FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Microbiol / Lactobacillus ruminis strains cluster according to their mam...
BMC microbiology2015; 15; 80; doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0403-y

Lactobacillus ruminis strains cluster according to their mammalian gut source.

Abstract: Lactobacillus ruminis is a motile Lactobacillus that is autochthonous to the human gut, and which may also be isolated from other mammals. Detailed characterization of L. ruminis has previously been restricted to strains of human and bovine origin. We therefore sought to expand our bio-bank of strains to identify and characterise isolates of porcine and equine origin by comparative genomics. Results: We isolated five strains from the faeces of horses and two strains from pigs, and compared their motility, biochemistry and genetic relatedness to six human isolates and three bovine isolates including the type strain 27780(T). Multilocus sequence typing analysis based on concatenated sequence data for six individual loci separated the 16 L. ruminis strains into three clades concordant with human, bovine or porcine, and equine sources. Sequencing the genomes of four additional strains of human, bovine, equine and porcine origin revealed a high level of genome synteny, independent of the source animal. Analysis of carbohydrate utilization, stress survival and technological robustness in a combined panel of sixteen L. ruminis isolates identified strains with optimal survival characteristics suitable for future investigation as candidate probiotics. Under laboratory conditions, six human isolates of L. ruminis tested were aflagellate and non-motile, whereas all 10 strains of bovine, equine and porcine origin were motile. Interestingly the equine and porcine strains were hyper-flagellated compared to bovine isolates, and this hyper-flagellate phenotype correlated with the ability to swarm on solid medium containing up to 1.8% agar. Analysis by RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR identified genes for the biosynthesis of flagella, genes for carbohydrate metabolism and genes of unknown function that were differentially expressed in swarming cells of an equine isolate of L. ruminis. Conclusions: We suggest that Lactobacillus ruminis isolates have potential to be used in the functional food industry. We have also identified a MLST scheme able to distinguish between strains of L. ruminis of different origin. Genes for non-digestible oligosaccharide metabolism were identified with a putative role in swarming behaviour.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2015-04-01 PubMed ID: 25879663PubMed Central: PMC4393605DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0403-yGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the characteristics of the bacteria Lactobacillus ruminis, sourced from different mammals. The findings indicate that the bacteria cluster based on their source animal, possessing variations in their motility and genetic relatedness. This discovery has implications for the functional food industry, potentially offering benefits for probiotics.

Research Objective

  • The research focused on the bacteria Lactobacillus ruminis, which is naturally found in the human gut but can also be isolated from other mammals. Prior studies have been limited to strains sourced from humans and cows, so this study aimed to widen the scope to include isolates from pigs and horses.

Methods and Results

  • Researchers successfully isolated L. ruminis strains from horse and pig feces and compared these to strains sourced from humans and cows.
  • The bacteria’s motility, biochemistry, and genetic relatedness were analyzed. The strains separated into three different groups according to their animal source.
  • Sequencing the genomes of certain human, bovine, equine, and porcine strains revealed that there was a high level of genome synteny, or similarity in the sequence of genes, regardless of the source animal. This suggests that the L. ruminis strains are essentially the same bacteria, with some variations based on the host animal.

Further Findings

  • In the lab, human strains of L. ruminis were found to be non-motile, meaning they did not move on their own. However, all strains from cows, pigs, and horses were motile. Strikingly, pig and horse strains were even hyper-flagellated, giving them an ability to “swarm” on solid medium.
  • Genes that control flagella production, carbohydrate metabolism, and some unknown functions were expressed differently in these swarming cells.
  • The researchers propose these strains have potential for use in the functional food industry, especially considering their unique behaviors and genetic structures.

Implications

  • The ability to distinguish between L. ruminis strains from different origins may prove helpful for probiotics and overall human gut health. Since these strains have specific survival characteristics, they might be optimal candidates for probiotic supplementation.
  • The unknown genes associated with the swarming behavior suggest there may be beneficial, yet undiscovered, properties of L. ruminis. This opens up room for future research into how the bacteria functions and interacts with its host.

Cite This Article

APA
O' Donnell MM, Harris HM, Lynch DB, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. (2015). Lactobacillus ruminis strains cluster according to their mammalian gut source. BMC Microbiol, 15, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0403-y

Publication

BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
NlmUniqueID: 100966981
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 15
Pages: 80
PII: 80

Researcher Affiliations

O' Donnell, Michelle M
  • Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., Cork, Ireland. michelle.o'donnell@teagasc.ie.
  • School of Microbiology & Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. michelle.o'donnell@teagasc.ie.
Harris, Hugh Michael B
  • School of Microbiology & Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. hughharris86@gmail.com.
Lynch, Denise B
  • School of Microbiology & Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. d.lynch@ucc.ie.
Ross, Reynolds Paul
  • School of Microbiology & Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. p.ross@ucc.ie.
  • College of Science, Engineering and Food Science (SEFS), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. p.ross@ucc.ie.
O'Toole, Paul W
  • School of Microbiology & Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. pwotoole@ucc.ie.
  • School of Microbiology, Food Science Building, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. pwotoole@ucc.ie.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Base Sequence
  • Cattle
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Flagella / genetics
  • Flagella / metabolism
  • Gastrointestinal Tract / microbiology
  • Genome, Bacterial
  • Genotype
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
  • Horses / microbiology
  • Host Specificity
  • Humans
  • Lactobacillus / classification
  • Lactobacillus / genetics
  • Lactobacillus / isolation & purification
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Multigene Family
  • Multilocus Sequence Typing
  • Oligosaccharides / genetics
  • Oligosaccharides / metabolism
  • Phylogeny
  • Probiotics
  • Swine / microbiology
  • Synteny

References

This article includes 81 references
  1. Heilig HG, Zoetendal EG, Vaughan EE, Marteau P, Akkermans AD, de Vos WM. Molecular diversity of Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria in the human intestine as determined by specific amplification of 16S ribosomal DNA.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002 Jan;68(1):114-23.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.1.114-123.2002pmc: PMC126540pubmed: 11772617google scholar: lookup
  2. Mäkivuokko H, Tiihonen K, Tynkkynen S, Paulin L, Rautonen N. The effect of age and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on human intestinal microbiota composition.. Br J Nutr 2010 Jan;103(2):227-34.
    doi: 10.1017/S0007114509991553pubmed: 19703328google scholar: lookup
  3. Reuter G. The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium microflora of the human intestine: composition and succession.. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 2001 Sep;2(2):43-53.
    pubmed: 11721280
  4. Wall R, Fitzgerald G, Hussey S, Ryan T, Murphy B, Ross P, Stanton C. Genomic diversity of cultivable Lactobacillus populations residing in the neonatal and adult gastrointestinal tract.. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2007 Jan;59(1):127-37.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00202.xpubmed: 16978242google scholar: lookup
  5. Sharpe ME, Latham MJ, Garvie EI, Zirngibl J, Kandler O. Two new species of Lactobacillus isolated from the bovine rumen, Lactobacillus ruminis sp.nov. and Lactobacillus vitulinus sp.nov.. J Gen Microbiol 1973 Jul;77(1):37-49.
    doi: 10.1099/00221287-77-1-37pubmed: 4723944google scholar: lookup
  6. Stewart CS, Fonty G, Gouet P. The establishment of rumen microbial communities.. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1988;21(2–4):69–97.
    doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(88)90093-4google scholar: lookup
  7. Greetham HL, Giffard C, Hutson RA, Collins MD, Gibson GR. Bacteriology of the Labrador dog gut: a cultural and genotypic approach.. J Appl Microbiol 2002;93(4):640-6.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01724.xpubmed: 12234347google scholar: lookup
  8. Al Jassim RA. Lactobacillus ruminis is a predominant lactic acid producing bacterium in the caecum and rectum of the pig.. Lett Appl Microbiol 2003;37(3):213-7.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01380.xpubmed: 12904222google scholar: lookup
  9. Desai AR, Musil KM, Carr AP, Hill JE. Characterization and quantification of feline fecal microbiota using cpn60 sequence-based methods and investigation of animal-to-animal variation in microbial population structure.. Vet Microbiol 2009 May 28;137(1-2):120-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.12.019pubmed: 19167842google scholar: lookup
  10. Mathiesen SD, Orpin CG, Greenwood Y, Blix AS. Seasonal changes in the cecal microflora of the high-arctic Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus).. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987 Jan;53(1):114-8.
    pmc: PMC203613pubmed: 3030193doi: 10.1128/aem.53.1.114-118.1987google scholar: lookup
  11. Ritchie LE, Burke KF, Garcia-Mazcorro JF, Steiner JM, Suchodolski JS. Characterization of fecal microbiota in cats using universal 16S rRNA gene and group-specific primers for Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp.. Vet Microbiol 2010 Jul 29;144(1-2):140-6.
    pubmed: 20092970doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.045google scholar: lookup
  12. Vörös A. Diet Related Changes in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Horses.. Masters. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 2008.
  13. Willing B, Vörös A, Roos S, Jones C, Jansson A, Lindberg JE. Changes in faecal bacteria associated with concentrate and forage-only diets fed to horses in training.. Equine Vet J 2009 Dec;41(9):908-14.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X447806pubmed: 20383990google scholar: lookup
  14. Endo A, Futagawa-Endo Y, Dicks LM. Diversity of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in feces of herbivores, omnivores and carnivores.. Anaerobe 2010 Dec;16(6):590-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.10.005pubmed: 21034840google scholar: lookup
  15. Kovalenko NK, Golovach TN, Kvasnikov EI. [Lactic bacteria in the digestive tract of poultry].. Mikrobiologiia 1989 Jan-Feb;58(1):137-43.
    pubmed: 2761452
  16. Xenoulis PG, Gray PL, Brightsmith D, Palculict B, Hoppes S, Steiner JM, Tizard I, Suchodolski JS. Molecular characterization of the cloacal microbiota of wild and captive parrots.. Vet Microbiol 2010 Dec 15;146(3-4):320-5.
    pubmed: 20646876doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.024google scholar: lookup
  17. Lerche M, Reuter G. Isolierung und Differenzierung anaerober Lactobacilleae aus Darm erwachsener Menschen (Beitrag zum Lactobacillus bifidus Problem). Zentralbl Bakteriol 1961;182:324.
  18. Tannock GW, Munro K, Harmsen HJ, Welling GW, Smart J, Gopal PK. Analysis of the fecal microflora of human subjects consuming a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000 Jun;66(6):2578-88.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2578-2588.2000pmc: PMC110584pubmed: 10831441google scholar: lookup
  19. Neville BA, Forde BM, Claesson MJ, Darby T, Coghlan A, Nally K, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. Characterization of pro-inflammatory flagellin proteins produced by Lactobacillus ruminis and related motile Lactobacilli.. PLoS One 2012;7(7):e40592.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040592pmc: PMC3393694pubmed: 22808200google scholar: lookup
  20. Taweechotipatr M, Iyer C, Spinler JK, Versalovic J, Tumwasorn S. Lactobacillus saerimneri and Lactobacillus ruminis: novel human-derived probiotic strains with immunomodulatory activities.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009 Apr;293(1):65-72.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01506.xpmc: PMC4105522pubmed: 19222575google scholar: lookup
  21. Yun JH, Yim DS, Kang JY, Kang BY, Shin EA, Chung MJ, Kim SD, Baek DH, Kim K, Ha NJ. Identification of Lactobacillus ruminus SPM0211 isolated from healthy Koreans and its antimicrobial activity against some pathogens.. Arch Pharm Res 2005 Jun;28(6):660-6.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02969355pubmed: 16042074google scholar: lookup
  22. O'Donnell MM, O'Toole PW, Ross RP. Catabolic flexibility of mammalian-associated lactobacilli.. Microb Cell Fact 2013 May 16;12:48.
    doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-48pmc: PMC3668208pubmed: 23680304google scholar: lookup
  23. O'Donnell MM, Forde BM, Neville B, Ross PR, O'Toole PW. Carbohydrate catabolic flexibility in the mammalian intestinal commensal Lactobacillus ruminis revealed by fermentation studies aligned to genome annotations.. Microb Cell Fact 2011 Aug 30;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12.
    doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S12pmc: PMC3231919pubmed: 21995520google scholar: lookup
  24. Forde BM, Neville BA, O'Donnell MM, Riboulet-Bisson E, Claesson MJ, Coghlan A, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. Genome sequences and comparative genomics of two Lactobacillus ruminis strains from the bovine and human intestinal tracts.. Microb Cell Fact 2011 Aug 30;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13.
    doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S13pmc: PMC3231920pubmed: 21995554google scholar: lookup
  25. De Vries MC, Vaughan EE, Kleerebezem M, De Vos WM. Lactobacillus plantarum survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract.. Int Dairy J 2006;16(9):1018–28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.003google scholar: lookup
  26. Dunne C, Murphy L, Flynn S, O'Mahony L, O'Halloran S, Feeney M, Morrissey D, Thornton G, Fitzgerald G, Daly C, Kiely B, Quigley EM, O'Sullivan GC, Shanahan F, Collins JK. Probiotics: from myth to reality. Demonstration of functionality in animal models of disease and in human clinical trials.. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1999 Jul-Nov;76(1-4):279-92.
    pubmed: 10532384
  27. Hänninen ML. Sensitivity of Helicobacter pylori to different bile salts.. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1991 Jun;10(6):515-8.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01963941pubmed: 1915389google scholar: lookup
  28. Bennedsen M, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Danielsen M, Johansen E. Screening for antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors via genome sequencing.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011 Apr;77(8):2785-7.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.02493-10pmc: PMC3126367pubmed: 21335393google scholar: lookup
  29. Zhou JS, Pillidge CJ, Gopal PK, Gill HS. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains.. Int J Food Microbiol 2005 Feb 1;98(2):211-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.011pubmed: 15681048google scholar: lookup
  30. Yoon KY, Woodams EE, Hang YD. Production of probiotic cabbage juice by lactic acid bacteria.. Bioresour Technol 2006 Aug;97(12):1427-30.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.06.018pubmed: 16125381google scholar: lookup
  31. Champagne CP, Gardner NJ, Roy D. Challenges in the addition of probiotic cultures to foods.. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2005;45(1):61-84.
    doi: 10.1080/10408690590900144pubmed: 15730189google scholar: lookup
  32. HARRISON AP Jr, HANSEN PA. A motile Lactobacillus from the cecal feces of turkeys.. J Bacteriol 1950 Mar;59(3):444-6.
    pmc: PMC385779pubmed: 15436416doi: 10.1128/jb.59.3.444-446.1950google scholar: lookup
  33. DEIBEL RH, NIVEN CF Jr. Microbiology of meat curing. I. The occurrence and significance of a motile microorganism of the genus Lactobacillus in ham curing brines.. Appl Microbiol 1958 Sep;6(5):323-7.
    pmc: PMC1057423pubmed: 13571973doi: 10.1128/am.6.5.323-327.1958google scholar: lookup
  34. Nielsen DS, Schillinger U, Franz CMAP, Bresciani J, Amoa-Awua W, Holzapfel WH, Jakobsen M. Lactobacillus ghanensis sp. nov., a motile lactic acid bacterium isolated from Ghanaian cocoa fermentations.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007 Jul;57(Pt 7):1468-1472.
    doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64811-0pubmed: 17625177google scholar: lookup
  35. Chao SH, Tomii Y, Sasamoto M, Fujimoto J, Tsai YC, Watanabe K. Lactobacillus capillatus sp. nov., a motile bacterium isolated from stinky tofu brine.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008 Nov;58(Pt 11):2555-9.
    doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65834-0pubmed: 18984692google scholar: lookup
  36. Hayashi F, Smith KD, Ozinsky A, Hawn TR, Yi EC, Goodlett DR, Eng JK, Akira S, Underhill DM, Aderem A. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5.. Nature 2001 Apr 26;410(6832):1099-103.
    doi: 10.1038/35074106pubmed: 11323673google scholar: lookup
  37. Lawley B, Sims IM, Tannock GW. Whole-transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) screen reveals upregulation of cellobiose and motility operons of Lactobacillus ruminis L5 during growth on tetrasaccharides derived from barley β-glucan.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013 Sep;79(18):5661-9.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01887-13pmc: PMC3754151pubmed: 23851085google scholar: lookup
  38. Harshey RM. Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal.. Annu Rev Microbiol 2003;57:249-73.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.091014pubmed: 14527279google scholar: lookup
  39. Rather PN. Swarmer cell differentiation in Proteus mirabilis.. Environ Microbiol 2005 Aug;7(8):1065-73.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00806.xpubmed: 16011745google scholar: lookup
  40. Verstraeten N, Braeken K, Debkumari B, Fauvart M, Fransaer J, Vermant J, Michiels J. Living on a surface: swarming and biofilm formation.. Trends Microbiol 2008 Oct;16(10):496-506.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.004pubmed: 18775660google scholar: lookup
  41. Partridge JD, Harshey RM. Swarming: flexible roaming plans.. J Bacteriol 2013 Mar;195(5):909-18.
    doi: 10.1128/JB.02063-12pmc: PMC3571328pubmed: 23264580google scholar: lookup
  42. Attmannspacher U, Scharf BE, Harshey RM. FliL is essential for swarming: motor rotation in absence of FliL fractures the flagellar rod in swarmer cells of Salmonella enterica.. Mol Microbiol 2008 Apr;68(2):328-41.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06170.xpubmed: 18284590google scholar: lookup
  43. Sharma M, Anand SK. Swarming: a coordinated bacterial activity.. Curr Sci 2002;83:707–15.
  44. Niu C, Graves JD, Mokuolu FO, Gilbert SE, Gilbert ES. Enhanced swarming of bacteria on agar plates containing the surfactant Tween 80.. J Microbiol Methods 2005 Jul;62(1):129-32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.01.013pubmed: 15823402google scholar: lookup
  45. Lebeer S, Claes IJ, Verhoeven TL, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Exopolysaccharides of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG form a protective shield against innate immune factors in the intestine.. Microb Biotechnol 2011 May;4(3):368-74.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00199.xpmc: PMC3818995pubmed: 21375696google scholar: lookup
  46. Butler MT, Wang Q, Harshey RM. Cell density and mobility protect swarming bacteria against antibiotics.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3776-81.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910934107pmc: PMC2840483pubmed: 20133590google scholar: lookup
  47. Başyiğit Kılıç G, Kuleaşan H, Sömer VF, Akpınar D. Determining potential probiotic properties of human originated Lactobacillus plantarum strains.. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2013;18(3):479–85.
    doi: 10.1007/s12257-012-0785-8google scholar: lookup
  48. Delgado S, Suárez A, Mayo B. Dominant cultivable Lactobacillus species from the feces of healthy adults in northern Spain.. Int Microbiol 2007 Jun;10(2):141-5.
    pubmed: 17661293
  49. Delgado S, O'Sullivan E, Fitzgerald G, Mayo B. Subtractive screening for probiotic properties of lactobacillus species from the human gastrointestinal tract in the search for new probiotics.. J Food Sci 2007 Oct;72(8):M310-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00479.xpubmed: 17995611google scholar: lookup
  50. Salyers AA, Gupta A, Wang Y. Human intestinal bacteria as reservoirs for antibiotic resistance genes.. Trends Microbiol 2004 Sep;12(9):412-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.07.004pubmed: 15337162google scholar: lookup
  51. Danielsen M, Wind A. Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents.. Int J Food Microbiol 2003 Jan 26;82(1):1-11.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00254-4pubmed: 12505455google scholar: lookup
  52. EFSA. Guidance on the Assessment of Bacterial Susceptibility to Antimicrobials of Human and Veterinary Importance.. EFSA J 2012;10:2740.
  53. Yunis AA. Chloramphenicol toxicity: 25 years of research.. Am J Med 1989 Sep;87(3N):44N-48N.
    pubmed: 2486534
  54. O'Donnell MM, O'Toole PW, Ross RP. Catabolic flexibility of mammalian-associated lactobacilli.. Microb Cell Fact 2013 May 16;12:48.
    doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-48pmc: PMC3668208pubmed: 23680304google scholar: lookup
  55. de Vrese M, Stegelmann A, Richter B, Fenselau S, Laue C, Schrezenmeir J. Probiotics--compensation for lactase insufficiency.. Am J Clin Nutr 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):421S-429S.
    pubmed: 11157352doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.421sgoogle scholar: lookup
  56. de Las Rivas B, Marcobal Á, Muñoz R. Development of a multilocus sequence typing method for analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum strains.. Microbiology (Reading) 2006 Jan;152(Pt 1):85-93.
    doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28482-0pubmed: 16385118google scholar: lookup
  57. Diancourt L, Passet V, Chervaux C, Garault P, Smokvina T, Brisse S. Multilocus sequence typing of Lactobacillus casei reveals a clonal population structure with low levels of homologous recombination.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 Oct;73(20):6601-11.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01095-07pmc: PMC2075077pubmed: 17704267google scholar: lookup
  58. Tanigawa K, Watanabe K. Multilocus sequence typing reveals a novel subspeciation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii.. Microbiology (Reading) 2011 Mar;157(Pt 3):727-738.
    doi: 10.1099/mic.0.043240-0pubmed: 21178164google scholar: lookup
  59. Daniels R, Vanderleyden J, Michiels J. Quorum sensing and swarming migration in bacteria.. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2004 Jun;28(3):261-89.
    doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.09.004pubmed: 15449604google scholar: lookup
  60. Kim W, Surette MG. Metabolic differentiation in actively swarming Salmonella.. Mol Microbiol 2004 Nov;54(3):702-14.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04295.xpubmed: 15491361google scholar: lookup
  61. Lux R, Munasinghe VR, Castellano F, Lengeler JW, Corrie JE, Khan S. Elucidation of a PTS-carbohydrate chemotactic signal pathway in Escherichia coli using a time-resolved behavioral assay.. Mol Biol Cell 1999 Apr;10(4):1133-46.
    doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.4.1133pmc: PMC25240pubmed: 10198062google scholar: lookup
  62. De Man JC, Rogosa M, Sharpe ME. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli.. J Appl Microbiol 1960;23(1):130–5.
  63. O' Donnell MM, Harris HM, Jeffery IB, Claesson MJ, Younge B, O' Toole PW, Ross RP. The core faecal bacterial microbiome of Irish Thoroughbred racehorses.. Lett Appl Microbiol 2013 Dec;57(6):492-501.
    doi: 10.1111/lam.12137pubmed: 23889584google scholar: lookup
  64. De Palencia PF, López P, Corbí AL, Peláez C, Requena T. Probiotic strains: survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions, in vitro adhesion to Caco-2 cells and effect on cytokine secretion.. Eur Food Res Technol 2008;227(5):1475–84.
    doi: 10.1007/s00217-008-0870-6google scholar: lookup
  65. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT.. Nucleic Acids Symposium series 1999;1999:95–8.
  66. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.. Mol Biol Evol 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121pmc: PMC3203626pubmed: 21546353google scholar: lookup
  67. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.. Mol Biol Evol 2006 Feb;23(2):254-67.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030pubmed: 16221896google scholar: lookup
  68. Jolley KA, Feil EJ, Chan MS, Maiden MC. Sequence type analysis and recombinational tests (START).. Bioinformatics 2001 Dec;17(12):1230-1.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1230pubmed: 11751234google scholar: lookup
  69. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.. J Mol Evol 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01731581pubmed: 7463489google scholar: lookup
  70. Noguchi H, Park J, Takagi T. MetaGene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences.. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34(19):5623-30.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl723pmc: PMC1636498pubmed: 17028096google scholar: lookup
  71. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool.. J Mol Biol 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10.
    doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2pubmed: 2231712google scholar: lookup
  72. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, Parkhill J. ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool.. Bioinformatics 2005 Aug 15;21(16):3422-3.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti553pubmed: 15976072google scholar: lookup
  73. Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons.. BMC Genomics 2011 Aug 8;12:402.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402pmc: PMC3163573pubmed: 21824423google scholar: lookup
  74. Higgins DG, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments.. Methods Enzymol 1996;266:383-402.
    pubmed: 8743695doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)66024-8google scholar: lookup
  75. Creevey CJ, McInerney JO. Clann: investigating phylogenetic information through supertree analyses.. Bioinformatics 2005 Feb 1;21(3):390-2.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti020pubmed: 15374874google scholar: lookup
  76. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.. Bioinformatics 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20.
    pmc: PMC4103590pubmed: 24695404doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170google scholar: lookup
  77. Lohse M, Bolger AM, Nagel A, Fernie AR, Lunn JE, Stitt M, Usadel B. RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics.. Nucleic Acids Res 2012 Jul;40(Web Server issue):W622-7.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gks540pmc: PMC3394330pubmed: 22684630google scholar: lookup
  78. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.. Nat Methods 2012 Mar 4;9(4):357-9.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923pmc: PMC3322381pubmed: 22388286google scholar: lookup
  79. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.. Genome Biol 2010;11(10):R106.
    doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106pmc: PMC3218662pubmed: 20979621google scholar: lookup
  80. Anders S. HTSeq: Analysing high-throughput sequencing data with Python.. 2010.
  81. Anders S. Analysing RNA-Seq data with the “DESeq” package.. Mol Biol 2010:1-17.

Citations

This article has been cited 22 times.
  1. Mendoza RM, Kim SH, Vasquez R, Hwang IC, Park YS, Paik HD, Moon GS, Kang DK. Bioinformatics and its role in the study of the evolution and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria. Food Sci Biotechnol 2023 Mar;32(4):389-412.
    doi: 10.1007/s10068-022-01142-8pubmed: 36911331google scholar: lookup
  2. Kajikawa A, Eguchi N, Suzuki S. Immunogenic Modification of Ligilactobacillus agilis by Specific Amino Acid Substitution of Flagellin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022 Oct 26;88(20):e0127722.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.01277-22pubmed: 36173204google scholar: lookup
  3. Scheithauer TPM, Herrema H, Yu H, Bakker GJ, Winkelmeijer M, Soukhatcheva G, Dai D, Ma C, Havik SR, Balvers M, Davids M, Meijnikman AS, Aydin Ö, van den Born BH, Besselink MG, Busch OR, de Brauw M, van de Laar A, Belzer C, Stahl M, de Vos WM, Vallance BA, Nieuwdorp M, Verchere CB, van Raalte DH. Gut-derived bacterial flagellin induces beta-cell inflammation and dysfunction. Gut Microbes 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2111951.
    doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2111951pubmed: 35984746google scholar: lookup
  4. Prajapati A, Palva A, von Ossowski I, Krishnan V. LrpCBA pilus proteins of gut-dwelling Ligilactobacillus ruminis: crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 2021 Aug 1;77(Pt 8):238-245.
    doi: 10.1107/S2053230X21007263pubmed: 34341189google scholar: lookup
  5. Kuznetsova V, Tyakht A, Akhmadishina L, Odintsova V, Klimenko N, Kostryukova E, Vakhitova M, Grigoryeva T, Malanin S, Vladimirtsev V, Nikitina R, Volok V, Osakovskiy V, Sivtseva T, Platonov F, Alexeev D, Karganova G. Gut microbiome signature of Viliuisk encephalomyelitis in Yakuts includes an increase in microbes linked to lean body mass and eating behaviour. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020 Nov 20;15(1):327.
    doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01612-4pubmed: 33218345google scholar: lookup
  6. Suzuki S, Fujita K, Maeno S, Shiwa Y, Endo A, Yokota K, Igimi S, Kajikawa A. PCR-based screening, isolation, and partial characterization of motile lactobacilli from various animal feces. BMC Microbiol 2020 Jun 3;20(1):142.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01830-7pubmed: 32493209google scholar: lookup
  7. Śliżewska K, Chlebicz-Wójcik A. The In Vitro Analysis of Prebiotics to Be Used as a Component of a Synbiotic Preparation. Nutrients 2020 Apr 30;12(5).
    doi: 10.3390/nህ1272pubmed: 32365804google scholar: lookup
  8. Wang S, Yang B, Ross RP, Stanton C, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W. Comparative Genomics Analysis of Lactobacillus ruminis from Different Niches. Genes (Basel) 2020 Jan 8;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/genes11010070pubmed: 31936280google scholar: lookup
  9. Grond K, Santo Domingo JW, Lanctot RB, Jumpponen A, Bentzen RL, Boldenow ML, Brown SC, Casler B, Cunningham JA, Doll AC, Freeman S, Hill BL, Kendall SJ, Kwon E, Liebezeit JR, Pirie-Dominix L, Rausch J, Sandercock BK. Composition and Drivers of Gut Microbial Communities in Arctic-Breeding Shorebirds. Front Microbiol 2019;10:2258.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02258pubmed: 31649627google scholar: lookup
  10. Iyer LR, Verma AK, Paul J, Bhattacharya A. Phagocytosis of Gut Bacteria by Entamoeba histolytica. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019;9:34.
    doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00034pubmed: 30863724google scholar: lookup
  11. Kajikawa A, Suzuki S, Igimi S. The impact of motility on the localization of Lactobacillus agilis in the murine gastrointestinal tract. BMC Microbiol 2018 Jul 11;18(1):68.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1219-3pubmed: 29996774google scholar: lookup
  12. Harris HMB, Bourin MJB, Claesson MJ, O'Toole PW. Phylogenomics and comparative genomics of Lactobacillus salivarius, a mammalian gut commensal. Microb Genom 2017 Aug;3(8):e000115.
    doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000115pubmed: 29026656google scholar: lookup
  13. von Ossowski I. Novel Molecular Insights about Lactobacillar Sortase-Dependent Piliation. Int J Mol Sci 2017 Jul 18;18(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms18071551pubmed: 28718795google scholar: lookup
  14. Yu X, Åvall-Jääskeläinen S, Koort J, Lindholm A, Rintahaka J, von Ossowski I, Palva A, Hynönen U. A Comparative Characterization of Different Host-sourced Lactobacillus ruminis Strains and Their Adhesive, Inhibitory, and Immunomodulating Functions. Front Microbiol 2017;8:657.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00657pubmed: 28450859google scholar: lookup
  15. Kant R, Palva A, von Ossowski I. An in silico pan-genomic probe for the molecular traits behind Lactobacillus ruminis gut autochthony. PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0175541.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175541pubmed: 28414739google scholar: lookup
  16. Bhute SS, Suryavanshi MV, Joshi SM, Yajnik CS, Shouche YS, Ghaskadbi SS. Gut Microbial Diversity Assessment of Indian Type-2-Diabetics Reveals Alterations in Eubacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes. Front Microbiol 2017;8:214.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00214pubmed: 28261173google scholar: lookup
  17. Kang JY, Lee DK, Ha NJ, Shin HS. Antiviral effects of Lactobacillus ruminis SPM0211 and Bifidobacterium longum SPM1205 and SPM1206 on rotavirus-infected Caco-2 cells and a neonatal mouse model. J Microbiol 2015 Nov;53(11):796-803.
    doi: 10.1007/s12275-015-5302-2pubmed: 26502964google scholar: lookup
  18. Misaki A, Suzuki S, Maeno S, Endo A, Sasaki Y, Enomoto G, Yokota K, Kajikawa A. The response regulator FpsR controls the flagella-pili transition and mucosal colonization in Ligilactobacillus ruminis. Gut Microbes 2025 Dec 31;17(1):2596807.
    doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2596807pubmed: 41342220google scholar: lookup
  19. Akpoghelie PO, Edo GI, Mafe AN, Isoje EF, Igbuku UA, Ali ABM, Yousif E, Owheruo JO, Oberhiri Oberhiri S, Essaghah AEA, Ahmed DS, Umar H, Alamiery AA. Food, Health, and Environmental Impact of Lactic Acid Bacteria: The Superbacteria for Posterity. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2025 Oct;17(5):2819-2855.
    doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10546-xpubmed: 40289239google scholar: lookup
  20. Florêncio GP, Xavier AR, Natal ACC, Sadoyama LP, Pena GDG, Menezes RP, Sadoyama Leal G, Patrizzi LJ, Röder DVDB. Synergistic Effects of Probiotics and Lifestyle Interventions on Intestinal Microbiota Composition and Clinical Outcomes in Obese Adults. Metabolites 2025 Jan 23;15(2).
    doi: 10.3390/metabo15020070pubmed: 39997695google scholar: lookup
  21. Srivastava G, Brylinski M. A Data-Driven Approach to Enhance the Prediction of Bacteria-Metabolite Interactions in the Human Gut Microbiome Using Enzyme Encodings and Metabolite Structural Embeddings. Nutrients 2025 Jan 28;17(3).
    doi: 10.3390/nu17030469pubmed: 39940326google scholar: lookup
  22. Edmunds CE, Welch CB, Lourenco JM, Callaway TR, Pringle TD, Dove CR. The Effects of Dietary Manganese and Selenium on Growth and the Fecal Microbiota of Nursery Piglets. Vet Sci 2023 Nov 10;10(11).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10110650pubmed: 37999473google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,001 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.