FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Is leadership a reliable concept in animals? An empirical st...
PloS one2015; 10(5); e0126344; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126344

Is leadership a reliable concept in animals? An empirical study in the horse.

Abstract: Leadership is commonly invoked when accounting for the coordination of group movements in animals, yet it remains loosely defined. In parallel, there is increased evidence of the sharing of group decisions by animals on the move. How leadership integrates within this recent framework on collective decision-making is unclear. Here, we question the occurrence of leadership in horses, a species in which this concept is of prevalent use. The relevance of the three main definitions of leadership--departing first, walking in front travel position, and eliciting the joining of mates--was tested on the collective movements of two semi-free ranging groups of Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii). We did not find any leader capable of driving most group movements or recruiting mates more quickly than others. Several group members often displayed pre-departure behaviours at the same time, and the simultaneous departure of several individuals was common. We conclude that the decision-making process was shared by several group members a group movement (i.e., partially shared consensus) and that the leadership concept did not help to depict individual departure and leading behaviour across movements in both study groups. Rather, the different proxies of leadership produced conflicting information about individual contributions to group coordination. This study discusses the implications of these findings for the field of coordination and decision-making research.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2015-05-26 PubMed ID: 26010442PubMed Central: PMC4444174DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126344Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the concept of leadership in animal groups, specifically horses, and questions its prevalence and relevance. The study doesn’t find any clear evidence of typical leadership behaviours like departing before others, staying ahead or influencing others to join in group movements.

Examination of Leadership Concepts

  • The research focuses on the three common definitions of leadership in animal groups. These include initiating a departure before others, leading the group on the move by walking in front, and inspiring the participation of other group members in the movement.
  • These leadership concepts are tested on two groups of Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) that were semi-free ranging.

Findings of the Study

  • The study found no sign of any one leader who could instigate most of the group movements, or be able to recruit other horses to join in more rapidly than others.
  • Often, several members of the group would display departure behaviour at the same time, leading to an overlap of leadership roles. Consequently, the start of a group movement was frequently a collective decision made by several horses.
  • The concept of leadership failed to effectively demonstrate individual departure and leading behavior across movements in the studied horse groups.

Implications of the Findings

  • These findings imply that leadership is not a straightforward concept in animal groups and is multi-faceted.
  • The variations in the markers of leadership, as shown in the study, can provide conflicting reports about individual contributions to group coordination.
  • These findings have broader implications for the field of coordination and decision-making research, where the understanding of leadership roles can impact the interpretation of collective decision-making processes.
  • It highlights a need to reassess the concept of leadership in animals, and consider its relevance and applicability in different species and contexts.

Cite This Article

APA
Bourjade M, Thierry B, Hausberger M, Petit O. (2015). Is leadership a reliable concept in animals? An empirical study in the horse. PLoS One, 10(5), e0126344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126344

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 5
Pages: e0126344
PII: e0126344

Researcher Affiliations

Bourjade, Marie
  • Unité de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Octogone, Laboratoire Cognition Communication Développement, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France; Association Takh pour le cheval de Przewalski, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles, France.
Thierry, Bernard
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Strasbourg, France; Université de Strasbourg, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Strasbourg, France.
Hausberger, Martine
  • Laboratoire d'Ethologie Animale et Humaine, Université de Rennes 1, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Rennes, France.
Petit, Odile
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Strasbourg, France; Université de Strasbourg, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Strasbourg, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Empirical Research
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Leadership
  • Male
  • Movement

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 69 references
  1. Byrne RW, Whiten A, Henzi SP. Social relationships of mountain baboons: Leadership and affiliation in a non-female-bonded monkey. Am J Primatol 20: 313–329.
  2. Schaller GE. The mountain gorilla: Ecology and behavior Oxford: The University of Chicago Press; 1963.
  3. Holekamp KE, Boydston EE, Smale L. Group travel in social carnivores. p. 587–627.
  4. Peterson RO, Jacobs AK, Drummer TD, Mech LD, Smith DW. Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus. Can J Zool 80: 1405–1412.
  5. Bonanni R, Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P, Natoli E. Effect of affiliative and agonistic relationships on leadership behaviour in free-ranging dogs. Anim Behav 79: 981–991.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.021google scholar: lookup
  6. Dumont B, Boissy A, Achard C, Sibbald AM, Erhard HW. Consistency of animal order in spontaneous group movements allows the measurement of leadership in a group of grazing heifers. Appl Anim Behav Sci 95: 55–66.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.005google scholar: lookup
  7. Réale D, Festa-Bianchet M. Predator-induced natural selection on temperament in bighorn ewes. Anim Behav 65: 463–470.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2100google scholar: lookup
  8. Reinhardt V. Movement orders and leadership in a semi-wild cattle herd. Behaviour 83: 251–264.
    doi: 10.1163/156853983X00183google scholar: lookup
  9. Boinski S, Garber PA. On the move: How and why animals travel in groups Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press; 2000.
  10. Fischhoff IR, Sundaresan SR, Cordingley J, Larkin HM, Sellier M- J, Rubenstein DI. Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii. Anim Behav 73: 825–831.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.012google scholar: lookup
  11. King AJ, Douglas CM, Huchard E, Isaac NJ, Cowlishaw G. Dominance and affiliation mediate despotism in a social primate.. Curr Biol 2008 Dec 9;18(23):1833-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.048pubmed: 19026539google scholar: lookup
  12. Leca J-B, Gunst N, Thierry B, Petit O. Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 66: 1045–1052.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2276google scholar: lookup
  13. Krause J, Hoare D, Krause S, Hemelrijk CK, Rubenstein DI. Leadership in fish shoals. Fish Fish 1: 82–89.
  14. Lamprecht J. What makes an individual the leader of its group? An evolutionary concept of distance regulation and leadership. Soc Sci Inf 35: 595–617.
    doi: 10.1177/053901896035004001google scholar: lookup
  15. Harcourt JL, Ang TZ, Sweetman G, Johnstone RA, Manica A. Social feedback and the emergence of leaders and followers.. Curr Biol 2009 Feb 10;19(3):248-52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.051pubmed: 19185497google scholar: lookup
  16. Nakayama S, Johnstone RA, Manica A. Temperament and hunger interact to determine the emergence of leaders in pairs of foraging fish.. PLoS One 2012;7(8):e43747.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043747pmc: PMC3430686pubmed: 22952753google scholar: lookup
  17. Nakayama S, Harcourt JL, Johnstone RA, Manica A. Initiative, personality and leadership in pairs of foraging fish.. PLoS One 2012;7(5):e36606.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036606pmc: PMC3342251pubmed: 22567168google scholar: lookup
  18. Rands SA, Cowlishaw G, Pettifor RA, Rowcliffe JM, Johnstone RA. Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs.. Nature 2003 May 22;423(6938):432-4.
    pubmed: 12761547doi: 10.1038/nature01630google scholar: lookup
  19. Rands SA, Cowlishaw G, Pettifor RA, Rowcliffe JM, Johnstone RA. The emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs when the qualities of individuals differ.. BMC Evol Biol 2008 Feb 18;8:51.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-51pmc: PMC2276478pubmed: 18282297google scholar: lookup
  20. Nagy M, Akos Z, Biro D, Vicsek T. Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks.. Nature 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):890-3.
    doi: 10.1038/nature08891pubmed: 20376149google scholar: lookup
  21. Ákos Z, Beck R, Nagy M, Vicsek T, Kubinyi E. Leadership and path characteristics during walks are linked to dominance order and individual traits in dogs.. PLoS Comput Biol 2014 Jan;10(1):e1003446.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003446pmc: PMC3900374pubmed: 24465200google scholar: lookup
  22. Šárová R, Špinka M, Panamá JLA, Šimeček P. Graded leadership by dominant animals in a herd of female beef cattle on pasture. Anim Behav 79: 1037–1045.
  23. Kurvers RH, Eijkelenkamp B, van Oers K, van Lith B, van Wieren SE, Ydenberg RC. Personality differences explain leadership in barnacle geese. Anim Behav 78: 447–453.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01488.xpubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  24. Johnstone RA, Manica A. Evolution of personality differences in leadership.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 May 17;108(20):8373-8.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102191108pmc: PMC3100967pubmed: 21536882google scholar: lookup
  25. Krueger K, Flauger B, Farmer K, Hemelrijk C. Movement initiation in groups of feral horses.. Behav Processes 2014 Mar;103:91-101.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.10.007pubmed: 24220794google scholar: lookup
  26. Krause J, Bumann D, Todt D. Relationship between the position preference and nutritional state of individuals in schools of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 177–180.
  27. Sueur C, Deneubourg JL, Petit O, Couzin ID. Differences in nutrient requirements imply a non-linear emergence of leaders in animal groups.. PLoS Comput Biol 2010 Sep 2;6(9):e1000917.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000917pmc: PMC2932680pubmed: 20824127google scholar: lookup
  28. Reebs SG. Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?. Anim Behav 2000 Feb;59(2):403-409.
    pubmed: 10675263doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1314google scholar: lookup
  29. Faria JJ, Dyer JRG, Tosh CR, Krause J. Leadership and social information use in human crowds. Anim Behav 79: 895–901.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.039google scholar: lookup
  30. Couzin ID, Krause J, Franks NR, Levin SA. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move.. Nature 2005 Feb 3;433(7025):513-6.
    pubmed: 15690039doi: 10.1038/nature03236google scholar: lookup
  31. King AJ, Johnson DD, Van Vugt M. The origins and evolution of leadership.. Curr Biol 2009 Oct 13;19(19):R911-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.027pubmed: 19825357google scholar: lookup
  32. King AJ. Follow me! I'm a leader if you do; I'm a failed initiator if you don't?. Behav Processes 2010 Jul;84(3):671-4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.03.006pubmed: 20350591google scholar: lookup
  33. Petit O, Bon R. Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements.. Behav Processes 2010 Jul;84(3):635-47.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.009pubmed: 20435103google scholar: lookup
  34. Van Vugt M, Hogan R, Kaiser RB. Leadership, followership, and evolution: some lessons from the past.. Am Psychol 2008 Apr;63(3):182-96.
    doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182pubmed: 18377108google scholar: lookup
  35. List C. Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective.. Trends Ecol Evol 2004 Apr;19(4):168-9.
    pubmed: 16701250doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.02.004google scholar: lookup
  36. Conradt L, Roper TJ. Consensus decision making in animals.. Trends Ecol Evol 2005 Aug;20(8):449-56.
    pubmed: 16701416doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008google scholar: lookup
  37. Bourjade M, Thierry B, Maumy M, Petit O. Decision-making in Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) is driven by the ecological contexts of collective movements. Ethology 115: 321–330.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01614.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  38. Kummer H. Social organization of hamadryas baboons: A field study 1st ed. Chicago, US: The University of Chicago Press; 1968.
  39. Ramseyer A, Thierry B, Boissy A, Dumont B. Decision-making processes in group departures of cattle. Ethology 115: 948–957.
  40. Ramseyer A, Boissy A, Dumont B, Thierry B. Decision making in group departures of sheep is a continuous process. Anim Behav 78: 71–78.
  41. Sueur C, Petit O. Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques?. Behav Processes 2008 May;78(1):84-92.
    pubmed: 18281161doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.004google scholar: lookup
  42. Pyritz LW, King AJ, Sueur C, Fichtel C. Reaching a Consensus: Terminology and Concepts Used in Coordination and Decision-Making Research.. Int J Primatol 2011 Dec;32(6):1268-1278.
    doi: 10.1007/s10764-011-9524-9pmc: PMC3228941pubmed: 22207769google scholar: lookup
  43. King AJ, Sueur C. Where next? Group coordination and collective decision making by primates. Int J Primatol 32: 1245–1267.
  44. Sueur C, Deneubourg J-L. Self-organization in primates: Understanding the rules underlying collective movements. Int J Primatol 32: 1413–1432.
  45. Feist JD, McCullough DR. Behavior patterns and communication in feral horses.. Z Tierpsychol 1976 Aug;41(4):337-71.
    pubmed: 983427doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1976.tb00947.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  46. Ozogány K, Vicsek T. Modeling the emergence of modular leadership hierarchy during the collective motion of herds made of harems. J Stat Phys 1–19.
    doi: 10.1007/s10955-014-1131-7google scholar: lookup
  47. Tyler SJ. The behaviour and social organization of the New Forest ponies. Anim Behav Monogr 5: 87–196.
  48. Welsh DA (1975) Population, behavioural and grazing ecology of the horses of Sable Island, Nova Scotia Thesis (Ph. D.)–Dalhousie University.
  49. Berger J. Organizational systems and dominance in feral horses in the Grand Canyon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2: 131–146.
  50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research San Francisco: Freeman; 1995.
  51. Fureix C, Bourjade M, Henry S, Sankey C, Hausberger M. Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses Equus caballus. Appl Anim Behav Sci 138: 216–228.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.009google scholar: lookup
  52. Linklater WL. Adaptive explanation in socio-ecology: lessons from the Equidae.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2000 Feb;75(1):1-20.
    pubmed: 10740891doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005411google scholar: lookup
  53. King SRB, Gurnell J. Effects of fly disturbance on the behaviour of a population of reintroduced Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Mongolia. Appl Anim Behav Sci 125: 22–29.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.03.006google scholar: lookup
  54. Souris AC, Kaczensky P, Julliard R, Walzer C. Time budget-, behavioral synchrony- and body score development of a newly released Przewalski's horse group Equus ferus przewalskii, in the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area in SW Mongolia.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007 Nov;107(3-4):307-321.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.023pmc: PMC3207227pubmed: 22064904google scholar: lookup
  55. Xia C, Cao J, Zhang H, Gao X, Yang W, Blank D. Reintroduction of Przewalski’s horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Xinjiang, China: The status and experience. Biol Conserv 177: 142–147.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.021google scholar: lookup
  56. Feh C. Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds In: Mills DS, McDonnell SM, editors. The Domestic Horse: The origins, development and management of its behaviour Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
  57. Bourjade M, Sueur C. Shared or unshared consensus for collective movement? Towards methodological concerns.. Behav Processes 2010 Jul;84(3):648-52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.027pubmed: 20211230google scholar: lookup
  58. Sumpter DJ, Pratt SC. Quorum responses and consensus decision making.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):743-53.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0204pmc: PMC2689713pubmed: 19073480google scholar: lookup
  59. King AJ, Cowlishaw G. When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making.. Biol Lett 2007 Apr 22;3(2):137-9.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0017pmc: PMC2104485pubmed: 17284400google scholar: lookup
  60. Bourjade M, de Boyer des Roches A, Hausberger M. Adult-young ratio, a major factor regulating social behaviour of young: a horse study.. PLoS One 2009;4(3):e4888.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004888pmc: PMC2654111pubmed: 19293930google scholar: lookup
  61. Pillot MH, Gautrais J, Gouello J, Michelena P, Sibbald A, Bon R. Moving together: Incidental leaders and naïve followers.. Behav Processes 2010 Mar;83(3):235-41.
    pubmed: 19931601doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.11.006google scholar: lookup
  62. Hinde RA. Biological bases of human social behaviour New-York: McGraw-Hill; 1974.
  63. Tomasello M, Carpenter M. Shared intentionality.. Dev Sci 2007 Jan;10(1):121-5.
    pubmed: 17181709doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  64. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H. Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition.. Behav Brain Sci 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735.
    doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000129pubmed: 16262930google scholar: lookup
  65. Meunier H, Deneubourg JL, Petit O. How many for dinner? Recruitment and monitoring by glances in capuchins.. Primates 2008 Jan;49(1):26-31.
    pubmed: 17646923doi: 10.1007/s10329-007-0055-0google scholar: lookup
  66. Petit O, Gautrais J, Leca JB, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL. Collective decision-making in white-faced capuchin monkeys.. Proc Biol Sci 2009 Oct 7;276(1672):3495-503.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0983pmc: PMC2817197pubmed: 19605395google scholar: lookup
  67. Sueur C, Petit O. Signals use by leaders in Macaca tonkeana and Macaca mulatta: group-mate recruitment and behaviour monitoring.. Anim Cogn 2010 Mar;13(2):239-48.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0261-9pubmed: 19597854google scholar: lookup
  68. Wolf M, Kurvers RH, Ward AJ, Krause S, Krause J. Accurate decisions in an uncertain world: collective cognition increases true positives while decreasing false positives.. Proc Biol Sci 2013 Apr 7;280(1756):20122777.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2777pmc: PMC3574371pubmed: 23407830google scholar: lookup
  69. Stueckle S, Zinner D. To follow or not to follow: Decision making and leadership during the morning departure in chacma baboons. Anim Behav 75: 1995–2004.

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Iglesias Pastrana C, Navas González FJ, Ciani E, Arando Arbulu A, Delgado Bermejo JV. The Youngest, the Heaviest and/or the Darkest? Selection Potentialities and Determinants of Leadership in Canarian Dromedary Camels. Animals (Basel) 2021 Oct 3;11(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102886pubmed: 34679907google scholar: lookup
  2. Gérard C, Valenchon M, Poulin N, Petit O. How does the expressiveness of leaders affect followership in domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus)?. Anim Cogn 2020 May;23(3):559-569.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01361-8pubmed: 32065307google scholar: lookup
  3. Séguret A, Collignon B, Cazenille L, Chemtob Y, Halloy J. Loose social organisation of AB strain zebrafish groups in a two-patch environment. PLoS One 2019;14(2):e0206193.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206193pubmed: 30735505google scholar: lookup
  4. Kydd E, Padalino B, Henshall C, McGreevy P. An analysis of equine round pen training videos posted online: Differences between amateur and professional trainers. PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0184851.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184851pubmed: 28922395google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.