Local and systemic responses to repeated gluteal muscle microbiopsies in mature sedentary horses.
Abstract: We aimed to test the hypothesis that repeated muscle collections would impact mitochondrial function, antioxidant status, and markers of inflammation and muscle damage. Twenty-six horses (8 geldings, 18 mares; mean±SD 9.5±3.5 y) had gluteus medius muscle biopsy samples collected at: 0 and 24h (n=7); 0 and 6h (n=6); 0, 6, and 12h (n=7); or 0, 6, 12, and 24h (n=6). Blood was collected from all horses every 6h for 72h, starting 24h prior to the 0h muscle collection. Data were analyzed using mixed linear models. Muscle integrative (per mg tissue) electron transfer capacity of complex II decreased (P=0.004) and intrinsic (relative to citrate synthase (CS) activity) LEAK increased (P<0.03) from 0 to 6h but both returned to 0h levels by 12h. Activity of CS was greater at 0 than 12 and 24h (P≤0.02). Serum creatine kinase (CK) activity was similar from -24 through 0h but increased in all horses at 6h and remained elevated through 48h (P<0.05) though not above reference ranges. Whole blood superoxide dismutase activity fluctuated throughout the 72-h collection period (P=0.03) and serum cortisol concentration displayed a circadian pattern (P<0.0001) but neither were altered by muscle collections. No other variable, including muscle mitochondrial capacities and function, blood and muscle antioxidant status and concentrations of select cytokines, and serum amyloid A, differed by time or muscle collection. Repeated gluteal collections had limited short-term or no effect on physiological markers in unstressed, mature horses except serum CK activity, which should be interpreted with caution during repeated tissue collections.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-18 PubMed ID: 38642813DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105070Google Scholar: Lookup The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research study aimed to examine the effects on horses’ mitochondrial function, antioxidant status, and inflammation markers in response to repeated muscle biopsies. The primary findings indicate limited or no short-term effects on most physiological markers, barring the increase in serum creatine kinase activity.
Research Design and Methodology
- The study involved 26 horses – 8 geldings and 18 mares aged approximately 9.5 years. The gluteus medius muscle biopsy samples were collected at various time intervals. The participants were divided into four groups, differentiated by the time frames at which samples were collected.
- In addition to the muscle samples, blood was also collected from all horses every 6 hours for a total of 72 hours, starting 24 hours prior to the first muscle collection.
- The collected data was analyzed using mixed linear models.
Findings and Interpretation
- The results showed that within the initial 6 hours, the per mg tissue electron transfer capacity of complex II decreased, and intrinsic LEAK, relative to citrate synthase (CS) activity, increased. However, these measures returned to their initial levels by the 12-hour mark.
- CS activity was higher at initiation than at the 12-hour and 24-hour marks.
- Serum creatine kinase (CK) activity was consistent up to the biopsy’s commencement, increased in all horses at 6 hours, and maintained the elevated state till 48 hours. Despite this increase, CK levels remained within reference ranges, suggesting that though biopsies cause a CK activity increase, they do not push it beyond normal levels.
- There was no remarkable change in whole blood superoxide dismutase activity and serum cortisol concentration due to muscle collections, even though these displayed fluctuations and a circadian pattern respectively over the course of 72 hours.
- No other variables, including muscle mitochondrial capacities and function, blood and muscle antioxidant status and concentrations of selected cytokines, and serum amyloid A, differed by time or muscle collection. This indicates that repeated muscle collections do not have a substantive effect on these physiological markers.
Conclusion and Implications
- Overall, repeated muscle collections had limited short-term effects or none on the physiological markers in middle-aged, unstressed horses, except for an increase in serum CK activity.
- Such a result implies that while interpreting the results of repeated tissue collections in studies involving horses, the standard increase in serum CK activity should be taken into account.
Cite This Article
APA
Artman JL, Wesolowski LT, Semanchik PL, Isles JK, Norton SA, White-Springer SH.
(2024).
Local and systemic responses to repeated gluteal muscle microbiopsies in mature sedentary horses.
J Equine Vet Sci, 105070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105070 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University and AgriLife Research, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX USA 77843.
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University and AgriLife Research, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX USA 77843.
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University and AgriLife Research, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX USA 77843.
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University and AgriLife Research, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX USA 77843.
- Cargill, Inc., 15407 McGinty Rd W Wayzata, MN USA 55391.
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University and AgriLife Research, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX USA 77843; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, 2929 Research Pkwy College Station, TX USA 77843. Electronic address: s.white@ag.tamu.edu.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest Dr. Sharon Norton (of Cargill, Inc.) assisted with study design but funding sources had no involvement in data collection and analysis or manuscript preparation. None of the other authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.