Metagenomic characterization of the equine endometrial microbiome during anestrus.
Abstract: The equine uterus is highly interrogated during estrus prior to breeding and establishing pregnancy. Many studies in mares have been performed during estrus under the influence of high estrogen concentrations, including the equine estrual microbiome. To date, it is unknown how the uterine microbiome of the mare is influenced by cyclicity; while, the equine vaginal microbiome is stable throughout the estrous cycle. We hypothesized that differences would exist between the equine endometrial microbiome of mares in estrus and anestrus. The aim of this study was two-fold: to characterize the resident endometrial microbiome of healthy mares during anestrus and to compare this with estrus. Double-guarded endometrial swabs were taken from healthy mares during estrus (n = 16) and in the following non-breeding season during anestrus (n = 8). Microbial population was identified using 16S rRNA sequencing. Our results suggest that the equine uterine microbiome in estrus has a low diversity and low richness, while during anestrus, a higher diversity and higher richness were seen compared to estrus. Despite this difference, both the estrus and anestrus endometrial microbiome were dominated by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidota. The composition of the microbial community between anestrus and estrus was significantly different. This may be explained by the difference in the composition of the endometrial immune milieu based on the stage of the cycle. Further research investigating the function of the equine endometrial microbiome and dynamics changes within the uterine environment is required.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2024-06-21 PubMed ID: 38909766DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105134Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
- This study examined the microbial communities in the uterus of healthy mares during two different reproductive stages: estrus (when mares are fertile) and anestrus (the non-breeding season).
- Using genetic sequencing methods, the research found significant differences in the diversity and composition of uterine bacteria between these stages, suggesting that the mare’s reproductive cycle influences the uterine microbiome.
Background
- The equine uterus is usually studied during estrus due to its importance for breeding and pregnancy establishment.
- High levels of estrogen during estrus influence the uterine environment and presumably its microbiome—the community of bacteria present.
- The vaginal microbiome in horses remains relatively stable throughout the reproductive cycle, but it was previously unknown if the uterine microbiome changes with cyclicity.
Research Hypothesis and Aim
- Hypothesis: The uterine microbiome differs between estrus and anestrus in mares.
- Goals:
- Characterize the resident endometrial microbiome during anestrus (non-breeding season).
- Compare the anestrus microbiome to that present during estrus.
Methodology
- Sample Collection:
- Endometrial swabs taken from 16 healthy mares during estrus.
- Swabs taken from the same or similar group of mares during anestrus (8 mares).
- Sampling used double-guarded swabs to minimize contamination.
- Microbial Identification:
- 16S rRNA gene sequencing employed to identify and classify bacteria present in samples.
- This method allows detection of a broad range of bacteria by targeting a conserved genetic marker.
Key Findings
- Microbial Diversity and Richness:
- The uterine microbiome during estrus showed low bacterial diversity and richness—fewer types of bacteria and less variety overall.
- During anestrus, both diversity (variety of bacterial species) and richness (number of species) were significantly higher compared to estrus.
- Dominant Bacterial Groups:
- Despite differences in diversity, both estrus and anestrus endometrial microbiomes were mainly composed of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidota phyla.
- This suggests core bacterial groups remain relatively stable, but their abundance and community structure shift between cycle stages.
- Microbial Community Composition:
- Statistical analyses demonstrated significant differences in the overall bacterial community structure between estrus and anestrus samples.
Interpretations and Implications
- The changes in the uterine microbiome may be influenced by hormonal shifts and the immune environment during the reproductive cycle.
- The estrus uterine environment, influenced by high estrogen, may favor fewer bacterial species, possibly to prepare for pregnancy or prevent infection.
- During anestrus, the immune system and uterine environment may allow for a more diverse bacterial population.
- Understanding these differences could improve reproductive management and health monitoring in horses.
Future Directions
- Functional studies are needed to determine the role these bacterial communities play in uterine health and fertility.
- Research should explore how dynamic changes in the microbiome relate to immune responses and reproductive outcomes.
- Longitudinal studies following individual mares over several cycles could clarify temporal microbiome changes.
- Potential development of microbiome-targeted interventions to support equine reproductive health.
Cite This Article
APA
Heil BA, van Heule M, Thompson SK, Kearns TA, Beckers KF, Oberhaus EL, King G, Daels P, Dini P, Sones JL.
(2024).
Metagenomic characterization of the equine endometrial microbiome during anestrus.
J Equine Vet Sci, 140, 105134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105134 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
- Department of Population Health and Reproduction (PHR), School of Veterinary Medicine, UCDavis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA; Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, UGent, Merelbeke, 9820, Belgium.
- Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
- Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
- School of Animal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
- Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
- Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, UGent, Merelbeke, 9820, Belgium.
- Department of Population Health and Reproduction (PHR), School of Veterinary Medicine, UCDavis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA; Equine Reproduction Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA. Electronic address: Jenny.sones@colostate.edu.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses / microbiology
- Female
- Endometrium / microbiology
- Microbiota / genetics
- Anestrus
- Bacteria / classification
- Bacteria / genetics
- Bacteria / isolation & purification
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
- Estrus / physiology
- RNA, Bacterial / genetics
- RNA, Bacterial / analysis
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
Citations
This article has been cited 4 times.- Beckers KF, Liu CC, Gomes VCL, Schulz CJ, Childers GW, Fedorka CE, Sones JL. Effects of Intra-uterine Ceftiofur on the Equine Uterine Microbiome. Vet Sci 2025 Aug 30;12(9).
- Yáñez Ramil U, Jezierska S, Krupa M, Bogado Pascottini O. Fundamentals of microbiome-based therapies for reproductive tract inflammatory diseases in domestic animals. Anim Reprod 2025;22(3):e20250030.
- Herzog F, Crissman KR, Beckers KF, Zhou G, Liu CC, Sones JL. Lactobacillus Genus Complex Probiotic-Induced Changes on the Equine Clitoral Microbiome. Vet Sci 2025 Mar 3;12(3).
- Gil-Miranda A, Caddey B, Orellana-Guerrero D, Smith H, Samper JC, Gomez DE. Vaginal and Uterine Microbiota of Healthy Maiden Mares during Estrus. Vet Sci 2024 Jul 18;11(7).
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists