Analyze Diet
iScience2025; 28(9); 113224; doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113224

Late Iron Age and Roman equine breeding north of the Alps: Genetic insights and cultural implications.

Abstract: The Roman conquest of the northern Alpine foreland in 15 BCE introduced larger-sized horses and hybrid mules to the region. To investigate their genetic profiles and influence on local breeding, we analyzed our previously generated shallow shotgun DNA data from 402 Late Iron Age and Roman equids, supplemented with mitochondrial and nuclear capture data from 40 to 31 equids from the same regions and periods. Late Iron Age and Roman horses exhibit high matrilineal diversity, with unique haplogroups in the latter indicating exogenous animals. The preferred use of male mounts in army service mentioned in historical writings is confirmed. The absence of donkey jacks in our study area and the lack of mule matrilineal lineages unique to Late Iron Age horses contradict local hybrid breeding. Alleles associated with speed, endurance, or rare coat colors have not been identified, nor has a genetic basis for the larger body size of Roman horses, although illustrated by archaeozoological and historical data.
Publication Date: 2025-08-13 PubMed ID: 40837235PubMed Central: PMC12362026DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113224Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study examines the genetic makeup of horses and mules from the Late Iron Age and Roman periods north of the Alps, focusing on how Roman conquest influenced local equine breeding.
  • It combines ancient DNA data with archaeological and historical evidence to understand horse genetics, breeding practices, and cultural implications.

Background and Research Context

  • The Roman conquest of the northern Alpine foreland began in 15 BCE, bringing significant cultural and biological changes, including in horse breeding practices.
  • Romans introduced larger horses and hybrid mules, which had potential military and cultural value in these regions.
  • Historical texts suggest the Roman army preferred using male horses as mounts, but the extent of local breeding impacts was unclear prior to this study.

Methods and Data

  • Genetic data was analyzed from 402 equid specimens (horses and related animals) from Late Iron Age and Roman periods using previously collected shallow shotgun DNA sequencing.
  • Supplemental data included mitochondrial and nuclear DNA capture data from an additional 40 to 31 equids, respectively, to broaden the genetic resolution.
  • The focus was on both matrilineal (mitochondrial) and nuclear genetic markers to uncover diversity, lineage, and traits.

Key Genetic Findings

  • There is high mitochondrial diversity among Late Iron Age and Roman horses, showing a broad array of maternal lineages.
  • Roman horses exhibited unique mitochondrial haplogroups not present in the preceding Iron Age populations, indicating the introduction of exogenous horses (horses brought from other regions).
  • Genetic analyses confirmed the historical preference for male horses in military use, aligning with cultural and practical considerations.
  • The study found no evidence of donkey paternal lines (donkey jacks) in the region, suggesting that the local breeding of mules from donkeys was not practiced north of the Alps.
  • Matrilineal lineages specific to Late Iron Age horses were absent in mule populations, further discrediting local hybrid breeding hypotheses.

Genetic Traits and Physical Characteristics

  • No genetic markers linked to traits like speed, endurance, or rare coat colors were detected within the analyzed samples, which contrasts with some expectations about Roman horse improvements.
  • The study did not find a genetic basis for the larger body size of Roman horses despite archaeological and historical records showing that Roman horses were physically bigger.
  • This suggests that size increases may have been due more to selective breeding practices, or environmental and management factors, rather than distinct genetic mutations detectable from current methods.

Cultural and Historical Implications

  • The introduction of larger horses and hybrid mules likely represents cultural and military strategies by the Romans to improve cavalry and transport capabilities in the conquered regions.
  • The genetic evidence supports historical accounts regarding the use and breeding preferences within the Roman army and society.
  • The lack of local hybrid mule breeding highlights the possibility that mules were either imported or bred elsewhere, indicating trade and animal movement patterns across the Roman Empire.
  • Genetic diversity among horses indicates dynamic exchanges and introductions rather than isolation, reflecting broader processes of Romanization and integration.

Conclusions

  • Roman conquests significantly altered the genetic profile of horses in the northern Alpine foreland by introducing exogenous lineages.
  • Hybrid mules did not originate from local breeding but were likely introduced, aligning with the absence of donkey genetics locally.
  • The physical advantages of Roman horses may not rely on simple genetic variants but rather on complex breeding regimes and environmental factors.
  • The study contributes to understanding the interplay between genetics, archaeology, and historical records in ancient animal husbandry under Roman influence.

Cite This Article

APA
Sharif MB, Mohaseb AF, Orlando L, Saliari K, Kunst GK, Czeika S, Mashkour M, Cucchi T, Peters J, Trixl S, Mohandesan E. (2025). Late Iron Age and Roman equine breeding north of the Alps: Genetic insights and cultural implications. iScience, 28(9), 113224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113224

Publication

ISSN: 2589-0042
NlmUniqueID: 101724038
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 28
Issue: 9
Pages: 113224
PII: 113224

Researcher Affiliations

Sharif, Muhammad Bilal
  • Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, 10 691 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Vienna Doctoral School of Ecology and Evolution (VDSEE), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Human Evolution and Archaeological Sciences (HEAS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mohaseb, Azadeh Fatemeh
  • Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique (AASPE), Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.
Orlando, Ludovic
  • Centre d'Anthropobiologie et de Génomique de Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5288, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Saliari, Konstantina
  • Human Evolution and Archaeological Sciences (HEAS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kunst, Günther Karl
  • Human Evolution and Archaeological Sciences (HEAS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science (VIAS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Czeika, Sigrid
  • Institute for Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Museen der Stadt Wien - Stadtarchäologie, Vienna, Austria.
Mashkour, Marjan
  • Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, AASPE UMR 7209, CNRS/Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.
Cucchi, Thomas
  • Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, AASPE UMR 7209, CNRS/Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.
Peters, Joris
  • ArchaeoBioCenter and Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine and ArchaeoBioCenter, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • SNSB, State Collection of Palaeoanatomy Munich (SPM), Munich, Germany.
Trixl, Simon
  • ArchaeoBioCenter and Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine and ArchaeoBioCenter, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • State Office for Cultural Heritage Management Baden-Wuerttemberg, Department of Osteology, Constance, Germany.
Mohandesan, Elmira
  • Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Human Evolution and Archaeological Sciences (HEAS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 121 references

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.