Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(14); 2056; doi: 10.3390/ani15142056

Influence of Pregnancy on Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing in the Mammary Gland of Kazakh Mares.

Abstract: Kazakh mares have drawn significant attention for their outstanding lactation traits. Lactation, a complex physiological activity, is modulated by multiple factors. This study utilized high-throughput sequencing to conduct whole-transcriptome sequencing analysis on the mammary gland tissue of eight Kazakh mares, of which four were pregnant and four were non-pregnant, to systematically reveal the molecular regulatory mechanisms. The results showed differential expression in 2136 mRNAs, 180 lncRNAs, 104 miRNAs, and 1162 circRNAs. Gene ontology functional annotation indicates that these differentially expressed genes are involved in multiple key biological processes, such as the cellular process (BP), metabolic process, and biological regulation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis suggests that the differentially expressed genes are significantly enriched in essential pathways such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, the chemokine signaling pathway, and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Additionally, this study constructed a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory network based on the differentially expressed genes (|logFC| > 1, FDR < 0.05), offering a novel perspective for revealing the functional regulation of the mammary gland. This study compared genomic differences in mammary gland tissue of pregnant and non-pregnant Kazakh mares and identified candidate genes that are closely related to lactation regulation. It found that various genes, such as , , and , play central regulatory roles in activating mammary gland functions. These findings provide theoretical support for explaining the molecular mechanisms underlying the mammary gland development of Kazakh mares.
Publication Date: 2025-07-11 PubMed ID: 40723519PubMed Central: PMC12291736DOI: 10.3390/ani15142056Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the influence of pregnancy on the genetic activity within the mammary glands of Kazakh mares, specifically looking at differences between pregnant and non-pregnant mares.

Methodology

  • The researchers applied high-throughput sequencing technology to conduct a whole-transcriptome sequencing analysis on the mammary gland tissues from a total of eight Kazakh mares, half of which were pregnant and the other half were non-pregnant.
  • The study used Gene ontology functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis to understand the functions and pathways that the differentially expressed genes were involved in.
  • A competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory network was constructed, using identified differentially expressed genes, to offer a fresh perspective on the functional regulation of the mammary gland.

Findings

  • The results showed differential expression between the two groups in a total of 2136 mRNA, 180 lncRNA, 104 miRNA, and 1162 circRNAs. Such variance indicates a significant genomic difference in the mammary gland tissue amongst the pregnant and non-pregnant mares.
  • Gene ontology functional annotation found these differentially expressed genes play a part in several essential biological processes such as cellular processes, metabolic processes, and biological regulation.
  • The differentially expressed genes were significantly enriched in essential pathways such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, the chemokine signaling pathway, and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, as suggested by the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis.
  • Several genes were identified as crucial in the regulation and activation of the mammary glands’ functions.

Implications

  • This research contributes to a better understanding of the molecular regulatory mechanisms involved in the development of the mammary gland in Kazakh mares.
  • Identifying the relevant genes and their functions can help develop theoretical support for future studies and possibly lead to more efficient breeding programs focusing on lactation traits in mares.

Cite This Article

APA
Zhang Z, Lu Z, Yao X, Li L, Meng J, Wang J, Zeng Y, Ren W. (2025). Influence of Pregnancy on Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing in the Mammary Gland of Kazakh Mares. Animals (Basel), 15(14), 2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142056

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 14
PII: 2056

Researcher Affiliations

Zhang, Zhenyu
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Lu, Zhixin
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Yao, Xinkui
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi 830052, China.
Li, Linling
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Meng, Jun
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi 830052, China.
Wang, Jianwen
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi 830052, China.
Zeng, Yaqi
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi 830052, China.
Ren, Wanlu
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi 830052, China.

Grant Funding

  • ZYYD2025JD02 / Central Guidance for Local Science and Technology Development Fund
  • 2024B02013-2 / Key Research and Development Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

Conflict of Interest Statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Ren W, Wang J, Zeng Y, Wang T, Sun Z, Meng J, Yao X. Investigating age-related differences in muscles of Kazakh horse through transcriptome analysis. Gene 2024;919:148483.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148483pubmed: 38670391google scholar: lookup
  2. Pozharskiy A, Abdrakhmanova A, Beishova I, Shamshidin A, Nametov A, Ulyanova T, Bekova G, Kikebayev N, Kovalchuk A, Ulyanov V. Genetic structure and genome-wide association study of the traditional Kazakh horses. Animal 2023;17:100926.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100926pubmed: 37611435google scholar: lookup
  3. Liu L, Zhang Y, Ma H, Cao H, Liu W. Integrating genome-wide methylation and transcriptome-wide analyses to reveal the genetic mechanism of milk traits in Kazakh horses. Gene 2023;856:147143.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.147143pubmed: 36574934google scholar: lookup
  4. Ulaangerel T, Wang M, Zhao B, Yi M, Shen Y, Mengkh Y, Wen X, Dugarjav M, Bou G. A Comparative Analysis of the Gene Expression Profiles in the Mammary Glands of Lactating and Nonlactating Mares at the Second Month of Gestation. Animals 2024;14:2319.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14162319pmc: PMC11350905pubmed: 39199853google scholar: lookup
  5. Gao J, Marins T, Calix J, Qi Z, Savegnago C, Roper A, Woldemeskel M, Bernard J, Tao S. Systemic and mammary inflammation and mammary gland development of Holstein dairy cows around dry-off and calving. J. Dairy Sci. 2025;108:2090–2110.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25279pubmed: 39662814google scholar: lookup
  6. Hughes K. Development and pathology of the equine mammary gland. J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia. 2021;26:121–134.
    doi: 10.1007/s10911-020-09471-2pmc: PMC8236023pubmed: 33280071google scholar: lookup
  7. Anantamongkol U, Charoenphandhu N, Wongdee K, Teerapornpuntakit J, Suthiphongchai T, Prapong S, Krishnamra N. Transcriptome analysis of mammary tissues reveals complex patterns of transporter gene expression during pregnancy and lactation. Cell Biol. Int. 2010;34:67–74.
    doi: 10.1042/CBI20090023pubmed: 19947944google scholar: lookup
  8. Qi Y-X, Liu Y-B, Rong W-H. RNA-Seq and its applications: A new technology for transcriptomics. Hereditas 2011;33:1191–1202.
    doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2011.01191pubmed: 22120074google scholar: lookup
  9. Hosseinzadeh S, Rafat S.A, Javanmard A, Fang L. Identification of candidate genes associated with milk production and mastitis based on transcriptome-wide association study. Anim. Genet. 2024;55:430–439.
    doi: 10.1111/age.13422pubmed: 38594914google scholar: lookup
  10. Xia W, Liu Y, Loor J.J, Bionaz M, Jiang M. Dynamic profile of the yak mammary transcriptome during the lactation cycle. Animals 2023;13:1710.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13101710pmc: PMC10215676pubmed: 37238139google scholar: lookup
  11. Shi T.P, Zhang L. Application of whole transcriptomics in animal husbandry. Hereditas 2019;41:193–205.
    pubmed: 30872256
  12. Ren W, Wang J, Zeng Y, Wang T, Meng J, Yao X. Transcriptome identification of differential mammary genes of Kazakh horses during early pregnancy. Gene 2024;902:148189.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148189pubmed: 38246578google scholar: lookup
  13. Roth M.J, Moorehead R.A. The miR-200 family in normal mammary gland development. BMC Dev. Biol. 2021;21:12.
    doi: 10.1186/s12861-021-00243-7pmc: PMC8399786pubmed: 34454436google scholar: lookup
  14. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018;34:i884–i890.
  15. Zhu Y. Exploration of Key Regulators of Back Fat Deposition in Dahe Pigs Based on Whole Transcriptome Sequencing. Yunnan Agricultural University; Kunming, China: 2024.
  16. Love M.I, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8pmc: PMC4302049pubmed: 25516281google scholar: lookup
  17. Spina E, Cowin P. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. Volume 114. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. Embryonic mammary gland development; pp. 83–92.
    pubmed: 33472760
  18. Wang W, Wang S, Wang H, Zheng E, Wu Z, Li Z. Protein Dynamic Landscape during Mouse Mammary Gland Development from Virgin to Pregnant, Lactating, and Involuting Stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024;72:7546–7557.
    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c09647pubmed: 38513219google scholar: lookup
  19. McNally S, Stein T. Overview of mammary gland development: A comparison of mouse and human. In: Martin F., Stein T., Howlin J., editors. Mammary Gland Development: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press; New York, NY, USA: 2017. pp. 1–17.
    pubmed: 27796946
  20. Wang W, Zang X, Liu Y, Liang Y, Cai G, Wu Z, Li Z. Dynamic miRNA landscape links mammary gland development to the regulation of milk protein expression in mice. Animals 2022;12:727.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12060727pmc: PMC8944794pubmed: 35327124google scholar: lookup
  21. Jena M.K, Jaswal S, Kumar S, Mohanty A.K. Molecular mechanism of mammary gland involution: An update. Dev. Biol. 2019;445:145–155.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.11.002pubmed: 30448440google scholar: lookup
  22. Macias H, Hinck L. Mammary gland development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2012;1:533–557.
    doi: 10.1002/wdev.35pmc: PMC3404495pubmed: 22844349google scholar: lookup
  23. Alateyah N, Gupta I, Rusyniak R.S, Ouhtit A. SOD2, a potential transcriptional target underpinning CD44-promoted breast cancer progression. Molecules 2022;27:811.
    doi: 10.3390/molecules27030811pmc: PMC8839817pubmed: 35164076google scholar: lookup
  24. Sun L, Wang F, Wu Z, Ma L, Baumrucker C, Bu D. Comparison of selenium source in preventing oxidative stress in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Animals 2020;10:842.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050842pmc: PMC7278423pubmed: 32414143google scholar: lookup
  25. Zhang W, Du J-Y, Yu Q, Jin J-O. Interleukin-7 produced by intestinal epithelial cells in response to Citrobacter rodentium infection plays a major role in innate immunity against this pathogen. Infect. Immun. 2015;83:3213–3223.
    doi: 10.1128/IAI.00320-15pmc: PMC4496619pubmed: 26034215google scholar: lookup
  26. Lai Y.C, Lai Y.T, Rahman M.M, Chen H.W, Husna A.A, Fujikawa T, Ando T, Kitahara G, Koiwa M, Kubota C. Bovine milk transcriptome analysis reveals microRNAs and RNU2 involved in mastitis. FEBS J. 2020;287:1899–1918.
    doi: 10.1111/febs.15114pubmed: 31663680google scholar: lookup
  27. Xu T, Wu J, Han P, Zhao Z, Song X. Circular RNA expression profiles and features in human tissues: A study using RNA-seq data. BMC Genom. 2017;18:131–142.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4029-3pmc: PMC5629547pubmed: 28984197google scholar: lookup
  28. Wang J, Ke N, Wu X, Zhen H, Hu J, Liu X, Li S, Zhao F, Li M, Shi B. MicroRNA-148a Targets DNMT1 and PPARGC1A to Regulate the Viability, Proliferation, and Milk Fat Synthesis of Ovine Mammary Epithelial Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:8558.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25168558pmc: PMC11354201pubmed: 39201245google scholar: lookup
  29. Wang X-P, Luoreng Z-M, Zan L-S, Li F, Li N. Bovine miR-146a regulates inflammatory cytokines of bovine mammary epithelial cells via targeting the TRAF6 gene. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;100:7648–7658.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12630pubmed: 28690061google scholar: lookup
  30. Watson C.J, Oliver C.H, Khaled W.T. Cytokine signalling in mammary gland development. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011;88:124–129.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2010.11.006pubmed: 21255846google scholar: lookup
  31. Spangler J.B, Moraga I, Mendoza J.L, Garcia K.C. Insights into cytokine–receptor interactions from cytokine engineering. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015;33:139–167.
  32. Sun X, Ingman W.V. Cytokine networks that mediate epithelial cell-macrophage crosstalk in the mammary gland: Implications for development and cancer. J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia. 2014;19:191–201.
    doi: 10.1007/s10911-014-9319-7pubmed: 24924120google scholar: lookup
  33. Zhao W, Shahzad K, Jiang M, Graugnard D.E, Rodriguez-Zas S.L, Luo J, Loor J.J, Hurley W.L. Bioinformatics and gene network analyses of the swine mammary gland transcriptome during late gestation. Bioinform. Biol. Insights. 2013;7:S12205.
    doi: 10.4137/BBI.S12205pmc: PMC3728096pubmed: 23908586google scholar: lookup
  34. Alluwaimi A.M. The cytokines of bovine mammary gland: Prospects for diagnosis and therapy. Res. Vet. Sci. 2004;77:211–222.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.04.006pubmed: 15276772google scholar: lookup
  35. Zhu C, Jiang Y, Zhu J, He Y, Yin H, Duan Q, Zhang L, Cao B, An X. CircRNA8220 sponges MiR-8516 to regulate cell viability and milk synthesis via Ras/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in goat mammary epithelial cells. Animals 2020;10:1347.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081347pmc: PMC7459788pubmed: 32759741google scholar: lookup
  36. Wakefield L.M, Piek E, Böttinger E.P. TGF-β signaling in mammary gland development and tumorigenesis. J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia. 2001;6:67–82.
    doi: 10.1023/A:1009568532177pubmed: 11467453google scholar: lookup
  37. Brisken C, Ayyannan A, Nguyen C, Heineman A, Reinhardt F, Jan T, Dey S, Dotto G.P, Weinberg R.A. IGF-2 is a mediator of prolactin-induced morphogenesis in the breast. Dev. Cell. 2002;3:877–887.
    doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00365-9pubmed: 12479812google scholar: lookup
  38. Mu T, Hu H, Ma Y, Yang C, Feng X, Wang Y, Liu J, Yu B, Zhang J, Gu Y. Identification of critical lncRNAs for milk fat metabolism in dairy cows using WGCNA and the construction of a ceRNAs network. Anim. Genet. 2022;53:740–760.
    doi: 10.1111/age.13249pubmed: 36193627google scholar: lookup
  39. Chen M, Wei X, Song M, Jiang R, Huang K, Deng Y, Liu Q, Shi D, Li H. Circular RNA circMYBPC1 promotes skeletal muscle differentiation by targeting MyHC. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids. 2021;24:352–368.
    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.03.004pmc: PMC8027698pubmed: 33868781google scholar: lookup
  40. Lawless N, Vegh P, O’Farrelly C, Lynn D.J. The role of microRNAs in bovine infection and immunity. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:611.
    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00611pmc: PMC4245999pubmed: 25505900google scholar: lookup
  41. Bach K, Pensa S, Grzelak M, Hadfield J, Adams D.J, Marioni J.C, Khaled W.T. Differentiation dynamics of mammary epithelial cells revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2128.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02001-5pmc: PMC5723634pubmed: 29225342google scholar: lookup
  42. Ostrander E.A, Wang G-D, Larson G, Vonholdt B.M, Davis B.W, Jagannathan V, Hitte C, Wayne R.K, Zhang Y-P. Dog10K: An international sequencing effort to advance studies of canine domestication, phenotypes and health. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019;6:810–824.
    doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz049pmc: PMC6776107pubmed: 31598383google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.