Analyze Diet
Heredity2006; 98(2); 114-122; doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800910

Individual-based assessment of population structure and admixture in Austrian, Croatian and German draught horses.

Abstract: All over Europe, the number of draught horses has decreased drastically during the last 50 years. As a prerequisite for efficient management decisions, we analysed the conservation status in Austrian (Noriker Carinthia - NC, Noriker Salzburg - NS), Croatian (Croatian Coldblood - C, Posavina horse - P) and German (Altmaerkisch Coldblood - A, Black Forest horse - BF, Mecklenburg Coldblood - M, Rhenish German Draught horse - R, Saxon Thuringa Coldblood - ST, Schleswig Draught horse - Sch, South German Coldblood - SG) draught horses (434) using multilocus genotypic information from 30 (effectively 27) microsatellite loci. Populations located in areas with less intensive agricultural production (C, NC, NS, P and SG) had greater diversity within the population and estimated effective population size than A, BF, Sch, M, R and ST populations. The PCA plots revealed that populations form five separate groups. The 'Noriker' group (NC, NS and SG) and the 'Rhenish' group (A, M, R and ST) were the most distinctive (pairwise F(ST) values ranged from 0.078 to 0.094). The 'Croatian' group (C and P) was in the centre, while the BF and Sch populations formed two out-groups. A posterior Bayesian analysis detected further differentiation, mainly caused by political and geographical factors. Thus, it was possible to separate the South German Coldblood from the Austrian Noriker population where no subpopulation structure was detected. The admixture analysis revealed imprecise classification between C and P populations. A small but notable separation of R from A, M and ST populations was detected, while Sch and BF populations remained as out-groups. The information obtained should aid in making efficient conservation decisions.
Publication Date: 2006-10-11 PubMed ID: 17035951DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800910Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on understanding the population structure and the extent of interbreeding among different draught horse breed populations in Austria, Croatia and Germany, utilizing genetic data from microsatellite loci. The data reveals that certain populations have greater genetic diversity and effective population size, especially those in less intensively farmed regions. The study also shows a clear separation between different groups of horse populations, mostly based on their geographical locations.

Study Design and Methods

  • The researchers analyzed the conservation status of various Austrian, Croatian and German draught horse populations, including the Noriker Carinthians, Noriker Salzburg, Croatian Coldblood, Posavina horse, Altmarksish Coldblood, Black Forest horse, Mecklenburg Coldblood, Rhenish German Draught horse, Saxon Thuringa Coldblood, Schleswig Draught horse, South German Coldblood.
  • This was done using genotypic data from 30 (effectively 27) microsatellite loci – specific, repeated portions of DNA that are highly variable, making them useful for genetic fingerprinting of individuals and populations.

Findings and Interpretations

  • The research found that horse populations in less intensively farmed regions had a higher genetic diversity and estimated effective population size than other populations examined in the study. This suggests that farming intensity could be a factor impacting the genetic diversity and population size of the draught horses.
  • The Principal Component Analysis (PCA), a statistical method used to simplify complex genetic data, separated the populations into five distinct groups based on their genetics. The groups appear to be influenced by geography and political factors.
  • The ‘Noriker’ group (NC, NS and SG) and the ‘Rhenish’ group (A, M, R, and ST) were the most distinctive genetically. The ‘Croatian’ group was at the center of the PCA plot, indicating a higher level of genetic overlap with other groups. The Black Forest and Schleswig populations were outliers compared to the other groups.
  • A Bayesian analysis, another statistical method, further revealed differentiation among populations. For instance, the South German Coldblood could be differentiated from the Austrian Noriker population. This analysis also showed some level of interbreeding between the Croatian Coldblood and Posavina horse populations.

Implications and Applications

  • The research offers valuable insights into the genetic structure and diversity of draught horse populations in parts of Europe, providing actionable information for efficient conservation decision-making.
  • These findings can inform strategies to maintain genetic diversity and population health, which is crucial given the drastic decrease in the number of draught horses over the last five decades.
  • Further research might extend this kind of analysis to other horse populations, and investigate the factors influencing genetic diversity and population structure in more detail.

Cite This Article

APA
Druml T, Curik I, Baumung R, Aberle K, Distl O, Sölkner J. (2006). Individual-based assessment of population structure and admixture in Austrian, Croatian and German draught horses. Heredity (Edinb), 98(2), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800910

Publication

ISSN: 0018-067X
NlmUniqueID: 0373007
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 98
Issue: 2
Pages: 114-122

Researcher Affiliations

Druml, T
  • BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Curik, I
    Baumung, R
      Aberle, K
        Distl, O
          Sölkner, J

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Austria
            • Bayes Theorem
            • Croatia
            • Genetic Markers
            • Genetic Variation
            • Genetics, Population
            • Germany
            • Horses / genetics
            • Microsatellite Repeats

            Citations

            This article has been cited 13 times.
            1. Hall SJG. Genetic Differentiation among Livestock Breeds-Values for F(st). Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 26;12(9).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12091115pubmed: 35565543google scholar: lookup
            2. Ablondi M, Dadousis C, Vasini M, Eriksson S, Mikko S, Sabbioni A. Genetic Diversity and Signatures of Selection in a Native Italian Horse Breed Based on SNP Data. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 8;10(6).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10061005pubmed: 32521830google scholar: lookup
            3. Lancioni H, Cardinali I, Giontella A, Antognoni MT, Miglio A. Mitochondrial DNA variation in the Italian Heavy Draught Horse. PeerJ 2020;8:e8996.
              doi: 10.7717/peerj.8996pubmed: 32461825google scholar: lookup
            4. Schurink A, Shrestha M, Eriksson S, Bosse M, Bovenhuis H, Back W, Johansson AM, Ducro BJ. The Genomic Makeup of Nine Horse Populations Sampled in the Netherlands. Genes (Basel) 2019 Jun 25;10(6).
              doi: 10.3390/genes10060480pubmed: 31242710google scholar: lookup
            5. Broxham ET, Kugler W, Medugorac I. A case study on strains of Buša cattle structured into a metapopulation to show the potential for use of single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in the management of small, cross-border populations of livestock breeds and varieties. Front Genet 2015;6:73.
              doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00073pubmed: 25798144google scholar: lookup
            6. Pirault P, Danvy S, Verrier E, Leroy G. Genetic structure and gene flows within horses: a genealogical study at the french population scale. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e61544.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061544pubmed: 23630596google scholar: lookup
            7. Warmuth V, Eriksson A, Bower MA, Cañon J, Cothran G, Distl O, Glowatzki-Mullis ML, Hunt H, Luís C, do Mar Oom M, Yupanqui IT, Ząbek T, Manica A. European domestic horses originated in two holocene refugia. PLoS One 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e18194.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018194pubmed: 21479181google scholar: lookup
            8. Leroy G, Callède L, Verrier E, Mériaux JC, Ricard A, Danchin-Burge C, Rognon X. Genetic diversity of a large set of horse breeds raised in France assessed by microsatellite polymorphism. Genet Sel Evol 2009 Jan 5;41(1):5.
              doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-5pubmed: 19284689google scholar: lookup
            9. Duderstadt S, Distl O. Insights into Genomic Patterns of Homozygosity in the Endangered Dülmen Wild Horse Population. Genes (Basel) 2025 Sep 8;16(9).
              doi: 10.3390/genes16091054pubmed: 41009997google scholar: lookup
            10. Sievers J, Distl O. Genomic Patterns of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in the Rhenish German Draught Horse. Genes (Basel) 2025 Mar 11;16(3).
              doi: 10.3390/genes16030327pubmed: 40149478google scholar: lookup
            11. Duderstadt S, Distl O. Influence of Sires on Population Substructure in Dülmen Wild Horses. Animals (Basel) 2024 Oct 9;14(19).
              doi: 10.3390/ani14192904pubmed: 39409853google scholar: lookup
            12. Duderstadt S, Distl O. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Dülmen Wild, Liebenthal and Polish Konik Horses in Comparison with Przewalski, Sorraia, German Draught and Riding Horses. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 31;14(15).
              doi: 10.3390/ani14152221pubmed: 39123746google scholar: lookup
            13. Ajibaye O, Olukosi YA, Oriero EC, Oboh MA, Iwalokun B, Nwankwo IC, Nnam CF, Adaramoye OV, Chukwemeka S, Okanazu J, Gabriel E, Balogun EO, Amambua-Ngwa A. Detection of novel Plasmodium falciparum coronin gene mutations in a recrudescent ACT-treated patient in South-Western Nigeria. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024;14:1366563.
              doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1366563pubmed: 38716192google scholar: lookup