Analyze Diet
Topics in cognitive science2010; 3(3); 536-559; doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01077.x

Linear versus branching depictions of evolutionary history: implications for diagram design.

Abstract: This article reports the results of an experiment involving 108 college students with varying backgrounds in biology. Subjects answered questions about the evolutionary history of sets of hominid and equine taxa. Each set of taxa was presented in one of three diagrammatic formats: a noncladogenic diagram found in a contemporary biology textbook or a cladogram in either the ladder or tree format. As predicted, the textbook diagrams, which contained linear components, were more likely than the cladogram formats to yield explanations of speciation as an anagenic process, a common misconception among students. In contrast, the branching cladogram formats yielded more appropriate explanations concerning levels of ancestry than did the textbook diagrams. Although students with stronger backgrounds in biology did better than those with weaker biology backgrounds, they generally showed the same effects of diagrammatic format. Implications of these results for evolution education and for diagram design more generally are discussed.
Publication Date: 2010-01-19 PubMed ID: 25164402DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01077.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates how different types of evolutionary diagrams influence people’s understanding of evolution. This study, involving 108 college students, found that linear diagrams commonly found in textbooks can lead to misconceptions about the process of evolution, while ‘branching’ cladogram diagrams yield a more accurate understanding about ancestry levels.

Study Summary and Key Findings

  • The study included 108 college students with varied degrees of understanding about biology. These students were provided with questions about the evolutionary progression of different sets of taxa, specifically hominid and equine.
  • Each set of taxa was shown through one of three different formats – a non-cladogenic diagram from a modern biology textbook or a cladogram in either a ladder or tree structure.
  • It was observed that the textbook diagrams, that have a linear structure, were more prone to trigger explanations of speciation as an anagenic process, a frequent misunderstanding among students. Anagenesis is the evolution of species involving a gradual accumulation of changes, a concept which can oversimplify the complex branches and nodes that typify actual patterns of speciation.
  • On the other hand, the branching cladogram diagrams, either in the form of a ladder or a tree, led to more suitable and comprehensive explanations relating to levels of ancestry than the textbook diagrams.
  • The results were consistent irrespective of the students’ biology backgrounds. Students with a stronger understanding of biology performed better overall, but the impact of the diagram format was seen in students across all levels of understanding.

Implications of the Research

  • These findings have significant implications for teaching evolutionary biology. They suggest that textbooks should use branching cladograms instead of linear diagrams to depict evolutionary histories, in order to prevent misconceptions about the straightforwardness of speciation.
  • This research also underlines the influence of the design of diagrams more generally. The structure and style of a diagram can significantly influence how the information it presents is interpreted.
  • The findings indicate that there might be a need for a comprehensive analysis of widely used textbooks and reference materials to ascertain the correctness of the diagrams being used.

Cite This Article

APA
Novick LR, Shade CK, Catley KM. (2010). Linear versus branching depictions of evolutionary history: implications for diagram design. Top Cogn Sci, 3(3), 536-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01077.x

Publication

ISSN: 1756-8765
NlmUniqueID: 101506764
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 3
Issue: 3
Pages: 536-559

Researcher Affiliations

Novick, Laura R
  • Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt UniversityDepartment of Biology, Western Carolina University.
Shade, Courtney K
    Catley, Kefyn M

      MeSH Terms

      • Biological Evolution
      • Comprehension
      • Data Display
      • Female
      • Humans
      • Male
      • Teaching Materials / standards
      • Visual Perception

      Citations

      This article has been cited 4 times.
      1. Khan MKI, Hossain MI, Momin MM. Impact of protein supplementation on semen quality, fertility, and BMP1R gene expression in sheep of Bangladesh.. Transl Anim Sci 2022 Jul;6(3):txac072.
        doi: 10.1093/tas/txac072pubmed: 35813665google scholar: lookup
      2. Menendez D, Mathiaparanam ON, Liu D, Seitz V, Alibali MW, Rosengren KS. Representing Variability: The Case of Life Cycle Diagrams.. CBE Life Sci Educ 2020 Sep;19(3):ar49.
        doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0251pubmed: 32870076google scholar: lookup
      3. Wilson KJ, Rigakos B. Scientific Process Flowchart Assessment (SPFA): A Method for Evaluating Changes in Understanding and Visualization of the Scientific Process in a Multidisciplinary Student Population.. CBE Life Sci Educ 2016 Winter;15(4).
        doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-10-0212pubmed: 27856551google scholar: lookup
      4. Dees J, Momsen JL, Niemi J, Montplaisir L. Student interpretations of phylogenetic trees in an introductory biology course.. CBE Life Sci Educ 2014 Winter;13(4):666-76.
        doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-01-0003pubmed: 25452489google scholar: lookup