Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 10; 1304868; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1304868

Lidocaine constant rate infusion in isoflurane anesthetized neonatal foals.

Abstract: In horses, lidocaine infusion is administered intraoperatively for analgesia and for a reduction of inhalant anaesthetic requirement. The objective of the study was to describe the anaesthetic effects of lidocaine infusion in isoflurane anaesthetised foals. Unassigned: Twelve foals (<3 weeks old) undergoing surgery were included in the study (LIDO group). Foals were premedicated with midazolam and butorphanol IV, anaesthesia was induced with ketamine and propofol IV and maintained with isoflurane. Lidocaine was administered intraoperatively at 0.05 mg/kg/min. Also, the anaesthetic records of 11 foals in which lidocaine was not administered intraoperatively were retrospectively evaluated and they were considered as a historical control group (HC). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and fraction of expired isoflurane were monitored continuously. Time of extubation, time to reach sternal recumbency and standing were recorded. The quality of recovery was assessed. Unassigned: HR decreased in both groups compared with baseline values and intraoperatively the differences were statistically significant ( = 0.01 and = 0.03 respectively in the LIDO and HC groups). Intraoperatively the HR was significantly lower in the LIDO group (71.2 ± 13.4 bpm) compared with the HC group (87.1 ± 17.7 bpm) ( = 0.0236). The number of foals requiring inotropic support (LIDO = 7 and HC = 9) was not statistically associated with the treatment group ( = 0.371). The extubation time, the time to reach the sternal recumbency and the quality of recovery did not differ significantly between the two groups ( = 0.7 and = 0.6 respectively). Unassigned: In conclusion, in anaesthetised foals the addition of lidocaine does not provide a sparing effect on isoflurane requirement, and it does not interfere with the quality of recovery, however it decreases significantly the HR, which is pivotal in foals for the maintenance of cardiac output and peripheral perfusion. Therefore, a continuous patient monitoring is essential.
Publication Date: 2024-01-17 PubMed ID: 38298459PubMed Central: PMC10828045DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1304868Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigated the effects of Lidocaine infusion in foals (horses less than 3 weeks old) under isoflurane anesthesia during surgery. It was found that such infusion lowers the heart rate of the foals, but does not have a significant impact on the anesthetic needs or the quality of recovery.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to explore the anaesthetic effects of lidocaine infusion in isoflurane anaesthetised foals.
  • The study consisted of twelve foals undergoing surgery (referred as LIDO group), where lidocaine was administered intraoperatively.
  • They were premedicated with midazolam and butorphanol IV, anesthesia was induced with ketamine and propofol IV and maintained with isoflurane.
  • The researchers also examined the anaesthetic records of 11 foals where lidocaine was not used during surgery. These were treated as a historical control group (HC).
  • Data on Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and fraction of expired isoflurane were continuously monitored. Information on extubation time, recovery time, and the overall quality of recovery were also noted.

Observations and Results

  • Heart rate decreased in both groups compared with baseline values and there was a statistically significant intraoperative difference between LIDO and HC groups.
  • The HR was significantly lower in the LIDO group (71.2 ± 13.4 bpm) compared with the HC group (87.1 ± 17.7 bpm).
  • The requirement of inotropic support differed across individual foals in both groups, but it was not statistically associated with the treatment group.
  • There were no significant differences found in extubation time, the time to reach the sternal recumbency (sternum-resting position) and the quality of recovery between the two groups.

Conclusions

  • As per the study, the addition of lidocaine during surgeries on anesthetised foals does not significantly affect the isoflurane requirement or interfere with the quality of recovery.
  • However, it significantly lowers the heart rate which is crucial in foals for maintaining cardiac output and peripheral perfusion.
  • The researchers emphasized that continuous patient monitoring is essential when using Lidocaine in such situations.

Cite This Article

APA
Lambertini C, Spaccini F, Mazzanti A, Spadari A, Lanci A, Romagnoli N. (2024). Lidocaine constant rate infusion in isoflurane anesthetized neonatal foals. Front Vet Sci, 10, 1304868. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1304868

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Pages: 1304868

Researcher Affiliations

Lambertini, Carlotta
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Spaccini, Francesca
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Mazzanti, Alessia
  • Private Practitioner, Bologna, Italy.
Spadari, Alessandro
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lanci, Aliai
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Romagnoli, Noemi
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 24 references
  1. Am J Vet Res. 2012 Jul;73(7):959-67
    pubmed: 22738046
  2. Equine Vet J. 1998 Jul;30(4):300-3
    pubmed: 9705112
  3. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015 Mar;42(2):150-6
    pubmed: 24986751
  4. Equine Vet J. 2001 Sep;33(5):434-7
    pubmed: 11558736
  5. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009 Jan;36(1):9-17
    pubmed: 19121154
  6. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2008 Dec;24(3):735-52, x
    pubmed: 19203709
  7. J Vet Intern Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):1417-26
    pubmed: 18976284
  8. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2015 Dec;31(3):567-85
    pubmed: 26612748
  9. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003 May;50(4):190-5
    pubmed: 12948155
  10. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2004 Oct;31(4):264-71
    pubmed: 15509291
  11. Am J Vet Res. 2006 Feb;67(2):317-22
    pubmed: 16454639
  12. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2004 Apr;20(1):77-106
    pubmed: 15062460
  13. Lancet. 1987 Jan 31;1(8527):243-8
    pubmed: 20928962
  14. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2005 Jul;32(4):212-21
    pubmed: 16008718
  15. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Apr;23(4):292-9
    pubmed: 16438755
  16. Am J Vet Res. 2011 Apr;72(4):446-51
    pubmed: 21453144
  17. Anesthesiology. 2017 Apr;126(4):729-737
    pubmed: 28114177
  18. Drugs. 2010 Jun 18;70(9):1149-63
    pubmed: 20518581
  19. Am J Vet Res. 1980 May;41(5):821-5
    pubmed: 7406305
  20. Anesth Analg. 1960 Jul-Aug;39:317-22
    pubmed: 14432629
  21. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Jan;24(1):106-13
    pubmed: 24299618
  22. Equine Vet J. 2005 Nov;37(6):559-64
    pubmed: 16295936
  23. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2002 Oct;29(4):159-170
    pubmed: 28404360
  24. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Aug 1;221(3):393-8
    pubmed: 12164537

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.