Analyze Diet

Molecular prevalence of equine alphaherpesvirus-1 shedding in healthy broodmares in Ontario.

Abstract: Equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) is ubiquitous in the horse population, but prevalence estimates have ranged from 3 to 88% depending on the population and method of sampling. No prevalence studies have been carried out in Ontario, Canada. The objective of this study was to measure the prevalence of EHV-1 shedding in healthy broodmares in Ontario. A total of 381 mares from 42 farms in Ontario were sampled, including pregnant and barren broodmares. Samples were collected from the nose, vagina, and blood of each mare up to 6 times from December 2016 through October 2017 using a cross-sectional study design. The EHV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) copy number was measured using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). A survey was completed at time of sampling regarding signalment, pregnancy status, and vaccination. Overall, 85% of the mares sampled were positive for EHV-1 from at least one site, on at least one occasion. Samples were positive 8.1%, 15.8%, and 17.2% of the time from the nose, vagina, and white blood cells, respectively. Pregnant mares had increased odds of shedding virus from the nose [odds ratio (OR) = 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 2.18, = 0.037]. Vaccination only reduced the odds of virus presence in blood (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.99, = 0.043). Advanced gestation appeared to also have a sparing effect on virus presence in blood (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.93, < 0.001). Most mares in Ontario were positive for EHV-1 despite being healthy and vaccinated, although the amount of viral DNA detected was extremely low. In addition, the vagina was identified as a source of viral shedding. L’herpèsvirus équin de type 1 (EHV-1) est omniprésent chez les chevaux, mais les estimations de prévalence varient de 3 à 88 % selon la population et la méthode d’échantillonnage. Aucune étude de prévalence n’a été menée en Ontario, Canada. L’objectif de cette étude était de mesurer la prévalence de l’excrétion d’EHV-1 chez les juments poulinières en bonne santé en Ontario. Au total, 381 juments provenant de 42 élevages ontariens ont été échantillonnées, incluant des juments gestantes et non gestantes. Des échantillons sanguins ainsi que des prélèvements à partir du nez et du vagin ont été effectués chez chaque jument, jusqu’à 6 fois, entre décembre 2016 et octobre 2017, selon un plan d’étude transversal. Le nombre de copies de la glycoprotéine B (gB) de l’EHV-1 a été mesuré par PCR numérique en gouttelettes (ddPCR). Un questionnaire portant sur les caractéristiques signalétiques, le statut de gestation et la vaccination a été rempli au moment du prélèvement. Au total, 85 % des juments échantillonnées étaient positives à l’EHV-1, à au moins un site et à au moins une reprise. Les prélèvements nasaux, vaginaux et leucocytaires étaient positifs respectivement dans 8,1 %, 15,8 % et 17,2 % des cas. Les juments gestantes présentaient une probabilité accrue d’excrétion virale nasale [rapport des cotes (OR) = 1,50, intervalle de confiance (IC) 95 % : 1,03 à 2,18, = 0,037]. La vaccination réduisait uniquement la probabilité de présence du virus dans le sang (OR = 0,70, IC 95 % : 0,49 à 0,99, = 0,043). Un stade de gestation avancé semblait également avoir un effet protecteur sur la présence du virus dans le sang (OR = 0,89, IC 95 % : 0,85 à 0,93, < 0,001). La plupart des juments de l’Ontario étaient positives à l’EHV-1 malgré leur bonne santé et leur vaccination, bien que la quantité d’ADN viral détectée fût extrêmement faible. De plus, le vagin a été identifié comme une source d’excrétion virale.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).
Publication Date: 2026-01-01 PubMed ID: 41585008PubMed Central: PMC12825682
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study measured the prevalence of equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) shedding in healthy broodmares in Ontario, Canada.
  • It found that a large majority (85%) of sampled mares shed EHV-1 virus from at least one bodily site despite being healthy and vaccinated, though the viral DNA levels were very low.

Background

  • EHV-1 is a common virus affecting horse populations worldwide.
  • Prevalence rates vary widely (3% to 88%) depending on population and sampling methods.
  • No prior studies had characterized EHV-1 shedding prevalence specifically in Ontario’s broodmare population.

Study Objectives and Design

  • The main goal was to determine how frequently healthy broodmares in Ontario shed EHV-1 virus.
  • The study used a cross-sectional design sampling 381 mares from 42 farms across Ontario over an 11-month period (Dec 2016 – Oct 2017).
  • Mares sampled included both pregnant and barren (non-pregnant) animals.
  • Sampling was done up to six times per mare from three sites: nose, vagina, and blood.
  • A survey was completed at the time of sampling recording factors such as age, pregnancy status, and vaccination history.

Methods: Detection of EHV-1

  • The presence of viral DNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), targeting the EHV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) gene copy number.
  • This method is sensitive and allows for precise measurement of small amounts of viral DNA.

Key Results

  • Overall, 85% of mares were positive for EHV-1 at least once from at least one sampling site.
  • Positive detection rates by site were:
    • 8.1% of nasal swabs
    • 15.8% of vaginal swabs
    • 17.2% of blood (white blood cells) samples
  • Pregnant mares were significantly more likely to shed virus nasally (odds ratio (OR) = 1.50), suggesting pregnancy increases nasal viral shedding risk.
  • Vaccination decreased the odds of detecting virus in the blood (OR = 0.70), but did not significantly affect nasal or vaginal shedding.
  • Advanced gestation stage was associated with reduced virus presence in blood (OR = 0.89), indicating a potential protective effect as pregnancy progresses.
  • Despite high prevalence, the overall viral DNA loads detected were very low, indicating low-level or latent infections rather than active disease.

Novel Findings and Implications

  • This was the first study to document EHV-1 shedding prevalence in Ontario’s broodmare population.
  • The high proportion of apparently healthy and vaccinated mares shedding virus highlights the ubiquitous and persistent nature of EHV-1 in horse populations.
  • The vagina was identified as an important and previously under-recognized site of viral shedding, which has implications for understanding transmission dynamics.
  • Vaccination appeared to primarily reduce viral presence in blood but had limited impact on mucosal shedding sites, suggesting that vaccines may protect against systemic infection more than viral shedding or transmission.
  • Pregnancy status influences viral shedding patterns, which may inform management and biosecurity practices for broodmares.

Conclusions

  • Molecular evidence shows that healthy broodmares in Ontario commonly harbor and intermittently shed EHV-1 virus despite vaccination.
  • Vaginal, nasal, and blood samples all can harbor low levels of viral DNA.
  • Understanding the patterns of viral shedding can aid in controlling the spread of EHV-1 and protecting breeding populations.

Cite This Article

APA
Cooper CJ, Arroyo LG, Hammermueller JD, Botts MM, Pearl DL, Wootton SK, Lillie BN. (2026). Molecular prevalence of equine alphaherpesvirus-1 shedding in healthy broodmares in Ontario. Can J Vet Res, 90(1), 16-24.

Publication

ISSN: 1928-9022
NlmUniqueID: 8607793
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 90
Issue: 1
Pages: 16-24

Researcher Affiliations

Cooper, Carina J
  • Canadian Large Animal Specialty Services, Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0T7 (Cooper); Department of Clinical Studies (Arroyo), Department of Pathobiology (Hammermueller, Botts, Wootton, Lillie), and Department of Population Medicine (Pearl), Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Arroyo, Luis G
  • Canadian Large Animal Specialty Services, Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0T7 (Cooper); Department of Clinical Studies (Arroyo), Department of Pathobiology (Hammermueller, Botts, Wootton, Lillie), and Department of Population Medicine (Pearl), Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Hammermueller, Jutta D
  • Canadian Large Animal Specialty Services, Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0T7 (Cooper); Department of Clinical Studies (Arroyo), Department of Pathobiology (Hammermueller, Botts, Wootton, Lillie), and Department of Population Medicine (Pearl), Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Botts, Michaela M
  • Canadian Large Animal Specialty Services, Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0T7 (Cooper); Department of Clinical Studies (Arroyo), Department of Pathobiology (Hammermueller, Botts, Wootton, Lillie), and Department of Population Medicine (Pearl), Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Pearl, David L
  • Canadian Large Animal Specialty Services, Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0T7 (Cooper); Department of Clinical Studies (Arroyo), Department of Pathobiology (Hammermueller, Botts, Wootton, Lillie), and Department of Population Medicine (Pearl), Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Wootton, Sarah K
  • Canadian Large Animal Specialty Services, Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0T7 (Cooper); Department of Clinical Studies (Arroyo), Department of Pathobiology (Hammermueller, Botts, Wootton, Lillie), and Department of Population Medicine (Pearl), Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Lillie, Brandon N
  • Canadian Large Animal Specialty Services, Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0T7 (Cooper); Department of Clinical Studies (Arroyo), Department of Pathobiology (Hammermueller, Botts, Wootton, Lillie), and Department of Population Medicine (Pearl), Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Herpesviridae Infections / veterinary
  • Herpesviridae Infections / epidemiology
  • Herpesviridae Infections / virology
  • Female
  • Ontario / epidemiology
  • Virus Shedding
  • Herpesvirus 1, Equid / isolation & purification
  • Herpesvirus 1, Equid / physiology
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Pregnancy
  • Prevalence
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Vagina / virology

References

This article includes 41 references
  1. Higgins WP, Gillespie JH, Robson DS. Studies of maternally-acquired antibodies in the foal to equine influenza A1 and A2, and equine rhinopneumonitis. J Equine Vet Sci. 1987;7:207–210.
  2. Gilkerson JR, Whalley JM, Drummer HE, Studdert MJ, Love DN. Epidemiology of EHV-1 and EHV-4 in the mare and foal populations on a Hunter Valley stud farm: Are mares the source of EHV-1 for unweaned foals. Vet Microbiol. 1999;68:27–34.
    pubmed: 10501159
  3. Edington N, Welch HM, Griffiths L. The prevalence of latent equid herpesviruses in the tissues of 40 abattoir horses. Equine Vet J. 1994;26:140–142.
    pubmed: 8575377
  4. Chesters PM, Allsop R, Purewal A, Edington N. Detection of latency-associated transcripts of equid herpesvirus 1 in equine leukocytes but not in trigeminal ganglia. J Virol. 1997;71:3437–3443.
    pmc: PMC191489pubmed: 9094614
  5. van Maanen C, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Damen EA, Derksen AG. Neurological disease associated with EHV-1-infection in a riding school: Clinical and virological characteristics. Equine Vet J. 2001;33:191–196.
    pubmed: 11266070
  6. Khusro A, Aarti C, Rivas-Caceres RR, Barbabosa-Pliego A. Equine herpesvirus-I infection in horses: Recent updates on its pathogenicity, vaccination, and preventive management strategies. J Equine Vet Sci. 2020;87:102923.
    pubmed: 32172913
  7. Oladunni FS, Horohov DW, Chambers TM. EHV-1: A constant threat to the horse industry. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2668.
    pmc: PMC6901505pubmed: 31849857
  8. Allen GP, Bolin DC, Bryant U, et al. Prevalence of latent, neuropathogenic equine herpesvirus-1 in the Thoroughbred broodmare population of central Kentucky. Equine Vet J. 2008;40:105–110.
    pubmed: 18089469
  9. Carlson JK, Traub-Dargatz JL, Lunn PD, et al. Equine viral respiratory pathogen surveillance at horse shows and sales. J Equine Vet Sci. 2013;33:229–237.
  10. Carvalho R, Oliveira A, Souza AM, Passos LM, Martins AS. Prevalence of equine herpesvirus-1 latency detected by polymerase chain reaction. Arch Virol. 2000;145:1773–1787.
    pubmed: 11043940
  11. Frymus T, Kita J, Woyciechowska S, Ganowicz M. Foetal and neonatal foal losses on equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) infected farms before and after EHV-1 vaccination was introduced. Pol Arch Weter. 1986;26:7–14.
    pubmed: 2830601
  12. Foote CE, Love DN, Gilkerson JR, Whalley JM. Detection of EHV-1 and EHV-4 DNA in unweaned Thoroughbred foals from vaccinated mares on a large stud farm. Equine Vet J. 2004;36:341–345.
    pubmed: 15163042
  13. Badenhorst M, Page PC, Ganswindt A, Guthrie AJ, Schulman GML. Sales consignment and nasal shedding of equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) and 4 (EHV-4) in young Thoroughbred horses in South Africa. Equine Vet J. 2014;46:13.
  14. Pusterla N, Sandler-Burtness E, Barnum S, et al. Frequency of detection of respiratory pathogens in nasal secretions from healthy sport horses attending a spring show in California. J Equine Vet Sci. 2022;117:104089.
    pubmed: 35908600
  15. Kydd JH, Townsend HG, Hannant D. The equine immune response to equine herpesvirus-1: The virus and its vaccines. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006;111:15–30.
    pubmed: 16476492
  16. Goehring LS, Hussey GS, Ashton LV, Schenkel AR, Lunn DP. Infection of central nervous system endothelial cells by cell-associated EHV-1. Vet Microbiol. 2011;148:389–395.
    pubmed: 20884134
  17. Smith DJ, Hamblin A, Edington N. Equid herpesvirus 1 infection of endothelial cells requires activation of putative adhesion molecules: An in vitro model. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;129:281–287.
    pmc: PMC1906444pubmed: 12165084
  18. Spiesschaert B, Osterrieder N, Azab W. Comparative analysis of glycoprotein B (gB) of equine herpesvirus type 1 and type 4 (EHV-1 and EHV-4) in cellular tropism and cell-to-cell transmission. Viruses. 2015;7:522–542.
    pmc: PMC4353902pubmed: 25654240
  19. Equestrian Canada [Internet] Evans V 2010 Canadian Horse Industry Profile Study. 2011. [Last accessed September 25, 2025]. Available from: https://equestrian.ca/wp-content/uploads/cdn/storage/resources_v2/mzpQQ3p39NRcMys6K.pdf.
  20. Cooper CJ, Arroyo LG, Pearl DL, Hewson J, Lillie BN. Survey of the equine broodmare industry, abortion, and equine herpesvirus-1 vaccination in Ontario. Can Vet J. 2021;62:124–132.
    pmc: PMC7808208pubmed: 33542550
  21. Diallo IS, Hewitson G, Wright L, Rodwell BJ, Corney BG. Detection of equine herpesvirus type 1 using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods. 2006;131:92–98.
    pubmed: 16137772
  22. Matumoto M, Ishizaki R, Shimizu T. Serological survey of equine rhinopneumonitis vires infection among horses in various countries. Arch Gestamte Virusforsch. 1965;15:609–624.
    pubmed: 4285632
  23. Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. J Anal Chem. 2011;83:8604–8610.
    pmc: PMC3216358pubmed: 22035192
  24. Taylor SC, Laparriere G, Germain H. Droplet digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: From variable nonsense to publication quality data. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–8.
    pmc: PMC5445070pubmed: 28546538
  25. Dall Agnol AM, Beuttemmuller EA, Pilz D, et al. Detection of equid gammaherpesvirus 2 and 5 DNA in the upper respiratory tract of asymptomatic horses from Southern Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2019;50:875–878.
    pmc: PMC6863341pubmed: 31187445
  26. Lee SK, Lee I. The molecular detection of equine herpesviruses 2 and 5 in genital swabs from clinically normal Thoroughbred mares in South Korea. J Equine Vet Sci. 2019;79:68–72.
    pubmed: 31405504
  27. Burgess BA, Tokateloff N, Manning S, et al. Nasal shedding of equine herpesvirus-1 from horses in an outbreak of equine herpes myeloencephalopathy in Western Canada. J Vet Intern Med. 2012;26:384–392.
    pubmed: 22332764
  28. Badenhorst M, Page P, Ganswindt A, Laver P, Guthrie A, Schulman M. Detection of equine herpesvirus-4 and physiological stress patterns in young Thoroughbreds consigned to a South African auction sale. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:126.
    pmc: PMC4450643pubmed: 26033323
  29. Pusterla N, Hussey SB, Mapes S, et al. Molecular investigation of the viral kinetics of equine herpesvirus-1 in blood and nasal secretions of horses after corticosteroid-induced recrudescence of latent infection. J Vet Intern Med. 2010;24:1153–1157.
    pubmed: 20584139
  30. Seeber PA, Dayaram A, Sicks F, Osterrieder N, Franz M, Greenwood AD. Noninvasive detection of equid herpesviruses in fecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e02234–18.
    pmc: PMC6344631pubmed: 30446563
  31. Goehring LS, Wagner B, Bigbie R, et al. Control of EHV-1 viremia and nasal shedding by commercial vaccines. Vaccine. 2010;28:5203–5211.
    pubmed: 20538091
  32. Wagner B, Perkins G, Babasyan S, et al. Neonatal immunization with a single IL-4/antigen dose induces increased antibody responses after challenge infection with equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) at weanling age. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169072.
    pmc: PMC5207648pubmed: 28045974
  33. Goodman LB, Wagner B, Flaminio MJ, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of inactivated combination and modified-live virus vaccines against challenge infection with neuropathogenic equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) Vaccine. 2006;24:3636–3645.
    pubmed: 16513225
  34. Perkins G, Babasyan S, Stout AE, et al. Intranasal IgG4/7 antibody responses protect horses against equid herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) infection including nasal virus shedding and cell-associated viremia. Virology. 2019;531:219–232.
    pubmed: 30928700
  35. Holmes MA, Townsend HG, Kohler AK, et al. Immune responses to commercial equine vaccines against equine herpesvirus-1, equine influenza virus, Eastern equine encephalomyelitis, and tetanus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006;111:67–80.
    pubmed: 16476488
  36. American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) [Internet] Equine Herpesvirus (Rhinopneumonitis) Vaccination Guidelines. 2024. [Last accessed September 25, 2025]. Available from: https://aaep.org/resource/equine-herpesvirus-rhinopneumonitis-vaccination-guidelines/
  37. Kydd JH, Case R, Winton C, et al. Polarisation of equine pregnancy outcome associated with a maternal MHC class I allele: Preliminary evidence. Vet Microbiol. 2016;188:34–40.
    pubmed: 27139027
  38. Dunuwille WMB, Yousefi Mashouf N, Balasuriya UBR, Pusterla N, Bailey E. Genome-wide association study for host genetic factors associated with equine herpesvirus type-1 induced myeloencephalopathy. Equine Vet J. 2020;52:794–798.
    pmc: PMC7586946pubmed: 32153055
  39. Gardiner DW, Lunn DP, Goehring LS, et al. Strain impact on equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) abortion models: Viral loads in fetal and placental tissues and foals. Vaccine. 2012;30:6564–6572.
    pubmed: 22944628
  40. Schnabel CL, Babasyan S, Rollins A, et al. An equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) Ab4 open reading frame 2 deletion mutant provides immunity and protection from EHV-1 infection and disease. J Virol. 2019;93:e01011–19.
    pmc: PMC6819910pubmed: 31462575
  41. Garvey M, Suárez NM, Kerr K, et al. Equid herpesvirus 8: Complete genome sequence and association with abortion in mares. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192301.
    pmc: PMC5802896pubmed: 29414990

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.