feral horses on desert ecosystems in southern California, particularly focusing on the effects of horse movements and feces on soil and vegetation characteristics.
  • Five parameters were assessed to evaluate the impacts of horse trampling, including soil strength, the coverage of vegetation, the percentage of non-native vegetation, plant species diversity, and the abundance of macroinvertebrates.
  • The researchers also assessed whether the presence of horse feces affected plant cover and species diversity.

Findings

  • The research found that horse trailing – the process of horses moving through the environment – resulted in reduced vegetation cover, compacted soils, and interestingly, where the disturbance was of an intermediate intensity, an increase in plant species diversity.
  • Despite initial assumptions, the presence of horse feces did not affect plant coverage, but it did contribute to an increase in the diversity of native plants.
  • It was also discovered that the negative impacts, such as soil compaction and increased potential for erosion, were generally localized around established horse trails, rather than evenly distributed across the environment.

Conclusions

  • The influence of horse activity tends to see adverse effect confined to established horse trails. However, it also leads to unpredictable positive outcomes, such as the increase in native plant diversity near trails and feces.
  • Considering the possible scale of the impact area, even a relatively small number of horses can significantly affect a large area of land. The study estimated that less than 30 horses used more than 25 km2 of trails in the study area, demonstrating the landscape-scale impact that feral horses can have.

Cite This Article

APA
Ostermann-Kelm SD, Atwill EA, Rubin ES, Hendrickson LE, Boyce WM. (2009). Impacts of feral horses on a desert environment. BMC Ecol, 9, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-9-22

Publication

BMC ecology
ISSN: 1472-6785
NlmUniqueID: 101088674
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 22

Researcher Affiliations

Ostermann-Kelm, Stacey D
  • Wildlife Health Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.Stacey_ostermann-kelm@nps.gov
Atwill, Edward A
    Rubin, Esther S
      Hendrickson, Larry E
        Boyce, Walter M

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • California
          • Desert Climate
          • Ecosystem
          • Feces / chemistry
          • Horses / physiology
          • Plant Development
          • Soil / analysis

          References

          This article includes 33 references
          1. Butler DR. The grizzly bear as an erosional agent in mountainous terrain.. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie 1992;36:179–189.
          2. Naiman RJ. Animal influences on ecosystem dynamics.. BioScience 1988;38:750–752.
            doi: 10.2307/1310783google scholar: lookup
          3. Butler DR. Zoogeomorphology: animals as geomorphic agents.. .
          4. Beever EA. Characterizing grazing disturbance in semiarid ecosystems across broad spatial scales, using diverse indices.. Ecological Applications 2003;13:199–136.
            doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0119:CGDISE]2.0.CO;2google scholar: lookup
          5. Beever EA. Management implications of the ecology of free-roaming horses in semi-arid ecosystems of the western United States.. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2003;31:887–895.
          6. Beever EA, Brussard PF. Community and landscape-level responses of reptiles and small mammals to feral horse grazing in the Great Basin.. Journal of Arid Environments 2004;59:271–297.
            doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2003.12.008google scholar: lookup
          7. Beever EA, Herrick JE. Effects of feral horses in Great Basin landscapes on soils and ants.. Journal of Arid Environments 2006;66:96–112.
            doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.11.006google scholar: lookup
          8. Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Minot EO, Cameron EZ. Researching feral horse ecology and behavior: turning political debate into opportunity.. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2002;30:644–650.
          9. Beever EA, Tausch RJ, Thogmartin WE. Multi-scale responses of vegetation to removal of horse grazing from Great Basin (U.S.A.) mountain ranges.. Plant Ecology 2008;196:163–184.
            doi: 10.1007/s11258-007-9342-5google scholar: lookup
          10. Fleischner TL. Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western North America.. Conservation Biology 1994;8:629–644.
            doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030629.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          11. Lovich JE, Bainbridge D. Anthropogenic Degradation of the Southern California Desert Ecosystem and Prospects for Natural Recovery and Restoration.. Environ Manage 1999 Oct;24(3):309-326.
            doi: 10.1007/s002679900235pubmed: 10486042google scholar: lookup
          12. Charley JL, Cowling SW. Changes in soil nutrient status resulting from overgrazing and their consequences in plant communities of semi-arid areas.. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 1968;3:28–38.
          13. Levin PS, Ellis J, Petrik R, Hay ME. Indirect effects of feral horses on estuarine communities.. Conservation Biology 2002;16:1364–1371.
            doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01167.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          14. Zalba SM, Cozzani NC. The impact of feral horses on grassland bird communities in Argentina.. Animal Conservation 2004;7:35–44.
            doi: 10.1017/S1367943003001094google scholar: lookup
          15. Menard C, Duncan P, Fleurance G, Gorges J, Lila M. Comparative foraging and nutrition of horses and cattle in European wetlands.. Journal of Applied Ecology 2002;3:120–133.
            doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00693.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          16. Liddle MJ, Chitty LD. The nutrient budget of horse tracks on an English lowland heath.. Journal of Applied Ecology 1981;18:841–848.
            doi: 10.2307/2402375google scholar: lookup
          17. Bienz U, Menzi H, Frossard E. Production and composition of horse feces.. Agrarforschung 1999;6:205–208.
          18. Meigs P. UNESCO, Reviews of research on arid zone hydrology. Arid Zone Programme 1.. UNESCO, Paris; 1953. World distribution of arid and semi-arid homoclimates; pp. 203–209.
          19. Baldwin BG, Boyd S, Ertter BJ, Patterson RW, Roasatti TJ, Wilken DH, Wetherwax M. The Jepson Desert Manual: Vascular Plants of Southeastern California.. University of California Press, Berkeley; 2002.
          20. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus.. Springer, New York; 2000.
          21. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models.. Chapman and Hall, London; 1983.
          22. Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure.. American Naturalist 1988;132:87–106.
            doi: 10.1086/284839google scholar: lookup
          23. Connell JH. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.. Science 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10.
            doi: 10.1126/science.199.4335.1302pubmed: 17840770google scholar: lookup
          24. Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK. Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments.. Ecological Monographs 1993;63:327–366.
            doi: 10.2307/2937150google scholar: lookup
          25. Ridley HN. Dispersal of plant throughout the world.. Reeve, Aston, Kent, United Kingdom; 1930.
          26. Janzen DH. Enterlobium cyclocarpun seed passage rate and survival in horses, Costa Rican Pleistocene seed dispersal agents.. Ecology 1981;62:593–601.
            doi: 10.2307/1937726google scholar: lookup
          27. Harmon GW, Kiem FD. The percentage and viability of weed seeds recovered in the feces of farm animals and their longevity when buried in manure.. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 1934;26:762–767.
          28. Hendee JC, Dawson CP. Wilderness management: stewardship and protection of resources and values.. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, Colorado; 2002.
          29. Deluca TH, Patterson Iv WA, Freimund WA, Cole DN. Influence of Llamas, Horses, and Hikers on Soil Erosion from Established Recreation Trails in Western Montana, USA.. Environ Manage 1998 Mar;22(2):255-62.
            doi: 10.1007/s002679900101pubmed: 9465134google scholar: lookup
          30. Beever EA. Species and community level responses to disturbance imposed by feral horse grazing and other management practices.. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA; 1999.
          31. Olff H, Ritchie ME. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity.. Trends Ecol Evol 1998 Jul 1;13(7):261-5.
            doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01364-0pubmed: 21238294google scholar: lookup
          32. Fahnestock JT, Detling JK. The influence of herbivory on plant cover and species composition in the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range, USA.. Plant Ecology 1999;144:145–157.
            doi: 10.1023/A:1009899509067google scholar: lookup
          33. Ostermann SD, Atwill ER, Rubin ES, Boyce WM. Interactions between feral horses and desert bighorn sheep at water.. Journal of Mammalogy 2008;89:459–466.
            doi: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-075R1.1google scholar: lookup

          Citations

          This article has been cited 3 times.
          1. Watson VT, Kehler D, Medeiros AS. A paleolimnological context of ecological vulnerability for the freshwater ecosystems of Sable Island National Park Reserve, Canada.. Sci Prog 2022 Oct-Dec;105(4):368504221126865.
            doi: 10.1177/00368504221126865pubmed: 36254564google scholar: lookup
          2. Lönker NS, Fechner K, Wahed AAE. Horses as a Crucial Part of One Health.. Vet Sci 2020 Feb 29;7(1).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci7010028pubmed: 32121327google scholar: lookup
          3. Naundrup PJ, Svenning JC. A Geographic Assessment of the Global Scope for Rewilding with Wild-Living Horses (Equus ferus).. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0132359.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132359pubmed: 26177104google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.