Analyze Diet

Leptospira seroprevalence in dogs, cats, and horses in Tennessee, USA.

Abstract: We estimated the seroprevalence in dogs, cats, and horses from Tennessee, USA, using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) against 12 serovars. We observed seropositivity in 110 of 374 (29.4%) dogs, 21 of 170 (12.4%) cats, and 42 of 88 (47.7%) horses. The highest seroprevalence was observed for serovars Autumnalis (74.6%) in dogs, and Bratislava in cats (42.9%) and horses (95.2%). We found a significant level of potential cross-reactivity between multiple serovars tested, with highest cross-reactivity to serovar Autumnalis in dogs. seroprevalence was significantly higher in vaccinated dogs (45 of 98 [46%]) compared to unvaccinated dogs (14 of 86 [16%];  < 0.001). A significant difference in seroprevalence was observed in vaccinated and unvaccinated dogs to all 4 serovars included in canine leptospiral vaccines ( < 0.001). We also evaluated the testing results from our diagnostic laboratory submissions from 2021-2023; 103 of 252 (40%) canine serum samples were positive, with the highest positivity rate for serovar Autumnalis. On real-time PCR, 35 of 325 (10.7%) urine samples and 15 of 257 (5.8%) blood samples were positive. The cross-reactivity between the serovars used in the MAT and vaccination status should be considered when estimating seroprevalence.
Publication Date: 2024-12-14 PubMed ID: 39673474PubMed Central: PMC11645677DOI: 10.1177/10406387241299880Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study measured the presence of antibodies against Leptospira bacteria in dogs, cats, and horses in Tennessee, USA, using laboratory tests to determine how common exposure to different Leptospira serovars is among these animals.
  • The research also examined how vaccination status and cross-reactivity between serovars affect the interpretation of seroprevalence data.

Background and Purpose

  • Leptospira is a genus of bacteria causing leptospirosis, an infectious disease affecting animals and humans.
  • Different serovars (distinct variations within the species) of Leptospira exist and may vary in prevalence among animal populations.
  • Seroprevalence studies measure antibodies in blood to estimate how many animals have been exposed to the bacterium.
  • The study aimed to evaluate seroprevalence in three animal species—dogs, cats, and horses—in Tennessee, USA, to understand the extent of exposure to multiple Leptospira serovars.

Methodology

  • Sample Collection:
    • Blood samples were collected from 374 dogs, 170 cats, and 88 horses from Tennessee.
  • Testing:
    • Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) was used to detect antibodies against 12 different Leptospira serovars.
    • Real-time PCR testing was conducted on urine and blood samples from dogs to detect active bacterial DNA.
  • Vaccination considerations:
    • The study recorded vaccination status for dogs and compared seropositivity rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.

Key Findings

  • Seroprevalence Rates:
    • 29.4% of dogs (110/374) tested positive for Leptospira antibodies.
    • 12.4% of cats (21/170) were seropositive.
    • 47.7% of horses (42/88) showed seropositivity.
  • Most Common Serovars:
    • Dogs showed highest seroprevalence to serovar Autumnalis (74.6% of seropositive dogs).
    • Cats and horses had the highest exposure to serovar Bratislava (42.9% in cats, 95.2% in horses among those seropositive).
  • Cross-Reactivity:
    • Significant cross-reactivity was noted between different serovars, especially to Autumnalis in dogs.
    • This means antibodies may react to more than one serovar, complicating interpretation.
  • Vaccination Impact:
    • Vaccinated dogs showed significantly higher seropositivity (46%) compared to unvaccinated dogs (16%) (p < 0.001).
    • Differences were also significant for serovars included in canine vaccines.
    • This underscores that vaccination influences antibody detection in serological tests.
  • Diagnostic Laboratory Data (2021-2023):
    • Out of 252 canine serum samples submitted for testing, 40% were positive, with Autumnalis again being the most common serovar.
    • Real-time PCR detected Leptospira DNA in 10.7% of 325 urine samples and in 5.8% of 257 blood samples from dogs, indicating active or recent infection in some animals.

Implications and Considerations

  • Seroprevalence in Tennessee animals suggests exposure to multiple Leptospira serovars is relatively common, especially in dogs and horses.
  • High seropositivity in vaccinated dogs points to the need to carefully interpret serological results, since vaccination can cause antibody presence and cross-react with multiple serovars.
  • Cross-reactivity among serovars complicates precise identification of the infecting serovar by MAT alone.
  • Complementary diagnostic methods, such as PCR, are valuable for confirming active infections.
  • These findings may inform veterinary disease surveillance, vaccination protocols, and public health risk assessments involving leptospirosis.

Cite This Article

APA
McCreight KA, Barbosa LN, Odoi A, Reed P, Rajeev S. (2024). Leptospira seroprevalence in dogs, cats, and horses in Tennessee, USA. J Vet Diagn Invest, 37(1), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387241299880

Publication

ISSN: 1943-4936
NlmUniqueID: 9011490
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 37
Issue: 1
Pages: 119-125

Researcher Affiliations

McCreight, Kellie A
  • Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Barbosa, Liana N
  • Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Odoi, Agricola
  • Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Reed, Porsha
  • Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Rajeev, Sreekumari
  • Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Leptospirosis / veterinary
  • Leptospirosis / epidemiology
  • Leptospirosis / microbiology
  • Seroepidemiologic Studies
  • Dogs
  • Leptospira / isolation & purification
  • Leptospira / immunology
  • Leptospira / classification
  • Dog Diseases / epidemiology
  • Dog Diseases / microbiology
  • Cats
  • Tennessee / epidemiology
  • Horses
  • Cat Diseases / epidemiology
  • Cat Diseases / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Male
  • Female
  • Serogroup
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
  • Agglutination Tests / veterinary

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

This article includes 26 references
  1. Andersen-Ranberg EU. Global patterns of prevalence in vertebrate reservoir hosts.. J Wildl Dis 2016;52:468–477.
    pubmed: 27187029
  2. Birnbaum N. Naturally acquired leptospirosis in 36 dogs: serological and clinicopathological features.. J Small Anim Pract 1998;39:231–236.
    pubmed: 9631358
  3. Costa F. Global morbidity and mortality of leptospirosis: a systematic review.. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015;9:e0003898.
    pmc: PMC4574773pubmed: 26379143
  4. Donahue JM. Diagnosis and prevalence of leptospira infection in aborted and stillborn horses.. J Vet Diagn Invest 1991;3:148–151.
    pubmed: 1892931
  5. Donato G. spp. prevalence in cats from southern Italy with evaluation of risk factors for exposure and clinical findings in infected cats.. Pathogens 2022;11:1129.
    pmc: PMC9609655pubmed: 36297186
  6. Ellis WA. Animal leptospirosis.. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2015;387:99–137.
    pubmed: 25388134
  7. Fagre AC. Seroprevalence of spp. in Colorado equids and association with clinical disease.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2020;32:718–721.
    pmc: PMC7488961pubmed: 32715980
  8. Gautam R. Detection of antibodies against serovars via microscopic agglutination tests in dogs in the United States, 2000–2007.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010;237:293–298.
    pubmed: 20673110
  9. Gorman M. enrichment culture followed by ONT metagenomic sequencing allows better detection of presence and diversity in water and soil samples.. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022;16:e0010589.
    pmc: PMC9639851pubmed: 36288395
  10. Hennebelle JH. Risk factors associated with leptospirosis in dogs from Northern California: 2001–2010.. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2014;14:733–739.
    pubmed: 25325317
  11. Lehtla A. spp. in cats in Estonia: seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity.. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2020;20:524–528.
    pubmed: 32202985
  12. Levett PN. Leptospirosis.. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:296–326.
    pmc: PMC88975pubmed: 11292640
  13. Markovich JE. The prevalence of leptospiral antibodies in free roaming cats in Worcester County, Massachusetts.. J Vet Intern Med 2012;26:688–689.
    pubmed: 22390370
  14. Moore GE. Canine leptospirosis, United States, 2002–2004.. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:501–503.
    pmc: PMC3291439pubmed: 16704794
  15. Murillo A. Leptospirosis in cats: current literature review to guide diagnosis and management.. J Feline Med Surg 2020;22:216–228.
    pmc: PMC11132596pubmed: 32093581
  16. nPalerme J-S, et al. Seroprevalence of spp., , and in freeroaming cats in Iowa. Vector Borne Zoonotic Disn2019;19:193–198.n
    pubmed: 30383983
  17. Poonacha KB, et al. Leptospirosis in equine fetuses, stillborn foals, and placentas. Vet Pathol 1993;30:362–369.
    pubmed: 8212458
  18. nRajeev S, et al. Detection and characterization of infection and exposure in rats on the Caribbean island of Saint Kitts. Animals (Basel)n2020;10:350.n
    pmc: PMC7071179pubmed: 32098357
  19. Rentko VT, et al. Canine leptospirosis. A retrospective study of 17 cases. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6:235–244.
    pubmed: 1522555
  20. Smith RE, et al. Serologic evidence of equine leptospirosis in the northeast United States. Cornell Vet 1976;66:105–109.
    pubmed: 1253604
  21. Spangler D, et al. Leptospiral shedding and seropositivity in shelter dogs in the Cumberland Gap Region of Southeastern Appalachia. PLoS One 2020;15:e0228038.
    pmc: PMC6992200pubmed: 31999733
  22. Sykes JE, et al. Updated ACVIM consensus statement on leptospirosis in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2023;37:1966–1982.
    pmc: PMC10658540pubmed: 37861061
  23. Ward MP, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for leptospirosis among dogs in the United States and Canada: 677 cases (1970–1998). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:53–58.
    pubmed: 12680448
  24. nWarshawsky B, et al. infections in trappers from Ontario. Can J Infect Disn2000;11:47–51.n
    pmc: PMC2094746pubmed: 18159265
  25. Williams DM, et al. Serological and microbiological findings on 3 farms with equine leptospiral abortions. Equine Vet J 1994;26:105–108.
    pubmed: 8575369
  26. nZilch TJ, et al. Equine leptospirosis: experimental challenge of serovar Bratislava fails to establish infection in naïve horses. Equine Vet Jn2021;53:845–854.n
    pubmed: 33617667

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Azócar-Aedo L, Meniconi G, Pino-Olguín C, Gallardo M. Seropositivity for Pathogenic Leptospira in Dogs, Cats, and Horses at a Teaching Veterinary Hospital in Southern Chile.. Trop Med Infect Dis 2025 Sep 3;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10090253pubmed: 41003563google scholar: lookup