FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Zool / Influence of weather on the behaviour of reintroduced Przewa...
BMC zoology2022; 7(1); 32; doi: 10.1186/s40850-022-00130-z

Influence of weather on the behaviour of reintroduced Przewalski’s horses in the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area (Mongolia): implications for conservation.

Abstract: Reintroduction is a common technique for re-establishing threatened species. However, the adaptation to novel habitats with distinct conditions poses a risk of failure. Weather conditions affect the behaviour of animals, and thus, their adaptation to new conditions and survival. Reintroduced Przewalski's horses living in Mongolia's continental arid climate with extreme temperature and precipitation variability, serve as an ideal model species for studying the behavioural response of selected groups to these harsh conditions. Methods: The research was conducted in The Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area, Mongolia. In summer 2018, three groups were recorded (Azaa, Tsetsen and Mares18) involving 29 individuals. In Spring 2019, 4 groups were recorded (Azaa, Tsetsen, Hustai1 and Mares19) involving 34 individuals. In Autumn 2019, 4 groups were recorded (Azaa, Tsetsen, Hustai2 and Tanan) involving 35 individuals. Thirteen weather variables were recorded in 10-min intervals, together with the percentage representation of selected behavioural categories (feeding, locomotion, resting, and social). The effect of weather on behaviour was analysed through GLMM. Influence of the group-history factors (recently reintroduced, long-term reintroduced and wild-born) was also analysed. Results: Feeding significantly increased with cloudy and windy conditions and was more frequent in autumn than spring and summer. Locomotion was positively explained by temperature and cloudiness and was higher in summer than spring and autumn. Resting behaviour decreased with altitude and cloudiness, and the dispersion of the group was lower when resting. Increased social interactions were observed with higher temperatures and were more frequent in summer compared to spring and autumn. Differences were found in the display of the behaviours among the selected harems, showing interesting patterns when grouping them according to their origin and experience. Conclusions: Weather patterns seem to influence the behaviour of Przewalski's horse. These results might assist in further management plans for the species, especially in the view of intensifying climate change and alteration of weather patterns. As previously suggested, after approximately 1 year, horses adapt to novel conditions and display the typical behavioural pattern of wild-born Przewalski's horses.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-06-09 PubMed ID: 37170378PubMed Central: PMC10127430DOI: 10.1186/s40850-022-00130-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study investigates the influence of weather on the behaviour of reintroduced Przewalski’s horses in Mongolia, finding that specific weather conditions and seasons stimulate different behavioural responses in different horse groups, which may affect their survival and adaptation to new habitats.

Research Location and Methodology

  • The research was carried out in the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area of Mongolia on the reintroduced Przewalski’s horses during three different seasons: summer 2018, spring 2019, and autumn 2019. The study focused on different groups of horses at each stage; – Azaa, Tsetsen, and Mares18 in summer; Azaa, Tsetsen, Hustai1 and Mares19 in spring; and Azaa, Tsetsen, Hustai2 and Tanan in autumn.
  • The researchers studied the behaviour of the horses as affected by different weather conditions. Thirteen weather variables were recorded (temperature, wind speed, cloudiness, precipitation, etc.), along with the horses’ behaviours, which were categorized into feeding, locomotion, resting, and social.
  • The effect of weather on behaviour was then analysed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM). Furthermore, the researchers also studied the influence of the group-history factors (whether the horses were recently reintroduced, long-term reintroduced, or wild-born) on their behaviours.

Research Results

  • The results show that feeding behaviour in the horses significantly increased during cloudy and windy conditions and was more frequent in autumn than in summer and spring.
  • Locomotion was positively affected by temperature and cloudiness, and was higher in summer than in spring and autumn.
  • Resting behaviour decreased with increasing altitude and cloudiness, and the horses tended to stay together more closely when resting.
  • Social interactions increased with higher temperatures, and were more frequent in summer as compared to spring and autumn.
  • There were differences in behaviours displayed among the different groups of horses, which revealed interesting patterns when the groups were classified according to their origin and experience.

Conclusions and Implications for Conservation

  • The study concludes that weather patterns have a significant influence on the behaviour of the Przewalski’s horses. As such, these findings could be crucial for designing future management plans for reintroducing the horses, especially considering the changes in weather patterns due to climate change.
  • The study also suggests that horses usually adapt to new conditions and display the typical behaviour patterns of wild-born Przewalski’s horses after approximately one year of reintroduction. This understanding can be useful to predict and ensure the successful adaptation of reintroduced species in new habitats.

Cite This Article

APA
Bernátková A, Oyunsaikhan G, Šimek J, Komárková M, Bobek M, Ceacero F. (2022). Influence of weather on the behaviour of reintroduced Przewalski’s horses in the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area (Mongolia): implications for conservation. BMC Zool, 7(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-022-00130-z

Publication

BMC zoology
ISSN: 2056-3132
NlmUniqueID: 101678241
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: 32
PII: 32

Researcher Affiliations

Bernátková, Anna
  • Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Oyunsaikhan, Ganbaatar
  • Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area, Takhin Tal, Mongolia.
Šimek, Jaroslav
  • Zoo Praha, U Trojského zámku 120/3, Prague, Czech Republic.
Komárková, Martina
  • Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Bobek, Miroslav
  • Zoo Praha, U Trojského zámku 120/3, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ceacero, Francisco
  • Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. ceacero@ftz.czu.cz.

Grant Funding

  • IGA-20213104 / Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 94 references
  1. Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF. Developing the science of reintroduction biology.. Conserv Biol 2007 Apr;21(2):303-12.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.xpubmed: 17391180google scholar: lookup
  2. Armstrong DP, Seddon PJ. Directions in reintroduction biology.. Trends Ecol Evol 2008 Jan;23(1):20-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.003pubmed: 18160175google scholar: lookup
  3. Baguette M, Blanchet S, Legrand D, Stevens VM, Turlure C. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2013 May;88(2):310-26.
    doi: 10.1111/brv.12000pubmed: 23176626google scholar: lookup
  4. Wolf CM, Garland T Jr, Griffith B. Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts.. Biol Conserv 1998;86:243–255.
    doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00179-1google scholar: lookup
  5. Gao X, Gu ZJ. The change on the distribution area of the wild horse in the modern times.. Arid Zone Res 1989;2:10.
  6. Macaluso W, Williams CK, Terhune TM II. Testing northern bobwhite reintroduction techniques in the northern edge of their range.. Nal Quail Symp Proc 2017;8:49.
  7. Paklina N, Pozdnyakova M. Why the Przewalski horses of Mongolia died out.. Przewalski Horse 1989;24:30–34.
  8. Wakefield S, Knowles J, Zimmermann W, Van Dierendonck M. 2002 status and action plan for the Przewalski's horse (Equus ferus przewalskii).. In: Moehlman PD, editor. Equids, zebras, asses and horses status survey and conservation action plan. Cambridge: UNC/SSC Equid Specialist Group, IUCN Publications Services Unit; 2002. p. 82–92.
  9. Wallach AD, Inbar M, Scantlebury M, Speakman JR, Shanas U. Water requirements as a bottleneck in the reintroduction of European roe deer to the southern edge of its range.. Can J Zool 2007;85:1182–1192.
    doi: 10.1139/Z07-098google scholar: lookup
  10. Zhang Y, Cao QS, Rubenstein DI, Zang S, Songer M, Leimgruber P, Chu H, Cao J, Li K, Hu D. Water Use Patterns of Sympatric Przewalski's Horse and Khulan: Interspecific Comparison Reveals Niche Differences.. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0132094.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132094pmc: PMC4498657pubmed: 26161909google scholar: lookup
  11. King SR, Boyd L, Zimmermann W, Kendall BE. Equus ferus.. IUCN 2015.
  12. IUCN SSC. Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations.. Gland: Camb UK IUCNSSC Re-Introd Spec Group; 2013.
  13. Dickens MJ, Delehanty DJ, Romero LM. Stress: an inevitable component of animal translocation.. Biol Conserv 2010;143:29–41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.032google scholar: lookup
  14. Swaisgood RR. The conservation-welfare nexus in reintroduction programmes: a role for sensory ecology.. Anim Welf 2010;19:125–137.
  15. Teixeira CP, De Azevedo CS, Mendl M, Cipreste CF, Young RJ. Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress.. Anim Behav 2007;73(1):1–3.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.002google scholar: lookup
  16. Fritts SH, Bangs EE, Fontaine JA, Johnson MR, Phillips MK, Koch ED, Gunson JR. Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Central Idaho.. Restor Ecol 1997;5:7–27.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.09702.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  17. Jefferies DJ, Wayre P, Jessop RM, Mitchell-Jones AJ. Reinforcing the native otter Lutra lutra population in East Anglia: an analysis of the behaviour and range development of the first release group.. Mammal Rev 1986;16:65–79.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1986.tb00023.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  18. Mateju J, Říčanová Š, Poláková S, Ambros M, Kala B, Matějů K, Kratochvíl L. Method of releasing and number of animals are determinants for the success of European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) reintroductions.. Eur J Wildl Res 2012;58:473–482.
    doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0597-8google scholar: lookup
  19. Moehrenschlager A, Macdonald DW. Movement and survival parameters of translocated and resident swift foxes Vulpes velox.. Anim Conserv 2003;6:199–206.
    doi: 10.1017/S1367943003251google scholar: lookup
  20. Truett JC, Dullum JA, Matchett MR, Owens E, Seery D. Translocating prairie dogs: a review.. Wildl Soc Bull 2001;29:863–72.
  21. Wanless RM, Cunningham J, Hockey PA, Wanless J, White RW, Wiseman R. The success of a soft-release reintroduction of the flightless Aldabra rail (Dryolimnas cuvieri aldabranus) on Aldabra atoll, Seychelles.. Biol Conserv 2002;107:203–210.
    doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00067-8google scholar: lookup
  22. Letty J, Marchandeau S, Clobert J, Aubineau J. Improving translocation success: an experimental study of anti-stress treatment and release method for wild rabbits.. Anim Conserv 2000;3:211–219.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00105.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  23. Miller B, Ralls K, Reading RP, Scott JM, Estes J. Biological and technical considerations of carnivore translocation: a review.. Anim Conserv 1999;2:59–68.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00049.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  24. Berger A, Scheibe KM, Eichhorn K, Scheibe A, Streich J. Diurnal and ultradian rhythms of behaviour in a mare group of Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii), measured through one year under semireserve conditions.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999;64:1–17.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00026-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  25. Van Dierendonck MC, Wallis de Vries MF. Ungulate reintroductions: experiences with the takhi or Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Mongolia.. Biol Conserv 1996;10:728–740.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030728.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. ITG International Takhi Group. Great Gobi B Biosphere.. ITG 2016.
  27. Kaczensky P, Ganbataar O, Altansukh N, Enkhsaikhan N, Stauffer C, Walzer C. The danger of having all your eggs in one basket--winter crash of the re-introduced Przewalski's horses in the Mongolian Gobi.. PLoS One 2011;6(12):e28057.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028057pmc: PMC3247207pubmed: 22216089google scholar: lookup
  28. Massaro M, Chick A, Kennedy ES, Whitsed R. Post-reintroduction distribution and habitat preferences of a spatially limited island bird species.. Anim Conserv 2008;2:54–64.
    doi: 10.1111/acv.12364google scholar: lookup
  29. Viola K, Katalin O, István S, Zsolt V, Csilla C, Bettina N, Timea S, Lajos S, Zoltán B. Analysis of habitat use, activity, and body condition scores of Przewalski’s horses in Hortobagy National Park, Hungary.. Nat Conserv Res 2019;4:1–2.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01407google scholar: lookup
  30. King SRB, Gurnell J. Habitat use and spatial dynamics of takhi introduced to Hustai National Park, Mongolia.. Biol Conserv 2005;124:277–290.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.034google scholar: lookup
  31. Schoenecker KA, King SRB, Nordquist MK, Nandintsetseg D, Cao Q. Habitat and diet of equids. Behaviour of horses, zebras, and asses.. In: Ransom JI, Kaczensky P, editors. Wild Equids: ecology, management, and conservation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2016. pp. 41–57.
  32. King SRB, Asa C, Pluhacek J, Houpt KA, Ransom JI. Behaviour of horses, zebras, and asses.. In: Ransom JI, Kaczensky P, editors. Wild Equids: ecology, management, and conservation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2016. pp. 23–40.
  33. Duncan P. Time budgets of Camargue horses. III Environmental influences.. Behaviour 1985;92:188–208.
    doi: 10.1163/156853985X00442google scholar: lookup
  34. Pratt RM, Putman RJ, Ekins JR, Edwards PJ. Use of habitat by free-ranging cattle and ponies in the new Forest, Southern England.. J Appl Ecol 1986;23:539–557.
    doi: 10.2307/2404035google scholar: lookup
  35. King SRB. Delinquency Behavioural ecology of Przewalski horses (Equus przewalskii) reintroduced to Hustai National Park, Mongolia [Doctoral dissertation].. [Queen Mary, UK] London: University of London; 2002.
  36. Rubenstein DI, Cao QS, Chiu J. Equids and ecological niches: behavioural and life history variations on a common theme.. In: Ransom JI, Kaczensky P, editors. Wild Equids: ecology, management, and conservation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2016. pp. 56–68.
  37. Gersick AS, Rubenstein DI. Physiology modulates social flexibility and collective behaviour in equids and other large ungulates.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017 Aug 19;372(1727).
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0241pmc: PMC5498301pubmed: 28673917google scholar: lookup
  38. Scheibe KM, Lange B, Lange V, Eichhorn E, Scheibe A, Streich J. Przewalskipferde in einem Semireservat–Verhaltensuntersuchungen zur Vorbereitung einer Auswilderung.. Curr Res Appl Ethol 1997;376:120–131.
  39. Kaczensky P, Enkhsaihan N, Ganbaatar O, Samjaa R, von Wehrden H, Walzer C. Takhis, Khulans, wolves and vegetation – an ecosystem approach for Takhi conservation.. Mong J Biol Sci 2004;2:60.
  40. Kaczensky P, Ganbaatar O, von Wehrden H, Walzer C. Resource selection by sympatric wild equids in the Mongolian Gobi.. J Appl Ecol 2008;45:1762–1769.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01565.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  41. National Statistic Office of Mongolia. 1212; 2021.. Available from: https://www.1212.mn/default.aspx?fbclid=IwAR0BEXeCvXQhyRjP_kUAmDcNmEHTl40knH-nMilphtaOsOvy2UZLDZAr7x8//. Cited 20 Oct 2021.
  42. McDonnell SM, Haviland JC. Agonistic ethogram of the equid bachelor band.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995;43:147–188.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00550-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  43. McDonnell SM, Poulin A. Equid play ethogram.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002;78:263–290.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00112-0google scholar: lookup
  44. Budaev SV. Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: caveats and guidelines.. Ethology 2010;116:472–480.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01758.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  45. Souris AC, Kaczensky P, Julliard R, Walzer C. Time budget-, behavioral synchrony- and body score development of a newly released Przewalski's horse group Equus ferus przewalskii, in the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area in SW Mongolia.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007 Nov;107(3-4):307-321.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.023pmc: PMC3207227pubmed: 22064904google scholar: lookup
  46. Shi Y, Ma Y, Ma W, Liang C, Zhao X, Fang J. Large scale patterns of forage yield and quality across Chinese grasslands.. Sci Bull 2013;58:10.
    doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5493-4google scholar: lookup
  47. Blank DA. Insect-repelling behaviour in goitered gazelles: responses to biting fly attack.. Eur J Wildl Res 2020;66:1–2.
    doi: 10.1007/s10344-020-01382-1google scholar: lookup
  48. Baldacchino F, Puech L, Manon S, Hertzog LR, Jay-Robert P. Biting behaviour of Tabanidae on cattle in mountainous summer pastures, Pyrenees, France, and effects of weather variables.. Bull Entomol Res 2014 Aug;104(4):471-9.
    pubmed: 24622151doi: 10.1017/s0007485314000170google scholar: lookup
  49. Helle T, Aspi J, Lempa K, Taskinen E. Strategies to avoid biting flies by reindeer: field experiments with silhouette traps.. Ann Zool Fenn 1992;29:69–74.
  50. Weladji RB, Holand Ø, Almøy T. Use of climatic data to assess the effect of insect harassment on the autumn weight of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) calves.. J Zool 2003;260:79–85.
    doi: 10.1017/S0952836903003510google scholar: lookup
  51. Arnold W, Ruf T, Reimoser S, Tataruch F, Onderscheka K, Schober F. Nocturnal hypometabolism as an overwintering strategy of red deer (Cervus elaphus).. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004 Jan;286(1):R174-81.
    doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00593.2002pubmed: 12969877google scholar: lookup
  52. Kuntz R, Kubalek C, Ruf T, Tataruch F, Arnold W. Seasonal adjustment of energy budget in a large wild mammal, the Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) I. Energy intake.. J Exp Biol 2006 Nov;209(Pt 22):4557-65.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02536pubmed: 17079725google scholar: lookup
  53. Scheibe KM, Streich WJ. Annual rhythm of body weight in Przewalski's horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) biol.. Rhythm Res 2003;34:383–395.
    doi: 10.1076/brhm.34.4.383.26227google scholar: lookup
  54. Arnold W, Ruf T, Kuntz R. Seasonal adjustment of energy budget in a large wild mammal, the Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) II. Energy expenditure.. J Exp Biol 2006 Nov;209(Pt 22):4566-73.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02536pubmed: 17079726google scholar: lookup
  55. Ihle P. Ethologische Studie über den Tagesrhythmus von Pferden in Abhängigkeit von der Haltungsform. [Doctoral dissertation]. Ludwigstraße: University of Gießen; 1984.
  56. Boyd L, Houpt KA. Activity patterns.. In: Boyd L, Houpt KA, editors. Przewalski’s horse: the history and biology of an endangered species. New York: State University of New York Press; 1994. pp. 195–227.
  57. Woodfine T. The Eelmoor Marsh Przewalski’s horse Project: The Complementary Management of an Endangered Equid and a British Nature Reserve [Doctoral dissertation]. Lexington: University of Kentucky; 2003.
  58. Hechler B. Beitrag zur Ethologie des Islandpferdes [Doctoral dissertation]. Ludwigstraße: University of Gießen; 1971.
  59. Zeitler-Feicht M. Handbuch Pferdeverhalten.. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer, Inc.; 2008.
  60. Heintzelmann-Gröngröft B. Spezielle Ethologie – Pferd.. In: Bogner H, Grauvogl A, editors. Verhalten landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer; 1984. pp. 87–147.
  61. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL. Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13850-3.
    pmc: PMC2728983pubmed: 19667179doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900639106google scholar: lookup
  62. Christensen JW, Zharkikh T, Ladewig J, Yasinetskaya N. Social behaviour in stallion groups (Equus przewalskii and Equus caballus) kept under natural and domestic conditions.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002;76:11–20.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00208-8google scholar: lookup
  63. Crowell-Davis SL, Houpt KA, Carini CM. Mutual grooming and nearest-neighbor relationships among foals of Equus caballus.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1986;15:113–123.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(86)90057-2google scholar: lookup
  64. Heitor F, do Mar Oom M, Vicente L. Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses Part II. Factors affecting affiliative relationships and sexual behaviours.. Behav Processes 2006 Nov 1;73(3):231-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.005pubmed: 16828984google scholar: lookup
  65. Kimura R. Mutual grooming and preferred associate relationships in a band of free-ranging horses.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998;59:265–276.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00129-9google scholar: lookup
  66. Sigurjónsdóttir H, Van Dierendonck MC, Snorrason S, Thórhallsdóttir AG. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion.. Behav 2003;140:783–804.
    doi: 10.1163/156853903322370670google scholar: lookup
  67. Robert N, Walzer C, Rüegg SR, Kaczensky P, Ganbaatar O, Stauffer C. Pathologic findings in reintroduced Przewalski's horses (Equus caballus przewalskii) in southwestern Mongolia.. J Zoo Wildl Med 2005 Jun;36(2):273-85.
    doi: 10.1638/03-035.1pubmed: 17323569google scholar: lookup
  68. Dehn MM. Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1990;26:337–342.
  69. Hamilton WD. Geometry for the selfish herd.. J Theor Biol 1971 May;31(2):295-311.
    doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5pubmed: 5104951google scholar: lookup
  70. Milinski M. Experiments on the selection by predators against spatial oddity of their prey.. Z Tierpsychol 1977;43:311–325.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1977.tb00078.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  71. Neill S, Cullen JM. Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators.. J Zool 1974;172:549–569.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1974.tb04385.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  72. Lehtonen J, Jaatinen K. Safety in numbers: the dilution effect and other drivers of group life in the face of danger.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2016;70(4):449–458.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2075-5google scholar: lookup
  73. Ross RA, Giller PS. Observations on the activity patterns and social interactions of a captive group of blackcapped or brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Primates 1988;3:307–317.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02380954google scholar: lookup
  74. Bernstein IS, Baker SC. Activity patterns in a captive group of Celebes black apes (Macaca nigra).. Folia Primatol (Basel) 1988;51(2-3):61-75.
    doi: 10.1159/000156358pubmed: 3254853google scholar: lookup
  75. Taraborelli P, Moreno P. Comparing composition of social groups, mating system and social behaviour in two populations of Micvocavia australis.. Mamm Biol 2009;74:15–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2008.08.002google scholar: lookup
  76. Young JK, González-Suárez M, Gerber LR. Determinants of agonistic interactions in California Sea lions.. Behaviour 2008;12:797–810.
  77. Fattorini N, Lovari S, Brunetti C, Baruzzi C, Cotza A, Macchi E, Pagliarella MC, Ferretti F. Age, seasonality, and correlates of aggression in female Apennine chamois.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2018;72:1–7.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-018-2584-5google scholar: lookup
  78. Ismail K, Kamal K, Plath M, Wronski T. Effects of an exceptional drought on daily activity patterns, reproductive behaviour, and reproductive success of reintroduced Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx). J Arid Environ 2011;75:125–131.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.09.017google scholar: lookup
  79. Stevens EF. Instability of harems offeral horses in relation to season and presence of subordinate stallions.. Behaviour 1990;112:149–161.
    doi: 10.1163/156853990X00167google scholar: lookup
  80. Bartholomew GA, Dawson W. Desert Biology.. Cambridge: Academic Press, Inc.; 1968.
  81. Cain JW, Krausman PR, Rosenstock SS, Turner JC. Mechanisms of thermoregulation and water balance in desert ungulates.. Wildl Soc Bull 2006;34:570–581.
    doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[570:MOTAWB]2.0.CO;2google scholar: lookup
  82. Rubenstein DI. Life history and social organisation in arid adapted ungulates.. J Arid Environ 1989;17:145–156.
    doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(18)30901-7google scholar: lookup
  83. Jarman P. Behaviour of topi in a shadeless environment.. Zool Afr 1977;12:101–111.
    doi: 10.1080/00445096.1977.11447552google scholar: lookup
  84. Fryxell J, Sinclair A. Seasonal migration by white-eared kob in relation to resources.. Afr J Ecol 1988;26:17–31.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1988.tb01125.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  85. Klimov VV. Spatial-ethological organization of the herd of Przewalski horses (Equus przewalskii) in Askania-Nova.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1988;21:99–115.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90103-7google scholar: lookup
  86. Wolter R, Pantel N, Stefanski V, Möstl E, Krueger K. The role of an alpha animal in changing environmental conditions.. Physiol Behav 2014 Jun 22;133:236-43.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.025pubmed: 24878311google scholar: lookup
  87. Briard L, Deneubourg JL, Petit O. How stallions influence the dynamic of collective movements in two groups of domestic horses, from departure to arrival.. Behav Processes 2017 Sep;142:56-63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.05.014pubmed: 28549567google scholar: lookup
  88. Keiper R, Receveur H. Social interactions of free-ranging Przewalski horses in semi-reserves in the Netherlands.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992;33:4.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80068-1google scholar: lookup
  89. Hogan ES, Houpt KA, Sweeney K. The effectof enclosure size on social interactions and daily activity patterns of the captive Asiatic wild horse (Equusprzewalskii). Appl Anim Behav Sci 1988;1:21.
  90. Boyd L, Bandi N. Reintroduction of takhi, Equus ferus przewalskii, to Hustai National Park, Mongolia: time budget and synchrony of activity pre-and post-release.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002:87–102.
    doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(02)00088-6google scholar: lookup
  91. Knight J. If they could talk to the animals.. Nature 2001 Nov 15;414(6861):246-7.
    doi: 10.1038/35104708pubmed: 11713496google scholar: lookup
  92. Snijders L, Blumstein DT, Stanley CR, Franks DW. Animal Social Network Theory Can Help Wildlife Conservation.. Trends Ecol Evol 2017 Aug;32(8):567-577.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.05.005pubmed: 28648805google scholar: lookup
  93. Slotta-Bachmayr LE, Boegel R, Kaczensky P, Stauffer C, Walzer C. Use of population viability analysis to identify management priorities and success in reintroducing Przewalski's horses to southwestern Mongolia.. J Wildl Manag 2004;684:790–798.
    doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0790:UOPVAT]2.0.CO;2google scholar: lookup
  94. Dagvadorj D, Batjargal Z, Natsagdorj L. Mongolia second assessment report on climate change 2014.. Ulaanbator: Ministry of Environment and Green Development of Mongolia; 2014.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.