Low progesterone concentration in early pregnancy is detrimental to conceptus development and pregnancy outcome in horses.
Abstract: High progesterone concentrations in the early luteal phase support pregnancy, whereas subphysiological progesterone concentrations delay embryonic development at least until placentation. In this study, fetal growth and development of pregnancy was investigated in pregnancies with prostaglandin F-induced low progesterone concentrations (PGF) in the early luteal phase and control pregnancies (CON) in the same mares (n = 12). Mares were inseminated and in PGF pregnancies received the prostaglandin F analogue cloprostenol (62.5 µg) on days 0-3 after ovulation to induce subphysiological progesterone concentrations; CON pregnancies remained untreated. Mares were assigned to PGF or CON treatments in alternating order and received the opposite treatment in the following year. Blood was collected and conceptus size determined repeatedly by transrectal (≤day 101) and transabdominal (>day 101) ultrasonography. After birth, foals were weighed, measured and submitted to a clinical examination. Treatment PGF resulted in fewer pregnancies than CON treatment. All foals born from CON pregnancies were healthy and mature, whereas 4/7 PGF pregnancies were either lost (one embryonic death, one abortion) or resulted in the birth of compromised foals (P = 0.018). Size of the conceptus (e.g., diameter day 49: PGF 6.6 ± 0.7, CON 7.7 ± 0.7 cm, P = 0.006) and embryo proper (e.g., crown rump length day 54; PGF 4.4 ± 0.8, CON 5.8 ± 0.6 cm, P = 0.015) differed between treatments. These size differences decreased over time and at birth PGF foals did not differ significantly from CON foals. In conclusion, reduced progesterone concentration in the early luteal phase leads to delayed conceptus growth beyond placentation and increased pregnancy loss.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2023-09-16 PubMed ID: 37725863DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2023.107334Google Scholar: Lookup The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article investigates the impact of low progesterone levels during early pregnancy in horses, concluding that those with reduced progesterone during the early luteal phase experienced delayed fetal growth and higher rates of pregnancy loss than those with normal progesterone levels.
Objective of the Study
- The aim of the study was to understand the effects of low progesterone concentrations during the early luteal phase on the growth and development of the fetus, and the overall outcome of pregnancy in horses.
Methodology
- In the study, 12 mares were inseminated and two kinds of treatments were administered. The first group, PGF, received a prostaglandin F analogue (cloprostenol) for the first three days after ovulation to induce low progesterone concentrations. The second group, CON, remained untreated as a control group.
- The type of treatment (PGF or CON) was alternated for each mare in the following year. Throughout the pregnancy, blood samples were collected and the size of the conceptus was determined by transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography.
- Once born, the foals were weighed, measured, and given a clinical examination.
Findings
- The findings demonstrated that low progesterone concentrations in the early luteal phase resulted in fewer successful pregnancies when comparing PGF to CON treatments.
- While all foals from CON pregnancies were healthy and mature, 4 out of 7 PGF pregnancies resulted in embryonic death, abortion, or compromised foals.
- Differences were also identified in the size of the conceptus and embryo between the two treatments. However, by the time of birth, these differences had decreased and there was no significant variation in size between PGF and CON foals.
Conclusion
- The research ultimately concluded that reduced progesterone concentration during the early luteal phase can delay conceptus growth beyond placentation and increase the risk of pregnancy loss in horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Wagner LH, Aurich J, Melchert M, Okada CTC, Gautier C, Kaps M, Claau00dfen S, Aurich C.
(2023).
Low progesterone concentration in early pregnancy is detrimental to conceptus development and pregnancy outcome in horses.
Anim Reprod Sci, 257, 107334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2023.107334 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Andrology, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Andrology, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
- Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
- Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
- Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
- Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
- Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer, Department for Small Animals and Horses, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria. Electronic address: christine.aurich@vetmeduni.ac.at.
MeSH Terms
- Pregnancy
- Horses
- Animals
- Female
- Progesterone
- Pregnancy Outcome / veterinary
- Ovulation
- Prostaglandins F
- Cloprostenol / pharmacology
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias this article. As an Editor with Animal Reproduction Science, Dr. Christine Aurich was not privy to any of the review process other than the anonymous reviews that were returned to her as corresponding author.